Enzymatic cleaning of biofouled thin-film composite reverse osmosis (RO) membrane operated in a biofilm membrane reactor

References

• Afonso C, Tulman E, Lu Z, Oma E, Kutish G, Rock D. 1999. The genome of Melanoplus sanguinipes entomopoxvirus. J Virol. 73:533–552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allie Z, Jacobs EP, Maartens A, Swart P. 2003. Enzymatic cleaning of ultrafiltration membranes fouled by abattoir effluent. J Membr Sci. 218:107–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ang WS, Lee SY, Elimelech M. 2006. Chemical and physical aspects of cleaning of organic-fouled reverse osmosis membranes. J Membr Sci. 272:198–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argüello MA, Álvarez S, Riera FA, Álvarez R. 2003. Enzymatic cleaning of inorganic ultrafiltration membranes used for whey protein fractionation. J Membr Sci. 216:121–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argüello MA, Álvarez S, Riera FA, Álvarez R. 2005. Utilization of enzymatic detergents to clean inorganic membranes fouled by whey proteins. Sep Purif Technol. 41:147–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arthur SD. 1989. Structure-property relationship in a thin film composite reverse osmosis membrane. J Membr Sci. 46:243–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bott R, Ultsch M, Kossiakoff A, Graycar T, Katz B, Power S. 1988. The three-dimensional structure of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens subtilisin at 1.8 A and an analysis of the structural consequences of peroxide inactivation. J Biol Chem. 263:7895–7906.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunner G, Okoro E. 1989. Reduction of membrane fouling by means of an electric-field during ultrafiltration of protein solutions. Berichte Der Bunsen-Gesellschaft – Phys Chem Chem Phys. 93:1026–1032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant MK, Schardl CL, Hesse U, Scott B. 2009. Evolution of a subtilisin-like protease gene family in the grass endophytic fungus Epichloë festucae. BMC Evol Biol. 9:168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen V, Li H, Li D, Tan S, Petrus HB. 2006. Cleaning strategies for membrane fouled with protein mixtures. Desalination. 200:198–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong TH, Wong FS, Fane AG. 2008. The effect of imposed flux on biofouling in reverse osmosis: role of concentration polarization and biofilm enhanced osmotic pressure phenomena. J Membr Sci. 325:840–850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costerton WJ, Lewandowski Z, Caldwell DE, Korber DR, Lappin-Scott HM. 1995. Microbial biofilms. Annu Rev Microbiol. 49:711–745.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donlan RM. 2002. Biofilms: microbial life on surfaces. Emerg Infect Dis. 8:881–890.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Dahshan ME. 2001. Corrosion and scaling problems present in some desalination plants in Abu Dhabi. Desalination. 138:371–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elimelech M, Zhu X, Childress AE, Hong S. 1997. Role of membrane surface morphology in colloidal fouling of cellulose acetate and composite aromatic polyamide reverse osmosis membranes. J Membr Sci. 127:101–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferjani E, Mejdoub M, Roudesli MS, Chehimi MM, Picard D, Delamar M. 2000. XPS characterization of poly(methylhydrosiloxane)-modified cellulose diacetate membranes. J Membr Sci. 165:125–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flemming HC. 2002. Biofouling in water systems – cases, causes and countermeasures. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 59:629–640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flemming H-C. 1997. Reverse osmosis membrane biofouling. Exp Therm Fluid Sci. 14:382–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flemming H-C, Schaule G, Griebe T, Schmitt J, Tamachkiarowa A. 1997. Biofouling – the Achilles heel of membrane processes. Desalination. 113:215–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasson D, Semiat R. 2006. Scale control in saline and wastewater desalination. Isr J Chem. 46:97–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herzberg M, Elimelech M. 2007. Biofouling of reverse osmosis membranes: role of biofilm-enhanced osmotic pressure. J Membr Sci. 295:11–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herzberg M, Kang S, Elimelech M. 2009. Role of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) in biofouling of reverse osmosis membranes. Environ Sci Technol. 43:4393–4398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong SK, Elimelech M. 1997. Chemical and physical aspects of natural organic matter (NOM) fouling of nanofiltration membranes. J Membr Sci. 132:159–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iritani E, Mukai Y, Kiyotomo Y. 2000. Effects of electric field on dynamic behaviors of dead-end inclined and downward ultrafiltration of protein solutions. J Membr Sci. 164:51–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones TM, Anderson AJ, Albersheim P. 1972. Host-pathogen interactions IV, studies on the polysaccharide-degrading enzymes secreted by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici. Physiol Plant Pathol. 2:153–166.
   Google Scholar
• Khan MMT, Stewart PS, Moll DJ, Mickols WE, Burr MD, Nelson SE, Camper AK. 2010. Assessing biofouling on polyamide reverse osmosis (RO) membrane surfaces in a laboratory system. J Membr Sci. 349:429–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan MMT, Stewart PS, Moll DJ, Mickols WE, Nelson SE, Camper AK. 2011. Characterization and effect of biofouling on polyamide reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membrane surfaces. Biofouling. 27:173–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan MMT, Takizawa S, Lewandowski Z, Jones WL, Camper AK, Katayama H, Kurisu F, Ohgaki S. 2011. Membrane fouling due to dynamic particle size changes in the aerated hybrid PAC–MF system. J Membr Sci. 371:99–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimura K, Hane Y, Watanabe Y, Amy G, Ohkuma N. 2004. Irreversible membrane fouling during ultrafiltration of surface water. Water Res. 38:3431–3441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwak SY, Ihm DW. 1999. Use of atomic force microscopy and solid-state NMR spectroscopy to characterize structure property-performance correlation in high-flux reverse osmosis (RO) membranes. J Membr Sci. 158:143–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee S, Elimelech M. 2007. Salt cleaning of organic-fouled reverse osmosis membranes. Water Res. 41:1134–1142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewandowski Z, Beyenal H. 2005. Biofilms: their structure, activity, and effect on membrane filtration. Water Sci Technol. 51:181–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Q, Elimelech M. 2004. Organic fouling and chemical cleaning of nanofiltration membranes: measurements and mechanisms. Environ Sci Technol. 38:4683–4693.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maartens A, Jacobs EP, Swart P. 2002. UF of pulp and paper effluent: membrane fouling-prevention and cleaning. J Membr Sci. 209:81–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munoz-Aguado MJ, Wiley DE, Fane AG. 1996. Enzymatic and detergent cleaning of a polysulfone ultrafiltration membrane fouled with BSA and whey. J Membr Sci. 117:175–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park N, Kwon B, Kim IS, Cho J. 2005. Biofouling potential of various NF membranes with respect to bacteria and their soluble microbial products (SMP): characterizations, flux decline, and transport parameters. J Membr Sci. 258:43–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen RJ. 1993. Composite reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes. J Membr Sci. 83:81–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Platt S, Nystrom M. 2008. Cleaning of fouled ultrafiltration (UF) membrane by algae during reservoir water treatment. Desalination. 220:267–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puspitasari VL, Rattier M, Le-Clech P, Chen V. 2010. Performances of protease and amylase cleaning for microporous membranes used in wastewater applications. Desalin Water Treat. 13:441–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao AP, Desai NV, Rangarajan R. 1997. Interfacially synthesized thin film composite RO membranes for seawater desalination. J Membr Sci. 124:263–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridgway HF, Flemming H-C. 1996. Membrane biofouling. In: Mallevialle J, Odendaal PE, Wiesner MR, editors. Water treatment membrane processes, membrane biofouling. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill; p. 6.1–6.62.
   Google Scholar
• Riedl K, Girard B, Lencki RW. 1998. Influence of membrane structure on fouling layer morphology during apple juice clarification. J Membr Sci. 139:155–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen MJ. 1989. Surfactant and interfacial phenomena. 2nd ed. New York (NY): Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Speth TF, Gusses AM, Summers RS. 2000. Evaluation of nanofiltration pretreatments for flux loss control. Desalination. 130:31–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoodley H-L, Stoodley P. 2002. Developmental regulation of microbial biofilms. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 13:228–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subasioglu T, Cansunar E. 2010. Optimization of culture conditions and environmental factors of dextranase enzyme produced by Paecilomyces lilacinus. Hacettepe J Biol Chem. 38:159–164.
   Google Scholar
• Taniguchi M, Belfort G. 2002. Correcting for surface roughness: advancing and receding contact angles. Langmuir. 18:6465–6467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarazaga CC, Campderros ME, Padilla AP. 2006. Physical cleaning by means of electric field in the ultrafiltration of a biological solution. J Membr Sci. 278:219–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thurman EM. 1985. Organic geochemistry of natural waters. Boston (MA): Martinus Nijhoff/Dr W. Junk Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• von Zumbusch P, Kulcke W, Brunner G. 1998. Use of alternating electrical fields as anti-fouling strategy in ultrafiltration of biological suspensions – introduction of a new experimental procedure for crossflow filtration. J Membr Sci. 142:75–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weng YH, Chaung-Hsieh LH, Lee HH, Li KC, Huang CP. 2005. Removal of arsenic and humic substances (HSs) by electro-ultrafiltration (EUF). J Hazard Mater. 122:171–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiesner MR, Aptel P. 1996. Mass transport and permeate flux and fouling in pressure-driven membrane processes. In: Mallevialle PEO, Wiesner MR, editors. Water treatment membrane processes. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill; p. 4.1–4.30.
   Google Scholar
• Xu H, Liu Y. 2011. D-amino acid mitigated membrane biofouling and promoted biofilm detachment. J Membr Sci. 376:266–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu J, Baek Y, Yoon H, Yoon J. 2013. New disinfectant to control biofouling of polyamide reverse osmosis membrane. J Membr Sci. 427:30–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou Y, Yu S, Liu M, Gao C. 2005. Preparation and characterization of polyamide-urethane thin-film composite membranes. Desalination. 180:189–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar