Potential biocontrol agents for biofouling on artificial structures

References

• Aldred N, Clare AS. 2014. Mini-review: Impact and dynamics of surface fouling by solitary and compound ascidians. Biofouling. 30:259–270.10.1080/08927014.2013.866653
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson MJ. 2001. A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecol. 26:32–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atalah J, Hopkins GA, Forrest BM. 2013. Augmentative biocontrol in natural marine habitats: persistence, spread and non-target effects of the sea urchin Evechinus chloroticus. PLoS ONE. 8:e80365.10.1371/journal.pone.0080365
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braithwaite RA, Carrascosa MCC, McEvoy LA. 2007. Biofouling of salmon cage netting and the efficacy of a typical copper-based antifoulant. Aquaculture. 262:219–226.10.1016/j.aquaculture.2006.11.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braithwaite RA, McEvoy LA. 2005. Marine biofouling on fish farms and its remediation. Adv Mar Biol. 47:215–252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulleri F, Chapman MG. 2010. The introduction of coastal infrastructure as a driver of change in marine environments. J Appl Ecol. 47:26–35.10.1111/jpe.2010.47.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne M, Barker M. 1991. Embryogenesis and larval development of the asteroid Patiriella regularis viewed by light and scanning electron microscopy. Bio Bull. 180:332–345.10.2307/1542335
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cahill P, Heasman K, Jeffs A, Kuhajek J, Mountfort D. 2012. Preventing ascidian fouling in aquaculture: screening selected allelochemicals for anti-metamorphic properties in ascidian larvae. Biofouling. 28:39–49.10.1080/08927014.2011.648624
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cahill PL, Heasman K, Mountford D, Jeffs A, Kuhajek J. 2013. Screening for negative effects of candidate ascidian antifoulant compounds on a target aquaculture species, Perna canaliculus Gmelin. Biofouling. 29:29–37.10.1080/08927014.2012.744826
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cahill PL, Heasman K, Jeffs A, Kuhajek JM. 2013. Laboratory assesment of the antifouling potential of a soluble-matrix paint laced with the natural compound polygodial. Biofouling. 29:967–975.10.1080/08927014.2013.822488
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlton JT. 1989. Man’s role in changing the face of the ocean: biological invasions and implications for conservation of near-shore environments. Conserv Biol. 3:265–273.10.1111/cbi.1989.3.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carver CE, Chisholm A, Mallet AL. 2003. Strategies to mitigate the impact of Ciona intestinalis (L.) biofouling on shellfish production. J Shellfish Res. 22:621–631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman RA, Underwood AJ, Benedetti-Cecchi L, Åberg P, Arenas F, Arrontes J, Castro J, Hartnoll RG, Jenkins SR, Paula J. 2006. A continental scale evaluation of the role of limpet grazing on rocky shores. Oecologia. 147:556–564.10.1007/s00442-005-0296-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coutts ADM, Forrest BM. 2007. Development and application of tools for incursion response: lessons learned from the management of the fouling pest Didemnum vexillum. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 342:154–162.10.1016/j.jembe.2006.10.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis AR, Benkendorff K, Ward DW. 2005. Responses of common SE Australian herbivores to three suspected invasive Caulerpa spp. Mar Biol. 146:859–868.10.1007/s00227-004-1499-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dix TG. 1970. Biology of Evechinus chloroticus (Echinoidea: Echinometridae) from different localities. N Z J Mar Freshw Res. 4:267–277.
   Google Scholar
• Dumont C, Gaymer C, Thiel M. 2011. Predation contributes to invasion resistance of benthic communities against the non-indigenous tunicate Ciona intestinalis. Biol Invasions. 13:1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eilenberg J, Hajek A, Lomer C. 2001. Suggestions for unifying the terminology in biological control. Biocontrol. 46:387–400.10.1023/A:1014193329979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epelbaum A, Pearce C, Barker D, Paulson A, Therriault T. 2009. Susceptibility of non-indigenous ascidian species in British Columbia (Canada) to invertebrate predation. Mar Biol. 156:1311–1320.10.1007/s00227-009-1172-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitridge I, Dempster T, Guenther J, de Nys R. 2012. The impact and control of biofouling in marine aquaculture: a review. Biofouling. 28:649–669.10.1080/08927014.2012.700478
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forrest BM, Fletcher LM, Atalah J, Piola RF, Hopkins GA. 2013. Predation limits spread of Didemnum vexillum into natural habitats from refuges on anthropogenic structures. PLOS ONE. 8:e82229.10.1371/journal.pone.0082229
   Google Scholar
• Forrest BM, Hopkins GA. 2013. Population control to mitigate the spread of marine pests: insights from management of the Asian kelp Undaria pinnatifida and colonial ascidian Didemnum vexillum. Manag of Biol Invasions. 4:317–326.
   Google Scholar
• Glasby T, Connell S, Holloway M, Hewitt C. 2007. Nonindigenous biota on artificial structures: could habitat creation facilitate biological invasions? Mar Biol. 151:887–895.10.1007/s00227-006-0552-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grange KR. 1976. Larval development in Lunella smaragda (Gastropoda: Turbinidae). N Z J Mar Freshw Res. 10:517–525.
   Google Scholar
• Hewitt CL, Campbell ML, McEnnulty F, Moore KM, Murfet NB, Robertson B, Schaffelke B. 2005. Efficacy of physical removal of a marine pest: the introduced kelp Undaria pinnatifida in a Tasmanian marine reserve. Biol Invasions. 7:251–263.10.1007/s10530-004-0739-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt RHF, Cordingley AP. 2011. Eradication of the non-native carpet ascidian (sea squirt) Didemnum vexillum in Holyhead harbour: progress, methods and results to spring 2011. CCW Marine Monitoring Report No. 90; [cited 2014 July 1]. Available from: http://www.nonnativespecies.org/downloadDocument.cfm?id=1035
   Google Scholar
• Hunt L, Chadderton L, Stuart M, Cooper S, Carruthers M. 2009. Results of an attempt to control and eradicate Undaria pinnatifida in Southland, New Zealand, April 1997–November 2004. Department of Conservation, Invercargill, New Zealand, 48 p.; [cited 2014 July 1]. Available from: http://docs.niwa.co.nz/library/public/9780478145823.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Keough MJ, Butler AJ. 1979. Role of asteroid predators in the organization of a sessile community on pier pilings. Mar Biol. 51:167–177.10.1007/BF00555196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keough MJ, Raimondi PT. 1996. Responses of settling invertebrate larvae to bioorganic films: effects of large-scale variation in films. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 207:59–78.10.1016/S0022-0981(96)02632-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohler KE, Gill SM. 2006. Coral Point Count with Excel extensions (CPCe): a Visual Basic program for the determination of coral and substrate coverage using random point count methodology. Comput Geosci. 32:1259–1269.10.1016/j.cageo.2005.11.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kürn U, Rendulic S, Tiozzo S, Lauzon RJ. 2011. Asexual propagation and regeneration in colonial ascidians. Biol Bull. 221:43–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke A, Doe KG, Fairchild WL, Jackman PM, Reese RJ. 2009. Preliminary evaluation of effects of invasive tunicate management with acetic acid and calcium hydroxide on non-target marine organisms in Prince Edward Island, Canada. Aquat Invasions. 4:221–236.10.3391/ai
   Google Scholar
• Lodeiros C, García N. 2004. The use of sea urchins to control fouling during suspended culture of bivalves. Aquaculture. 231:293–298.10.1016/j.aquaculture.2003.10.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann LD, Holzer KK, Davidson IC, Ashton GV, Chapman MD, Ruiz GM. 2013. Promoting invasive species control and eradication in the sea: options for managing the tunicate invader Didemnum vexillum in Sitka, Alaska. Mar Pollut Bull. 77:165–171.10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.10.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meese RJ, Tomich PA. 1992. Dots on rocks: a comparison of percentage cover methods. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 165:59–73.10.1016/0022-0981(92)90289-M
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menge BA, Foley MM, Pamplin J, Murphy G, Pennington C. 2010. Supply-side ecology, barnacle recruitment, and rocky intertidal community dynamics: do settlement surface and limpet disturbance matter? J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 392:160–175.10.1016/j.jembe.2010.04.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montalto L, Drago IE. 2003. Tolerance to desiccation of an invasive mussel, Limnoperna fortunei (Dunker, 1857), (Bivalvia, Mytilidae), under experimental conditions. Hydrobiologia. 498:161–167.10.1023/A:1026222414881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Nys R, Guenther J. 2009. The impact and control of biofouling in marine finfish aquaculture. Advances in marine antifouling coatings and technologies. Cambridge: Woodhead; p. 177–221.
   Google Scholar
• Osman RW, Whitlatch RB. 1995. Predation on early ontogenetic life-stages and its effect on recruitment into a marine community. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 117:111–126.10.3354/meps117111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osman RW, Whitlatch RB. 2004. The control of the development of a marine benthic community by predation on recruits. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 311:117–145.10.1016/j.jembe.2004.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piola RF, Dunmore RA, Forrest BM. 2010. Assessing the efficacy of spray-delivered ‘eco-friendly’ chemicals for the control and eradication of marine fouling pests. Biofouling. 26:187–203.10.1080/08927010903428029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. 2013. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. [cited 2014 July 1]. Available from: http://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Ramsay A, Davidson J, Landry T, Arsenault G. 2008. Process of invasiveness among exotic tunicates in Prince Edward Island, Canada. Biol Invasions. 10:1311–1316.10.1007/s10530-007-9205-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross DJ, Keough MJ, Longmore AR, Knott NA. 2007. Impacts of two introduced suspension feeders in Port Phillip Bay, Australia. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 340:41–53.10.3354/meps340041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross KA, Thorpe JP, Brand AR. 2004. Biological control of fouling in suspended scallop cultivation. Aquaculture. 229:99–116.10.1016/S0044-8486(03)00328-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz GM, Freestone AL, Fofonoff PW, Simkanin C. 2009. Habitat distribution and heterogeneity in marine invasion dynamics: the importance of hard substrate and artificial structure. In: Wahl M, editor. Biological invasions in marine ecosystems: ecological, management, and geographic perspectives. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; p. 321–332.
   Google Scholar
• Scardino A, De Nys R, Ison O, O’Connor W, Steinberg P. 2003. Microtopography and antifouling properties of the shell surface of the bivalve molluscs Mytilus galloprovincialis and Pinctada imbricata. Biofouling. 19:221–230.10.1080/0892701021000057882
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommer U. 1999. The impact of herbivore type and grazing pressure on benthic microalgal diversity. Ecol Lett. 2:65–69.10.1046/j.1461-0248.1999.22052.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarjuelo I, Lopez-Legentil S, Codina M, Turon X. 2002. Defence mechanisms of adults and larvae of colonial ascidians: patterns of palatability and toxicity. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 235:103–115.10.3354/meps235103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teo SLM, Ryland JS. 1994. Toxicity and palatability of some British ascidians. Mar Biol. 120:297–303.10.1007/BF00349691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thibaut T, Meinesz A, Amade P, Charrier S, De Angelis K, Ierardi S, Mangialajo L, Melnick J, Vidal V. 2001. Elysia subornata (Mollusca) a potential control agent of the alga Caulerpa taxifolia (Chlorophyta) in the Mediterranean Sea. J Mar Biol Assoc UK. 81:497–504.10.1017/S0025315401004143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiel M, Dernedde T. 1994. Recruitment of shore crabs Carcinus maenas on tidal flats: mussel clumps as an important refuge for juveniles. Helgolander Meeresunters. 48:321–332.10.1007/BF02367044
   Google Scholar
• Trussell GC. 1997. Phenotypic plasticity in the foot size of an intertidal snail. Ecology. 78:1033–1048.10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[1033:PPITFS]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trussell GC, Johnson AS, Rudolph SG, Gilfillan ES. 1993. Resistance to dislodgment – habitat and size-specific differences in morphology and tenacity in an intertidal snail. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 100:135–144.10.3354/meps100135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Underwood AJ, Keough MJ. 2001. Supply-side ecology; the nature and consequences of variations in recruitment of intertidal organisms. In: Bertness MD, Gaines SD, Hay ME, editors. Marine community ecology. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer; p. 183–200.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Brink PJ, ter Braak CJF. 1999. Principal response curves: analysis of time-dependent multivariate responses of biological community to stress. Environ Toxicol Chem. 18:138–148.10.1002/etc.v18:2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vervoort HC, Pawlik JR, Fenical W. 1998. Chemical defense of the Caribbean ascidian Didemnum conchyliatum. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 164:221–228.10.3354/meps164221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witman JD. 1985. Refuges, biological disturbance, and rocky subtidal community structure in New England. Ecol Monogr. 55:421–445.10.2307/2937130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar