In situ microstructure and rheological behavior of yeast biofilms from the juice processing industries

References

• Baillie G, Douglas LJ. 1999. Role of dimorphism in the development of Candida albicans biofilms. J Med Microbiol. 48:671–679. doi: 10.1099/00222615-48-7-671
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blel W, Benezech T, Legentilhomme P, Legrand J, Le Gentil-Lelièvre C. 2007. Effect of flow arrangement on the removal of Bacillus spores from stainless steel equipment surfaces during a cleaning in place procedure. Chem Eng Sci. 62:3798–3808. doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2007.04.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks J, Flint S. 2008. Biofilms in the food industry: problems and potential solutions. Int J Food Sci Technol. 43:2163–2176. doi: 10.1111/ifs.2008.43.issue-12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brugnoni LI, Cubitto MA, Lozano JE. 2011. Biofilm formation under laminar flow conditions of yeast isolated from an apple juice processing plant. J Food Process Eng. 34:49–66. doi: 10.1111/jfpe.2011.34.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brugnoni LI, Tarifa MC, Lozano JE, Genovese DB. 2014. In situ rheology of yeast biofilms. Biofouling. 30:1269–1279. doi: 10.1080/08927014.2014.981165
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen MJ, Zhang A, Bott TR. 2005. Effects of operating conditions on the adhesive strength of Pseudomonas fluorescens biofilms in tubes. Colloids Surf B. 43:61–71. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2005.04.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chmielewsky R, Frank J. 2003. Biofilm formation and control in food processing facilities. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2:22–32.10.1111/crfs.2003.2.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Cloete T, Westaard D, van Vuuren SJ. 2003. Dynamic response of biofilm to pipe surface and fluid velocity. Water Sci Technol. 47:57–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleet GH. 2007. Food microbiology: fundamentals and frontiers. Washington (DC): ASM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flemming HC. 2011. The perfect slime. Colloids Surf B. 86:251–259. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2011.04.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houari A, Picard J, Habarou H, Galas L, Vaudry H, Heim V, Di Martino P. 2008. Rheology of biofilms formed at the surface of NF membranes in a drinking water production unit. Biofouling. 24:235–240. doi: 10.1080/08927010802023764
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt SM, Werner EM, Huang B, Hamilton MA, Stewart PS. 2004. Hypothesis for the role of nutrient starvation in biofilm detachment. Appl Environ Microbiol. 70:7418–7425. doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.12.7418-7425.2004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyun K, Kim SH, Ahn KH, Lee SJ. 2002. Large amplitude oscillatory shear as a way to classify the complex fluids. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 107:51–65. doi: 10.1016/S0377-0257(02)00141-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen BBB, Friis A, Benezech T, Legentilhomme P, Lelievre C. 2005. Local wall shear stress variations predicted by computational fluid dynamics for hygienic design. Food Bioprod Process. 83:53–60. doi: 10.1205/fbp.04021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karimi A, Karig D, Kumar A, Ardekani AM. 2015. Interplay of physical mechanisms and biofilm processes: review of microfluidic methods. Lab Chip. 15:23–42. doi: 10.1039/C4LC01095G
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khelissa S, Abdallah M, Jama C, Faille N, Chihib E. 2017. Bacterial contamination and biofilm formation on abiotic surfaces and strategies to overcome their persistence. J Mater Environ Sci. 8:3326–3346.
   Google Scholar
• Ki-Bong O, Hideaki M. 2002. Rapid viability assessment of yeast cells using vital staining with 2-NBDG, a fluorescent derivative of glucose. Int J Food Microbiol. 76:47–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korstgens HC, Flemming J, Wingender W, Dorchard W. 2001. Uniaxial compression measurement device for investigation of the mechanical stability of biofilms. J Microbiol Methods. 46:9–17. doi: 10.1016/S0167-7012(01)00248-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreth J, Merritt J, Shi W, Qi F. 2005. Competition and coexistence between Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sanguinis in the dental biofilm. J Bacteriol. 187:7193–7203. doi: 10.1128/JB.187.21.7193-7203.2005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurtzman CP, Fell JW. 1998. The yeast, a taxonomic study. New York (NY): Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Lea AGH. 1990. Production and packaging of noncarbonated fruit juices and fruit beverages: apple juice. New York (NY): Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lee CY, Mattick JR. 1989. Processed apple products: composition and nutritive value of apple products. New York (NY): Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lelièvre C, Legentilhomme P, Gaucher C, Legrand J, Faille C, Bénézech T. 2002. Cleaning in place: effect of local wall shear stress variation on bacterial removal from stainless steel equipment. Chem Eng Sci. 57:1287–1297. doi: 10.1016/S0009-2509(02)00019-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levich VG. 1962. Physicochemical hydrodynamics. New York (NY): Prentice –Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Lozano JE. 2006. Food engineering series: fruit manufacturing: scientific basis, engineering properties and deteriorative reactions of technological importance. New York (NY): Springer.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien SS, Lindsay D, von Holy A. 2007. Biofilms associated with the final stages of Baker’s compressed yeast production. Br Food J. 109:20–30. doi: 10.1108/00070700710718480
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palková Z, Váchová L. 2006. Life within a community: benefit to yeast long-term survival. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 30:806–824. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2006.00034.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paramonova E, Krom BP, van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ, Sharma PK. 2009. Hyphal content determines the compression strength of Candida albicans biofilms. Microbiology. 155:1997–2003. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.021568-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul E, Ochoa JC, Pechaud Y, Liu Y, Liné A. 2012. Effect of shear stress and growth conditions on detachment and physical properties of biofilms. Water Res. 46:5499–5508.10.1016/j.watres.2012.07.029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlovsky L, Younger JG, Solomon MJ. 2013. In situ rheology of Staphylococcus epidermidis bacterial biofilms. Soft Matter. 9:122–131. doi: 10.1039/C2SM27005F
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson B, He Y, Ren Y, Zerdoum A, Libera M, Sharma P, van Winkelhoff AJ, Neut D, Stoodley P, van der Mei HC, Busscher H. 2015. Viscoelasticity of biofilms and their recalcitrance to mechanical and chemical challenges. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 39:234–245. doi: 10.1093/femsre/fuu008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peyton BM. 1996. Effects of shear stress and substrate loading rate on Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm thickness and density. Water Res. 30:29–36. doi: 10.1016/0043-1354(95)00110-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramage G, Van de Walle K, Bachmann SP, Wickes BL, Lopez-Ribot JL. 2002. In vitro pharmacodynamic properties of three antifungal agents against preformed Candida albicans biofilms determined by time-kill studies. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 46:3634–3636. doi: 10.1128/AAC.46.11.3634-3636.2002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rochex A, Lebeault JM. 2007. Effects of nutrients on biofilm formation and detachment of a Pseudomonas putida strain isolated from a paper machine. Water Res. 41:2885–2892. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2007.03.041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw M, Winston CJ, Rupp I, Klapper P, Stoodley P. 2004. Commonality of elastic relaxation times in biofilms. Phys Rev Lett. 93:1–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simões M, Simões LC, Vieira MJ. 2008. Physiology and behavior of Pseudomonas fluorescens single and dual strain biofilms under diverse hydrodynamics stresses. Int J Food Microbiol. 128:309–316. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.09.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spanos GA, Wrolstad RE. 1990. Influence of processing and storage on the phenolic composition of apple juice. J Agric Food Chem. 38:817–824. doi: 10.1021/jf00093a049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spanos GA, Wrolstad RE. 1992. Phenolics of apple, pear, and white grape juices and their changes with processing and storage. J Agric Food Chem. 40:1478–1487. doi: 10.1021/jf00021a002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart PS, Franklin MJ. 2008. Physiological heterogeneity in biofilms. Nat Rev Microbiol. 6:199–210. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1838
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoodley P, Dodds I, Boyle JD, Lappin-Scott HM. 1999. Influence of hydrodynamics and nutrients on biofilm structure. J Appl Microbiol Symp Suppl. 85:19S–28S.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarifa MC, Brugnoni LI, Lozano JE. 2013. Role of hydrophobicity in adhesion of wild yeast isolated from the ultrafiltration membranes of an apple juice processing plant. Biofouling. 29:841–853. doi: 10.1080/08927014.2013.808628
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tallawi M, Opitz M, Lieleg O. 2017. Modulation of the mechanical properties of bacterial biofilms in response to environmental challenges. Biomater Sci. 5:887–900. doi: 10.1039/C6BM00832A10.1039/C6BM00832A
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Telgmann U, Horn H, Morgenroth E. 2004. Influence of growth history on sloughing and erosion from biofilms. Water Res. 38:3671–3684. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2004.05.02010.1016/j.watres.2004.05.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teodósio JS, Simões M, Melo LF, Mergulhão FJ. 2011. Flow cell hydrodynamics and their effects on E. coli biofilm formation under different nutrient conditions and turbulent flow. Biofouling. 27:1–11. doi: 10.1080/08927014.2010.535206
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thavarajah P, Low NH. 2006. Adulteration of apple with pear juice: emphasis on major carbohydrates, proline, and arbutin. J Agric Food Chem. 54:4861–4867. doi: 10.1021/jf060259 m
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thein ZM, Seneviratne CJ, Samaranayake YH, Samaranayake LP. 2009. Community lifestyle of Candida in mixed biofilms: a mini review. Mycoses. 52:467–475. doi: 10.1111/myc.2009.52.issue-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomen P, Robert J, Monmeyran A, Bitbol A-F, Douarche C, Henry N. 2017. Bacterial biofilm under flow: first a physical struggle to stay, then a matter of breathing. PLoS ONE. 12:e0175197. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175197https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson DS, Carlisle PL, Kadosh D. 2011. Coevolution of morphology and virulence in Candida species. Eukaryot Cell. 10:1173–1182. doi: 10.1128/EC.05085-11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tornai-Lehoczki J, Péter G, Dlauchy D. 2003. CHROMagar Candida medium as a practical tool for the differentiation and presumptive identification of yeast species isolated from salads. Int J Food Microbiol. 86:189–200. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1605(03)00256-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visser J. 1973. The adhesion of colloidal particles to a planar surface in aqueous solutions [dissertation]. London: London University.
   Google Scholar
• Yazdanshenas M, Tabatabaeenezhad AR, Roostaazad R, Khoshfetrat B. 2005. Full scale analysis of apple juice ultrafiltration and optimization of diafiltration. Sep Purif Technol. 47:52–57. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2005.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou G, Li L, Shi Q, Ouyang Y, Chen Y, Hu W. 2013. Effects of nutritional and environmental conditions on planktonic growth and biofilm formation of Citrobacter werkmanii BF-6. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 23:1673–1682. doi: 10.4014/jmb1307.07041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar