Modelling antisepsis using defined populations of facultative and anaerobic wound pathogens grown in a basally perfused biofilm model

References

• Barnea Y, Weiss J, Gur E. 2010. A review of the applications of the hydrofiber dressing with silver (Aquacel Ag) in wound care. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 6:21–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjarnsholt T, Kirketerp-Moller K, Jensen PO, Madsen KG, Phipps R, Krogfelt K, Hoiby N, Givskov M. 2008. Why chronic wounds will not heal: a novel hypothesis. Wound Repair Regen. 16:2–10. doi:10.1111/wrr.2008.16.issue-1.10.1111/wrr.2008.16.issue-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolton L. 2006. Are silver products safe and effective for chronic wound management? J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 33:469–477. doi:10.1097/00152192-200609000-00003.10.1097/00152192-200609000-00003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley M, Cullum N, Nelson EA, Petticrew M, Sheldon T, Torgerson D. 1999. Systematic reviews of wound care management: (2). Dressings and topical agents used in the healing of chronic wounds. Health Technol. 3:1–35.
   Google Scholar
• Burks RI. 1998. Povidone-iodine solution in wound treatment. Physical Therapy. 78:212–218. doi:10.1093/ptj/78.2.212.10.1093/ptj/78.2.212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butcher M. 2012. PHMB: an effective antimicrobial in wound bioburden management. Br J Nurs. 11; 21:S16, S18-21.
   Google Scholar
• Claessen D, Rozen DE, Kuipers OP, Sogaard-Andersen L, van Wezel GP. 2014. Bacterial solutions to multicellularity: a tale of biofilms, filaments and fruiting bodies. Nat Rev Microbiol. 12:115–124 Epub 2014/01/05. doi:10.1038/nrmicro3178.10.1038/nrmicro3178
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costerton JW. 1999. Introduction to biofilm. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 11:217–221. doi:10.1016/S0924-8579(99)00018-7.10.1016/S0924-8579(99)00018-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis SC, Martinez L, Kirsner R. 2006. The diabetic foot: the importance of biofilms and wound bed preparation. Curr Diab Rep. 6:439–445. doi:10.1007/s11892-006-0076-x.10.1007/s11892-006-0076-x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fong J, Wood F. 2006. Nanocrystalline silver dressings in wound management: a review. Int J Nanomed. 1:441–449. doi:10.2147/nano.2006.1.issue-4.10.2147/nano.2006.1.issue-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forstner C, Leitgeb J, Schuster R, Dosch V, Kramer A, Cutting KF, Leaper DJ, Assadian O. 2013. Bacterial growth kinetics under a novel flexible methacrylate dressing serving as a drug delivery vehicle for antiseptics. Int J Mol Sci. 14:10582–10590. doi:10.3390/ijms140510582.10.3390/ijms140510582
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert P, Maira-Litran T, McBain AJ, Rickard AH, Whyte FW. 2002. The physiology and collective recalcitrance of microbial biofilm communities. Adv Microb Physiol. 46:202–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldenheim PD. 1993. An appraisal of povidone-iodine and wound healing. Postgrad Med J. 69:S97–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall-Stoodley L, Costerton JW, Stoodley P. 2004. Bacterial biofilms: from the natural environment to infectious diseases. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2:95–108. doi:10.1038/nrmicro821.10.1038/nrmicro821
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausner M, Wuertz S. 1999. High rates of conjugation in bacterial biofilms as determined by quantitative in situ analysis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 65:3710–3713.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill KE, Malic S, McKee R, Rennison T, Harding KG, Williams DW, Thomas DW. 2010. An in vitro model of chronic wound biofilms to test wound dressings and assess antimicrobial susceptibilities. J Antimicrob Chemother. 65:1195–1206. doi:10.1093/jac/dkq105.10.1093/jac/dkq105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgson AE, Nelson SM, Brown MR, Gilbert P. 1995. A simple in vitro model for growth control of bacterial biofilms. J Appl Bacteriol. 79:87–93. doi:10.1111/jam.1995.79.issue-1.10.1111/jam.1995.79.issue-1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Humphreys G, Lee GL, Percival SL, McBain AJ. 2011. Combinatorial activities of ionic silver and sodium hexametaphosphate against microorganisms associated with chronic wounds. J Antimicrob Chemother. 66:2556–2561. doi:10.1093/jac/dkr350.10.1093/jac/dkr350
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James G, Swogger E, Wolcott R, deLancey-Pulcini E, Secor P, Sestrich J, Costerton JW, Stewart PS. 2008. Biofilms in chronic wounds. Wound Repair Regen. 16:37–44. doi:10.1111/wrr.2008.16.issue-1.10.1111/wrr.2008.16.issue-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanno E, Toriyabe S, Zhang L, Imai Y, Tachi M. 2009. Biofilm formation on rat skin wounds by Pseudomonas aeruginosa carrying the green fluorescent protein gene. Exp Dermatol. 19:154–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ledder RG, Gilbert P, Pluen A, Sreenivasan PK, De Vizio W, McBain AJ. 2006. Individual microflora beget unique oral microcosms. J Appl Microbiol. 100:1123–1131. doi:10.1111/jam.2006.100.issue-5.10.1111/jam.2006.100.issue-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenski RE, Rose MR, Simpson SC, Tadler SC. 1991. Long-term experimental evolution in Escherichia coli. 1. Adaptation and divergence during 2,000 generations. Am Soc Nat. 1315–1341. doi:10.1086/285289.10.1086/285289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipp C, Kirker K, Agostinho A, James G, Stewart P. 2010. Testing wound dressings using an in vitro wound model. J Wound Care. 19:220–226. doi:10.12968/jowc.2010.19.6.48468.10.12968/jowc.2010.19.6.48468
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy H, Rudkin JK, Black NS, Gallagher L, O’Neill E, O’Gara JP. 2015. Methicillin resistance and the biofilm phenotype in Staphylococcus aureus. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 5:1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neut D, Tijdens-Creusen EJ, Bulstra SK, van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ. 2011. Biofilms in chronic diabetic foot ulcers-a study of 2 cases. Acta Orthop. 82:383–385. doi:10.3109/17453674.2011.581265.10.3109/17453674.2011.581265
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oates A, Bowling FL, Boulton AJM, Bowler PG, Metcalf DG, McBain AJ. 2014. The visualization of biofilms in chronic diabetic foot wounds using routine diagnostic microscopy methods. J Diabetes Res. 2014:8–16.
   Google Scholar
• Oates A, McBain AJ. 2016. Growth of MRSA and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a fine-celled foam model containing sessile commensal skin bacteria. Biofouling. 32:25–33 Epub 2016/01/05. doi:10.1080/08927014.2015.1117607.10.1080/08927014.2015.1117607
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohadian Moghadam S, Pourmand MR, Aminharati F. 2014. Biofilm formation and antimicrobial resistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from burn patients, Iran. J Infect Dev Ctries. 8:1511–1517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen SS. 1992. Lung infection with alginate-producing, mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa in cystic fibrosis. APMIS Suppl. 28:1–79.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ramos AN, Peral MC, Valdez JC. 2010. Differences between Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a clinical sample and in a colony isolated from it: Comparison of virulence capacity and susceptibility of biofilm to inhibitors. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 33:267–275. doi:10.1016/j.cimid.2008.10.004.10.1016/j.cimid.2008.10.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rochex A, Lebeault JM. 2007. Effects of nutrients on biofilm formation and detachment of a Pseudomonas putida strain isolated from a paper machine. Water Res. 41:2885–2892. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2007.03.041.10.1016/j.watres.2007.03.041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy S, Elgharably H, Sinha M, Ganesh K, Chaney S, Mann E, Miller C, Khanna S, Bergdall VK, Powell HM, et al. 2014. Mixed-species biofilm compromises wound healing by disrupting epidermal barrier function. J Pathol. 233:331–343. doi:10.1002/path.2014.233.issue-4.10.1002/path.2014.233.issue-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozen DE, McGee L, Levin BR, Klugman KP. 2007. Fitness costs of fluoroquinolone resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 51:412–416. doi:10.1128/AAC.01161-06.10.1128/AAC.01161-06
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saye DE. 2007. Recurring and antimicrobial-resistant infections:considering the potential role of biofilms in clinical practice. Ostomy Wound Manage. 53:46–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scali C, Kunimoto B. 2013. An Update on chronic wounds and the role of biofilms. J Cutan Med Surg. 17:371–376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schierle CF, De la Garza M, Mustoe TA, Galiano RD. 2009. Staphylococcal biofilms impair wound healing by delaying reepithelialization in a murine cutaneous wound model. Wound Repair Regen. 17:354–359. doi:10.1111/wrr.2009.17.issue-3.10.1111/wrr.2009.17.issue-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorensen SJ, Bailey M, Hansen LH, Kroer N, Wuertz S. 2005. Studying plasmid horizontal transfer in situ: a critical review. Nat Rev Microbiol. 3:700–710. doi:10.1038/nrmicro1232.10.1038/nrmicro1232
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart PS, Costerton JW. 2001. Antibiotic resistance of bacteria in biofilms. Lancet. 358:135–138. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05321-1.10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05321-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun Y, Dowd SE, Smith E, Rhoads DD, Wolcott RD. 2008. In vitro multispecies Lubbock chronic wound biofilm model. Wound Repair Regen. 16:805–813. doi:10.1111/j.1524-475X.2008.00434.x.10.1111/j.1524-475X.2008.00434.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorn RMS, Greenman J. 2009. A novel in vitro flat-bed perfusion biofilm model for determining the potential antimicrobial efficacy of topical wound treatments. J Appl Microbiol. 107:2070–2079. doi:10.1111/jam.2009.107.issue-6.10.1111/jam.2009.107.issue-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters MC 3rd, Roe F, Bugnicourt A, Franklin MJ, Stewart PS. 2003. Contributions of antibiotic penetration, oxygen limitation, and low metabolic activity to tolerance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms to ciprofloxacin and tobramycin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 47:317–323. doi:10.1128/AAC.47.1.317-323.2003.10.1128/AAC.47.1.317-323.2003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watanabe K, Teramoto M, Futamata H, Harayama S. 1998. Molecular detection, isolation, and physiological characterization of functionally dominant phenol-degrading bacteria in activated sludge. Appl Environ Microbiol. 64:4396–4402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werthén M, Henriksson L, Jensen PØ, Sternberg C, Givskov M, Bjarnsholt T. 2010. An in vitro model of bacterial infections in wounds and other soft tissues. APMIS. 118:156–164. doi:10.1111/apm.2010.118.issue-2.10.1111/apm.2010.118.issue-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson HN, McBain AJ, Stephenson C, Hardman MJ. 2016. Comparing the effectiveness of polymer debriding devices using a porcine wound biofilm model. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 5:475–485. doi:10.1089/wound.2015.0683.10.1089/wound.2015.0683
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolcott RD, Rhoads DD. 2008. A study of biofilm-based wound management in subjects with critical limb ischaemia. J Wound Care. 17:145–155, 150-142, 154-145. doi:10.12968/jowc.2008.17.4.28835.10.12968/jowc.2008.17.4.28835
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Woods J, Boegli L, Kirker KR, Agostinho AM, Durch AM, Delancey Pulcini E, Stewart PS, James GA. 2012. Development and application of a polymicrobial, in vitro, wound biofilm model. J Appl Microbiol. 112:998–1006. doi:10.1111/jam.2012.112.issue-5.10.1111/jam.2012.112.issue-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar