Towards an absolute scale for adhesion strength of ship hull microfouling

References

• Ackerman JD, Ethier CR, Allen DG, Spelt JK. 1992. Investigation of zebra mussel adhesion strength using rotating disks. J Environ Eng. 118:708–724. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1992)118:5(708)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alekseenko SV, Markovich DM. 1994. Electrodiffusion diagnostics of wall shear stresses in impinging jets. J Appl Electrochem. 24:626–631. doi: 10.1007/BF00252087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen R. 2012. A surface-cleaning device and vehicle. International Patent WO 2012/074408 A2.
   Google Scholar
• Beltaos S, Rajaratnam N. 1974. Impinging circular turbulent jets. ASCE J Hydraul Div. 100:1313–1328.
   Google Scholar
• Bradshaw P, Love EM. 1961. The normal impingement of a circular air jet on a flat surface. Reports and Memoranda No. 3205. London (UK).
   Google Scholar
• Callow JA, Crawford S. A, Higgins MJ, Mulvaney P, Wetherbee R. 2000. The application of atomic force microscopy to topographical studies and force measurements on the secreted adhesive of the green alga Enteromorpha. Planta. 211:641–647. doi: 10.1007/s004250000337
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson IC, Scianni C, Hewitt C, Everett R, Holm ER, Tamburri M, Ruiz GM. 2016. Mini-review: assessing the drivers of ship biofouling management – aligning industry and biosecurity goals. Biofouling. 32:411–428. doi: 10.1080/08927014.2016.1149572
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finlay JA, Callow ME, Schultz MP, Swain GW, Callow JA. 2002. Adhesion strength of settled spores of the green alga Enteromorpha. Biofouling. 18:251–256. doi: 10.1080/08927010290029010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghaneeizad SM, Atkinson JF, Bennett SJ. 2015. Effect of flow confinement on the hydrodynamics of circular impinging jets: implications for erosion assessment. Environ Fluid Mech. 15:1–25. doi: 10.1007/s10652-014-9354-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giralt F, Chia C-J, Trass O. 1977. Characterization of the impingement region in a axisymmetric turbulent jet. Ind Eng Chem Fund. 16:21–28. doi: 10.1021/i160061a007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson GJ, Cook KR. 2004. Apparatus, test procedures, and analytical methods to measure soil erodibility in situ. Appl Eng Agric. 20:455–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson GJ, Robinson KM, Temple DM. 1990. Pressure and stress distributions due to a submerged impinging jet. Proceedings of the 1990 National Conference ASCE, Vol. 1. pp. 525–530. San Diego, CA, Jul 30–Aug 3, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Hearin J, Hunsucker KZ, Swain G, Stephens A, Gardner H, Lieberman K, Harper M. 2015. Analysis of long-term mechanical grooming on large-scale test panels coated with an antifouling and a fouling-release coating. Biofouling. 31:625–638. doi: 10.1080/08927014.2015.1081687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holm ER, Haslbeck EG, Horinek AA. 2003. Evaluation of brushes for removal of fouling from fouling-release surfaces, using a hydraulic cleaning device. Biofouling. 19:297–305. doi: 10.1080/0892701031000137512
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunsucker KZ, Swain GW. 2016. In situ measurements of diatom adhesion to silicone-based ship hull coatings. J Appl Phycol. 28:269–277. doi: 10.1007/s10811-015-0584-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunsucker KZ, Vora GJ, Hunsucker JT, Gardner H, Leary DH, Kim S, Lin B, Swain G. 2018. Biofilm community structure and the associated drag penalties of a groomed fouling release ship hull coating. Biofouling. 7014:1–11.
   Google Scholar
• IMO 2011. Guidelines for the control and management of ships’ biofouling to minimize the transfer of invasive aquatic species. In: Resolut MEPC207(62). London (UK); p. 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Jambunathan K, Lai E, Moss MA, Button BL. 1992. A review of heat transfer data for single circular jet impingement. Int J Heat Fluid Flow. 13:106–115. doi: 10.1016/0142-727X(92)90017-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalumuck KM, Chahine GL, Frederick GS, Aley PD. 1997. Development of a DynaJet(TM) cavitating water jet cleaning tool for underwater marine fouling removal. In: Hashish M, editor. 9th Am Waterjet Conf. Dearborn, Michigan: Waterjet Technology Association; p. 541–554.
   Google Scholar
• Kataoka K, Mizushina T. 1974. Local enhancement of the rate of heat transfer in an impinging round jet by free-stream turbulence. In: Kaigi NG, Kyōkai KK, Gakkai NK, editors. Proc 5th Int Heat Transf Conf. Tokyo (Japan); p. 305–309.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson L, Raven HC. 2010. Governing equations. In: Paulling JR, editor. Princ Nav Archit Ser - Sh Resist Flow. Jersey City (NJ); p. 5–9.
   Google Scholar
• Malone JA. 1980. Effects of hull foulants and cleaning/coating practices on ship performace and economics. Trans Soc Nav Archit Mar Eng. 88:75–101.
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery DC. 2013. Design and analysis of experiments. 8th edition. Singapore: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Morrisey D, Woods CMC. 2015. In-water cleaning technologies: Review of information Prepared for Ministry for Primary Industries [Internet]. Wellington (New Zealand). Available from: http://www.mpi.govt.nz/news-and-resources/publications/
   Google Scholar
• Munk T, Kane D, Yebra DM. 2009. The effects of corrosion and fouling on the performance of ocean-going vessels: a naval architectural perspective. In: Hellio C, Yebra D, editors. Adv Mar antifouling coatings Technol. Oxford (UK): Woodhead Publishing Limited; p. 148–176.
   Google Scholar
• Naval Sea Systems Command. 2006. Chapter 081 – Water-borne underwater hull cleaning of Navy ships. In: Nav Ship’s Tech Man. Washington DC.
   Google Scholar
• Noordstrand AM, Cornelis Petrus Maria DV. 2013. Cleaning head for cleaning a surface, device comprising such cleaning head, and method of cleaning, International Patent WO 2013/154426 A1.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira D, Granhag L. 2016. Matching forces applied in underwater hull cleaning with adhesion strength of marine organisms. JMSE. 4:66–78. doi: 10.3390/jmse4040066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phares DJ, Smedley GT, Flagan RC. 2000. The wall shear stress produced by the normal impingement of a jet on a flat surface. J Fluid Mech. 418:351–375. doi: 10.1017/S002211200000121X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poreh M, Tsuei YG, Cermak JE. 1967. Investigation of a turbulent radial wall jet. J Appl Mech. 34:457–463. doi: 10.1115/1.3607705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roache PJ. 1994. Perspective: a method for uniform reporting of grid refinement studies. J Fluids Eng. 116:405–413. doi: 10.1115/1.2910291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiff K, Diehl D, Valkirs A. 2004. Copper emissions from antifouling paint on recreational vessels. Mar Pollut Bull. 48:371–377. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2003.08.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz MP, Bendick JA, Holm ER, Hertel WM. 2011. Economic impact of biofouling on a naval surface ship. Biofouling. 27:87–98. doi: 10.1080/08927014.2010.542809
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz MP, Finlay JA, Callow ME, Callow JA. 2000. A turbulent channel flow apparatus for the determination of the adhesion strength of microfouling organisms. Biofouling. 15:243–251. doi: 10.1080/08927010009386315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz MP, Finlay JA, Callow ME, Callow JA. 2003. Three models to relate detachment of low form fouling at laboratory and ship scale. Biofouling. 19 Suppl:17–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz MP. 2007. Effects of coating roughness and biofouling on ship resistance and powering. Biofouling. 23:331–341. doi: 10.1080/08927010701461974
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shademan M, Balachandar R, Barron RM. 2013. CFD analysis of the effect of nozzle stand-off distance on turbulent impinging jets. Can J Civ Eng. 40:603–612. doi: 10.1139/cjce-2012-0199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shademan M, Balachandar R, Roussinova V, Barron R. 2016. Round impinging jets with relatively large stand-off distance. Phys Fluids. 28:075107. doi: 10.1063/1.4955167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swain GW, Schultz MP. 1996. The testing and evaluation of non-toxic antifouling coatings. Biofouling. 10:187–197. doi: 10.1080/08927019609386279
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tribou M, Swain G. 2017. The effects of grooming on a copper ablative coating: a six year study. Biofouling. 33:494–504. doi: 10.1080/08927014.2017.1328596
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tribou M, Swain GW. 2015. Grooming using rotating brushes as a proactive method to control ship hull fouling. Biofouling. 31:309–319. doi: 10.1080/08927014.2015.1041021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu W, Banyassady R, Piomelli U. 2016. Large-eddy simulation of impinging jets on smooth and rough surfaces. J Turbul. 17:847–869. doi: 10.1080/14685248.2016.1181761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu G, Antonia RA. 2002. Effect of initial conditions on the temperature field of a turbulent round free jet. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 29:1057–1068. doi: 10.1016/S0735-1933(02)00434-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yebra DM, Kiil S, Dam-Johansen K. 2004. Antifouling technology - Past, present and future steps towards efficient and environmentally friendly antifouling coatings. Prog Org Coatings. 50:75–104. doi: 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2003.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar