Boundary layer hydrodynamics of patchy biofilms

References

• Adrian RJ, Christensen KT, Liu Z-C. 2000. Analysis and interpretation of instantaneous turbulent velocity fields. Exp Fluids. 29:275–290. doi:10.1007/s003489900087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrewartha J, Perkins K, Sargison J, Osborn J, Walker G, Henderson A, Hallegraeff G. 2010. Drag force and surface roughness measurements on freshwater biofouled surfaces. Biofouling. 26:487–496. doi:10.1080/08927014.2010.482208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonia RA, Luxton RE. 1971. The response of a turbulent boundary layer to a step change in surface roughness Part 1. Smooth to rough. J Fluid Mech. 48:721–761. doi:10.1017/S0022112071001824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battin TJ, Kaplan LA, Denis Newbold J, Hansen CME. 2003. Contributions of microbial biofilms to ecosystem processes in stream mesocosms. Nature. 426:439–442. doi:10.1038/nature02152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Beer D, Kühl M. 2001. Interfacial microbial mats and biofilms. In: Boudreau BP, Jørgensen BB, editors. The benthic boundary layer. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; p. 374–394.
   Google Scholar
• Brzek BG, Cal RB, Johansson G, Castillo L. 2007. Transitionally rough zero pressure gradient turbulent boundary layers. Exp Fluids. 44:115–124. doi:10.1007/s00348-007-0380-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celler K, Hödl I, Simone A, Battin TJ, Picioreanu C. 2014. A mass-spring model unveils the morphogenesis of phototrophic Diatoma biofilms. Sci Rep. 4:3649. doi:10.1038/srep03649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decho AW. 2000. Microbial biofilms in intertidal systems: an overview. Cont Shelf Res. 20:1257–1273. doi:10.1016/S0278-4343(00)00022-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Depetris A, Tagliavini G, Peter H, Kühl M, Holzner M, Battin TJ. 2022. Biophysical properties at patch scale shape the metabolism of biofilm landscapes. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 8:5. doi:10.1038/s41522-022-00269-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobretsov S, Rittschof D. 2020. Love at first taste: induction of larval settlement by marine microbes. Int J Mol Sci. 21:731. doi:10.3390/ijms21030731
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckman JE. 1990. A model of passive settlement by planktonic larvae onto bottoms of differing roughness. Limnol Oceanogr. 35:887–901. doi:10.4319/lo.1990.35.4.0887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flack KA, Schultz MP. 2014. Roughness effects on wall-bounded turbulent flows. Phys Fluids. 26:101305. doi:10.1063/1.4896280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flack KA, Schultz MP, Connelly JS. 2007. Examination of a critical roughness height for outer layer similarity. Phys Fluids. 19:095104. doi:10.1063/1.2757708
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flack KA, Schultz MP, Rose WB. 2012. The onset of roughness effects in the transitionally rough regime. Int J Heat Fluid Flow. 35:160–167. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2012.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florens E, Eiff O, Moulin F. 2013. Defining the roughness sublayer and its turbulence statistics. Exp Fluids. 54:1500. doi:10.1007/s00348-013-1500-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs HL, Neubert MG, Mullineaux LS. 2007. Effects of turbulence-mediated larval behavior on larval supply and settlement in tidal currents. Limnol Oceanogr. 52:1156–1165. doi:10.4319/lo.2007.52.3.1156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graba M, Sauvage S, Majdi N, Mialet B, Moulin FY, Urrea G, Buffan-Dubau E, Tackx M, Sabater S, Sanchez-Pérez J-M. 2014. Modelling epilithic biofilms combining hydrodynamics, invertebrate grazing and algal traits. Freshw Biol. 59:1213–1228. doi:10.1111/fwb.12341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graba M, Sauvage S, Moulin FY, Urrea G, Sabater S, Sanchez-Pérez JM. 2013. Interaction between local hydrodynamics and algal community in epilithic biofilm. Water Res. 47:2153–2163. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2013.01.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grass AJ. 1971. Structural features of turbulent flow over smooth and rough boundaries. J Fluid Mech. 50:233–255. doi:10.1017/S0022112071002556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadfield M, Paul V. 2001. Natural Chemical Cues for Settlement and Metamorphosis of Marine-Invertebrate Larvae. In: McClintock J, Baker B, editors. Marine chemical ecology. Vol. 20015660: Boca Raton: CRC Press; p. 431–461. doi:10.1201/9781420036602.ch13
   Google Scholar
• Hansen JCR, Reidenbach MA. 2012. Wave and tidally driven flows in eelgrass beds and their effect on sediment suspension. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 448:271–287. doi:10.3354/meps09225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartenberger JD, Callison EG, Gose JW, Perlin M, Ceccio SL. 2020. Drag production mechanisms of filamentous biofilms. Biofouling. 36:736–752. doi:10.1080/08927014.2020.1806250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hata T, Madin JS, Cumbo VR, Denny M, Figueiredo J, Harii S, Thomas CJ, Baird AH. 2017. Coral larvae are poor swimmers and require fine-scale reef structure to settle. Sci Rep. 7:2249. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-02402-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendriks IE, van Duren LA, Herman PM. 2006. Turbulence levels in a flume compared to the field: implications for larval settlement studies. J Sea Res. 55:15–29. doi:10.1016/j.seares.2005.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunsucker JT, Hunsucker KZ, Gardner H, Swain G. 2016. Influence of hydrodynamic stress on the frictional drag of biofouling communities. Biofouling. 32:1209–1221. doi:10.1080/08927014.2016.1242724.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunsucker KZ, Koka A, Lund G, Swain G. 2014. Diatom community structure on in-service cruise ship hulls. Biofouling. 30:1133–1140. doi:10.1080/08927014.2014.974576.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunsucker KZ, Vora GJ, Hunsucker JT, Gardner H, Leary DH, Kim S, Lin B, Swain G. 2018. Biofilm community structure and the associated drag penalties of a groomed fouling release ship hull coating. Biofouling. 34:162–172. doi:10.1080/08927014.2017.1417395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kevin K, Monty JP, Bai HL, Pathikonda G, Nugroho B, Barros JM, Christensen KT, Hutchins N. 2017. Cross-stream stereoscopic particle image velocimetry of a modified turbulent boundary layer over directional surface pattern. J Fluid Mech. 813:412–435. doi:10.1017/jfm.2016.879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koehl MAR. 2006. The fluid mechanics of arthropod sniffing in turbulent odor plumes. Chem Senses. 31:93–105. doi:10.1093/chemse/bjj009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koehl MRA. 2007. Mini review: hydrodynamics of larval settlement into fouling communities. Biofouling. 23:357–368. doi:10.1080/08927010701492250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koehl MAR, Perotti E, Sischo D, Hata T, Hadfield MG. 2022. Effects of currents, waves, and biofilms on motion and surface contacts by tubeworm larvae swimming above or below surfaces. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 686:107–126. doi:10.3354/meps14001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krogstadt PÅ, Antonia RA. 1999. Surface roughness effects in turbulent boundary layers. Exp Fluids. 27:450–460. doi:10.1007/s003480050370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonardi S, Orlandi P, Antonia RA. 2007. Properties of d-and k-type roughness in a turbulent channel flow. Phys Fluids. 19:125101. doi:10.1063/1.2821908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ligrani PM, Moffat RJ. 1986. Structure of transitionally rough and fully rough turbulent boundary layers. J Fluid Mech. 162:69–98. doi:10.1017/S0022112086001933
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu SS, Willmarth WW. 1973. Measurements of the structure of the Reynolds stress in a turbulent boundary layer. J Fluid Mech. 60:481–511. doi:10.1017/S0022112073000315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martino R, Paterson A, Piva M. 2012. Double-average mean flow and local turbulence intensity profiles from PIV measurements for an open channel flow with rigid vegetation. Environ Fluid Mech. 12:45–62. doi:10.1007/s10652-011-9221-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mignot E, Barthelemy E, Hurther D. 2009. Double-averaging analysis and local flow characterization of near-bed turbulence in gravel-bed channel flows. J Fluid Mech. 618:279–303. doi:10.1017/S0022112008004643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mignot E, Hurther D, Barthelemy E. 2009. On the structure of shear stress and turbulent kinetic energy flux across the roughness layer of a gravel-bed channel flow. J Fluid Mech. 638:423–452. doi:10.1017/S0022112009990772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy EAK, Barros JM, Schultz MP, Flack KA, Steppe CN, Reidenbach MA. 2018. Roughness effects of diatomaceous slime fouling on turbulent boundary layer hydrodynamics. Biofouling. 34:1–12. doi:10.1080/08927014.2018.1517867
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nepf HM, Vivoni ER. 2000. Flow structure in depth-limited, vegetated flow. J Geophys Res. 105:28547–28557. doi:10.1029/2000JC900145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikora V, McEwan I, McLean S, Coleman S, Pokrajac D, Walters R. 2007. Double-averaging concept for rough-bed open-channel and overland flows: theoretical background. J Hydraul Eng. 133:873–883. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2007)133:8(873)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikuradse J. 1933. Laws of flow in rough pipes. NACA Technical Memorandum 1292.
   Google Scholar
• Poggi D, Katul GG, Albertson JD. 2004. A note on the contribution of dispersive fluxes to momentum transfer within canopies. Bound-Layer Meteorol. 111:615–621. doi:10.1023/B:BOUN.0000016563.76874.47
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pokrajac D, Campbell LJ, Nikora V, Manes C, McEwan I. 2007. Quadrant analysis of persistent spatial velocity perturbations over square-bar roughness. Exp Fluids. 42:413–423. doi:10.1007/s00348-006-0248-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raupach MR. 1981. Conditional statistics of Reynolds stress in rough-wall and smooth-wall turbulent boundary layers. J Fluid Mech. 108:363–382. doi:10.1017/S0022112081002164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raupach MR, Finnigan JJ, Brunei Y. 1996. Coherent eddies and turbulence in vegetation canopies: the mixing-layer analogy. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 78:351–382. doi:10.1007/978-94-017-0944-6_15
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raupach MR, Shaw RH. 1982. Averaging procedures for flow within vegetation canopies. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 22:79–90. doi:10.1007/BF00128057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reidenbach MA, Koseff JR, Monismith SG. 2007. Laboratory experiments of fine-scale mixing and mass transport within a coral canopy. Phys Fluids. 19:075107. doi:10.1063/1.2752189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reidenbach MA, Limm M, Hondzo M, Stacey MT. 2010. Effects of bed roughness on boundary layer mixing and mass flux across the sediment-water interface. Water Resour Res. 46:W07530. doi:10.1029/2009WR008248
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz MP. 2000. Turbulent boundary layers on surfaces covered with filamentous algae. J Fluids Eng. 122:357–363. doi:10.1115/1.483265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz MP. 2007. Effects of coating roughness and biofouling on ship resistance and powering. Biofouling. 23:331–341. doi:10.1080/08927010701461974.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz MP, Bendick JA, Holm ER, Hertel WM. 2011. Economic impact of biofouling on a naval surface ship. Biofouling. 27:87–98. doi:10.1080/08927014.2010.542809.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz MP, Finlay JA, Callow ME, Callow JA. 2003. Three models to relate detachment of low form fouling at laboratory and ship scale. Biofouling. 19:17–26. doi:10.1080/0892701031000089516
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz MP, Swain GW. 1999. The effect of biofilms on turbulent boundary layers. J Fluids Eng. 121:44–51. doi:10.1115/1.2822009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz MP, Swain GW. 2000. The influence of biofilms on skin friction drag. Biofouling. 15:129–139. doi:10.1080/08927010009386304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz MP, Walker JM, Steppe CN, Flack KA. 2015. Impact of diatomaceous biofilms on the frictional drag of fouling-release coatings. Biofouling. 31:759–773. doi:10.1080/08927014.2015.1108407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder WH, Castro IP. 2002. The critical Reynolds number for rough-wall boundary layers. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn. 90:41–54. doi:10.1016/S0167-6105(01)00114-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stocking JB, Rippe JP, Reidenbach MA. 2016. Structure and dynamics of turbulent boundary layer flow over healthy and algae-covered corals. Coral Reefs. 35:1047–1059. doi:10.1007/s00338-016-1446-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoodley P, Lewandowski Z, Boyle JD, Lappin-Scott HM. 1998. Oscillation characteristics of biofilm streamers in turbulent flowing water as related to drag and pressure drop. Biotechnol Bioeng. 57:536–544. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19980305)57:5 < 536::AID-BIT5 > 3.0.CO;2-H
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoodley P, Lewandowski Z, Boyle JD, Lappin-Scott HM. 1999. Structural deformation of bacterial biofilms caused by short-term fluctuations in fluid shear: an in situ investigation of biofilm rheology. Biotechnol Bioeng. 65:11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swain GW. 2010. The importance of ship hull coatings and maintenance as drivers for environmental sustainability. Proceedings of Ship Design and Operation for Environmental Sustainability; Mar 2010; London: Royal Institute of Naval Architects. doi:10.3940/rina.es.2010.17
   Google Scholar
• Taherzadeh D, Picioreanu C, Horn H. 2012. Mass transfer enhancement in moving biofilm structures. Biophys J. 102:1483–1492. doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2012.02.033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Telgmann U, Horn H, Morgenroth E. 2004. Influence of growth history on sloughing and erosion from biofilms. Water Res. 38:3671–3684. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2004.05.020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Mooy BAS, Hmelo LR, Fredricks HF, Ossolinski JE, Pedler BE, Bogorff DJ, Smith PJS. 2014. Quantitative exploration of the contribution of settlement, growth, dispersal and grazing to the accumulation of natural marine biofilms on antifouling and fouling-release coatings. Biofouling. 30:223–236. doi:10.1080/08927014.2013.861422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volino RJ, Schultz MP. 2018. Determination of wall shear stress from mean velocity and Reynolds shear stress profiles. Phys Rev Fluids. 3:034606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volino RJ, Schultz MP, Flack KA. 2007. Turbulence structure in rough- and smooth-wall boundary layers. J Fluid Mech. 592:263–293. doi:10.1017/S0022112007008518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volino RJ, Schultz MP, Flack KA. 2009. Turbulence structure in a boundary layer with two-dimensional roughness. J Fluid Mech. 635:75–101. doi:10.1017/S0022112009007617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volino RJ, Schultz MP, Flack KA. 2011. Turbulence structure in boundary layers over periodic two- and three-dimensional roughness. J Fluid Mech. 676:172–190. doi:10.1017/S0022112011000383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker JM, Flack KA, Lust EE, Schultz MP, Luznik L. 2014. Experimental and numerical studies of blade roughness and fouling on marine current turbine performance. Renew Energy. 66:257–267. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2013.12.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker JM, Sargison JE, Henderson AD. 2013. Turbulent boundary-layer structure of flows over freshwater biofilms. Exp Fluids. 54:1628. doi:10.1007/s00348-013-1628-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace JM. 2016. Quadrant analysis in turbulence research: history and evolution. Annu Rev Fluid Mech. 48:131–158. doi:10.1146/annurev-fluid-122414-034550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Womack KM, Meneveau C, Schultz MP. 2019. Comprehensive shear stress analysis of turbulent boundary layer profiles. J Fluid Mech. 879:360–389. doi:10.1017/jfm.2019.673
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Womack KM, Volino RJ, Meneveau C, Schultz MP. 2022. Turbulent boundary layer flow over regularly and irregularly arranged truncated cone surfaces. J Fluid Mech. 933:A38. doi:10.1017/jfm.2021.946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Y, Christensen KT. 2006. Population trends of spanwise vortices in wall turbulence. J Fluid Mech. 568:55–76. doi:10.1017/S002211200600259X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Y, Christensen KT. 2010. Spatial structure of a turbulent boundary layer with irregular surface roughness. J Fluid Mech. 655:380–418. doi:10.1017/S0022112010000960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan J, Piomelli U. 2014. Roughness effects on the Reynolds stress budgets in near-wall turbulence. J Fluid Mech. 760:R1. doi:10.1017/jfm.2014.608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yue W, Meneveau C, Parlange MB, Zhu W, Van Hout R, Katz J. 2007. A comparative quadrant analysis of turbulence in a plant canopy. Water Resour Res. 43:W05422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zargiel KA, Coogan JS, Swain GW. 2011. Diatom community structure on commercially available ship hull coatings. Biofouling. 27:955–965. doi:10.1080/08927014.2011.618268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zargiel KA, Swain GW. 2014. Static vs dynamic settlement and adhesion of diatoms to ship hull coatings. Biofouling. 30:115–129. doi:10.1080/08927014.2013.847927.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou J, Adrian RJ, Balachandar S, Kendall TM. 1999. Mechanisms for generating coherent packets of hairpin vortices in channel flow. J Fluid Mech. 387:353–396. doi:10.1017/S002211209900467X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar