PDMS networks meet barnacles: a complex and often toxic relationship

References

• Baier RE. 1970. Surface properties influencing biological adhesion. In: Manly RS, editor. Adhesion in biological systems. New York (NY): Academic Press Inc; p. 15–48.
   Google Scholar
• Baier RE. 1972. Influence of the initial surface condition of materials on bioadhesion. In: Acker RF, Brown BF, DePalma JR, Iverson WP, editors. Proceedings of the Third International Congress on Marine Corrosion and Fouling. Evanston (IL): Northwestern University Press; p. 633–639.
   Google Scholar
• Baier RE. 2006. Surface behavior of biomaterials: the theta surface for biocompatibility. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 17:1057–1062.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berglin M, Gatenholm P. 2003. The barnacle adhesive plaque: morphological and chemical differences as a response to substrate properties. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 28:107–117. doi:10.1016/S0927-7765(02)00149-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady R, Jr. 2001. A fracture mechanical analysis of fouling release from nontoxic antifouling coatings. Progr Organ Coatings. 43:188–192. doi:10.1016/S0300-9440(01)00180-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady R, Jr, Singer I. 2000. Mechanical factors favoring release from fouling release coatings. Biofouling. 15:73–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaudhury MK, Finlay JA, Chung JJ, Callow ME, Callow, J, A. 2005. The influence of elastic modulus and thickness of the release of the soft-fouling green alga Ulva linza (syn. Enteromorpha linza) form poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) model networks. Biofouling. 21:41–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowe-Willoughby JA, Weiger KL, Özçam AE, Genzer J. 2010. Formation of silicone elastomer networks films with gradients in modulus. Polymer. 51:763–773. doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2009.11.070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delebecq E, Ganachaud F. 2012. Looking over liquid silicone rubbers: (1) network topology vs. chemical formulations. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 4:3340–3352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickinson GH. 2008. Barnacle cement: a polymerization model based on evolutionary concepts. Dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the University Program in Ecology at the Graduate School of Duke University.
   Google Scholar
• Dickinson GH, Vega IE, Wahl KJ, Orihuela B, Beyley V, Rodriguez EN, Everett RK, Bonaventura J, Rittschof D. 2009. Barnacle cement: a polymerization model based on evolutionary concepts. J Exp Biol. 212:3499–3510.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixit N, Maloney KM, Kalonia DS. 2013. Protein-silicone oil interactions: comparative effect of nonionic surfactants on the interfacial behavior of a fusion protein. Pharm Res. 30:1848–1859.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Essock-Burns T, Soderblom EJ, Orihuela B, Moseley MA, Rittschof D. 2019. Hypothesis testing with proteomics: a case study using wound healing mechanisms in fluids associated with barnacle glue. Front Mar Sci. 6:343. doi:10.3389/fmars.2019.00343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genzer JK, Efimenko K. 2006. Superhydrophobic surfaces: recent developments and relevance to marine fouling. Biofouling. 22:339–360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grzybowski A, Pieczynski J, Ascaso FJ. 2014. Neuronal complications of intravitreal silicone oil: an updated review. Acta Ophthalmol. 92:201–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holm ER, Orihuela B, Kavanagh CJ, Rittschof D. 2005. Variation among families for characteristics of the adhesive plaque in the barnacle Balanus amphitrite. Biofouling. 21:121–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaffashi A, Jannesari A, Ranjbar Z. 2012. Silicone fouling-release coatings: effects of the molecular weight of poly(dimethylsiloxane) and tetraethyl orthosilicate on the magnitude of pseudobarnacle adhesion strength. Biofouling. 28:729–741. doi:10.1080/08927014.2012.702342
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavanagh CJ, Quinn RD, Swain GW. 2005. Observations of barnacle detachment from silicones using high-speed video. J Adhes. 81:843–868. doi:10.1080/00218460500189331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavanagh CJ, Schultz MP, Swain GW, Stein J, Truby K, Darkangelo-Wood C. 2001. Variation in adhesion strength of Balanus eburneus, Crassostrea virginica, and Hydroides dianthus to fouling-release coatings. Biofouling. 17:155–167. doi:10.1080/08927010109378474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavanagh CJ, Swain GW, Kovach BS, Stein J, Darkangelo-Wood C, Truby K, Holm E, Montemarano J, Meyer A, Wiebe D. 2003. The effects of silicone fluid additives and silicone elastomer matrices on barnacle adhesion strength. Biofouling. 19:381–390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nurioglu AG, Esteves ACA, de With G. 2015. Non-toxic, non-biocide-release antifouling coatings. Based on molecular structure design for marine applications. J Mater Chem B. 3:6547–6570. doi:10.1039/C5TB00232J
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özçam AE, Efimenko K, Genzer J. 2014. Effect of ultraviolet/ozone treatment on the surface and bulk properties of poly(dimethyl siloxane) and poly(vinylmethyl siloxane) networks. Polymer. 55:3107–3119. doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2014.05.027[ ]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Probst C. 2020. Characterization of protein aggregates, silicone oil droplets, and protein-silicone interactions using imaging flow cytometry. J Pharm Sci. 109:364–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittschof D, Holm ER. 1997. Antifouling and foul-release: a primer. In: Fingerman M, Nagabhushanam R, Thompson MF, editors. Recent advances in marine biotechnology, Vol. I Endocrinology and reproduction. New Delhi (India): Oxford & IBH Publishing; p. 497–512.
   Google Scholar
• Rittschof D, Orihuela B, Harder T, Stafslien S, Chisholm B, GH, Dickinson, G, H. 2011. Compounds from silicones alter enzyme activity in curing barnacle glue and model enzymes. PLoS One. 6:e16487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittschof D, Orihuela B, Stafslien S, Daniels J, Christianson D, Chisholm B, Holm E. 2008. Barnacle reattachment: a tool for studying barnacle adhesion. Biofouling. 24:1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultzhaus JN, Dean SN, Leary DH, Hervey WJ, Fears KP, Wahl KJ, Spillmann CM. 2019. Pressure cycling technology for challenging proteomic sample processing: application to barnacle adhesive. Integr Biol (Camb). 11:235–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultzhaus JN, Wang C, Patel S, Smerchansky M, Phillips D, Taitt CR, Leary DH, HeRVey J, Dickinson GH, So CR, et al. 2020. Distribution of select cement proteins in the acorn barnacle Amphibalanus amphitrite. Front Mar Sci. 7:797. doi:10.3389/fmars.2020.586281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• So C, Scancella J, Fears K, Essock-Burns T, Haynes S, Leary D, Diana Z, Wang C, North S, Oh C, et al. 2017. Oxidase activity of the barnacle adhesive interface involves peroxide-dependent catechol-oxidase and lysyl oxidase enzymes. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 9:11493–11505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stafslien S, Daniels D, Bahr J, Chisholm B, Ekin A, Webster D, Orihuela B, Rittschof D. 2012. An improved laboratory reattachment method for the rapid assessment of adult barnacle adhesion strength to fouling-release marine coatings. J Coat Technol Res. 9:651–665. doi:10.1007/s11998-012-9409-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang CS, Stewart RJ. 2012. Localization of the bioadhesive precursors of the sandcastle worm, Phragmatopoma californica (Fewkes). J Exp Biol. 215:351–361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar