References
- Kitchen DB, Decornez H, Furr JR, Bajorath J. Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: methods and applications. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2004;3(11):935–949.
- Oda A, Tsuchida K, Takakura T, Yamaotsu N, Hirono S. Comparison of consensus scoring strategies for evaluating computational models of protein − ligand complexes. J Chem Inf Model. 2006;46(1):380–391.
- Jones G, Willett P, Glen RC, Leach AR, Taylor R. Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking. J Mol Biol. 1997;267(3):727–748.
- Zsoldos Z, Reid D, Simon A, Sadjad SB, Johnson AP. eHiTS: A new fast, exhaustive flexible ligand docking system. J Mol Graph Model. 2007;26(1):198–212.
- Morris GM, Huey R, Lindstrom W, Sanner MF, Belew RK, Goodsell DS, Olson AJ. AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: automated docking with selective receptor flexibility. J Comput Chem. 2009;30(16):2785–2791.
- Trott O, Olson AJ. AutoDock vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. J Comput Chem. 2010;31(2):455–461.
- McGann M. FRED pose prediction and virtual screening accuracy. J Chem Inf Model. 2011;51(3):578–596.
- Kuntz ID, Blaney JM, Oatley SJ, Langridge R, Ferrin TE. A geometric approach to macromolecule–ligand interactions. J Mol Biol. 1982;25(2):269–288.
- Leach AR. Molecular modelling: principles and applications. Harlow: Pearson Education; 2001.
- McConkey BJ, Sobolev V, Edelman M. The performance of current methods in ligand–protein docking. Curr Sci. 2002;83(7):845–856.
- Onodera K, Satou K, Hirota H. Evaluations of molecular docking programs for virtual screening. J Chem Inf Model. 2007;47(4):1609–1618.
- Feher M, Williams CI. Effect of input differences on the results of docking calculations. J Chem Inf Model. 2009;49(7):1704–1714.
- Oda A, Yamaotsu N, Hirono S. Evaluation of the searching abilities of HBOP and HBSITE for binding pocket detection. J Comput Chem. 2009;30(16):2728–2737.
- Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE. The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28(1):235–242.
- Tsujishita H, Hirono S. Camdas: an automated conformational analysis system using molecular dynamics. J Comput Aided Mol Des. 1997;11(3):305–315.
- Oda A, Yamaotsu N, Hirono S, Takano Y, Fukuyoshi S, Nakagaki R, Takahashi O. Evaluations of the conformational search accuracy of CAMDAS using experimental three-dimensional structures of protein–ligand complexes. J Phys: Conf Ser. 2013;454:012028.
- Wang J, Wolf RM, Caldwell JW, Kollman PA, Case DA. Development and testing of a general amber force field. J Comput Chem. 2004;25(9):1157–1174.
- Case DA, Darden TA, Cheatham TE III, Simmerling CL, Wang J, Duke RE, Luo R, Merz KM, Pearlman DA, Crowley M, Walker RC, Zhang W, Wang B, Hayik S, Roitberg A, Seabra G, Wong KF, Paesani F, Wu X, Brozell S, Tsui V, Gohlke H, Yang L, Tan C, Mongan J, Hornak V, Cui G, Beroza P, Mathews DH, Schafmeister C, Ross WS, Kollman PA. AMBER9. San Francisco: University of California, San Francisco; 2006.
- Stewart JJP. MOPAC2007. Colorado Springs, CO: Stewart Computational Chemistry; 2007.
- Nakagome I, Yamaotsu N, Oda A, Hirono S. Energy estimation of ligand conformations including solvent effects. Proceedings of the 30th symposium of structure–activity relationships, Toyohashi: Hotel Nikko Toyohashi; 2002 Nov 12–13; p. 95–98.
- Charifson PS, Corkery JJ, Murcko MA, Walters WP. Consensus scoring: a method for obtaining improved hit rates from docking databases of three-dimensional structures into proteins. J Med Chem. 1999;42(25):5100–5109.