Molecular dynamics simulation study on the high-pressure behaviour of an AK16 peptide

References

• Silva JL, Foguel D, Royer CA. Pressure provides new insights into protein folding, dynamics and structure. Trends Biochem Sci. 2001;26:612–618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takekiyo T, Imai T, Kato M, Taniguchi Y. Temperature and pressure effects on conformational equilibria of alanine dipeptide in aqueous solution. Biopolymers. 2004;73:283–290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takekiyo T, Shimizu A, Kato M, Taniguchi Y. Pressure-tuning FT-IR spectroscopic study on the helix-coil transition of Ala-rich oligopeptide in aqueous solution. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005;1750:1–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imamura H, Kato M. Effect of pressure on helix-coil transition of an alanine-based peptide: an FTIR study. Proteins Struct Funct Bioinform. 2009;75:911–918.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitahara R, Yamada H, Akasaka K. Two folded conformers of ubiquitin revealed by high-pressure NMR. Biochemistry. 2001;40:13556–13563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitahara R, Akasaka K. Close identity of a pressure-stabilized intermediate with a kinetic intermediate in protein folding. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:3167–3172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitahara R, Yokoyama S, Akasaka K. NMR snapshots of a fluctuating protein structure: ubiquitin at 30 bar–3 kbar. J Mol Biol. 2005;347:277–285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson MP, Akasaka K, Refaee M. The solution structure of bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor at high pressure. Protein Sci. 2003;12:1971–1979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Refaee M, Tezuka T, Akasaka K, Williamson MP. Pressure-dependent changes in the solution structure of hen egg-white lysozyme. J Mol Biol. 2003;327:857–865.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilton DJ, Tunnicliffe RB, Kamatari YO, Akasaka K, Williamson MP. Pressure-induced changes in the solution structure of the GB1 domain of protein G. Proteins Struct Funct Bioinform. 2008;71:1432–1440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day R, García AE. Water penetration in the low and high pressure native states of ubiquitin. Proteins Struct Funct Bioinform. 2008;70:1175–1184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imai T, Sugita Y. Dynamic correlation between pressure-induced protein structural transition and water penetration. J Phys Chem B. 2010;114:2281–2286.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nisius L, Grzesiek S. Key stabilizing elements of protein structure identified through pressure and temperature perturbation of its hydrogen bond network. Nat Chem. 2012;4:711–717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The PyMOL molecular graphics system, version 1.5.0.3, Schrödinger, LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Scholtz JM, Baldwin RL. The mechanism of α-helix formation by peptides. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 1992;21:95–118.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chakrabartty A, Kortemme T, Baldwin RL. Helix propensities of the amino acids measured in alanine-based peptides without helix-stabilizing side-chain interactions. Protein Sci. 1994;3:843–852.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakrabartty A, Baldwin RL. Stability of α-helices. Adv Protein Chem. 1995;46:141–176.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pace CN, Scholtz JM. A helix propensity scale based on experimental studies of peptides and proteins. Biophys J. 1998;75:422–427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo P, Baldwin RL. Interaction between water and polar groups of the helix backbone: an important determinant of helix propensities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:4930–4935.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitsutake A, Sugita Y, Okamoto Y. Generalized-ensemble algorithms for molecular simulations of biopolymers. Biopolymers. 2001;60:96–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hukushima K, Nemoto K. Exchange Monte Carlo method and application to spin glass simulations. J Phys Soc Jpn. 1996;65:1604–1608.
   Google Scholar
• Sugita Y, Okamoto Y. Replica-exchange molecular dynamics method for protein folding. Chem Phys Lett. 1999;314:141–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mori Y, Okamoto Y. Replica-exchange molecular dynamics simulations for various constant temperature algorithms. J Phys Soc Jpn. 2010;79:074001.
   Google Scholar
• Itoh SG, Okumura H. Replica-permutation method with the Suwa–Todo algorithm beyond the replica-exchange method. J Chem Theory Comput. 2013;9:570–581.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg BA, Neuhaus T. Multicanonical algorithms for first order phase transitions. Phys Lett B. 1991;267:249–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg BA, Neuhaus T. Multicanonical ensemble: a new approach to simulate first-order phase transitions. Phys Rev Lett. 1992;68:9–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansmann UHE, Okamoto Y, Eisenmenger F. Molecular dynamics, Langevin and hybrid Monte Carlo simulations in a multicanonical ensemble. Chem Phys Lett. 1996;259:321–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakajima N, Nakamura H, Kidera A. Multicanonical ensemble generated by molecular dynamics simulation for enhanced conformational sampling of peptides. J Phys Chem B. 1997;101:817–824.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marinari E, Parisi G. Simulated tempering: a new Monte Carlo scheme. Europhys Lett. 1992;19:451–458.
   Google Scholar
• Lyubartsev AP, Martsinovski AA, Shevkunov SV, Vorontsov-Velyaminov PN. New approach to Monte Carlo calculation of the free-energy: method of expanded ensembles. J Chem Phys. 1992;96:1776–1783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishikawa T, Ohtsuka H, Sugita Y, Mikami M, Okamoto Y. Replica-exchange Monte Carlo method for Ar fluid. Prog Theor Phys Suppl. 2000;138:270–271.
   Google Scholar
• Okabe T, Kawata M, Okamoto Y, Mikami M. Replica-exchange Monte Carlo method for the isobaric–isothermal ensemble. Chem Phys Lett. 2001;335:435–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugita Y, Okamoto Y. Free-energy calculations in protein folding by generalized-ensemble algorithms. In: Schlick T, editor. Lecture notes in computational science and engineering. Berlin: Springer; 2002. p. 303–331.
   Google Scholar
• Paschek D, García AE. Reversible temperature and pressure denaturation of a protein fragment: a replica exchange molecular dynamics simulation study. Phys Rev Lett. 2004;93:238105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okumura H, Okamoto Y. Molecular dynamics simulations in the multibaric–multithermal ensemble. Chem Phys Lett. 2004;391:248–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okumura H, Okamoto Y. Monte Carlo simulations in generalized isobaric–isothermal ensembles. Phys Rev E. 2004;70:026702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okumura H, Okamoto Y. Monte Carlo simulations in multibaric–multithermal ensemble. Chem Phys Lett. 2004;383:391–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okumura H, Okamoto Y. Multibaric–multithermal ensemble molecular dynamics simulations. J Comput Chem. 2006;27:379–395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mori Y, Okamoto Y. Generalized-ensemble algorithms for the isobaric–isothermal ensemble. J Phys Soc Jpn. 2010;79:074003.
   Google Scholar
• Mori Y, Okamoto Y. Generalised-ensemble algorithms for studying temperature and pressure dependence of complex systems. Mol Simul. 2012;38:452–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paschek D, Gnanakaran S, Garcia AE. Simulations of the pressure and temperature unfolding of an α-helical peptide. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:6765–6770.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okumura H, Okamoto Y. Multibaric–multithermal molecular dynamics simulation of alanine dipeptide in explicit water. Bull Chem Soc Jpn. 2007;80:1114–1123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okumura H, Okamoto Y. Temperature and pressure dependence of alanine dipeptide studied by multibaric–multithermal molecular dynamics simulations. J Phys Chem B. 2008;112:12038–12049.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitsutake A, Mori Y, Okamoto Y. Multi-dimensional multicanonical algorithm, simulated tempering, replica-exchange method, and all that. Phys Procedia. 2010;4:89–105.
   Google Scholar
• Mori Y, Mitsutake A, Okamoto Y. Generalized-ensemble simulations in protein science. In: Kholmurodov K, editor. Proceedings of the 4th Japan-Russia international workshop MSSMBS'10 “molecular simulations studies in material and biological sciences” computational science and engineering. Hauppauge: Nova Science; 2011. p. 46–60.
   Google Scholar
• Okumura H. Temperature and pressure denaturation of chignolin: folding and unfolding simulation by multibaric–multithermal molecular dynamics method. Proteins Struct Funct Bioinform. 2012;80:2397–2416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitsutake A, Mori Y, Okamoto Y. Enhanced sampling algorithms. In: Monticelli L, Salonen E, editors. Biomolecular simulations: methods and protocols. New York: Humana Press; 2012. p. 153–195.
   Google Scholar
• Mori Y, Okumura H. Pressure-induced helical structure of a peptide studied by simulated tempering molecular dynamics simulations. J Phys Chem Lett. 2013;4:2079–2083.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitsutake A, Okamoto Y. Multidimensional generalized-ensemble algorithms for complex systems. J Chem Phys. 2009;130:214105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrenberg AM, Swendsen RH. Optimized Monte Carlo data analysis. Phys Rev Lett. 1989;63:1195–1198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar S, Bouzida D, Swendsen RH, Kollman PA, Rosenberg JM. The weighted histogram analysis method for free-energy calculations on biomolecules. I. The method. J Comput Chem. 1992;13:1011–1021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirts MR, Chodera JD. Statistically optimal analysis of samples from multiple equilibrium states. J Chem Phys. 2008;129:124105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips JC, Braun R, Wang W, Gumbart J, Tajkhorshid E, Villa E, Chipot C, Skeel RD, Kale L, Schulten K. Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. J Comput Chem. 2005;26:1781–1802.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKerell AD, Bashford D, Bellott M, Dunbrack RL, Evanseck JD, Field MJ, Fischer S, Gao J, Guo H, Ha S, Joseph-McCarthy D, Kuchnir L, Kuczera K, Lau FTK, Mattos C, Michnick S, Ngo T, Nguyen DT, Prodhom B, Reiher WE, Roux B, Schlenkrich M, Smith JC, Stote R, Straub J, Watanabe M, Wiorkiewicz-Kuczera J, Yin D, Karplus M. All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. J Phys Chem B. 1998;102:3586–3616.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackerell AD, Feig M, Brooks CL. Extending the treatment of backbone energetics in protein force fields: limitations of gas-phase quantum mechanics in reproducing protein conformational distributions in molecular dynamics simulations. J Comput Chem. 2004;25:1400–1415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorgensen WL, Chandrasekhar J, Madura JD, Impey RW, Klein ML. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J Chem Phys. 1983;79:926–935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darden T, York D, Pedersen L. Particle mesh Ewald: an n·log(n) method for Ewald sums in large systems. J Chem Phys. 1993;98:10089–10092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Essmann U, Perera L, Berkowitz ML, Darden T, Lee H, Pedersen LG. A smooth particle mesh Ewald method. J Chem Phys. 1995;103:8577–8593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quigley D, Probert MIJ. Langevin dynamics in constant pressure extended systems. J Chem Phys. 2004;120:11432–11441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nosé S. A unified formulation of the constant temperature molecular dynamics methods. J Chem Phys. 1984;81:511–519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoover WG. Canonical dynamics: equilibrium phase-space distributions. Phys Rev A. 1985;31:1695–1697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feller SE, Zhang YH, Pastor RW, Brooks BR. Constant pressure molecular dynamics simulation: the Langevin piston method. J Chem Phys. 1995;103:4613–4621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabsch W, Sander C. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers. 1983;22:2577–2637.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joosten RP, Beek TAHT, Krieger E, Hekkelman ML, Hooft RWW, Schneider R, Sander C, Vriend G. A series of PDB related databases for everyday needs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39:D411–D419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imai T, Takahiro T, Kovalenko A, Hirata F, Kato M, Taniguchi Y. Theoretical study of volume changes associated with the helix-coil transition of an alanine-rich peptide in aqueous solution. Biopolymers. 2005;79:97–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouget JB, Aksel T, Roche J, Saldana JL, Garcia AE, Barrick D, Royer CA. Size and sequence and the volume change of protein folding. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133:6020–6027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roche J, Caro JA, Norberto DR, Barthe P, Roumestand C, Schlessman JL, Garcia AE, Garcia-Moreno B, Royer CA. Cavities determine the pressure unfolding of proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:6945–6950.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoda T, Sugita Y, Okamoto Y. Comparisons of force fields for proteins by generalized-ensemble simulations. Chem Phys Lett. 2004;386:460–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best RB, Hummer G. Optimized molecular dynamics force fields applied to the helix-coil transition of polypeptides. J Phys Chem B. 2009;113:9004–9015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatch HW, Stillinger FH, Debenedetti PG. Computational study of the stability of the miniprotein trp-cage, the GB1 β-hairpin, and the AK16 peptide, under negative pressure. J Phys Chem B. doi:10.1021/jp410651u.
   Google Scholar
• Herberhold H, Winter R. Temperature- and pressure-induced unfolding and refolding of ubiquitin: a static and kinetic Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy study. Biochemistry. 2002;41:2396–2401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar