Concepts and protocols for electrostatic free energies

References

• Ulstrup J. Charge transfer processes in condensed media. Berlin: Springer; 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus R. Electron transfer reactions in chemistry: theory and experiment. In: Bendall D, editor. Protein electron transfer. BIOS Scientific Publishers: Oxford; 1996. p. 249–272.
   Google Scholar
• Hünenberger P, Reif M. Single-ion solvation: experimental and theoretical approaches to elusive thermodynamic quantities. London: Royal Society of Chemistry; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Warshel A. Computer modelling of chemical reactions in enzymes and solutions. New York: Wiley; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Warshel A, Sharma P, Kato M, et al. Modeling electrostatic effects in proteins. Biochem. Biophys. Acta. 2006;1764:1647–1676.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonson T, Archontis G, Karplus M. Free energy simulations come of age: the protein-ligand recognition problem. Acc. Chem. Res. 2002;35:430–437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aqvist J, Hansson T. On the validity of electrostatic linear response in polar solvents. J. Phys. Chem. 1996;100:9512–9521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hummer G, Pratt L, Garcia A. Free energy of ionic hydration. J. Phys. Chem. 1996;100:1206–1215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorgensen W, Chandrasekar J, Madura J, et al. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J. Chem. Phys. 1983;79:926–935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darden T, Pearlman D, Pedersen L. Ionic charging free energies: spherical vs. periodic boundary conditions. J. Chem. Phys. 1998;109:10921–10935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harder E, Roux B. On the origin of the electrostatic potential difference at a liquid--vacuum interface. J. Chem. Phys. 2008;129:234706.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kathmann SM, Kuo I, Mundy CJ, et al. Understanding the surface potential of water. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2011;115:4369–4377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landau L, Lifschitz E. Electrodynamics of continuous media. New York (NY): Pergamon Press; 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Fröhlich H. Theory of dielectrics. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1949.
   Google Scholar
• Roux B, Simonson T. Implicit solvent models. Biophys. Chem. 1999;78:1–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkwood J, Westheimer F. The electrostatic influence of substituents on the dissociation constant of organic acids. J. Chem. Phys. 1938;6:506–512.
   Google Scholar
• Miertus S, Scrocco E, Tomasi J. Electrostatic interaction of a solute with a continuum. A direct utilization of ab initio molecular potentials for the prevision of solvent effects. Chem. Phys. 1981;55:117–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beglov D, Roux B. Finite representation of an infinite bulk system: solvent boundary potential for computer simulations. J. Chem. Phys. 1994;100:9050–9063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen M, Tildesley D. Computer simulations of liquids. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Born M, Huang K. Dynamical theory of crystal lattices. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1954.
   Google Scholar
• De Leeuw S, Perram J, Smith E. Simulation of electric systems in periodic boundary conditions. I. Lattice sums and dielectric constants. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A. 1980;373:27–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Leeuw S, Perram J, Smith E. Simulation of electric systems in periodic boundary conditions. II. Equivalence of boundary conditions. Proc. Roy. Soc Lond. A. 1980;373:57–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nijboer BRA, Ruijgrok TW. On the energy per particle in three- and two-dimensional Wigner lattices. J. Stat. Phys. 1988;53:361–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cichocki B, Felderhof BU, Hinsen K. Electrostatic interactions in periodic Coulomb and dipolar systems. Phys. Rev. A. 1989;39:5350–5358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figueirido FE, Levy R. On finite-size effects in computer simulations using the Ewald potential. J. Chem. Phys. 1995;103:6133–6142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogusz S, Cheatham TE, Brooks BR. Removal of pressure and free energy artefacts in charged periodic systems via net charge corrections to the Ewald potential. J. Chem. Phys. 1998;108:7070–7084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darden T. Treatment of long-range forces and potential. In: Becker O, Mackerell A, Roux B, et al., editors. Computational biochemistry & biophysics. Chapter 4, New York: Marcel Dekker; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Cisneros GA, Karttunen M, Ren P, et al. Classical electrostatics for biomolecular simulations. Chem. Rev. 2013;114:779–814.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker J, Watts R. Monte Carlo studies of the dielectric proterties of water-like models. Mol. Phys. 1973;26:789–792.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Gunsteren W, Berendsen H, Rullmann J. Inclusion of reaction fields in molecular dynamics: application to liquid water. Faraday Discuss Chem. Soc. 1979;66:58–70.
   Google Scholar
• Figueirido FE, Del Buono GS, Levy R. On finite-size corrections to the free energy of hydration. J. Phys. Chem. B. 1997;101:5622–5623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hummer G, Pratt L, Garcia A. Ion sizes and finite-size corrections for ionic-solvation free energies. J. Chem. Phys. 1997;107:9275–9277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunenberger P, McCammon J. Effect of artificial periodicity in simulations of biomolecules under Ewald boundary conditions: a continuum electrostatics study. Biophys. Chem. 1999;78:69–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boresch S, Ringhofer S, Höchtl P, et al. Towards a better understanding of biomolecular solvation. Biophys. Chem. 1999;78:43–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz L. Méthodes mathématiques pour les sciences physiques. Paris: Hermann; 1961.
   Google Scholar
• Nijboer BRA, de Wette FW. The internal field in dipole lattices. Physica. 1958;24:422–431.
   Google Scholar
• Hummer G, Pratt L, Garcia A, et al. Electrostatic potentials and free energies of solvation of polar and charged molecules. J. Phys. Chem. B. 1997;101:3017–3020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashbaugh HS, Wood RH. Effects of long-range electrostatic potential truncation on the free energy of ionic hydration. J. Chem. Phys. 1997;106:8135–8139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aqvist J, Hansson T. Analysis of electrostatic potential truncation schemes in polar solvents. J. Phys. Chem. 1998;102:3837–3840.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hummer G, Pratt L, Garcia A, et al. Reply to comment on “electrostatic potentials and free energies of solvation of polar and charged molecules”. J. Phys. Chem. B. 1998;102:3841–3843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashbaugh HS, Sakane S, Wood RH. Reply to comment on “electrostatic potentials and free energies of solvation of polar and charged molecules”. J. Phys. Chem. B. 1998;102:3844–3845.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill T. On intermolecular and intramolecular interactions between independent pairs of binding sites in proteins and other molecules. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1956;78:5529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaefer M, van Vlijmen HWT, Karplus M. Electrostatic contributions to molecular free energies in solution. Adv. Prot. Chem. 1998;51:1–57.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baker NA, Sept D, Simpson J, et al. Electrostatics of nanosystems: application to microtubules and the ribosome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001;98:10037–10041.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonson T. Electrostatics and dynamics of proteins. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2003;66:737–787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onufriev AV, Alexov E. Protonation and pKa changes in protein-ligand binding. Q. Rev. Biophys. 2013;46:181–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roux B, Yu HA, Karplus M. Molecular basis for the Born model of solvation. J. Phys. Chem. 1990;94:4683–4688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Netz RR, Orland H. Beyond Poisson--Boltzmann: Fluctuation effects and correlation functions. Eur. Phys. J.E. 2000;1:203–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler D. Introduction to modern statistical mechanics. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen JP, McDonald I. Theory of simple liquids. New York: Academic Press; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Warshel A. Dynamics of reactions in polar solvents. Semiclassical trajectory studies of electron transfer and proton transfer studies. J. Phys. Chem. 1982;86:2218–2224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warshel A, Chu Z, Parson W. Dispersed polaron simulations of electron transfer in photosynthetic reaction centers. Science. 1989;246:112–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aqvist J, Luzhkov VB, Brandsdal BO. Ligand binding affinities from MD simulations. Acc. Chem. Res. 2002;35:358–365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonson T, Archontis G, Karplus M. A Poisson--Boltzmann study of charge insertion in an enzyme active site: the effect of dielectric relaxation. J. Phys. Chem. B. 1999;103:6142–6156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archontis G, Simonson T. Dielectric relaxation in an enzyme active site: molecular dynamics simulations intepreted with a macroscopic continuum model. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001;123:11047–11056.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin YL, Aleksandrov A, Simonson T, et al. Electrostatic free energy computations for solutions and proteins. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2014;10:2690–2709.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwanzig F. High-temperature equation of state by a perturbation method. I. Non-polar gases. J. Chem. Phys. 1954;22:1420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archontis G, Karplus M. Cumulant expansion of the free energy: application to free energy derivatives and component analysis. J. Chem. Phys. 1996;105:11246–11260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King G, Warshel A. Investigation of the free energy functions for electron transfer reactions. J. Chem. Phys. 1990;93:8682–8692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng L, Chen M, Yang W. Random walk in orthogonal space to achieve efficient free energy simulation of complex systems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008;105:20227–20232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson MA, Pohorille A, Pratt LR. Comment on “Study on the liquid-vapor interface of water. I. Simulation results of thermodynamic properties and orientational structure”. J. Chem. Phys. 1989;90:5211–5213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorgensen W, Buckner K, Boudon S, et al. Efficient computation of absolute free energies of binding by computer simulations. Application to the methane dimer in water. J. Chem. Phys. 1988;89:3742–3746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng Y, Roux B. Computations of standard binding free energies with molecular dynamics simulations. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2009;113:2234–2246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynden-Bell RM, Rasaiah JC. J. Chem. Phys. 1997;107:1981.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakane S, Ashbaugh HS, Wood RH. Continuum corrections to the polarization and thermodynamic properties of Ewald sum simulations for ions and ion pairs at infinite dilution. J. Phys. Chem. B. 1998;102:5673–5682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen TW, Andersen OS, Roux B. Energetics of ion conduction through the gramicidin channel. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2004;101:117–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen TW, Andersen OS, Roux B. Ion permeation through a narrow channel: using gramicidin to ascertain all-atom potential of mean force methodology and biomolecular force fields. Biophys. J. 2006;90:3447–3468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocklin GJ, Mobley DL, Dill KA, et al. Calculating the binding free energies of charged species based on explicit-solvent simulations employing lattice-sum methods: an accurate correction scheme for electrostatic finite-size effects. J. Chem. Phys. 2013;139:184103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekimoto T, Matubayashi N, Ikeguchi M. Finite-size effect on the charging free energy of protein in explicit solvent. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2014;11:215–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onsager L. Electric moments of molecules in liquids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1936;58:1486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berendsen H, Postma J, van Gunsteren W, et al. Interaction models for water in relation to protein hydration. Pullman B, editor. Intermolecular forces. Dordrecht, Holland: Reidel; 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar M, Simonson T, Ohanessian G, et al. Structure and thermodynamics of Mg:phosphate interactions in water: A simulation study. ChemPhysChem. 2015;16:658–665.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponder JW, Wu CJ, Ren PY, et al. The current status of the AMOEBA polarizable force field. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2010;114:2549–2564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks B, Brooks CL III, Mackerell AD Jr., et al. CHARMM: the biomolecular simulation program. J. Comp. Chem. 2009;30:1545–1614.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aleksandrov A, Simonson T. Molecular dynamics simulations show that conformational selection governs the binding preferences of imatinib for several tyrosine kinases. J. Biol. Chem. 2010;285:13807–13815.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin YL, Meng Y, Jiang W, et al. Explaining why Gleevec is a specific and potent inhibitor of Abl kinase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013;110:1664–1669.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aksimentiev A, Schulten K. Imaging alpha-hemolysin with molecular dynamics: ionic conductance, osmotic permeability, and the electrostatic potential map. Biophys. J. 2005;88:3745–3761.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K. VMD -- visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graph. 1996;14:33–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Im W, Beglov D, Roux B. Continuum solvation model: computation of electrostatic forces from numerical solutions to the Poisson--Boltzmann equation. Comput. Phys. Commun. 1998;111:59–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepherd TR, Hard RL, Murray AM, et al. Distinct ligand specificity of the Tiam1 and Tiam2 PDZ domains. Biochemistry. 2011;50:1296–1308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips JC, Braun R, Wang W, et al. Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. J. Comput. Chem. 2005;26:1781–1802.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muegge I, Qi P, Wand AJ, et al. Reorganization energy of cytochrome c revisited. J. Phys. Chem. B. 1997;101:825–836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tipmanee V, Oberhofer H, Park M, et al. Prediction of reorganization free energies for biological electron transfer: a comparative study of Ru-modified cytochromes and a 4-helix bundle protein. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010;132:17032–17040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bortolotti CA, Siwko ME, Castellini E, et al. The reorganization free energy in cytochrome c is controlled by the accessibility of the heme to solvent. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2011;2:1761–1765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cascella M, Magistrato A, Tavernelli I, et al. Role of protein frame and solvent for the redox properties of azurin from pseudomonas aeruginosa. Proc. National Acad. Sci. USA 2006;103:19641–19646.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paltrinieri L, Borsari M, Ranieri A, et al. The active site loop modulates the reorganization energy of blue copper proteins by controlling the dynamic interplay with solvent. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2013;4:710–715.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aleksandrov A, Schuldt L, Hinrichs W, et al. Tetracycline-Tet Repressor binding specificity: insights from experiments and simulations. Biophys. J. 2009;97:2829–2838.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonson T, Perahia D. Microscopic dielectric properties of cytochrome c from molecular dynamics simulations in aqueous solution. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995;117:7987–8000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonson T, Carlsson J, Case DA. Proton binding to proteins: pKa calculations with explicit and implicit solvent models. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004;126:4167–4180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar