Index of ideality of correlation and correlation contradiction index: a confluent perusal on acetylcholinesterase inhibitors

References

• Dos Santos Picanco LC, Ozela PF, de Fatima de Brito Brito M, et al. Alzheimer’s disease: a review from the pathophysiology to diagnosis, new perspectives for pharmacological treatment. Curr Med Chem. 2018;25(26):3141–3159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norton S, Matthews FE, Barnes DE, et al. Potential for primary prevention of Alzheimer’s disease: an analysis of population-based data. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13(8):788–794.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummings J, Lee G, Mortsdorf T, et al. Alzheimer’s disease drug pipeline: 2017. Alzheimers Dement. 2017;3(3):367–384.
   Google Scholar
• Francis PT, Palmer AM, Snape M, et al. The cholinergic hypothesis of Alzheimer’s disease: a review of progress. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1999;66(2):137–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane CA, Hardy J, Schott JM. Alzheimer’s disease. Eur J Neurol. 2018;25(1):59–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandal S, Moudgil M, Mandal SK. Rational drug design. Eur J Pharmacol. 2009;625(1-3):90–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neves BJ, Braga RC, Melo-Filho CC, et al. QSAR-based virtual screening: advances and applications in drug discovery. Front Pharmacol. 2018;9:1275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdel-Ilah L, Veljovic E, Pokvic G, et al. Applications of QSAR study in drug design. IJERT. 2017;6:582–587.
   Google Scholar
• Vracko M. Advances in mathematical chemistry and applications. Amsterdam: Bentham Science, Elsevier; 2015; p. 222.
   Google Scholar
• Danishuddin KA. Descriptors and their selection methods in QSAR analysis: paradigm for drug design. Drug Discov Today. 2016;21(8):1291–1302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kausar S, Falcao AO. An automated framework for QSAR model building. J Cheminform. 2018;10(1):1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Toropov AA, Benfenati E. SMILES in QSPR/QSAR modeling: results and perspectives. Curr Drug Discov Technol. 2007;4(2):77–116.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Benfenati E, Toropov AA, Toropova AP, et al. CORAL software: QSAR for Anticancer. Agents Chem Biol Drug Des. 2011;77(6):471–476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veselinovic AM, Milosavljevic JB, Toropov AA, et al. SMILES-based QSAR model for arylpiperazines as high-affinity 5-HT1A receptor ligands using CORAL. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2013;48(3):532–541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam A, Pillay TS. Simplified molecular input line entry system-based descriptors in QSAR modeling for HIV-protease inhibitors. Chemom Intell Lab Syst. 2016;153:67–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar A, Chauhan S. Use of the Monte Carlo method for OECD principles-Guided QSAR Modeling of SIRT1 inhibitors. Arch Pharm (Weinheim). 2017;350(1):1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar A, Chauhan S. QSAR differential model for prediction of SIRT1 modulation using monte carlo method. Drug Res. 2017;67(3):156–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar P, Kumar A, Sindhu J, et al. QSAR models for nitrogen containing monophosphonate and bisphosphonate derivatives as human farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase inhibitors based on monte carlo method. Drug Res. 2019;69(3):159–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toropov AA, Toropova AP. CORALSEA; software 2019. Available from: http://insilico.eu/coral.
   Google Scholar
• Weininger D. SMILES, a chemical language and information system. 1. Introduction to methodology and encoding rules. J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 1988;28(1):31–36.
   Google Scholar
• SMILES: a simplified chemical language, May 2019. Available from:https://www.daylight.com/dayhtml/doc/theory/theory.smiles.html.
   Google Scholar
• Toropov AA, Toropova AP, Benfenati E. SMILES-based optimal descriptors: QSAR modeling of carcinogenicity by balance of correlations with ideal slopes. Eur J Med Chem. 2010;45(9):3581–3587.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toropov AA, Toropova AP. The index of ideality of correlation: a criterion of predictive potential of QSPR/QSAR models. Mutat Res. 2017;819:31–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toropov AA, Raska Jr I, Torpova AP, et al. The study of the index of ideality of correlation as new criterion of predictive potential of QSPR/QSAR-models. Sci Total Enviorn. 2019;659:1387–1394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toropov AA, Toropova AP. Predicting cytotoxicity of 2-phenylindole derivatives against breast cancer cells using index of ideality of correlation. Anticancer Res. 2018;38(11):6189–6194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toropov AA, Toropova AP. QSAR as a random event: criteria of predictive potential for a chance model. Struc Chem. 2019;30(5):1677–1683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piplani P, Danta C. Design and synthesis of newer potential 4-(N-acetylamino)phenol derived piperazine derivatives as potential cognition enhancers. Bioorg Chem. 2015;60:64–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulshreshtha A, Piplani P. Ameliorative effects of amide derivatives of 1,3,4-thiadiazoles on scopolamine induced cognitive dysfunction. Eur J Med Chem. 2016;122:557–573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma A, Piplani P. Design and synthesis of some acridine-piperazine hybrids for the improvement of cognitive dysfunction. Chem Biol Drug Des. 2017;90(5):926–935.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piplani P, Sharma M, Mehta P, et al. N-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)-3,4,5-trimethoxybenzamide derivatives as potential memory enhancers: synthesis, biological evaluation and molecular simulation studies. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2018;36(7):1867–1877.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piplani P, Jain A, Devi D, et al. Design, synthesis and pharmacological evaluation of some novel indanone derivatives as acetylcholinesterase inhibitors for the management of cognitive dysfunction. Bioorg Med Chem. 2018;26(1):215–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MarvinSketch v.14.11.17.0. ChemAxon, XhemAxon Kft. Budapest, Hungary; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• O’Boyle NM, Banck M, James CA, et al. Open Babel: an open chemical toolbox. J Cheminform. 2011;3:33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar A, Chauhan S. Monte Carlo method based QSAR modelling of natural lipase inhibitors using hybrid optimal descriptors. SAR QSAR Environ Res. 2017;28(3):179–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nimbhal M, Chauhan S, Kumar P, et al. Development of prediction model for fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase inhibitors using the Monte Carlo method. SAR QSAR Environ Res. 2019;30(3):145–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worachartcheewan A, Mandi P, Prachayasittikul V, et al. Large-scale QSAR study of aromatase inhibitors using SMILES-based descriptors. Chemometr Intell Lab. 2014;138:120–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toropova AP, Toropov AA, Veselinovic AM, et al. Monte Carlo based quantitative structure-activity relationship models for toxicity of organic chemicals to Daphnia magna. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2016;35(11):2691–2697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toropov AA, Toropova AP, Como F, et al. Quantitative structure–activity relationship models for bee toxicity. Toxicol Environ Chem. 2017;99(7-8):1117–1128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toropova AP, Toropov AA, Rasulev BF, et al. QSAR models for ACE-inhibitor activity of tri-peptides based on representation of the molecular structure by graph of atomic orbitals and SMILES. Struct Chem. 2012;23(6):1873–1878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar A, Chauhan S. Use of simplified molecular input line entry system and molecular graph based descriptors in prediction and design of pancreatic lipase inhibitors. Future Med Chem. 2018;10(13):1603–1622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD Document. Guidance document on the validation of (quantitative) 1226 structure activity relationships (Q)SARs models. ENV/JM/MONO. 2007;2(2007):1–154.
   Google Scholar
• Roy K, Kar S, Das RN. Understanding the basics of QSAR for applications in pharmaceutical sciences and risk assessment. San Diego: Academic Press, Elsevier; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Roy PP, Leonard JT, Roy K. Exploring the impact of size of training sets for the development of predictive QSAR models. Chemometr Intell Lab. 2008;90(1):31–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy K. On some aspects of validation of predictive quantitative structure-activity relationship models. Expert Opin Drug Discov. 2007;2(12):1567–1577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chirico N, Gramatica P. Real external predictivity of QSAR models: how to evaluate it? Comparison of different validation criteria and proposal of using the concordance correlation coefficient. J Chem Inf Model. 2011;51(9):2320–2335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gramatica P. On the development and validation of QSAR models. Methods Mol Biol. 2013;930:499–526.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gramatica P. Principles of QSAR models validation: internal and external. QSAR Comb Sci. 2007;26:694–701.
   Google Scholar
• Golbraikh A, Tropsha A. Beware of q2!. J Mol Graph Model. 2002;20(4):269–276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Consonni V, Ballabio D, Todeschini R. Evaluation of model predictive ability by external validation techniques. J Chemometrics. 2010;24(3-4):194–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ojha PK, Mitra I, Das RN, et al. Further exploring rm2 metrics for validation of QSPR models. Chemometr Intell Lab. 2011;107(1):194–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy K, Kar S. The rm2 metrics and regression through origin approach: reliable and useful validation tools for predictive QSAR models (commentary on ‘Is regression through origin useful in external validation of QSAR models?’). Eur J Pharm Sci. 2014;62:111–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shayanfar A, Shayanfar S. Is regression through origin useful in external validation of QSAR models? Eur J Pharm Sci. 2014;59(1):31–35.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aptula N, Jeliazkova G, Schultz TW, et al. The better predictive model: high q2 for the training set or low root mean square error of prediction for the test set? QSAR Comb Sci. 2005;24(3):385–396.
   Google Scholar
• Roy K, Das RN, Ambure P, et al. Be aware of error measures. Further studies on validation of predictive QSAR models. Chemometr Intell Lab. 2016;152:18–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chirico N, Gramatica P. Real external predictivity of QSAR models. Part 2. New intercomparable thresholds for different validation criteria and the need for scatter plot inspection. J Chem Inf Model. 2012;52(8):2044–2058.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gramatica P, Sangion A. A historical excursus on the statistical validation parameters for QSAR models: a clarification concerning metrics and terminology. J Chem Inf Model. 2016;56(6):1127–1131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toropov AA, Toropova AP. Use of the index of ideality of correlation to improve predictive potential for biochemical endpoints. Toxicol Mech Methods. 2019;29(1):43–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toropova AP, Toropov AA. The index of ideality of correlation: improvement of models for toxicity to algae. Nat Prod Res. 2019;33(15):2200–2207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toropova AP, Toropov AA. Does the index of ideality of correlation detect the better model correctly? Mol. Inform. 2019;38:1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toropov AA, Toropova AP. The correlation contradictions index (CCI): building up reliable models of mutagenic potential of silver nanoparticles under different conditions using quasi-SMILES. Sci Total Environ. 2019;681:102–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitra I, Saha A, Roy K. Exploring quantitative structure–activity relationship studies of antioxidant phenolic compounds obtained from traditional Chinese medicinal plants. Mol Simulat. 2010;36(13):1067–1079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy K, Kar S, Ambure P. On a simple approach for determining applicability domain of QSAR models. Chemometr Intell Lab. 2015;145:22–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veselinović JB, Veselinovic AM, Toropova AP, et al. The Monte Carlo technique as a tool to predict LOAEL. Eur J Med Chem. 2016;116:71–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trott O, Olson AJ. Autodock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. J Comput Chem. 2010;31(2):455–461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung J, Gary EN, Shiomi K, et al. Structures of human acetylcholinesterase bound to dihydrotanshinone I and territrem B show peripheral site flexibility. ACS Med Chem Lett. 2013;4(11):1091–1096.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dassault Systèmes BIOVIA. Discovery Studio, 2019. San Diego: Dassault Systèmes; 2019.
   Google Scholar