Fast transport of water in carbon nanotubes: a review of current accomplishments and challenges

References

• Zhong J, Alibakhshi MA, Xie Q, et al. Exploring anomalous fluid behavior at the nanoscale: direct visualization and quantification via nanofluidic devices. Acc Chem Res. 2020;55(2):347–357.
   Google Scholar
• Eijkel JC, Van Den Berg A. Nanofluidics: what is it and what can we expect from it? Microfluid Nanofluidics. 2005;1(3):249–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bocquet L. Nanofluidics coming of age. Nat Mater. 2020;19(3):254–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agre P. The aquaporin water channels. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2006;3(1):5–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zeidel ML, Ambudkar SV, Smith BL, et al. Reconstitution of functional water channels in liposomes containing purified red cell chip28 protein. Biochemistry. 1992;31(33):7436–7440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radha B, Esfandiar A, Wang F, et al. Molecular transport through capillaries made with atomic-scale precision. Nature. 2016;538(7624):222–225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Wen L, Jiang L. Bioinspired smart asymmetric nanochannel membranes. Chem Soc Rev. 2018;47(2):322–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bocquet L, Charlaix E. Nanofluidics, from bulk to interfaces. Chem Soc Rev. 2010;39(3):1073–1095.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russo A, Durán-Olivencia MA, Kalliadasis S, et al. Macroscopic relations for microscopic properties at the interface between solid substrates and dense fluids. J Chem Phys. 2019;150(21):214705.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X, Cao G, Han A, et al. Nanoscale fluid transport: size and rate effects. Nano Lett. 2008;8(9):2988–2992.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas JA, McGaughey AJ, Kuter-Arnebeck O. Pressure-driven water flow through carbon nanotubes: insights from molecular dynamics simulation. Int J Thermal Sci. 2010;49(2):281–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas JA, McGaughey AJ. Reassessing fast water transport through carbon nanotubes. Nano Lett. 2008;8(9):2788–2793.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas JA, McGaughey AJ. Water flow in carbon nanotubes: transition to subcontinuum transport. Phys Rev Lett. 2009;102(18):184502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholls WD, Borg MK, Lockerby DA, et al. Water transport through (7,7) carbon nanotubes of different lengths using molecular dynamics. Microfluid Nanofluidics. 2012;12(1-4):257–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu B, Li Y, Park T, et al. Effect of wall roughness on fluid transport resistance in nanopores. J Chem Phys. 2011;135(14):144703.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu B, Wu R, Law AWK, et al. Channel morphology effect on water transport through graphene bilayers. Sci Rep. 2016;6:38583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daivis PJ, Todd BD. Challenges in nanofluidics-beyond Navier–Stokes at the molecular scale. Processes. 2018;6(9):144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kannam SK, Daivis PJ, Todd B. Modeling slip and flow enhancement of water in carbon nanotubes. MRS Bull. 2017;42(4):283–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasek J, Drbohlavova J, Chomoucka J, et al. Methods for carbon nanotubes synthesis – review. J Mater Chem. 2011;21(40):15872–15884.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iijima S. Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon. Nature. 1991;354(6348):56–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saito R, Dresselhaus G, Dresselhaus MS, et al. Physical properties of carbon nanotubes. Vol. 35. London: Imperial College Press, Imperial College; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Dresselhaus MS, Dresselhaus G, Eklund P, et al. Carbon nanotubes. Dordrecht: Springer; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Dresselhaus M. Down the straight and narrow. Nature. 1992;358:195–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hummer G, Rasaiah JC, Noworyta JP. Water conduction through the hydrophobic channel of a carbon nanotube. Nature. 2001;414(6860):188–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murata K, Mitsuoka K, Hirai T, et al. Structural determinants of water permeation through aquaporin-1. Nature. 2000;407(6804):599–605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sui H, Han BG, Lee JK, et al. Structural basis of water-specific transport through the AQP1 water channel. Nature. 2001;414(6866):872–878.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agre P, Borgnia MJ, Yasui M, et al. Discovery of the aquaporins and their impact on basic and clinical physiology. Curr Top Membr. 2001;51:1–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgnia M, Nielsen S, Engel A, et al. Cellular and molecular biology of the aquaporin water channels. Ann Rev Biochem. 1999;68(1):425–458.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Majumder M, Chopra N, Andrews R, et al. Nanoscale hydrodynamics: enhanced flow in carbon nanotubes. Nature. 2005;438(7064):44–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falk K, Sedlmeier F, Joly L, et al. Molecular origin of fast water transport in carbon nanotube membranes: superlubricity versus curvature dependent friction. Nano Lett. 2010;10(10):4067–4073.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falk K, Sedlmeier F, Joly L, et al. Ultralow liquid/solid friction in carbon nanotubes: comprehensive theory for alcohols, alkanes, omcts, and water. Langmuir. 2012;28(40):14261–14272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalra A, Garde S, Hummer G. Osmotic water transport through carbon nanotube membranes. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2003;100(18):10175–10180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosa SA, Al-Zhrani G, Salam MA. Removal of heavy metals from aqueous solutions by multi-walled carbon nanotubes modified with 8-hydroxyquinoline. Chem Eng J. 2012;181–182:159–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salam MA. Coating carbon nanotubes with crystalline manganese dioxide nanoparticles and their application for lead ions removal from model and real water. Colloids Surf A. 2013;419:69–79.
   Google Scholar
• Upadhyayula VK, Deng S, Mitchell MC, et al. Application of carbon nanotube technology for removal of contaminants in drinking water: a review. Sci Total Environ. 2009;408(1):1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mostafavi S, Mehrnia M, Rashidi A. Preparation of nanofilter from carbon nanotubes for application in virus removal from water. Desalination. 2009;238(1–3):271–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornasiero F, Park HG, Holt JK, et al. Ion exclusion by sub-2-nm carbon nanotube pores. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2008;105(45):17250–17255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vatanpour V, Madaeni SS, Moradian R, et al. Fabrication and characterization of novel antifouling nanofiltration membrane prepared from oxidized multiwalled carbon nanotube/polyethersulfone nanocomposite. J Membr Sci. 2011;375(1–2):284–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh S, Sood A, Kumar N. Carbon nanotube flow sensors. Science. 2003;299(5609):1042–1044.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt JK, Park HG, Wang Y, et al. Fast mass transport through sub-2-nanometer carbon nanotubes. Science. 2006;312(5776):1034–1037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corry B. Designing carbon nanotube membranes for efficient water desalination. J Phys Chem B. 2008;112(5):1427–1434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majumder M, Corry B. Anomalous decline of water transport in covalently modified carbon nanotube membranes. Chem Commun. 2011;47(27):7683–7685.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goh P, Ismail A, Ng B. Carbon nanotubes for desalination: performance evaluation and current hurdles. Desalination. 2013;308:2–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semiat R. Energy issues in desalination processes. Environ Sci Technol. 2008;42(22):8193–8201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elimelech M, Phillip WA. The future of seawater desalination: energy, technology, and the environment. Science. 2011;333(6043):712–717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritzmann C, Löwenberg J, Wintgens T, et al. State-of-the-art of reverse osmosis desalination. Desalination. 2007;216(1–3):1–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sablani S, Goosen M, Al-Belushi R, et al. Concentration polarization in ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis: a critical review. Desalination. 2001;141(3):269–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maskan F, Wiley DE, Johnston LP, et al. Optimal design of reverse osmosis module networks. AIChE J. 2000;46(5):946–954.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han Y, Xu Z, Gao C. Ultrathin graphene nanofiltration membrane for water purification. Adv Funct Mater. 2013;23(29):3693–3700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong SS, Joselevich E, Woolley AT, et al. Covalently functionalized nanotubes as nanometre-sized probes in chemistry and biology. Nature. 1998;394(6688):52–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordillo M, Martı J. Hydrogen bond structure of liquid water confined in nanotubes. Chem Phys Lett. 2000;329(5–6):341–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koga K, Gao G, Tanaka H, et al. Formation of ordered ice nanotubes inside carbon nanotubes. Nature. 2001;412(6849):802–805.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marti J, Gordillo M. Temperature effects on the static and dynamic properties of liquid water inside nanotubes. Phys Rev E. 2001;64(2):021504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther JH, Jaffe R, Halicioglu T, et al. Carbon nanotubes in water: structural characteristics and energetics. J Phys Chem B. 2001;105(41):9980–9987.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werder T, Walther JH, Jaffe RL, et al. Molecular dynamics simulation of contact angles of water droplets in carbon nanotubes. Nano Lett. 2001;1(12):697–702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noon WH, Ausman KD, Smalley RE, et al. Helical ice-sheets inside carbon nanotubes in the physiological condition. Chem Phys Lett. 2002;355(5–6):445–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascal TA, Goddard WA, Jung Y. Entropy and the driving force for the filling of carbon nanotubes with water. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2011;108(29):11794–11798.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorgensen WL, Madura JD. Temperature and size dependence for monte carlo simulations of TIP4P water. Mol Phys. 1985;56(6):1381–1392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prada-Gracia D, Shevchuk R, Rao F. The quest for self-consistency in hydrogen bond definitions. J Chem Phys. 2013;139(8):084501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartkamp R, Coasne B. Structure and transport of aqueous electrolytes: from simple halides to radionuclide ions. J Chem Phys. 2014;141(12):124508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berezhkovskii A, Hummer G. Single-file transport of water molecules through a carbon nanotube. Phys Rev Lett. 2002;89(6):064503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hummer G. Water, proton, and ion transport: from nanotubes to proteins. Mol Phys. 2007;105(2-3):201–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cambré S, Schoeters B, Luyckx S, et al. Experimental observation of single-file water filling of thin single-wall carbon nanotubes down to chiral index (5,3). Phys Rev Lett. 2010;104(20):207401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borg MK, Lockerby DA, Ritos K, et al. Multiscale simulation of water flow through laboratory-scale nanotube membranes. J Membr Sci. 2018;567:115–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Striolo A, Michaelides A, Joly L. The carbon-water interface: modeling challenges and opportunities for the water-energy nexus. Ann Rev Chem Biomol Eng. 2016;7:533–556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biedermann F, Nau WM, Schneider HJ. The hydrophobic effect revisited-studies with supramolecular complexes imply high-energy water as a noncovalent driving force. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2014;53(42):11158–11171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sam A, Hartkamp R, Kannam SK, et al. Prediction of fluid slip in cylindrical nanopores using equilibrium molecular simulations. Nanotechnology. 2018;29(48):485404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navier C. Mémoire sur les lois du mouvement des fluides. Mém Acad Sci Inst France. 1823;6:389–440.
   Google Scholar
• Sam A, Prasad V, Sathian SP. Water flow in carbon nanotubes: the role of tube chirality. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2019;21(12):6566–6573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin X, Yuan Q, Zhao Y, et al. Measurement of the rate of water translocation through carbon nanotubes. Nano Lett. 2011;11(5):2173–2177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du F, Qu L, Xia Z, et al. Membranes of vertically aligned superlong carbon nanotubes. Langmuir. 2011;27(13):8437–8443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotsalis E, Walther J, Koumoutsakos P. Multiphase water flow inside carbon nanotubes. Int J Multiphase Flow. 2004;30(7–8):995–1010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph S, Aluru N. Why are carbon nanotubes fast transporters of water? Nano Lett. 2008;8(2):452–458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babu JS, Sathian SP. The role of activation energy and reduced viscosity on the enhancement of water flow through carbon nanotubes. J Chem Phys. 2011;134(19):194509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kannam SK, Todd B, Hansen JS, et al. How fast does water flow in carbon nanotubes? J Chem Phys. 2013;138(9):094701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Secchi E, Marbach S, Niguès A, et al. Massive radius-dependent flow slippage in carbon nanotubes. Nature. 2016;537(7619):210–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govind Rajan A, Strano MS, Blankschtein D. Liquids with lower wettability can exhibit higher friction on hexagonal boron nitride: the intriguing role of solid–liquid electrostatic interactions. Nano Lett. 2019;19(3):1539–1551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siria A, Bocquet ML, Bocquet L. New avenues for the large-scale harvesting of blue energy. Nat Rev Chem. 2017;1(11):1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iijima S, Ajayan P, Ichihashi T. Growth model for carbon nanotubes. Phys Rev Lett. 1992;69(21):3100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebbesen T, Ajayan P. Large-scale synthesis of carbon nanotubes. Nature. 1992;358(6383):220–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iijima S, Ichihashi T. Single-shell carbon nanotubes of 1-nm diameter. 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Bethune D, Klang C, De Vries M, et al. Cobalt-catalysed growth of carbon nanotubes with single-atomic-layer walls. 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Liu C, Cong H, Li F, et al. Semi-continuous synthesis of single-walled carbon nanotubes by a hydrogen arc discharge method. Carbon. 1999;37(11):1865–1868.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antisari MV, Marazzi R, Krsmanovic R. Synthesis of multiwall carbon nanotubes by electric arc discharge in liquid environments. Carbon. 2003;41(12):2393–2401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu Hw, Jiang B, Xu Cl, et al. Synthesis of high quality single-walled carbon nanotube silks by the arc discharge technique. J Phys Chem B. 2003;107(27):6514–6518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H, Guan L, Shi Z, et al. Direct synthesis of high purity single-walled carbon nanotube fibers by arc discharge. J Phys Chem B. 2004;108(15):4573–4575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Journet C, Maser W, Bernier P, et al. Large-scale production of single-walled carbon nanotubes by the electric-arc technique. Nature. 1997;388(6644):756–758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thess A, Lee R, Nikolaev P, et al. Crystalline ropes of metallic carbon nanotubes. Science. 1996;273(5274):483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braidy N, El Khakani M, Botton G. Carbon nanotubular structures synthesis by means of ultraviolet laser ablation. J Mater Res. 2002;17(09):2189–2192.
   Google Scholar
• Takahashi S, Ikuno T, Oyama T, et al. Synthesis and characterization of carbon nanotubes grown on carbon particles by using high vacuum laser ablation. (Japanese title: Kō shinkū rēzāaburēshon o shiyō shite tanso ryūshi-jō ni seichōshita kābon'nanochūbu no gōsei to tokusei hyōka). J Vac Soc Jpn. 2002;45:609–612.
   Google Scholar
• Vander Wal R, Berger G, Ticich T. Carbon nanotube synthesis in a flame using laser ablation for in situ catalyst generation. Appl Phys A. 2003;77(7):885–889.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• José-Yacamán M, Miki-Yoshida M, Rendon L, et al. Catalytic growth of carbon microtubules with fullerene structure. Appl Phys Lett. 1993;62(2):202–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li W, Xie S, Qian L, et al. Large-scale synthesis of aligned carbon nanotubes. Science. 1996;274(5293):1701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin L. Cvd synthesis of carbon nanotubes. J Mater Sci Lett. 1997;16(6):457–459.
   Google Scholar
• Choi YC, Bae DJ, Lee YH, et al. Growth of carbon nanotubes by microwave plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition at low temperature. J Vac Sci Technol A. 2000;18(4):1864–1868.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varadan VK, Xie J. Large-scale synthesis of multi-walled carbon nanotubes by microwave CVD. Smart Mater Struct. 2002;11(4):610.
   Google Scholar
• Chatterjee A, Sharon M, Banerjee R, et al. CVD synthesis of carbon nanotubes using a finely dispersed cobalt catalyst and their use in double layer electrochemical capacitors. Electrochim Acta. 2003;48(23):3439–3446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park D, Kim YH, Lee JK. Synthesis of carbon nanotubes on metallic substrates by a sequential combination of pecvd and thermal CVD. Carbon. 2003;41(5):1025–1029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaisitsak S, Yamada A, Konagai M. Hot filament enhanced CVD synthesis of carbon nanotubes by using a carbon filament. Diam Relat Mater. 2004;13(3):438–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidel R, Duesberg GS, Unger E, et al. Chemical vapor deposition growth of single-walled carbon nanotubes at 600∘C and a simple growth model. J Phys Chem B. 2004;108(6):1888–1893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das R, Ali ME, Hamid SBA, et al. Carbon nanotube membranes for water purification: a bright future in water desalination. Desalination. 2014;336:97–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li S, Liao G, Liu Z, et al. Enhanced water flux in vertically aligned carbon nanotube arrays and polyethersulfone composite membranes. J Mater Chem A. 2014;2(31):12171–12176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamada T, Namai T, Hata K, et al. Size-selective growth of double-walled carbon nanotube forests from engineered iron catalysts. Nat Nanotechnol. 2006;1(2):131–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiramatsu M, Deguchi T, Nagao H, et al. Aligned growth of single-walled and double-walled carbon nanotube films by control of catalyst preparation. Jap J Appl Phys. 2007;46(4L):L303.
   Google Scholar
• Hinds BJ, Chopra N, Rantell T, et al. Aligned multiwalled carbon nanotube membranes. Science. 2004;303(5654):62–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt JK, Noy A, Huser T, et al. Fabrication of a carbon nanotube-embedded silicon nitride membrane for studies of nanometer-scale mass transport. Nano Lett. 2004;4(11):2245–2250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majumder M, Chopra N, Hinds BJ. Mass transport through carbon nanotube membranes in three different regimes: ionic diffusion and gas and liquid flow. ACS Nano. 2011;5(5):3867–3877.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitby M, Cagnon L, Thanou M, et al. Enhanced fluid flow through nanoscale carbon pipes. Nano Lett. 2008;8(9):2632–2637.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figueras L, Faraudo J. Competition between hydrogen bonding and electric field in single-file transport of water in carbon nanotubes. Mol Simul. 2012;38(1):23–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen JS, Todd B, Daivis PJ. Prediction of fluid velocity slip at solid surfaces. Phys Rev E. 2011;84(1):016313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu YC, Shen JW, Gubbins KE, et al. Diffusion dynamics of water controlled by topology of potential energy surface inside carbon nanotubes. Phys Rev B. 2008;77(12):125438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vijayaraghavan V, Wong C. Transport characteristics of water molecules in carbon nanotubes investigated by using molecular dynamics simulation. Comput Mater Sci. 2014;89:36–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu L, Patey G. Simulations of water transport through carbon nanotubes: how different water models influence the conduction rate. J Chem Phys. 2014;141(18):18C518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu L, Patey G. Simulated conduction rates of water through a (6,6) carbon nanotube strongly depend on bulk properties of the model employed. J Chem Phys. 2016;144(18):184502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Losey J, Kannam SK, Todd B, et al. Flow of water through carbon nanotubes predicted by different atomistic water models. J Chem Phys. 2019;150(19):194501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popadić A, Walther JH, Koumoutsakos P, et al. Continuum simulations of water flow in carbon nanotube membranes. New J Phys. 2014;16(8):082001.
   Google Scholar
• Myers TG. Why are slip lengths so large in carbon nanotubes? Microfluid Nanofluidics. 2011;10(5):1141–1145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattia D, Calabrò F. Explaining high flow rate of water in carbon nanotubes via solid–liquid molecular interactions. Microfluid Nanofluidics. 2012;13(1):125–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexiadis A, Kassinos S. Molecular simulation of water in carbon nanotubes. Chem Rev. 2008;108(12):5014–5034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markesteijn A, Hartkamp R, Luding S, et al. A comparison of the value of viscosity for several water models using poiseuille flow in a nano-channel. J Chem Phys. 2012;136(13):134104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thekkethala JF, Sathian SP. The effect of graphene layers on interfacial thermal resistance in composite nanochannels with flow. Microfluid Nanofluidics. 2015;18(4):637–648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie Q, Alibakhshi MA, Jiao S, et al. Fast water transport in graphene nanofluidic channels. Nat Nanotechnol. 2018;13(3):238–245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lokesh M, Youn SK, Park HG. Osmotic transport across surface functionalized carbon nanotube membrane. Nano Lett. 2018;18(11):6679–6685.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao R, Pint CL, Islam AE, et al. Carbon nanotubes and related nanomaterials: critical advances and challenges for synthesis toward mainstream commercial applications. ACS Nano. 2018;12(12):11756–11784.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim S, Jinschek JR, Chen H, et al. Scalable fabrication of carbon nanotube/polymer nanocomposite membranes for high flux gas transport. Nano Lett. 2007;7(9):2806–2811.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu M, Funke HH, Falconer JL, et al. High density, vertically-aligned carbon nanotube membranes. Nano Lett. 2008;9(1):225–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tocci G, Joly L, Michaelides A. Friction of water on graphene and hexagonal boron nitride from ab initio methods: very different slippage despite very similar interface structures. Nano Lett. 2014;14(12):6872–6877.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokoloff J. Enhancement of the water flow velocity through carbon nanotubes resulting from the radius dependence of the friction due to electron excitations. Phys Rev E. 2018;97(3):033107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaelides A. Nanoscience: slippery when narrow. Nature. 2016;537(7619):171–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velioğlu S, Karahan HE, Goh K, et al. Metallicity-dependent ultrafast water transport in carbon nanotubes. Small. 2020;1907575. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201907575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saito R, Fujita M, Dresselhaus G, et al. Electronic structure of chiral graphene tubules. Appl Phys Lett. 1992;60(18):2204–2206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louie SG. Electronic properties, junctions, and defects of carbon nanotubes. In: Carbon nanotubes. Berlin: Springer; 2001. p. 113–145.
   Google Scholar
• Tans SJ, Devoret MH, Dai H, et al. Individual single-wall carbon nanotubes as quantum wires. Nature. 1997;386(6624):474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintmire JW, Dunlap B, White C. Are fullerene tubules metallic? Phys Rev Lett. 1992;68(5):631.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamada N, Sawada Si, Oshiyama A. New one-dimensional conductors: graphitic microtubules. Phys Rev Lett. 1992;68(10):1579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goh K, Chen Y. Controlling water transport in carbon nanotubes. Nano Today. 2017;14:13–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J, Wang C, Tu X, et al. Chirality-controlled synthesis of single-wall carbon nanotubes using vapour-phase epitaxy. Nat Commun. 2012;3:1199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang F, Wang X, Zhang D, et al. Chirality-specific growth of single-walled carbon nanotubes on solid alloy catalysts. Nature. 2014;510(7506):522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu B, Liu J, Tu X, et al. Chirality-dependent vapor-phase epitaxial growth and termination of single-wall carbon nanotubes. Nano Lett. 2013;13(9):4416–4421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu M, Vegas AJ, Anderson DG, et al. Combinatorial synthesis with high throughput discovery of protein-resistant membrane surfaces. Biomaterials. 2013;34(26):6133–6138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imbrogno J, Williams MD, Belfort G. A new combinatorial method for synthesizing, screening, and discovering antifouling surface chemistries. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2015;7(4):2385–2392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park SM, Jung J, Lee S, et al. Fouling and rejection behavior of carbon nanotube membranes. Desalination. 2014;343:180–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Travis KP, Todd B, Evans DJ. Departure from Navier–Stokes hydrodynamics in confined liquids. Phys Rev E. 1997;55(4):4288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Travis KP, Gubbins KE. Poiseuille flow of Lennard–Jones fluids in narrow slit pores. J Chem Phys. 2000;112(4):1984–1994.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todd B, Hansen J. Nonlocal viscous transport and the effect on fluid stress. Phys Rev E. 2008;78(5):051202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todd B, Hansen J, Daivis PJ. Nonlocal shear stress for homogeneous fluids. Phys Rev Lett. 2008;100(19):195901.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton BA, Daivis PJ, Hansen JS, et al. Effects of nanoscale density inhomogeneities on shearing fluids. Phys Rev E. 2013;88(5):052143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glavatskiy KS, Dalton BA, Daivis PJ, et al. Nonlocal response functions for predicting shear flow of strongly inhomogeneous fluids. I. Sinusoidally driven shear and sinusoidally driven inhomogeneity. Phys Rev E. 2015;91(6):062132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton BA, Glavatskiy KS, Daivis PJ, et al. Nonlocal response functions for predicting shear flow of strongly inhomogeneous fluids. II. Sinusoidally driven shear and multisinusoidal inhomogeneity. Phys Rev E. 2015;92(1):012108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton BA, Glavatskiy KS, Daivis PJ, et al. Linear and nonlinear density response functions for a simple atomic fluid. J Chem Phys. 2013;139(4):044510.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Wang Q. Transport behavior of water confined in carbon nanotubes. Phys Rev B. 2005;72(8):085420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Wang Q, Wu T, et al. Fluid structure and transport properties of water inside carbon nanotubes. J Chem Phys. 2005;123(23):234701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye H, Zhang H, Zhang Z, et al. Size and temperature effects on the viscosity of water inside carbon nanotubes. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2011;6(1):1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Ye H, Zheng Y, et al. Prediction of the viscosity of water confined in carbon nanotubes. Microfluid Nanofluidics. 2011;10(2):403–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu K, Chen Z, Li J, et al. Wettability effect on nanoconfined water flow. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2017;114(13):3358–3363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neek-Amal M, Peeters FM, Grigorieva IV, et al. Commensurability effects in viscosity of nanoconfined water. ACS Nano. 2016;10(3):3685–3692.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Xu J, Wang S, et al. Quantitative relationship between fluid inhomogeneities and flow enhancement in nanotubes. Nanoscale. 2017;9(20):6777–6782.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaat M, Zheng Y. Fluidity and phase transitions of water in hydrophobic and hydrophilic nanotubes. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):5689.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Feng D, Li X, Wang X, et al. Capillary filling of confined water in nanopores: coupling the increased viscosity and slippage. Chem Eng Sci. 2018;186:228–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camargo D, de la Torre JA, Duque-Zumajo D, et al. Nanoscale hydrodynamics near solids. J Chem Phys. 2018;148(6):064107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camargo D, de la Torre JA, Delgado-Buscalioni R, et al. Boundary conditions derived from a microscopic theory of hydrodynamics near solids. J Chem Phys. 2019;150(14):144104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardi S, Todd B, Searles DJ. Thermostating highly confined fluids. J Chem Phys. 2010;132(24):244706.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sam A, Kannam SK, Hartkamp R, et al. Water flow in carbon nanotubes: the effect of tube flexibility and thermostat. J Chem Phys. 2017;146(23):234701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma M, Grey F, Shen L, et al. Water transport inside carbon nanotubes mediated by phonon-induced oscillating friction. Nat Nanotechnol. 2015;10(8):692.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao W, Wang J, Ma M. Carbon nanostructure based mechano-nanofluidics. J Micromech Microeng. 2018;28(3):033001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao W, Wang J, Ma M. Water diffusion in wiggling graphene membranes. J Phys Chem Lett. 2019;10(22):7251–7258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas M, Corry B. Thermostat choice significantly influences water flow rates in molecular dynamics studies of carbon nanotubes. Microfluid Nanofluidics. 2015;18(1):41–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vega C, Abascal JL. Simulating water with rigid non-polarizable models: a general perspective. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2011;13(44):19663–19688.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celebi AT, Nguyen CT, Hartkamp R, et al. The role of water models on the prediction of slip length of water in graphene nanochannels. J Chem Phys. 2019;151(17):174705.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasad V, Kannam SK, Hartkamp R, et al. Water desalination using graphene nanopores: influence of the water models used in simulations. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2018;20(23):16005–16011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melillo M, Zhu F, Snyder MA, et al. Water transport through nanotubes with varying interaction strength between tube wall and water. J Phys Chem Lett. 2011;2(23):2978–2983.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen C, Guo W. Manipulation of long-range water ordering in less confined nanotubes. J Phys Chem C. 2019;123(15):10101–10106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie Y, Fu L, Joly L. Liquid–solid slip on charged walls: dramatic impact of charge distribution. Preprint 2020. arXiv:200202444.
   Google Scholar
• Wang C, Yang H, Wang X, et al. Unexpected large impact of small charges on surface frictions with similar wetting properties. Commun Chem. 2020;3(1):1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf D, Keblinski P, Phillpot S, et al. Exact method for the simulation of Coulombic systems by spherically truncated, pairwise r-1 summation. J Chem Phys. 1999;110(17):8254–8282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewald PP. Ewald summation. Ann Phys. 1921;369:253.
   Google Scholar
• Yeh IC, Berkowitz ML. Ewald summation for systems with slab geometry. J Chem Phys. 1999;111(7):3155–3162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sisan TB, Lichter S. The end of nanochannels. Microfluid Nanofluidics. 2011;11(6):787–791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joly L. Capillary filling with giant liquid/solid slip: dynamics of water uptake by carbon nanotubes. J Chem Phys. 2011;135(21):214705.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther JH, Ritos K, Cruz-Chu ER, et al. Barriers to superfast water transport in carbon nanotube membranes. Nano Lett. 2013;13(5):1910–1914.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gravelle S, Joly L, Detcheverry F, et al. Optimizing water permeability through the hourglass shape of aquaporins. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2013;110(41):16367–16372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gravelle S, Joly L, Ybert C, et al. Large permeabilities of hourglass nanopores: from hydrodynamics to single file transport. J Chem Phys. 2014;141(18):18C526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang D, Yoo YE, Kim D. Molecular dynamics simulations on water permeation through hourglass-shaped nanopores with varying pore geometry. Chem Phys. 2015;453:13–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Zhou W, Xu F, et al. Resistance of water transport in carbon nanotube membranes. Nanoscale. 2018;10(27):13242–13249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kannam SK, Todd B, Hansen JS, et al. Slip length of water on graphene: limitations of non-equilibrium molecular dynamics simulations. J Chem Phys. 2012;136(2):024705.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bocquet L, Barrat JL. Hydrodynamic boundary conditions, correlation functions, and kubo relations for confined fluids. Phys Rev E. 1994;49(4):3079.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokhan V, Nicholson D, Quirke N. Fluid flow in nanopores: an examination of hydrodynamic boundary conditions. J Chem Phys. 2001;115(8):3878–3887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokhan VP, Nicholson D, Quirke N. Fluid flow in nanopores: accurate boundary conditions for carbon nanotubes. J Chem Phys. 2002;117(18):8531–8539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen S, Wang H, Qian T, et al. Determining hydrodynamic boundary conditions from equilibrium fluctuations. Phys Rev E. 2015;92(4):043007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kannam SK, Todd B, Hansen JS, et al. Slip flow in graphene nanochannels. J Chem Phys. 2011;135(14):144701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kannam SK, Todd B, Hansen JS, et al. Interfacial slip friction at a fluid-solid cylindrical boundary. J Chem Phys. 2012;136(24):244704.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oga H, Yamaguchi Y, Omori T, et al. Green-kubo measurement of liquid-solid friction in finite-size systems. J Chem Phys. 2019;151(5):054502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petravic J, Harrowell P. On the equilibrium calculation of the friction coefficient for liquid slip against a wall. J Chem Phys. 2007;127(17):174706.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang K, Szlufarska I. Green-kubo relation for friction at liquid-solid interfaces. Phys Rev E. 2014;89(3):032119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokhan VP, Quirke N. Slip coefficient in nanoscale pore flow. Phys Rev E. 2008;78(1):015301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokhan VP, Quirke N. Interfacial friction and collective diffusion in nanopores. Mol Simul. 2004;30(4):217–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groombridge M, Schneemilch M, Quirke N. Slip boundaries in nanopores. Mol Simul. 2011;37(12):1023–1030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma MD, Shen L, Sheridan J, et al. Friction of water slipping in carbon nanotubes. Phys Rev E. 2011;83(3):036316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su J, Guo H. Effect of nanochannel dimension on the transport of water molecules. J Phys Chem B. 2012;116(20):5925–5932.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar