The calibration for many-body dissipative particle dynamics by using back-propagation neural networks

References

• Español P, Warren PB. Perspective: dissipative particle dynamics. J Chem Phys. 2017;146:1–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mai-Duy N, Phan-Thien N, Tran-Cong T. An improved dissipative particle dynamics scheme. Appl Math Model. 2017;46:602–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mai-Duy N, Phan-Thien N, Tran-Cong T. Imposition of physical parameters in dissipative particle dynamics. Comput Phys Commun. 2017;221:290–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh C. Theoretical aspects of dissipative particle dynamics. Reviews in Computational Chemistry; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Li Z, Tang Y-H, Lei H, et al. Energy-conserving dissipative particle dynamics with temperature-dependent properties. J Comput Phys. 2014;265:113–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krafnick RC, García A. Efficient schmidt number scaling in dissipative particle dynamics. J Chem Phys. 2015;143:243106.
   Google Scholar
• Warren BP. Vapor-liquid coexistence in many-body dissipative particle dynamics. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlinear Soft Matter Phys. 2003;68:066702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pagonabarraga I, Frenkel D. Dissipative particle dynamics for interacting systems. J Chem Phys. 2001;115:5015–5026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avalos JB, Lísal M, Larentzos JP, et al. Generalised dissipative particle dynamics with energy conservation: density- and temperature-dependent potentials. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2019;21:24891–24911.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avalos JB, Lísal M, Larentzos JP, et al. Generalized energy-conserving dissipative particle dynamics revisited: insight from the thermodynamics of the mesoparticle leading to an alternative heat flow model. Phys Rev E. 2021;103:062128.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao J, Chen S, Zhang K, et al. A review of many-body dissipative particle dynamics (MDPD): theoretical models and its applications. Phys Fluids. 2021;33:112002.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao J, Chen S, Liu. Y. Spontaneous wetting transition of droplet coalescence on immersed micropillared surfaces. Appl Math Model. 2018;63:390–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang K, Li Z, Maxey M, et al. Self-cleaning of hydrophobic rough surfaces by coalescence-induced wetting transition. Langmuir. 2019;36:2431–2442.
   Google Scholar
• Wang C, Wu X, Zhang H, et al. A many-body dissipative particle dynamics study of eccentric droplets impacting inclined fiber. Phys Fluids. 2021;33:042001.
   Google Scholar
• Chen C, Lu K, Li X, et al. A many-body dissipative particle dynamics study of fluid-fluid spontaneous capillary displacement. RSC Adv. 2014;4:6545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu K-C, Tsao H-K, Sheng Y-J. Penetration dynamics through nanometer-scale hydrophilic capillaries: beyond Washburn's equation and extended menisci – Sciencedirect. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2019;538:340–348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nie Q, Zhong Y, Fang H. Study of a nanodroplet breakup through many-body dissipative particle dynamics. Phys Fluids. 2019;31:042007.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao J, Zhou N, Zhang K, et al. Rupture process of liquid bridges: the effects of thermal fluctuations. Phys Rev E. 2020;102:023116.
   Google Scholar
• Jiayi Z, Shuo C, Phan-Thien N. Viscometric flow for a many-body dissipative particle dynamics (MDPD) fluid with Lees-Edwards boundary condition. Mol Simul. 2018;44:213–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanya P, Crout P, Sharman J, et al. Liquid phase parameterisation and solidification in many-body dissipative particle dynamics. Phys Rev E. 2018;98:033310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao Q, Xia Y, Li J, et al. A modified many-body dissipative particle dynamics model for mesoscopic fluid simulation: methodology, calibration, and application for hydrocarbon and water. Mol Simul. 2021;47:363–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rupp M, Tkatchenko A, Müller K, et al. Fast and accurate modeling of molecular atomization energies with machine learning. Phys Rev Lett. 2012;108:058301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brockherde F, Vogt L, Li L, et al. By-passing the Kohn-Sham equations with machine learning. Nat Commun. 2016;8:A1133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Hong W, Cao B. Machine learning for predicting thermodynamic properties of pure fluids and their mixtures. Energy. 2019;188:116091.
   Google Scholar
• Arienti M, Pan W, Li X, et al. Many-body dissipative particle dynamics simulation of liquid/vapor and liquid/solid interactions. J Chem Phys. 2011;134:026704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamali S, Boromand A, Khani S, et al. Generalized mapping of multi-body dissipative particle dynamics onto fluid compressibility and the flory-huggins theory. J Chem Phys. 2015;142:164902.
   Google Scholar
• Rumelhart DE, Hinton GE, Williams R. Learning representations by back propagating errors. Nature. 1986;323:533–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen XQ, Luo SB, Wang ZG, et al. Research on preprocessing and postprocessing of the application of bp neural network. Xitong Gongcheng Lilun Yu Shijian/System Engineering Theory and Practice. 2002;22:65–66.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao W, Li J, Zhao J, et al. Research on evaporation duct height prediction based on back propagation neural network. IET Microwaves, Antennas Propagation. 2020;14:1547–1554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingma D, Ba J. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. Computer Science. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Bai Y, Chen M, Zhou P. How important is the train-validation split in meta-learning?. International Conference on Machine Learning; 2021. p. 543–553.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang W, Zhu L, Kou J. Machine learning methods for turbulence modeling in subsonic flows over airfoils. Phys Fluids. 2019;31(1):015105.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao R, Wang Y, Hu P, et al. Selfish Herds optimization algorithm with orthogonal design and information update for training multi-layer perceptron neural network. Applied Intelligence. 2019;49:2339–2381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo L, Parsa L. Geometry optimization of ipm machines using orthogonal experimental design method and artificial neural network. J Electromagn Waves Appl. 2011;25:901–912.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar