Potential antifungal activity of novel carbohydrate derivatives validated by POM, molecular docking and molecular dynamic simulations analyses

References

• Zavrel M, White TC. Medically important fungi respond to azole drugs: an update. Future Microbiol. 2015;10:1355–1373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuenca-Estrella M. Antifungal drug resistance mechanisms in pathogenic fungi: from bench to bedside. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014;20:54–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutherford JC, Bahn YS, van den Berg B, et al. Nutrient and stress sensing in pathogenic yeasts. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenz MC. Carbon catabolite control in Candida albicans: new wrinkles in metabolism. mBio. 2013;4:e00034–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amin MR, Yasmin F, Hosen MA, et al. Synthesis, antimicrobial, anticancer, PASS, molecular docking, molecular dynamic simulations and pharmacokinetic predictions of some methyl β-D-galactopyranoside analogs. Molecules. 2021;26:1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sajia I, Hosen MA, Sajjad A, et al. Synthesis, antimicrobial, anticancer activities, PASS prediction, molecular docking, molecular dynamics and pharmacokinetic studies of designed methyl α-D-glucopyranoside esters. J Mol Struct. 2022;1260:132761.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farhana Y, Amin MR, Hosen MA, et al. Monosaccharide derivatives: synthesis, antimicrobial, PASS, antiviral, and molecular docking studies against sars-cov-2 mpro inhibitors. J Cellul Chem Technol. 2021;55:477–499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawsar SMA, Hosen MA, El Bakri Y, et al. In silico approach for potential antimicrobial agents through antiviral, molecular docking, molecular dynamics, pharmacokinetic and bioactivity predictions of galactopyranoside derivatives. Arab J Basic Appl Sci. 2022;29:99–112.
   Google Scholar
• Tahmida S, Hosen MA, Alam MS, et al. Uridine derivatives: antifungal, PASS outcomes, ADME/T, drug-likeliness, molecular docking and binding energy calculations. Med Sci Int Med J. 2021;10:1373–1386.
   Google Scholar
• Alam A, Rana KM, Hosen MA, et al. Modified thymidine derivatives as potential inhibitors of SARS-CoV: PASS, in vitro antimicrobial, physicochemical and molecular docking studies. Phys Chem Res. 2022;10:391–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawsar SMA, Hosen MA, Chowdhury TS, et al. Thermochemical, PASS, molecular docking, drug-likeness and in silico ADMET prediction of cytidine derivatives against HIV-1 reverse transcriptase. Rev de Chim. 2021;72:159–178.
   Google Scholar
• Maowa J, Hosen MA, Alam A, et al. Pharmacokinetics and molecular docking studies of uridine derivatives as SARS- COV-2 Mpro inhibitors. Phys Chem Res. 2021;9:385–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amin MR, Yasmin F, Dey S, et al. Methyl β-D-galactopyranoside esters as potential inhibitors for SARS-CoV-2 protease enzyme: synthesis, antimicrobial, PASS, molecular docking, molecular dynamics simulations and quantum computations. Glycoconj J. 2021;38:1–11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bulbul MZH, Hosen MA, Ferdous J, et al. Thermochemical, DFT study, physicochemical, molecular docking and ADMET predictions of some modified uridine derivatives. Int J New Chem. 2021;8:88–110.
   Google Scholar
• Kawsar SMA, Hosen MA, Alam A, et al. Thymidine derivatives as inhibitors against novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) main protease: theoretical and computational investigations. Adv Chem Res. 2021;69:89–129.
   Google Scholar
• Hosen MA, Alam A, Islam M, et al. Geometrical optimization, PASS prediction, molecular docking, and in silico ADMET studies of thymidine derivatives against FimH adhesin of Escherichia coli. Bulg Chem Commun. 2021;53:327–342.
   Google Scholar
• Kawsar SMA, Kumer A, Munia NS, et al. Chemical descriptors, PASS, molecular docking, molecular dynamics and ADMET predictions of glucopyranoside derivatives as inhibitors to bacteria and fungi growth. Org Commun. 2022;15:1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawsar SMA, Hosen MA, Fujii Y, et al. Thermochemical, DFT, molecular docking and pharmacokinetic studies of methyl β-D-galactopyranoside esters. J Comput Chem Mol Model. 2020;4:452–462.
   Google Scholar
• Kawsar SMA, Hosen MA. An optimization and pharmacokinetic studies of some thymidine derivatives. Turkish Comp Theo Chem (TC&TC). 2020;4:59–66.
   Google Scholar
• Mirajul MI, Arifuzzaman M, Monjur MR, et al. Novel methyl 4,6-O-benzylidene-α-D-glucopyranoside derivatives: synthesis, structural characterization and evaluation of antibacterial activities. Hacettepe J Biol Chem. 2019;47:153–164.
   Google Scholar
• Kawsar SMA, Faruk MO, Rahman MS, et al. Regioselective synthesis, characterization and antimicrobial activities of some new monosaccharide derivatives. Sci Pharm. 2014;82:1–20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Misbah MMH, Ferdous J, Bulbul MZH, et al. Evaluation of MIC, MBC, MFC and anticancer activities of acylated methyl β-D-galactopyranoside esters. Int J Biosci. 2020;16:299–309.
   Google Scholar
• Kawsar SMA, Kumar A. Computational investigation of methyl α-D-glucopyranoside derivatives as inhibitor against bacteria, fungi and COVID-19 (SARS-2). J Chil Chem Soci. 2021;66:5206–5214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farhana Y, Amin MR, Hosen A, et al. Bromobenzoylation of methyl α-D-mannopyranoside: synthesis and spectral characterization. J Sib Fed Univ Chem. 2021;14:171–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dias C, Pais JP, Nunes R, et al. Sugar-based bactericides targeting phosphatidylethanolamine-enriched membranes. Nat Commun. 2018;9:1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Sun Q, Zhang H, et al. Insight into antibacterial mechanism of polysaccharides: A review. LWT. 2021;150:111929.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dias C, Rauter AP. Membrane-targeting antibiotics: recent developments outside the peptide space. Future Med Chem. 2019;11:211–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta R, Paul S, Gupta AK, et al. Synthesis and biological activities of some 2-substituted phenyl-3-(3-alkyllaryl-5, 6-dihydro-s-triazolo-[3, 4-b][1, 3, 4] thiadiazol-6-yl) indoles. NISCAIR-CSIR. 1997:707–710.
   Google Scholar
• Xu Y, Liu XW. The versatility of carbohydrates in antimicrobial applications. J Chinese Chem Soc. 2020;67:2204–2207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawsar SMA, Kabir AKMS, Manik MM, et al. Selective synthesisof some new carbohydrate derivatives: antimicrobial screening studies against human and phytopthogens. Chem Sci J. 2012;73:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Kumaresan S, Senthilkumar V, Stephen A, et al. GC-MS analysis and PASS-assisted prediction of biological activity spectra of extract of Phomopsis sp. Isolated from Andrographis paniculata. World J Pharm Res. 2015;4:1035–1053.
   Google Scholar
• Delano WL. The PyMOL molecular graphics system. San Carlos (CA): De-Lano Scientific; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Williams CH, Hong CC, editor. Chemical biology: methods and protocols. New York, USA: Springer; 2015. p. 243–250.
   Google Scholar
• Guex N, Peitsch MC. SWISS-MODEL and the Swiss-PdbViewer: an environment for comparative protein modeling. Electrophoresis. 1997;18:2714–2723.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Version ADS 4.0. San Diego, USA: Accelrys; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Onodera K, Satou K, Hirota H. Evaluations of molecular docking programs for virtual screening. J Chem Inf Model. 2007;47:1609–1618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren GL, Andrews CW, Capelli AM, et al. A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions. J Med Chem. 2006;49:5912–5931.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Land H, Humble MS. YASARA: a tool to obtain structural guidance in biocatalytic investigations. Methods Mol Biol. 2018;1685:43–67.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang J, Wolf RM, Caldwell JW, et al. Development and testing of a general amber force field. J Comput Chem. 2004;25:1157–1174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrach MF, Drossel B. Structure and dynamics of TIP3P, TIP4P, and TIP5P water near smooth and atomistic walls of different hydroaffinity. J Chem Phys. 2014;140:174501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krieger E, Vriend G. New ways to boost molecular dynamics simulations. J Comput Chem. 2015;36:996–1007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey MJ, De Fabritiis G. An implementation of the smooth particle mesh Ewald method on GPU hardware. J Chem Theory Comput. 2009;5:2371–2377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Essmann U, Perera L, Berkowitz ML, et al. A smooth particle mesh Ewald method. J Chem Phys. 1995;103:8577–8593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmud S, Biswas S, Paul GK, et al. Plant-based phytochemical screening by targeting main protease of sars-cov-2 to design effective potent inhibitors. Biology (Basel). 2021;10:589.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mahmud S, Biswas S, Paul GK, et al. Antiviral peptides against the main protease of SARS-CoV-2: A molecular docking and dynamics study. Arab J Chem. 2021;14:103315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmud S, Mita MA, Biswas S, et al. Molecular docking and dynamics study to explore phytochemical ligand molecules against the main protease of SARS-CoV-2 from extensive phytochemical datasets. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2021;14:1305–1315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmud S, Uddin MAR, Paul GK, et al. Virtual screening and molecular dynamics simulation study of plant-derived compounds to identify potential inhibitors of main protease from SARS-CoV-2. Brief Bioinform. 2021;22:1402–1414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmud S, Paul GK, Biswas S, et al. Prospective role of peptide-based antiviral therapy against the main protease of SARS-CoV-2. Front Mol Biosci. 2021;8:628585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pires DEV, Blundell TL, Ascher BD. pkCSM: predicting small-molecule pharmacokinetic and toxicity properties using graph-based signatures. J Med Chem. 2015;58:4066–4072.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira DBD, Gaudio AC. Build QSAR: a new computer program for QSAR analysis. quantitative structure-activity relationships: An international journal devoted to fundamental and practical aspects of electroanalysis. Mol Inform. 2000;19:599–601.
   Google Scholar
• Sana T, Qayyum S, Jabeen A, et al. Isolation and characterization of anti-inflammatory and anti-proliferative compound, for B-cell Non-Hodgkin lymphoma, from Nyctanthes arbor-tristis Linn. J Ethnopharmacol. 2022;115267.
   Google Scholar
• Bechlem K, Berredjem M, Djouad SE, et al. Novel N-acylsulfamoyl-oxazolidin-2ones: synthesis, antitumor activity, X-ray crystallographic study, molecular docking and POM analyses. J Mol Struct. 2022;1262:132935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munia NS, Hosen MA, Azzam KMA, et al. Synthesis, antimicrobial, SAR, PASS, molecular docking, molecular dynamics and pharmacokinetics studies of 5´-O-uridine derivatives bearing acyl moieties: POM study and identification of the pharmacophore sites. Nucleos Nucleot Nucl Acids. 2022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lafridi H, Hadda TB, Almalki FA, et al. Molecular drug design and DFT/POM analyses of the pharmacophore site of the anti-tobacco mosaic virus of chiral thiourea containing amino-phosphonates moiety. J Chem Res. 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Rbaa M, Haida S, Tuzun B, et al. Synthesis, characterization and bioactivity of novel 8-hydroxyquinoline derivatives: experimental, molecular docking, DFT and POM analyses. J Mol Struct. 2022;1258:132688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Younes L, Mohamed R, Burak T, et al. Synthesis, structural confirmation, antibacterial properties and Bio-informatics computational analyses of New pyrrole based on 8-hydroxyquinoline. J Mol Struct. 2022;1259:132683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lafridi H, Hadda TB, Zgou H, et al. In silico evaluation of molecular interactions between macrocyclic inhibitors with the HCV NS3 protease. docking and identification of antiviral pharmacophore site. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2022: 1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esharkawy ER, Almalki FA, Hadda TB. In vitro potential antiviral SARS-CoV-19- activity of natural product thymohydroquinone and dithymoquinone from nigella sativa. Bioorg Chem. 2022;120:105587.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasan AH, Sankaranarayanan M, Syazwani IA, et al. Novel thiophene chalcones-coumarin as acetylcholinesterase inhibitors: design, synthesis, biological evaluation, molecular docking, ADMET prediction and molecular dynamics simulation. Bioorg Chem. 2022;119:105572.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malika B, Abdeslem B, Rania B, et al. Antitumor activity, X-Ray crystallography, in silico study of some-sulfamido-phosphonates. Identification of pharmacophore sites. J Mol Struct. 2021;1250:131886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroemer RT, Vulpetti A, Mcdonald JJ, et al. Assessment of docking poses:  interactions-based accuracy classification (IBAC) versus crystal structure deviations. J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 2004;44:871–881.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jones G, Willett P, Glen RC, et al. Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking. J Mol Biol. 1997;267:727–748.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kontoyianni M, Mcclellan LM, Sokol GS. Evaluation of docking performance:  comparative data on docking algorithms. J Med Chem. 2004;47:558–565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grubic Z, Stalc A, Sentjurc M, et al. Different effects of two peripheral anionic site-binding ligands on acetylcholinesterase active-site gorge topography revealed by electron paramagnetic resonance. Biochim Biophys Acta (BBA)-Protein Struct Mol Enzymol. 1995;1249:55–160.
   Google Scholar
• Note1:https://www.maroc.ma/fr/actualites/research-excellence-awards-une-vingtaine-de-travaux-de-recherche-et-dinnovation-primes.
   Google Scholar