Molecular dynamics simulation studies on uptake of fipronil sulfone by gut microbiome and its influence on risk for cause of Parkinson’s disease

References

• Chapman JR, Balasubramanian D, Tam K, et al. Using quantitative spectrometry to understand the influence of genetics and nutritional perturbations on the virulence potential of Staphylococcus aureus. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2017;16:S15–S28. doi: 10.1074/mcp.O116.065581
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgui S, Gil C, Solano C, et al. A systematic evaluation of the two-component systems network reveals that ArlRS is a key regulator of catheter colonization by Staphylococcus aureus. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:342. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00342
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tam K, Torres VJ. Staphylococcus aureus secreted toxins and extracellular enzymes. Microbiol Spectr. 2019;7. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.GPP3-0039-2018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cryan JF, O'Riordan KJ, Cowan CSM, et al. The microbiota-Gut-brain axis. Physiol Rev 2019;99(4):1877–2013. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00018.2018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight E, Geetha T, Burnett D, et al. The role of diet and dietary patterns in Parkinson's disease. Nutrients. 2022;14(21):4472. doi: 10.3390/nu14214472
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villageliú D, Lyte M. Dopamine production in Enterococcus faecium: a microbial endocrinology-based mechanism for the selection of probiotics based on neurochemical-producing potential. PLoS One. 2018;13(11):e0207038. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207038. PMID: 30485295; PMCID: PMC6261559.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, He X, Mo C, et al. Association between microbial tyrosine decarboxylase gene and levodopa responsiveness in patients with Parkinson disease. Neurology. 2022;99(22):e2443–e2453. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000201204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maini Rekdal V, Bess Elizabeth N, Bisanz Jordan E, et al. Discovery and inhibition of an interspecies gut bacterial pathway for Levodopa metabolism. Science. 2019;364(6445). doi:10.1126/science.aau6323
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamtaji OR, Taghizadeh M, Daneshvar KR, et al. Clinical and metabolic response to probiotic administration in people with Parkinson's disease: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Clin Nutr. 2019;38(3):1031–1035. doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2018.05.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indrio F, Riezzo G, Raimondi F, et al. Lactobacillus reuteri accelerates gastric emptying and improves regurgitation in infants. Eur J Clin Invest. 2011;41:417–422. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2010.02425.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krygowska-Wajs A, Cheshire WP, Wszolek ZK, et al. Evaluation of gastric emptying in familial and sporadic Parkinson disease. Parkinsonism Relat D. 2009;15:692–696. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2009.04.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardoff R, Sula M, Tamir A, Soil A, Front A, Badarna S, Honigman S, Giladi N. Gastric emptying time and gastric motility in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2001, 16, 1041–1047. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doi H, Sakakibara R, Sato M, et al. Plasma levodopa peak delay and impaired gastric emptying in Parkinson's disease. J Neurol Sci. 2012;319(1-2):86–88. doi:10.1016/j.jns.2012.05.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caporaso JG, Lauber CL, Costello EK, et al. Moving pictures of the human microbiome. Genome Biol. 2011;12:R50. doi: 10.1186/gb-2011-12-5-r50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lozupone C, Stombaugh J, Gordon J, et al. Diversity, stability and resilience of the human gut microbiota. Nature. 2012;489:220–230. doi: 10.1038/nature11550
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clemente JC, Ursell LK, Parfrey LW, et al. The impact of the gut microbiota on human health: an integrative view. Cell. 2012;148(6):1258–1270. ISSN 0092-8674. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmood I, Imadi SR, Shazadi K, et al. Effects of pesticides on the environment. In: Hakeem K, Akhtar M, Abdullah S, editors. Plant, soil and microbes;2016. p. 253–269. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-27455-3_13
   Google Scholar
• Akashe Megha M, Pawade Uday V, Nikam Ashwin V, et al. Classification of Pesticides: a review. Int J Res Ayur Pharm. 2018;9(4):144–150. doi:10.7897/2277-4343
   Google Scholar
• Surekha S. Prognosis and ameliorative possibilities against cognitive impairment. S Kadam, editor. Scieng Publications; 2022. ISBN: 978-81-955557-2-7. 67-79
   Google Scholar
• Cao F, Soudersii CL, Perez-Rodriguez V, et al. Elucidating conserved transcriptional networks underlying pesticide exposure and Parkinson's disease: a focus on chemicals of epidemiological relevance. Front Genet. 2019;9:701. doi:10.3389/fgene.2018.00701
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh NB, Sharma R, Singh S, et al. A comprehensive review of environmental fate and degradation of fipronil and its toxic metabolites. Environ Res. 2021;199:111316. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111316
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park JH, Park YS, Koh HC. Progressive loss of nigrostriatal dopaminergic neurons induced by inflammatory responses to fipronil. Toxicol Lett. 2016;258:36–45. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2016.06.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmoud YK, Ali AA, Abdelrazek HMA, et al. Neurotoxic effect of fipronil in male wistar rats: ameliorative effect of L-arginine and L-carnitine. Biology (Basel). 2021;10(7):682. doi: 10.3390/biology10070682
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pierluigi C, Sammelson RE, Casida JE. Phenylpyrazole Insecticide Photochemistry, Metabolism, and GABAergic Action: Ethiprole Compared with Fipronil. J Agri Food Chem. 2003;51(24):7055–7061. doi:10.1021/jf030439l
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan Amanda A, Harwood AD, You J, et al. Degradation of fipronil in anaerobic sediments and the effect on porewater concentrations. Chemosphere. 2009;77(1):22–28. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.06.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cravedi JP, Delous G, Zalko D, et al. Disposition of fipronil in rats. Chemosphere. 2013;93(10):2276–2283. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.07.083
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMahen Rebecca L, Strynar Mark J, Dagnino S, et al. Identification of fipronil metabolites by time-of-flight mass spectrometry for application in a human exposure study. Environ Int. 2015;78:16–23. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2015.01.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon-Delso N, Amaral-Rogers V, Belzunces L P, et al. Systemic insecticides (neonicotinoids and fipronil): trends, uses, mode of action and metabolites. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2015;22(1):5–34. doi:10.1007/s11356-014-3470-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malsha K, Buttemer WA, Astheimer LB. Adverse effects of fipronil on avian reproduction and development: maternal transfer of fipronil to eggs in zebra finch Taeniopygia guttata and in ovo exposure in chickens Gallus domesticus. Ecotoxicology. 2011;20(4):653–660. doi:10.1007/s10646-011-0605-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang J, Amin Usmani K, Ernest H, et al. In vitro metabolism of fipronil by human and rat cytochrome P450 and its interactions with testosterone and diazepam. Chemico-Biol Int. 2004;147(3):319–329. doi:10.1016/j.cbi.2004.03.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesnage R, Bowyer RCE, Balkhi SE, et al. Impacts of dietary exposure to pesticides on faecal microbiome metabolism in adult twins. Environ Health. 2022;21(1). doi: 10.1186/s12940-022-00860-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramakrishnan B, Maddela NR, Megharaj M, et al. Linkages between plant rhizosphere and animal gut environments: interaction effects of pesticides with their microbiomes. Environ Adv. 2021;5:100091. doi: 10.1016/j.envadv.2021.100091
   Google Scholar
• Syromyatnikov MY, Isuwa MM, Savinkova OV, et al. The effect of pesticides on the microbiome of animals. Agriculture. 2020;10(3):79. doi: 10.3390/agriculture10030079
   Google Scholar
• Gama JR, Neves BC, Pereira AV. Chronic effects of dietary pesticides on the gut microbiome and neurodevelopment. Front Microbiol. 2022;13. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.931440
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PubMed - Beck J. Report from the field: pubmed central, an XML-based archive of life sciences journal articles. Proceedings of the International Symposium on XML for the Long Haul: Issues in the Long-term Preservation of XML. 6, 6; 2010. doi: 10.4242/BalisageVol6.Beck01. ISBN978-1-935958-02-4.
   Google Scholar
• Dallakyan S, Olson AJ. Small-Molecule Library Screening by Docking with PyRx. Chem Biol Meth Protocols. 2015;1263:243–250. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2269-7_19
   Google Scholar
• PyRx - Dallakyan S, Olson AJ. Small-molecule library screening by docking with PyRx. Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.). 1263. 243–250; 2015. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2269-7_19.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks BR, Brooks CL, Mackerell AD, et al. CHARMM: The biomolecular simulation program. J Comput Chem. 2009;30(10):1545–1614. doi:10.1002/jcc.v30:10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monticelli L, Emppu S. 2013. p. 197–213.
   Google Scholar
• O'Boyle NM, Michael B, Craig A. J, et al. Open Babel: An open chemical toolbox. J Cheminform. 2011;3(1):31. doi:10.1186/1758-2946-3-33
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oleg T, Arthur O. AutoDock Vina: Improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. J Comput Chem. 2010;31(2):455–461. doi:10.1002/jcc.v31:2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schrödinger L, DeLano W. (2020). PyMOL. Available from: http://www.pymol.org/pymol
   Google Scholar
• LigPlot - Laskowski RA, Swindells MB. LigPlot+: multiple ligand-protein interaction diagrams for drug discovery. J Chem Inf Model. 2011;51(10):2778–2786. doi: 10.1021/ci200227u. Epub 2011 Oct 5. PMID: 21919503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anvita M, Anoushka Chinmayi GV, Shruti R, et al. Antimicrobial activity of Geranyl acetate against cell wall synthesis proteins of P. aeruginosa and S. aureus using molecular docking and simulation. J Biomol Struct Dynam. 2023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipinski CA, Lombardo F, Dominy BW, et al. Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 1997;23(1–3):3–25. doi: 10.1016/S0169-409X(96)00423-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghose A, Viswanadhan V, Wendoloski J. A knowledge-based approach in designing combinatorial or medicinal chemistry libraries for drug discovery. 1. A qualitative and quantitative characterization of known drug databases. J Comb Chem. 1999;1(1):55–68. doi: 10.1021/cc9800071
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Veber D, et al. Molecular properties that influence the oral bioavailability of drug candidates. J Med Chem. 2002;45(12):2615–2623. doi: 10.1021/jm020017n
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muegge I, Heald S, Brittelli D. Simple selection criteria for drug-like chemical matter. J Med Chem. 2001;44(12):1841–1846. doi: 10.1021/jm015507e
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feixiong C, Weihua L, Zhou Y, et al. admetSAR: A Comprehensive Source and Free Tool for Assessment of Chemical ADMET Properties. J Chem Inform Model. 2012;52(11):3099–3105. doi:10.1021/ci300367a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longfei G, Hongbin Y, Yingchun C, et al. ADMET-score – a comprehensive scoring function for evaluation of chemical drug-likeness. MedChemComm. 2019;10(1):148–157. doi:10.1039/C8MD00472B
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorgensen WL, Maxwell DS, Tirado-Rives J. Development and testing of the OPLS all-atom force field on conformational energetics and properties of organic liquids. J Am Chem Soc. 1996;118:11225–11236. doi: doi: 10.1021/ja9621760
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorgensen WL, Chandrasekhar J, Madura JD, et al. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J Chem Phys. 1983;79:926–935. doi: 10.1063/1.445869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shūichi N. A molecular dynamics method for simulations in the canonical ensemble. Mol Phys. 2006;52(2):255–268. doi:10.1080/00268978400101201
   Google Scholar
• Reddy SVG, Reddy KT, Kumari VV, et al. Molecular docking and dynamic simulation studies evidenced plausible immunotherapeutic anticancer property by Withaferin A targeting indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2015;33:2695–2709. doi: 10.1080/07391102.2015.1004834
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basha SH, Bethapudi P, Majji Rambabu F. Anti-angiogenesis property by quercetin compound targeting VEGFR2 elucidated in a computational approach. European J Biotechnol Biosc. 2014;2:30–46.
   Google Scholar
• Kumari R, Kumar R, Lynn A. g_mmpbsa—A GROMACS Tool for High-Throughput MM-PBSA Calculations. J Chem Inform Model. 2014;54(7):1951–1962. doi:10.1021/ci500020m
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romeo A, Roberto P, Maurizio G. Experimental and in silico evaluations of the possible molecular interaction between airborne particulate matter and SARS-CoV-2. Sci Total Environ. 2023;895:165059. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oostenbrink C, Villa A, Mark AE, et al. A biomolecular force field based on the free enthalpy of hydration and solvation: the GROMOS force-field parameter sets 53A5 and 53A6. J Comput Chem. 2004;25(13):1656–1676. doi: 10.1002/jcc.20090
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess B, Kutzner C, van der Spoel D, et al. Gromacs 4:  algorithms for highly efficient, load-balanced, and scalable molecular simulation. J Chem Theory Comput. 2008;4:435–447. doi: 10.1021/ct700301q
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anandakrishnan R, Aguilar B, Onufriev AV. H++ 3.0: automating pK prediction and the preparation of biomolecular structures for atomistic molecular modeling and simulations. Nucleic Acids Res. 1 July 2012;40(W1):W537–W541. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks375
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Essmann U, et al. A smooth particle mesh Ewald method. J Chem Phy. 1995;103:8577–8593. doi: 10.1063/1.470117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess B, Bekker H, Berendsen HJC, et al. Lincs: a linear constraint solver for molecular simulations. J Comput Chem. 1997;18:1463–1472. 1463::AID-JCC4>3.0.CO;2-H
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berendsen HJC, van der Spoel D, van Drunen R. GROMACS: A message-passing parallel molecular dynamics implementation. Comput Phys Commun. 1995;91(1-3):43–56. doi:10.1016/0010-4655(95)00042-E
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess B, Carsten K, van der Spoel D, et al. GROMACS 4: algorithms for highly efficient, load-balanced, and scalable molecular simulation. J Chem Theor Comput. 2008;4(3):435–447. doi:10.1021/ct700301q
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLano WL. (2002). The PyMOL molecular graphics system. Available from: http://pymol.sourceforge.net
   Google Scholar
• Rajagopal A, Adarsh V, Karan R, et al. Investigative study on the influence of physiological pH on choline TMA Lyase in P. vulgaris by molecular dynamics and simulation. Res J Biotechnol. 2023;18(2):104–111. doi: 10.25303/1802rjbt1040111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiu Y, Huan Lei. Atomic radius and charge parameter uncertainty in biomolecular solvation energy calculations. J Chem Theor Comput. 2018;14(2):759–767.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang D, Xu J, Wang J, et al. Dynamic changes in the nigrostriatal pathway in the MPTP mouse model of Parkinson's disease. Parkinsons Dis. 2017;2017:9349487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaccari C, El Dib R, Gomaa H, et al. Paraquat and Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2019;22(5–6):172–202. doi: 10.1080/10937404.2019.1659197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Utembe W, Kamng'ona AW. Gut microbiota-mediated pesticide toxicity in humans: methodological issues and challenges in the risk assessment of pesticides. Chemosphere. 2021;271:129817. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.129817
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta RC, Anadón A. Chapter 42 - fipronil, veterinary toxicology. 3rd ed. Academic Press; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Souders 2nd CL, Rushin A, Sanchez CL, et al. Mitochondrial and transcriptome responses in rat dopaminergic neuronal cells following exposure to the insecticide fipronil. Neurotoxicology. 2021;85:173–185. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2021.05.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerasimavicius L, Livesey B, Marsh J. Loss-of-function, gain-of-function and dominant-negative mutations have profoundly different effects on protein structure. Nat Commun. 2022;13.doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31686-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perez M, et al. The relationship among Tyrosine Decarboxylase and Agmatine Deiminase pathways in Enterococcus faecalis. Front Microbiol. 2017;8. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02107. [cited 2022 Nov 27].
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nachar VR, Savka FC, McGroty SE, et al. Genomic and biochemical analysis of the Diaminopimelate and Lysine Biosynthesis pathway in Verrucomicrobium spinosum: identification and partial characterization of L,L-Diaminopimelate Aminotransferase and UDP-N-Acetylmuramoylalanyl-D-glutamyl-2,6-meso-Diaminopimelate Ligase. Front Microbiol. 2012;3. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00183
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Kessel SP, Frye AK, El-Gendy AO, et al. Gut bacterial tyrosine decarboxylases restrict levels of levodopa in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):310. Published 2019 Jan 18. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-08294-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar