References
- Alba, B., & Haslam, N. (2015). Dog people and cat people differ on dominance-related traits. Anthrozoös, 28(1), 37–44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2752/089279315X14129350721858
- Atran, S. (1998). Folk biology and the anthropology of science: Cognitive universals and cultural particulars. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21(4), 547–569. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X98001277
- Berlin, B. (1992). Ethnobiological classification: Principles of categorization of plants and animals in traditional societies. Princeton University Press.
- Bradshaw, J. (2017). The animals among us: The new science of anthrozoology. Penguin.
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Erlbaum.
- Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). The revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-E) and NEO-five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.
- Dotson, M. J., & Hyatt, E. M. (2008). Understanding dog–human companionship. Journal of Business Research, 61(5), 457–466. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.07.019
- Eddy, T., Gallup, G., & Povinelli, D. (1993). Attribution of cognitive states to animals: Anthropomorphism in comparative perspective. Journal of Social Issues, 49(1), 87–101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1993.tb00910.x
- Egan, V., & MacKenzie, J. (2012). Does personality, delinquency, or mating effort necessarily dictate a preference for an aggressive dog? Anthrozoös, 25(2), 161–170. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2752/175303712X13316289505305
- Epley, N., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007). On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review, 114(4), 864–886. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.864
- European Commission. (2016). Attitudes of Europeans towards animal welfare. Special Eurobarometer, 442. https://ec.europa.eu/.
- Ferrando, P. J., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2016). A note on improving EAP trait estimation in oblique factor-analytic and item response theory models. Psicológica, 37, 235–247. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=16946248007
- Fundación Affinity. (2017). Estudio de abandono y adopción 2017 [Study on relinqueshment and adoption, 2017]. http://www.fundacion-affinity.org
- Gosling, S. D., Sandy, C. J., & Potter, J. (2010). Personalities of self-identified “dog people” and “cat people.”. Anthrozoös, 23(3), 213–222. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2752/175303710X12750451258850
- Gray, P. B., & Young, S. M. (2011). Human–pet dynamics in cross-cultural perspective. Anthrozoös, 24(1), 17–30. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2752/175303711X12923300467285
- Harrison, M. A., & Hall, A. E. (2010). Anthropomorphism, empathy, and perceived communicative ability vary with phylogenetic relatedness to humans. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 4(1), 34–48. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/h0099303
- Hergovic, A., Mauerer, I., & Riemer, V. (2011). Exotic animal companions and the personality of their owners. Anthrozoös, 24(3), 317–327. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2752/175303711X13045914865349
- Herzog, H. (2007). Gender differences in human–animal interactions: A review. Anthrozoös, 20(1), 7–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2752/089279307780216687
- Herzog, H. (2011). Some we love, some we hate, some we eat. Harper Collins.
- Herzog, H., Betchart, N. S., & Pittman, R. B. (1991). Gender, sex role orientation, and attitudes toward animals. Anthrozoös, 4(3), 184–191. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2752/089279391787057170
- Marciniak, A. (2011). Folk taxonomies and human–animal relations: The early Neolithic in the Polish lowlands. In U. Albarella & A. Trentacoste (Eds.), Ethnozooarchealogy: The present and past of human–animal relationships (pp. 29–38). Oxbow Books.
- María, G. A., Mazas, B., Zarza, F. J., & Miranda de la Lama, G. C. (2017). Animal welfare, national identity and social change: Attitudes and opinions of Spanish citizens towards bullfighting. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 30(6), 809–826. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-017-9700-9
- Mitchell, A. M., Bruyere, B. L., Otieno, T. O., Bhalla, S., & Teel, T. L. (2019). A comparison between human–carnivore conflicts and local community attitudes toward carnivores in Westgate Community Conservancy, Samburu, Kenya. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 24(2), 168–179. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10871209.2018.1548671
- Morris, P. H., Doe, C., & Godsell, E. (2008). Secondary emotions in non-primate species? Behavioral reports and subjective claims by animal owners. Cognition and Emotion, 22(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930701273716
- Morris, P., Knight, S., & Lesley, S. (2012). Belief in animal mind: Does familiarity with animals influence beliefs about animal emotions? Society & Animals, 20(3), 211–224. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1163/15685306-12341234
- Nakajima, S., Yamamoto, M., & Yoshimoto, N. (2009). Dogs look like their owners: Replications with racially homogeneous owner portraits. Anthrozoös, 22(2), 173–181. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2752/175303709X434194
- Payne, C., & Jaffe, K. (2005). Self seeks like: Many humans choose their dog pets following rules used for assortative mating. Journal of Ethology, 23(1), 15–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-004-0122-6
- Romero, E., Villar, P., Gómez-Fraguela, J. A., & López-Romero, L. (2012). Measuring personality traits with ultra-short scales: A study of the Ten Item Personality Inventory (TIPI) in a Spanish sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(3), 289–293. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.03.035
- Roy, M. M., & Christenfeld, N. J. S. (2005). Dogs still resemble their owners. Psychological Science, 16(9), 743–744. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01605.x
- Saraswat, R., Sinha, A., & Radhakrishna, S. (2015). A god became a pest? Human–rhesus macaque interactions in Himachal Pradesh, Northern India. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 61, 435–443. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-015-0913-9.
- Signal, T. D., Taylor, N., & MacLean, A. S. (2018). Pampered or pariah: Does animal type influence the interaction between animal attitude and empathy? Psychology, Crime & Law, 24(5), 527–537. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2017.1399394
- Spanish Department of Agriculture, Food, and Environment [Ministerio de Agricultura, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente]. (2015). Análisis y caracterización del sector de los animales de compañía: informe de resultados [Analysis and characterization of the companion animals sector: results report]. https://www.mapa.gob.es/.
- Spanish Department of Agriculture, Food, and Environment [Ministerio de Agricultura, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente]. (2019). Informe del consumo alimentario en España 2018 [Report of food consumption in Spain, 2018]. https://www.mapa.gob.es/.
- Taylor, N., & Signal, T. D. (2009). Pet, pest, profit: Isolating differences in attitudes towards the treatment of animals. Anthrozoös, 22(2), 129–135. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2752/175303709X434158
- Villatoro, F. J., Naughton-Treves, L., Sepúlveda, M. A., Stowhas, P., Mardones, F. O., & Silva-Rodríguez, E. A. (2019). When free-ranging dogs threaten wildlife: Public attitudes toward management strategies in southern Chile. Journal of Environmental Management, 229, 67–75. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.06.035
- Wells, D. L., & Hepper, P. G. (2012). The personality of “aggressive” and “non-aggressive” dog owners. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(6), 770–773. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.05.038
- Wilkins, A. M., McCrae, L. S., & McBride, A. (2015). Factors affecting the human attribution of emotions towards animals. Anthrozoös, 28(3), 357–369. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2015.1052270