University Cats? Predictors of Staff and Student Responsiveness Toward On-Campus Cat Visitations

References

• Ainsworth, M. D. S. (1978). The Bowlby-Ainsworth attachment theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(3), 436–438. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00075828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., Perugini, M., Szarota, P., de Vries, R. E., Di Blas, L., Boies, K., & De Raad, B. (2004). A six-factor structure of personality-descriptive adjectives: Solutions from psycholexical studies in seven languages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(2), 356–366. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.356
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bao, K. J., & Schreer, G. (2016). Pets and happiness: Examining the association between pet ownership and wellbeing. Anthrozoös, 29(2), 283–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2016.1152721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, R. T. (2005). On the edge or not? Opportunities for interdisciplinary scholars in business communication to focus on the individual and organizational benefits of companion animals in the workplace. Journal of Business Communication, 42(3), 299–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943605277399
   Google Scholar
• Barker, R. T., Knisely, J. S., Barker, S. B., Cobb, R. K., & Schubert, C. M. (2012). Preliminary investigation of employee's dog presence on stress and organizational perceptions. International Journal of Workplace Health Management, 5(1), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1108/17538351211215366
   Google Scholar
• Beetz, A., Uvnäs-Moberg, K., Julius, H., & Kotrschal, K. (2012). Psychosocial and psychophysiological effects of human–animal interactions: The possible role of oxytocin. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 234. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkel, C., Mauricio, A. M., Schoenfelder, E., & Sandler, I. N. (2011). Putting the pieces together: An integrated model of program implementation. Prevention Science, 12(1), 23–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-010-0186-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binfet, J. T., Green, F. L., & Draper, Z. A. (2022). The importance of client–canine contact in canine-assisted interventions: A randomized controlled trial. Anthrozoös, 35(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2021.1944558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjerke, T., & Østdahl, T. (2004). Animal-related attitudes and activities in an urban population. Anthrozoös, 17(2), 109–129. https://doi.org/10.2752/089279304786991783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss – Volume I: Attachment. The Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho-Analysis.
   Google Scholar
• Buttelmann, D., & Römpke, A. K. (2014). Anxiety-reducing effect: Dog, fish and plant in direct comparison. Anthrozoös, 27(2), 267–277. https://doi.org/10.2752/175303714X13903827487647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caplan, R. D. (1987). Person–environment fit theory and organizations: Commensurate dimensions, time perspectives, and mechanisms. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 31(3), 248–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(87)90042-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlisle, G. K., Johnson, R. A., Wang, Z., Bibbo, J., Cheak-Zamora, N., & Lyons, L. A. (2021). Exploratory study of cat adoption in families of children with autism: Impact on children’s social skills and anxiety. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 58, 28–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2020.11.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casey, J., Csiernik, R., Knezevic, D., & Ebear, J. (2018). The impact of animal-assisted intervention on staff in a seniors residential care facility. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 16(5), 1238–1248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-017-9849-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charles, N., & Wolkowitz, C. (2019). Bringing dogs onto campus: Inclusions and exclusions of animal bodies in organizations. Gender, Work & Organization, 26(3), 303–321. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clements, H., Valentin, S., Jenkins, N., Rankin, J., Gee, N. R., Snellgrove, D., & Sloman, K. A. (2021). Companion animal type and level of engagement matter: A mixed-methods study examining links between companion animal guardianship, loneliness and well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic. Animals, 11(8), 2349. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11082349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Conniff, K. M., Scarlett, J. M., Goodman, S., & Appel, L. D. (2005). Effects of a pet visitation program on the behavior and emotional state of adjudicated female adolescents. Anthrozoös, 18(4), 379–395. https://doi.org/10.2752/089279305785593974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, E., Henderson-Wilson, C., Warner, E., & LaMontagne, A. (2022). Animal-assisted interventions in universities: A scoping review of implementation and associated outcomes. Health Promotion International, Article daac001. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daac001
   Google Scholar
• Crowley-Robinson, P., & Blackshaw, J. K. (1998). Nursing home staffs’ empathy for a missing therapy dog, their attitudes to animal-assisted therapy programs and suitable dog breeds. Anthrozoös, 11(2), 101–104. https://doi.org/10.2752/089279398787000779
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunha, M., Rego, A., & Munro, I. (2019). Dogs in organizations. Human Relations, 72(4), 778–800. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718780210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delanoeije, J. (2018). Dogs at the 2020 (home-)workplace. Work-Life Balance Bulletin: A DOP Publication, 2(2), 23–26. https://shop.bps.org.uk/work-life-balance-bulletin-a-dop-publication-volume-4-no-1-summer-2020, SKU: PUB-CAT-2322.
   Google Scholar
• Delanoeije, J., Gerencsér, L., & Miklósi, Á. (2020). Do dogs mind the dots? Investigating domestic dogs’ (Canis familiaris) preferential looking at human-shaped point-light figures. Ethology, 126(6), 637–650. https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.13016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delanoeije, J., Moons, C. P. H., & Peeters, E. H. K. A. (2020, September 3–5). Should we bring an employee-owned cat to a university campus [Paper presentation]. International Society for Anthrozoology (ISAZ) Conference: “One health, one welfare: Well-being for all in human–animal interactions”, Liverpool, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Delanoeije, J., Pendry, P., Peeters, E. H. K. A., & Moons, C. P. H. (2021, October 7–9). Behavioural profile differences between cats engaged in animal assisted interventions (AAIs) and non-AAI cats using a Flemish translation of the Feline Behavioral Assessment & Research Questionnaire (Fe-BARQ) [Paper presentation]. 3rd Annual Meeting of the European Veterinary Congress of Behavioural Medicine and Animal Welfare (EVCBMAW), Ghent, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Delanoeije, J., & Verbruggen, M. (2019). The use of work-home practices and work-home conflict: Examining the role of volition and perceived pressure in a multi-method study. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, article 2362. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02362
   Google Scholar
• del Pilar Sánchez-López, M., & Dresch, V. (2008). The 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12): Reliability, external validity and factor structure in the Spanish population. Psicothema, 20(4), 839–843. PMID: 18940092, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18940092
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinis, F. A. B. S. G., & Martins, T. L. F. (2016). Does cat attachment have an effect on human health? A comparison between owners and volunteers. Pet Behaviour Science, (1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.21071/pbs.v0i1.3986
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, D. L., de Moura, R. T. D., & Serpell, J. A. (2017). Development and evaluation of the Fe-BARQ: A new survey instrument for measuring behavior in domestic cats (Felis s. catus). Behavioural Processes, 141, 329–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2017.02.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunst, C. J., Hamby, D. W., & Trivette, C. M. (2004). Guidelines for calculating effect sizes for practice-based research syntheses. Centerscope, 3(1), 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, J. R. (1988). The determinants and consequences of coping with stress. In C. L. Cooper & R. Payne (Eds.), Causes, coping, and consequences of stress at work (pp. 233–263). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Endo, K., Yamasaki, S., Ando, S., Kikusui, T., Mogi, K., Nagasawa, M., Kamimura, I., Ishihara, J., Nakanishi, M., Usami, S., Hiraiwa-Hasegawa, M., Kasai, K., & Nishida, A. (2020). Dog and cat ownership predicts adolescents’ mental well-being: A population-based longitudinal study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(3), 884. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17030884
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fine, A. H., Tedeschi, P., Morris, K. N., & Elvove, E. (2019). Forward thinking: The evolving field of human–animal interactions. In A. H. Fine (Ed.), Handbook on animal-assisted therapy: Foundations and guidelines for animal-assisted interventions (5th ed., pp. 23–41). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815395-6.00003-1
   Google Scholar
• Finka, L. R. (2022). Conspecific and human sociality in the domestic cat: Consideration of proximate mechanisms, human selection and implications for cat welfare. Animals, 12(3), 298. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12030298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foreman, A. M., Allison, P., Poland, M., Meade, B. J., & Wirth, O. (2019). Employee attitudes about the impact of visitation dogs on a college campus. Anthrozoös, 32(1), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2019.1550280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fossey, J., & Lawrence, V. (2013). Staff views on the involvement of animals in care home life: An exploratory study. Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 40, 305–333. ISSN: 0191-5096, EISSN: 1949-7652.
   Google Scholar
• Gadeyne, N., Verbruggen, M., Delanoeije, J., & De Cooman, R. (2018). All wired, all tired? Work-related ICT-use outside work hours and work-to-home conflict: The role of integration preference, integration norms and work demands. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 107, 86–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerencsér, L., Kosztolányi, A., Delanoeije, J., & Miklósi, Á. (2016). The effect of reward–handler dissociation on dogs’ obedience performance in different conditions. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 174, 103–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2015.11.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, D. P., & Hillier, V. F. (1979). A scaled version of the General Health Questionnaire. Psychological Medicine, 9(1), 139–145. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291700021644
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gundersen, E. D., & Johannessen, B. (2018). What motivates arrangements of dog visits in nursing homes? Experiences by dog handlers and nurses. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice, 31, 104–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctcp.2018.02.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haggerty, J. M., & Mueller, M. K. (2017). Animal-assisted stress reduction programs in higher education. Innovative Higher Education, 42(5), 379–389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-017-9392-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, S., & Mills, D. (2019). Taking dogs into the office: A novel strategy for promoting work engagement, commitment and quality of life. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2019.00138
   Google Scholar
• Hartwig, E. K., & Binfet, J.-T. (2019). What is important in canine-assisted intervention teams? An investigation of canine-assisted intervention program online screening tools. Journal of Veterinary Behavior, 29, 53–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2018.09.004
   Google Scholar
• Haywood, C., Ripari, L., Puzzo, J., Foreman-Worsley, R., & Finka, L. R. (2021). Providing humans with practical, best practice handling guidelines during human–cat interactions increases cats’ affiliative behaviour and reduces aggression and signs of conflict. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 8, 835. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.714143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herzog, H. A. (2007). Gender differences in human–animal interactions: A review. Anthrozoös, 20(1), 7–21. https://doi.org/10.2752/089279307780216687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain, B., Syed, S., Hafford-Letchfield, T., & O’Farrell-Pearce, S. (2020). Dog-assisted interventions and outcomes for older adults in residential long-term care facilities: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Older People Nursing, 15(3), e12320. https://doi.org/10.1111/opn.12320
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jammaers, E. (2021). On ableism and anthropocentrism: A canine perspective on the workplace inclusion of disabled people. Human Relations. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267211057549
   Google Scholar
• Janssens, M., Janssens, E., Eshuis, J., Lataster, J., Simons, M., Reijnders, J., & Jacobs, N. (2021). Companion animals as buffer against the impact of stress on affect: An experience sampling study. Animals, 11(8), 2171. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11082171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John, O. P., Donahue, E. M., & Kentle, R. L. (1991). Big Five Inventory (BFI) [Database record]. APA PsycTests. https://doi.org/10.1037/t07550-000
   Google Scholar
• Kinman, G., & Johnson, S. (2019). Special section on well-being in academic employees. International Journal of Stress Management, 26(2), 159–161. https://doi.org/10.1037/str0000131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi, A., Yamaguchi, Y., Ohtani, N., & Ohta, M. (2017). The effects of touching and stroking a cat on the inferior frontal gyrus in people. Anthrozoös, 30(3), 473–486. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2017.1335115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause-Parello, C. A., & Morales, K. A. (2018). Military veterans and service dogs: A qualitative inquiry using interpretive phenomenological analysis. Anthrozoös, 31(1), 61–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2018.1406201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurdek, L. A. (2008). Pet dogs as attachment figures. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25(2), 247–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407507087958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeCroy, C. W., & Krysik, J. (2007). Understanding and interpreting effect size measures. Social Work Research, 31(4), 243–248. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/31.4.243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipson, S. K., Lattie, E. G., & Eisenberg, D. (2019). Increased rates of mental health service utilization by U.S. college students: 10-year population-level trends (2007–2017). Psychiatric Services, 70(1), 60–63. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201800332
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConnell, A. R., Brown, C. M., Shoda, T. M., Stayton, L. E., & Martin, C. E. (2011). Friends with benefits: On the positive consequences of pet ownership. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(6), 1239–1252. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024506
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Möller-Leimkühler, A. M. (2002). Barriers to help-seeking by men: A review of sociocultural and clinical literature with particular reference to depression. Journal of Affective Disorders, 71(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0327(01)00379-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molnár, M., Iváncsik, R., DiBlasio, B., & Nagy, I. (2020). Examining the effects of rabbit-assisted interventions in the classroom environment. Animals, 10(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10010026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muris, P., Roelofs, J., Rassin, E., Franken, I., & Mayer, B. (2005). Mediating effects of rumination and worry on the links between neuroticism, anxiety and depression. Personality and Individual Differences, 39(6), 1105–1111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naragon-Gainey, K., Watson, D., & Markon, K. E. (2009). Differential relations of depression and social anxiety symptoms to the facets of extraversion/positive emotionality. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 118(2), 299–310. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015637
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navrady, L. B., Ritchie, S. J., Chan, S. W. Y., Kerr, D. M., Adams, M. J., Hawkins, E. H., Porteous, D., Deary, I. J., Gale, C. R., Batty, G. D., & McIntosh, A. M. (2017). Intelligence and neuroticism in relation to depression and psychological distress: Evidence from two large population cohorts. European Psychiatry, 43, 58–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2016.12.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pendry, P., Carr, A. M., Gee, N. R., & Vandagriff, J. L. (2020). Randomized trial examining effects of animal assisted intervention and stress related symptoms on college students’ learning and study skills. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(6), 1909. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17061909
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pendry, P., Carr, A. M., Vandagriff, J. L., & Gee, N. R. (2021). Incorporating human–animal interaction into academic stress management programs: Effects on typical and at-risk college students’ executive function. AERA Open, 7. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584211011612
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pendry, P., Carr, A., Roeter, S., & Vandagriff, J. (2018). Experimental trial-demonstrates effects of animal-assisted stress prevention program on college students’ positive and negative emotion. Human–Animal Interaction Bulletin, 6(1), 81–97. ISBN/ISSN: 2333-522X. https://habricentral.org/resources/73414
   Google Scholar
• Pendry, P., Kuzara, S., & Gee, N. R. (2019). Evaluation of undergraduate students’ responsiveness to a 4-week university-based animal-assisted stress prevention program. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(18), 3331. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16183331
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pendry, P., & Vandagriff, J. L. (2019). Animal visitation program (AVP) reduces cortisol levels of university students: A randomized controlled trial. AERA Open, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419852592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pendry, P., & Vandagriff, J. L. (2020). Salivary studies of the social neuroscience of human–animal interaction. In D. A. Granger & M. K. Taylor (Eds.), Salivary bioscience (pp. 555–581). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Reevy, G. M., & Delgado, M. M. (2015). Are emotionally attached companion animal caregivers conscientious and neurotic? Factors that affect the human–companion animal relationship. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 18(3), 239–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888705.2014.988333
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reevy, G. M., & Delgado, M. M. (2020). The relationship between neuroticism facets, conscientiousness, and human attachment to pet cats. Anthrozoös, 33(3), 387–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2020.1746527
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robino, A. E., & Adams, C. R. (2021). Implementing a dog in college counseling: A mixed methods study. Journal of College Student Psychotherapy, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/87568225.2021.1884950
   Google Scholar
• Roelofs, J., Huibers, M., Peeters, F., & Arntz, A. (2008). Effects of neuroticism on depression and anxiety: Rumination as a possible mediator. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(3), 576–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.09.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somervill, J., Kruglikova, Y., Robertson, R., Hanson, L., & MacLin, O. (2008). Physiological responses by college students to a dog and a cat: Implications for pet therapy. North American Journal of Psychology, 10(3), 519–528. ISSN: 1527-7143.
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Tedeschi, P., & Jenkins, M. (2019). Transforming trauma: Resilience and healing through our connections with animals. Purdue University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, D. C. (2017). A review of over three decades of research on cat–human and human–cat interactions and relationships. Behavioural Processes, 141, 297–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2017.01.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, D. C. (2021). The mechanics of social interactions between cats and their owners. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 8, 292. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.650143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, D. C., & Rieger, G. (2001). Singly living people and their cats: A study of human mood and subsequent behavior. Anthrozoös, 14(1), 38–46. https://doi.org/10.2752/089279301786999652
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandagriff, J. L., Carr, A. M., Roeter Smith, S. M., & Pendry, P. (2022). Effects of essential animal visitation program (AVP) components on students’ salivary α-amylase and amylase-to-cortisol ratios. Anthrozoös, 35(3), 443–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2021.1996025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward-Griffin, E., Klaiber, P., Collins, H. K., Owens, R. L., Coren, S., & Chen, F. S. (2018). Petting away pre-exam stress: The effect of therapy dog sessions on student well-being. Stress and Health, 34(3), 468–473. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.2804
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkle, M., Johnson, A., & Mills, D. (2020). Dog welfare, well-being and behavior: Considerations for selection, evaluation and suitability for animal-assisted therapy. Animals, 10(11), 2188. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10112188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar