Willingness to Consume Fewer Animal Products: A Latent Profile Analysis

References

• Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C., & Rothengatter, T. (2005). A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(3), 273–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C., & Rothengatter, T. (2007). The effect of tailored information, goal setting, and tailored feedback on household energy use, energy-related behaviors, and behavioral antecedents. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(4), 265–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akaike, H. (1987). Factor analysis and AIC. In E. Parzen, K. Tanabe, & G. Kitagawa (Eds.), Selected papers of Hirotugu Akaike (pp. 371–386). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1694-0_29
   Google Scholar
• Bakker, E., & Dagevos, H. (2012). Reducing meat consumption in today’s consumer society: Questioning the citizen-consumer gap. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 25(6), 877–894. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-011-9345-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, J. (2008). Thinking and deciding (4th ed.). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, C. J. (2019). We can’t keep meating like this: Attitudes towards vegetarian and vegan diets in the United Kingdom. Sustainability, 11(23), 6844. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11236844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buhrmester, M. D., Talaifar, S., & Gosling, S. D. (2018). An evaluation of Amazon’s Mechanical Turk, its rapid rise, and its effective use. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(2), 149–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617706516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 3–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610393980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell-Arvai, V. (2015). Food-related environmental beliefs and behaviors among university undergraduates: A mixed-methods study. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-06-2013-0071
   Google Scholar
• Celeux, G., & Soromenho, G. (1996). An entropy criterion for assessing the number of clusters in a mixture model. Journal of Classification, 13(2), 195–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01246098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler, J., Mueller, P., & Paolacci, G. (2014). Nonnaivete among Amazon Mechanical Turk workers: Consequences and solutions for behavioral researchers. Behavior Research Methods, 46(1), 112–130. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0365-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, M., & Tilman, D. (2017). Comparative analysis of environmental impacts of agricultural production systems, agricultural input efficiency, and food choice. Environmental Research Letters, 12(6). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa6cd5
   Google Scholar
• Cordts, A., Nitzko, S., & Spiller, A. (2014). Consumer response to negative information on meat consumption in Germany. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 17(4), 83–106. DOI:10.22004/ag.econ.164599
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L., & Meehl, P. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040957
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crump, M. J. C., McDonnell, J. V., & Gureckis, T. M. (2013). Evaluating Amazon’s Mechanical Turk as a tool for experimental behavioral research. PLoS ONE, 8(3), e57410. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0057410
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demmel, R., Beck, B., Richter, D., & Reker, T. (2004). Readiness to change in a clinical sample of problem drinkers: Relation to alcohol use, self-efficacy, and treatment outcome. European Addiction Research, 10(3), 133–138. https://doi.org/10.1159/000077702
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engel, M. (2000). The immorality of eating meat. In L. Pojman (Ed.), The moral life: An introductory reader in ethics and literature (pp. 856–890). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engel, M. (2002). Why YOU are committed to the immorality of eating meat. In W. Shaw (Ed.), Social and personal ethics (pp. 212–221). Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Feltz, A., Caton, J., Cogely, Z., Engel, M., Feltz, S., Ilea, R., Johnson, L. S., & Offer-Westort, T. (2022a). Developing an objective measure of knowledge of factory farming. Philosophical Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2022.2056436
   Google Scholar
• Feltz, A., Caton, J., Cogley, Z., Engel, M., Feltz, S., Ilea, R., … Offer-Westort, T. (in press). Using food frequency questionnaires to measure traits: A case study of human consumption of animals and animal products. PHAIR.
   Google Scholar
• Feltz, A., Feltz, S., Cogley, Z., Caton, J., Engel, M., Ilea, R., Johnson, L. S., & Tuvel, R. (2022b). Educational interventions and animal consumption: Results from lab and field studies. Appetite, 173, 105981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2022.105981
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feltz, S., & Feltz, A. (2019). The Knowledge of Animals as Food Scale. Human–Animal Interaction Bulletin, 7(2), 19–45. https://doi.org/10.1079/hai.2019.0011
   Google Scholar
• Happer, C., & Wellesley, L. (2019). Meat consumption, behaviour and the media environment: A focus group analysis across four countries. Food Security, 11(1), 123–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-018-0877-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harguess, J. M., Crespo, N. C., & Hong, M. Y. (2020). Strategies to reduce meat consumption: A systematic literature review of experimental studies. Appetite, 144, 104478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2019.104478
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heather, N., Luce, A., Peck, D., Dunbar, B., & James, I. (1999). Development of a treatment version of the Readiness to Change Questionnaire. Addiction Research, 7(1), 63–68. https://doi.org/10.3109/16066359909004375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschi, A., & Valero, D. (2017). Chance events and career decidedness: Latent profiles in relation to work motivation. The Career Development Quarterly, 65(1), 2–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/cdq.12076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holm, S. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6(2), 65–70. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4615733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hormes, J., Rozin, P., Green, M., & Fincher, K. (2013). Reading a book can change your mind, but only some changes last for a year: Food attidues changes in readers of The Ominvore’s Dilemma. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 778. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00778
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, M., & Hoffman, M. (2018). Variable-centered, person-centered, and person-specific approaches: Where theory meets method. Organizational Research Methods, 21(4), 846–876. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428117744021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, J., Liao, L. M., Weinstein, S. J., Sinha, R., Graubard, B. I., & Albanes, D. (2020). Association between plant and animal protein intake and overall and cause-specific mortality. JAMA Internal Medicine, 180(9), 1173–1184. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.2790
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jalil, A., Tasoff, J., & Bustamante, A. (2020). Eating to save the planet: Evidence from a randomized control trial using individual-level food purchase data. Food Policy, 95, 101950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2020.101950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khara, T., Riedy, C., & Ruby, M. (2021). A cross cultural meat paradox: A qualitative study of Australia and India. Appetite, 164, 105227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2021.105227
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kloeckner, C., & Ofstad, S. (2017). Tailored information helps people progress towards reducing their beef consumption. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 50, 24–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwasny, T., Dobernig, K., & Riefler, P. (2022). Towards reduced meat consumption: A systematic literature review of intervention effectiveness, 2001–2019. Appetite, 168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2021.105739
   Google Scholar
• Leach, S., Piazza, J., Loughnan, S., Sutton, R. M., Kapantai, I., Dhont, K., & Douglas, K. M. (2022). Unpalatable truths: Commitment to eating meat is associated with strategic ignorance of food-animal minds. Appetite, 171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2022.105935
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loy, L. S., Wieber, F., Gollwitzer, P. M., & Oettingen, G. (2016). Supporting sustainable food consumption: Mental contrasting with implementation intentions (MCII) aligns intentions and behaviors. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 607. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00607
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, W., & Suri, S. (2012). Conducting behavioral research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Behavior Research Methods, 44(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0124-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50(9), 741–749. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.50.9.741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nylund-Gibson, K., Garber, A. C., Carter, D. B., Chan, M., Arch, D. A. N., Simon, O., & Lawrie, S. I. (2022). Ten frequently asked questions about latent transition analysis. Psychological Methods. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000486
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Mara, F. P. (2011). The significance of livestock as a contributor to global greenhouse gas emissions today and in the near future. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 166, 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.04.074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piazza, J., Ruby, M., Loughnan, S., Luong, M., Kulik, J., Watkins, H., & Seigerman, M. (2015). Rationalizing meat consumption: The 4Ns. Appetite, 91, 114–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2015.04.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R CoreTeam. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Regan, T. (2004). The case for animal rights. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, J., Beymer, P., Anderson, D., Van Lissa, C., & Schmidt, J. (2018). TidyLPA: An R package to easily carry out latent profile analysis (LPA) using open-soure or commercial software. Journal of Open Source Software, 30(3), 978. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00978
   Google Scholar
• Rothgerber, H. (2013). Real men don’t eat (vegetable) quiche: Masculinity and the justification of meat consumption. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 14(4), 363–375. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothgerber, H. (2014). Efforts to overcome vegetarian-induced dissonance among meat eaters. Appetite, 79, 32–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2014.04.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozin, P., Markwith, M., & Stoess, C. (1997). Moralization and becoming a vegetarian: The transformation of preferences into values and the recruitment of disgust. Psychological Science, 8(2), 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00685.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder, T. C., Barkley, A. P., & Schroeder, K. C. (1996). Income growth and international meat consumption. Journal of International Food & Agribusiness Marketing, 7(3), 15–30. doi:10.1300/J047v07n03_02
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. Analysis of Statistics, 6(2), 461–464. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176344136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwitzgebel, E. (2019, July 11). Ethics classes can influence student behavior: Students purchase less meat after discussing arguments for vegetarianism. http://schwitzsplinters.blogspot.com/2019/07/ethics-classes-can-influence-student.html.
   Google Scholar
• Schwitzgebel, E., Cokelet, B., & Singer, P. (2020). Do ethics classes influence student behavior? Case study: Teaching the ethics of eating meat. Cognition, 203, 104397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104397
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sclove, S. L. (1987). Application of model-selection criteria to some problems in multivariate analysis. Psychometrika, 52(3), 333–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, P. (1975). Animal liberation: A new ethics for our treatment of animals. Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, P. (1979). Practical ethics. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, P. (1989). All animals are equal. In T. Regan, & P. Singer (Eds.), Animal rights and human obligations (pp. 148–162). Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Spurk, D., Hirschi, A., Wang, M., Valero, D., & Kauffeld, S. (2020). Latent profile analysis: A review and “how to” guide of its application within vocational behavior research. Jouranl of Vocational Behavior, 120, 103445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, N., Ungemach, C., Harris, A. J. L., Bartels, D. M., Newell, B. R., Paolacci, G., & Chandler, J. (2015). The average laboratory samples a population of 7,3000 Amazon Mechanical Turk workers. Judgment and Decision Making, 10(5), 479–491. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500005611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taft, C. (2016). Motivational methods for vegan advocacy: A clinical psychology perspective. Vegan Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• von Treuer, K., Karantzas, G., McCabe, M., Mellor, D., Konis, A., Davison, T. E., & O'Connor, D. (2018). Organizational factors associated with readiness for change in residential aged care settings. BMC Health Services Research, 18(1), 77. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-2832-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weirich, P. (2004). Realistic decision theory: Rules for nonideal agents in nonideal circumstances. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar