Greyhounds, Hunters, and Hares: The Construction of Fluid Animality in Interspecies Relations

References

• Anderson, D. G., Loovers, J. P. L., Schroer, S. A., & Wishart, R. P. (2017). Architectures of domestication: On emplacing human–animal relations in the North. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 23(2), 398–416. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.12613_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birke, L. (2017). Meeting points: Choreographies of horses and humans. TRACE: Journal for Human-Animal Studies, 3, 54–70. https://doi.org/10.23984/fjhas.53189
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2003). Qualitative interviewing and grounded theory analysis. In J. F. Gubrium & J. S. Holstein (Eds.), Handbook of interview research: Context and method (pp. 675–694). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452218403.n25
   Google Scholar
• Cruzada, S. M. (2017). Nosotros también somos indígenas: la vulnerabilidad del naturalismo en contextos occidentales de convivencia entre especies [We are also indigenous: The vulnerability of naturalism in western contexts of interspecies coexistence]. Etnografica, 21(1), 49–71. https://doi.org/10.4000/etnografica.4810
   Google Scholar
• Cruzada, S. M. (2019). Encuentros de Vida y muerte [Life and death encounters]. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Universidad Pablo Olavide Sevilla.
   Google Scholar
• Cruzada, S., & Marvin, G. (2020). El estudio de las relaciones humano–animales en la actual “encrucijada Ambiental” [The study of human–animal relations at the current “environmental crossroads”]. Revista Andaluza De Antropología, 1(18), 4–20. https://doi.org/10.12795/RAA.2020.18.02
   Google Scholar
• Dalla Bernardina, S. (2000). Una persona no completamente como las demás. El animal y su estatuto [A person not entirely like other people. The animal and its status]. Gazeta de Antropología, 16, a9. https://doi.org/10.30827/Digibug.7504
   Google Scholar
• Davydov, V. N. (2014a). Issledovanie otnosheniĭ cheloveka i olen'͡ta ν IU͡zhnoĭ IAkutii [ The research of human–reindeer relations in Southern Yakutiia]. In E. G. Fedorova (Ed.), Materialy polevykh issledovaniï (pp. 95–117). MAÈ RAN.
   Google Scholar
• Davydov, V. N. (2014b). Ot dikogo k domashnemu: strategii domestikats͡ii olenia͡ v Severnom Zabaĭkal’e [From wild to domestic: Strategies of reindeer domestication in the Northern Zabaikal’e]. In E. G. Fedorova (Ed.), Radlovskiĭ sborník: nauchnye issledovannia͡ i muzeĭnye proekty (pp. 365–371). MAÈ RAN.
   Google Scholar
• de la Cadena, M. (2014). The politics of modern politics meets ethnographies of excess through ontological openings. Theorizing the Contemporary, Fieldsights, January 13. https://culanth.org/fieldsights/the-politics-of-modern-politics-meets-ethnographies-of-excess-through-ontological-openings
   Google Scholar
• Descola, P. (2001). Construyendo naturalezas: ecología simbólica y práctica social [Constructing natures: Symbolic ecology and social practice]. In P. Descola & G. Pálsson (Eds.), Naturaleza y Sociedad: Perspectivas Antropológicas (pp. 101–123). Siglo XXI.
   Google Scholar
• Desjarlais, R., & Throop, J. (2011). Phenomenological approaches in anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 40(1), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-092010-153345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Digard, P. (1990). L’homme et les animaux domestiques: Anthropologia d’une passion. Fayard.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. (2000). El lugar de la naturaleza y la naturaleza del lugar: ¿Globalización o postdesarrollo? [The place of nature and the nature of place: Globalization or postdevelopment?]. In A. Viola (Ed.), Antropología del Desarrollo (pp. 113–144). CLACSO.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. (2008). Territories of difference: Place, movements, life, redes. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Faier, L., & Rofel, L. (2014). Ethnographies of encounter. Annual Review of Anthropology, 43(1), 363–377. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102313-030210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fanaro, L. A. (2020). The domestic, the wild and its interstices: What can a dog do in Tierra del Fuego. Vibrant: Virtual Brazilian Anthropology, 17. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-43412020v17a353
   Google Scholar
• Fanaro, L. A. (2021). Arquiteturas da domesticação, arquiteturas contra a invasão: Cães ferais e paisagens reconfiguradas no cone sul (Brasil, Chile e Argentina) [Architectures of domestication, architectures against invasion: Feral dogs and reconfigured landscapes in the southern cone (Brazil, Chile and Argentina)]. Revista Ñanduty, 9(13), 152–177. https://doi.org/10.30612/nty.v9i13.15545
   Google Scholar
• Gamuz, H. P. (2021). Etnografía de las relaciones humano–animales en el contexto de la caza de liebres con galgos en Fuentes de Andalucía (Sevilla) [Ethnography of human–animal relationships in the context of hare hunting with greyhounds in Fuentes de Andalucía (Seville)]. [Trabajo Fin de Master Inedito]. Universidad de Sevilla. https://hdl.handle.net/11441/143531
   Google Scholar
• Gamuz, H. P., & Palenzuela, P. (2021). La caza de liebres con galgos en andalucía: desde el conflicto a la patrimonialización [Hare coursing with greyhounds in Andalusia: From conflict to patrimonialization]. Revista Andaluza de Antropología, 21(20), 8–44. https://doi.org/10.12795/RAA.2021.21.2
   Google Scholar
• Gamuz, H. P., & Ruiz-Ballesteros, E. (in press). Galgos cazadores, toros de lidia y gatos domesticos: animalidades emergentes y fluidas. In Entongrafías álter-humanas: antropología de las relaciones animales en España. Editorial CSIC.
   Google Scholar
• Glasser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1999). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research (1st ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, D. (1976). The question of animal awareness. Rockefeller University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, D. (1984). Animal thinking. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hallowell, I. (1960). Ojibwa ontology, behavior, and worldview. In S. Diamond (Ed.), Culture in history: Essays in honor of Paul Radin (pp. 19–52). Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (1984). Ciencia, cyborgs y mujeres. La reinvención de la naturaleza [Simians, cyborgs and women: The reinvention of nature]. Cátedra.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (2003). The companion species manifesto: Dogs, people and significant otherness. Prickly Paradigm Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (2008). When species meet. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. (1992). Culture and the perception of the environment. In E. Croll & D. Parkin (Eds.), Bush base, forest farm: Culture, environment and development (pp. 39–56). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. (1994a). From trust to domination: An alternative history of human–animal relations. In A. Manning & J. A. Serpell (Eds.), Animals and human society: Changing perspectives (pp. 1–22). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. (1988/1994b). What is an animal? (1st ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. (1990/1996). Against the motion: Human worlds are culturally constructed. In T. Ingold (Ed.), Key debates in anthropology (pp. 81–106). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kohn, E. (2007). How dogs dream: Amazonian natures and the politics of transspecies engagement. American Ethnologist, 34(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.2007.34.1.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohn, E. (2013). How forests think: Towards an anthropology beyond the human. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content analysis. An introduction to its methodology. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2007). Nunca fuimos modernos. Ensayo de antropología simétrica [We were never modern. An essay on symmetrical anthropology]. Siglo XXI.
   Google Scholar
• Leach, E. (1989). Anthropological aspects of language: Animal categories and verbal abuse. Anthrozoös, 2(3), 151–165. https://doi.org/10.2752/089279389787058055
   Google Scholar
• Leach, H. M. (2007). Selection and the unforeseen consequences of domestication. In R. Cassidy & M. Mullin (Eds.), Where the wild things are now: Domestication reconsidered (pp. 71–100). Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Leenhardt, M. (1997). Do kamo. La persona y el mito en el mundo melanesio [Do kamo. The person and the myth in the Melanesian world]. Paidós.
   Google Scholar
• Lestel, D., & Taylor, H. (2013). Shared life: An introduction. Social Science Information, 52(2), 183–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018413477335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marvin, G. (2000). Natural instincts and cultural passions. Performance Research, 5(2), 108–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/13528165.2000.10871735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marvin, G. (2005). Sensing nature: Encountering the world in hunting. Etnofoor, 18(1), 15–26. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25758083
   Google Scholar
• Marvin, G., & McHugh, S. (2014). In it together: An introduction to human–animal studies. In G. Marvin & S. McHugh (Eds.), Routledge handbook of human–animal studies (pp. 23–37). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945/1993). Fenomenología de la percepción [Phenomenology of perception]. Planeta-Agostini.
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (1960/1995). La nature: Notes cours du college de France [Nature: Course notes from collège de France]. Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• Milton, K. (2005). Anthropomorphism or egomorphism? The perception of non-human persons by human ones. In J. Knight (Ed.), Animals in person (pp. 255–271). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mullin, M. H. (1999). Mirrors and windows: Sociocultural studies of human–animal relationships. Annual Reviews of Anthropology, 28(1), 201–224. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.28.1.201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadasdy, P. (2007). The gift in the animal: The ontology of hunting and human–animal sociality. American Ethnologist, 34(1), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.2007.34.1.25
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oma, K. A. (2013). Human–animal meeting points: Use of space in the household arena in past societies. Society & Animals, 21(2), 162–177. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685306-12341296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortega y Gasset, J. (1962). La caza y los toros [Hunting and bulfighting]. Espasa.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2009) A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science, 325, 419–422. https://www.science.org/doi/10 .1126/science.1172133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pazos, A. (2005). El otro como sí-mismo. Observaciones antropológicas sobre las tecnologías de la subjetividad [The other as self. Anthropological observations on the technologies of subjectivity]. AIBR. Revista de Antropología Iberoamericana. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/623/62309912.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S. (1978). Fragmentos de La ciencia de la semiótica. [Excerpts from the science of semiotics]. Nueva Visión.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S. (1987). Fragmentos de Obra Lógica Semiótica. [Fragments of semiotic logic work]. Taurus.
   Google Scholar
• Petitt, A. (2021). Cow paths and horse trails: In academia and around the world. In L. Birke & H. Wals (Eds.), Dreaming of Pegasus: Equine imaginings (pp. 99–115). Victorina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petitt, A. (2022). Conceptualizing the multispecies triad: Toward a multispecies intersectionality. Feminist Anthropology. https://doi.org/10.1002/fea2.12099
   Google Scholar
• Petitt, A., & Brandt-Off, K. (2022). Zoocialization: Learning together, becoming together in a multispecies triad. Society & Animals. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685306-bja10082
   Google Scholar
• Ram, K., & Houston, C. (2015). Introduction. In K. Ram & C. Houston (Eds.), Phenomenology in anthropology: A sense of perspective (pp. 1–26). Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Romero, A. (2010). El gran libro de los galgos [The great book of greyhounds]. Editorial Almuzara.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Ballesteros, E., & Valcuende, J. M. (2019). Trapped in nature: Discourses on humanity in processes of environmental naturalization. Journal of Political Ecology, 26(1), 184–201. https://doi.org/10.2458/v26i1.23244
   Google Scholar
• Scott, C. (1989). Knowledge construction among Cree hunters: Metaphors and literal understanding. Journal de la Société des Américanistes, 75(1), 193–208. https://doi.org/10.3406/jsa.1989.1349
   Google Scholar
• Scott, C. (1996). Science for the West, myth for the rest? The case of James Bay Cree knowledge production. In L. Nader (Ed.), Naked science: Anthropological inquiry into boundaries, power, and knowledge (pp. 69–86). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Strathern, M. (1999). Property, substance and effect: Anthropological essays on persons and things. The Athlone Press.
   Google Scholar
• Uexküll, J. (1934/2016). Andanzas por los mundos circundantes de los animales y los hombres [Wanderings through the surrounding worlds of animals and humans]. Cactus.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dooren, T., Kirksey, E., & Münster, U. (2016). Multispecies studies. Cultivating arts of attentiveness. Environmental Humanities, 8(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-3527695
   Google Scholar