Organizational Policy Communication Research: Challenges, Discoveries, and Future Directions

References4

• *Alderson, J. C. (2009). Air safety, language assessment policy, and policy implementation: A case of aviation English. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 29, 168–187. doi:10.1017/S0267190509090128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Aldred, R. (2007). Closed policy networks, broken chains of communication and the stories behind an ‘entrepreneurial policy’: The case of NHS Local Improvement Finance Trust (NHS LIFT). Critical Social Policy Ltd., 27, 139–151. doi:10.1177/0261018307072211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Anagnostopoulos, D., Buchanan, N. T., Pereira, C. & Lichty, L. F. (2008). School staff responses to gender-based bullying as moral interpretation: An exploratory study. Education Policy, 23, 519–553. doi:10.1177/0895904807312469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Atkinson, E. (2004). Thinking outside the box: An exercise in heresy. Qualitative Inquiry, 10, 111–129. doi:10.1177/1077800403259495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Bandow, D. & Hunter, D. (2008). Developing policies about uncivil workplace behavior. Business Communication Quarterly, 71, 103–106. doi:10.1177/1080569907313380
   Google Scholar
• *Baumgartner, F. R., Gray, V. & Lowery, D. (2009). Federal policy activity and the mobilization of state lobbying organizations. Political Research Quarterly, 62, 552–567. doi:10.1177/1065912908322407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Berk, J. M. & Bierut, B. K. (2011). Communication in a monetary policy committee. European Journal of Political Economy, 27, 791–801. doi:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2011.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Bourne, K. A. & Lentz, P. J. (2009). Reifying the private/public divide: Examining rhetorical strategies in the debate on maternity leave policy in the USA. Equal Opportunities International, 28, 513–531. doi:10.1108/02610150910980800
   Google Scholar
• *Brammer, S. & Pavelin, S. (2008). Factors influencing the quality of corporate environmental disclosure. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17, 120–136. doi:10.1002/bse.506
   Google Scholar
• *Bremmers, H., Haverk, D. & Omta, O. (2009). Dynamic behavioral fingerprinting: What drives the deployment of environmental information and communication capabilities? Journal of Cleaner Production, 17, 751–761. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.11.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Buzzanell, P. M. & Liu, M. (2005). Struggling with maternity leave policies and practices: A poststructuralist feminist analysis of gendered organizing. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 33, 1–25. doi:10.1080/0090988042000318495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Buzzanell, P. M., Meisenbach, R., Remke, R., Liu, M., Bowers, V. & Conn, C. (2005). The good working mother: Managerial women's sensemaking and feelings about work-family issues. Communication Studies, 56, 261–285. doi:10.1080/10510970500181389
   Google Scholar
• *Canary, H. E. (2010). Constructing policy knowledge: Contradictions, communication, and knowledge frames. Communication Monographs, 77, 181–206. doi:10.1080/03637751003758185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Canary, H. E. & McPhee, R. D. (2009). The mediation of policy knowledge: An interpretive analysis of activity systems. Management Communication Quarterly, 23, 147–187. doi:10.1177/0893318909341409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Carter, J. J., Claudie, D. D. & Smith, N. N. (2006). An indigenous role in partnerships for sustainable homelands occupation in Australia. Sustainable Development, 14, 162–176. doi:10.1002/sd.261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Castor, T. (2007). Language use during school board meetings: Understanding controversies of and about communication. Journal of Business Communication, 44, 111–136. doi:10.1177/0021943606298828
   Google Scholar
• *Castor, T. (2009). ‘It's just a process’: Questioning in the construction of a university crisis. Discourse Studies, 11, 179–198. doi:10.1177/1461445608100943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Chang, L. & Jacobson, T. (2010). Measuring participation as communicative action: A case study of citizen involvement in and assessment of a city's smoking cessation policy-making process. Journal of Communication, 60, 660–679. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01508.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Chess, C., Burger, J. & McDermott, M. (2005). Speaking like a state: Environmental justice and fish consumption advisories. Society & Natural Resources, 18, 267–278. doi:10.1080/0894920590908132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Cogburn, D. L., Johnsen, J. F. & Bhattacharyya, S. (2008). Distributed deliberative citizens: Exploring the impact of cyber infrastructure on transnational civil society participation in global ICT policy processes. International Journal of Media and Cultural Politics, 4, 27–49. doi:10.1386/macp.4.1.27_1
   Google Scholar
• *Colgan, F., Creegan, C., McKearny, A. & Wright, T. (2007). Equality and diversity policies and practices at work: Lesbian, gay and bisexual workers. Equal Opportunities International, 26, 590–609. doi:10.1108/02610150710777060
   Google Scholar
• *Conrad, C. & Cudahy, C. (2010). The rhetoric and origins of the Canadian Medicare system. Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 13, 543–580. doi:10.1353/rap.2010.0206
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J. & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• *Cowan, R. L. (2011). “Yes, we have an anti-bullying policy, but …”: HR professionals' understandings and experiences with workplace bullying policy. Communication Studies, 62, 307–327. doi:10.1080/10510974.2011.553763
   Google Scholar
• *Creegan, C., Colgan, F., Charlesworth, R. & Robinson, G. (2003). Race equality policies at work: Employee perceptions of the ‘implementation gap’ in a UK local authority. Work, Employment & Society, 17, 617–640. doi:10.1177/0950017003174002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Crona, B. I. & Parker, J. N. (2011). Network determinants of knowledge utilization: Preliminary lessons from a boundary organization. Science Communication, 33, 448–471. doi:10.1177/1075547011408116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daft, R. L. (1986). Organization theory and design (2nd ed.). St. Paul, MN: West Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• *Dalgic, U. K. (2007). International expert organizations and policy adoption: The World Bank and microfinance in the 1990s. Cultural Dynamics, 16, 5–38. doi:10.1177/0921374007077266
   Google Scholar
• *Davison, E. L. & Rouse, J. (2004). Exploring domestic partnership benefits policies in corporate America. Journal of Homosexuality, 48, 21–44. doi:10.1300/J082v48n02_02
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deetz, S. (2001). Conceptual foundations. In F. M. Jablin & L. L. Putnam (Eds.), The new handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods (pp. 3–46). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• *Denham, B. E. (2004). Sports Illustrated, the mainstream press and the enactment of drug policy in Major League Baseball: A study in agenda-building theory. Journalism, 5, 51–68. doi:10.1177/1464884904039554
   Google Scholar
• *di Mauro, D. & Joffe, C. (2007). The religious right and the reshaping of sexual policy: An examination of reproductive rights and sexuality education. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 4, 67–92. doi:10.1525/srsp.2007.4.1.67
   Google Scholar
• *Doren, R. F., Trexler, J. C., Gottlieb, A. D. & Harwell, M. C. (2009). Ecological indicators for system-wide assessment of the great everglades ecosystem restoration. Ecological Indicators, 9(6), s2–s16. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2008.08.009
   Google Scholar
• *Dougherty, D. S. & Smythe, M. J. (2004). Sensemaking, organizational culture, and sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 32, 293–317. doi:10.1080/0090988042000275998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Fredriksson, R., Barner-Rasmussen, W. & Piekkari, R. (2006). The multinational corporation as a multilingual organization: The notion of a common corporate language. Corporate Communication, 11, 406–423. doi:10.1108/13563280610713879
   Google Scholar
• *Frundt, H. J. (2010). Sustaining labor-environmental collation: Banana allies in Costa Rica. Latin American Politics and Society, 52, 99–129. doi:10.1111/j.1548-2456.2010.00091.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Gabler, M. (2010). Norms, institutions and social learning: An explanation for weak policy integration in the WTO's Committee on Trade and Environment. Global Environmental Politics, 10, 80–117. doi:10.1162/glep.2010.10.2.80
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Guttman, N. (2007). Bringing the mountain to the public: Dilemmas and contradictions in the procedures of public deliberation initiatives that aim to get “ordinary citizens” to deliberate policy issues. Communication Theory, 17, 411–438. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00305.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Hamilton, H. L. (2011). Employee dissent in federal government organizations: Lessons for managing reputation and fostering employee loyalty. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 16, 225–273. doi:10.1108/13563281111156907
   Google Scholar
• *Hargie, O. & Dickson, D. (2007). Are important corporate policies understood by employees? A tracking study of organizational information flow. Journal of Communication Management, 11, 9–29. doi:10.1108/13632540710725969
   Google Scholar
• *Harris, M., Hutchinson, R. & Carins, B. (2005). Community-wide planning for faith-based service provisions: Practical, policy, and conceptual challenges. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 34, 88–109. doi:10.1177/0899764004269305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Hastings, J. G. (2011). International environmental NGOs and conservation science and policy: A case from Brazil. Coastal Management, 39, 317–335. doi:10.1080/08920753.2011.566125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Hearn, J. & Piekkari, R. (2005). Gendered leadership and leaderships on gender policy: National contexts, corporate structures, and chief human resources managers in transnational corporations. Leadership, 1, 429–454. doi:10.1177/1742715005057450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Hintz, A. & Milan, S. (2009). At the margins of Internet governance: Grassroots tech groups and communication policy. International Journal of Media and Cultural Politics, 5, 23–38. doi:10.1386/macp.5.1&2.23/1
   Google Scholar
• *Honeycutt, T. C. & Strong, D. A. (2012). Using social network analysis to predict early collaboration within health advocacy coalitions. American Journal of Evaluation, 33, 221–239. doi:10.1177/1098214011424201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Hornby, G. & Witte, C. (2010). Parent involvement in rural elementary schools in New Zealand: A survey. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 19, 771–777. doi:10.1007/s10826-010-9368-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Hutchings, J. A. & Festa-Bianchet, M. (2009). Scientific advice on species at risk: A comparative analysis of status assessments of polar bear, ursus maritimus. Environmental Reviews, 17, 45–51. doi:10.1139/A09-002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Ingenbleek, T. M. & Immink, V. M. (2010). Managing conflicting stakeholder interest: An exploratory case analysis of the formulation of corporate social responsibility standards in the Netherlands. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 29, 52–65. doi:10.1509/jppm.29.1.52
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Jakobsen, C. & McLaughlin, W. J. (2004). Communication in ecosystem management: A case study of cross-disciplinary integration in the assessment phase of the Interior Columbia Basin Ecosystem Management Project. Environmental Management, 33, 591–605. doi:10.1007/s00267-003-2900-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Jephcote, M. & Davies, B. (2004). Recontextualizing discourse: An exploration of the workings of the meso level. Journal of Education Policy, 19, 547–564. doi:10.1080/0268093042000269135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Johnson, P. E. & Chrispeels, J. H. (2010). Linking the central office and its school for reform. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46, 738–775. doi:10.1177/0013161 × 10377346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Jorstad, E. & Skogen, K. (2010). The Norwegian red list between science and policy. Environmental Science and Policy, 13, 115–122. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2009.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Jovanovic, S. & Wood, R. V. (2006). Communication ethics and ethical culture: A study of the ethics initiative in Denver city government. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 34, 386–405. doi:10.1080/00909880600908633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Kelly, E. L. (2010). Failure to update: An institutional perspective on noncompliance with the Family and Medical Leave Act. Law & Society Review, 44, 33–66. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5893.2010.00395.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Kim, S. (2001). Perceived impacts of family leave policy: Do organizational factors matter? Public Personnel Management, 30, 221–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Kirby, E. & Krone, K. J. (2002). “The policy exists but you can't really use it”: Communication and structuration of work-family policies. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 30, 50–77. doi:10.1080/00909880216577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Knapp, K. J. & Ferrante, C. J. (2012). Policy awareness, enforcement and maintenance: Critical to information security effectiveness in organizations. Journal of Management Policy and Practice, 13(5), 66–80. doi:10.1108/09685220610648355
   Google Scholar
• *Kohsaka, R. & Flitner, M. (2004). Exploring forest aesthetics using forestry photo contest case studies examining Japanese and German public preferences. Forest Policy and Economics, 6, 289–299. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2004.03.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Kuk, G., Fokeer, S. & Woan Ting, H. (2005). Strategic formulation and communication of corporate environmental policy statements: UK firms' perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 58, 375–385. doi:10.1007/s10551-004-8316-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Larsen, K. A. & Valentine, P. S. (2007). The role of organizational culture in the on-ground implementation of tourism partnerships in protected areas. Organization & Environment, 20, 460–479. doi:10.1177/1086026607309391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *LeGreco, M. (2012). Working with policy: Restructuring healthy eating practices and the circuit of policy communication. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 40, 44–64. doi:10.1080/00909882.2011.636372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonardi, P. M. (2009). Why do people reject new technologies and stymie organizational changes of which they are in favor? Exploring misalignments between social interactions and materiality. Human Communication Research, 35, 407–441. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2009.01357.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, L. K. & Russ, T. L. (2012). Soliciting and using input during organizational change initiatives: What are practitioners doing. Management Communication Quarterly, 26, 267–294. doi:10.1177/0893318911431804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Liu, M. & Buzzanell, P. M. (2004). Negotiating maternity leave expectations: Perceived tensions between ethics of justice and care. Journal of Business Communication, 41, 323–349. doi:10.1177/0021943604268174
   Google Scholar
• *Lovell, H., Bulkeley, H. & Owens, S. (2009). Converging agendas? Energy and climate change policies in the UK. Environment & Planning C: Government & Policy, 27, 90–109. doi:10.1068/c0797j
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Mackeogh, C. & Preston, P. (2004). Strategies of inclusion: A case study from Ireland. Gender Technology and Development, 8, 231–253. doi:10.1177/097185240400800204
   Google Scholar
• *Madda, C. L., Halvers, R. R. & Gomez, L. M. (2007). Organizational resource for carrying out reform initiatives. Teachers College Record, 109, 1957–1979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Meisenbach, R. J., Remke, R. V., Buzzanell, P. M. & Liu, M. (2008). “They allowed": Pentadic mapping of women's maternity leave discourse as organizational rhetoric. Communication Monographs, 75, 1–24. doi:10.1080/03637750801952727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Menzies, H. & Newson, J. (2008). Time, stress and intellectual engagement in academic work: Exploring gender difference. Gender, Work and Organization, 15, 504–522. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0432.2008.00415.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Mills, H. J. (2005). Organizational change and representations of women in North American utility company. Gender, Work and Organization, 12, 242–269. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0432.2005.00272.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Morgan, E. L. (2003). Discourses of water: A framework for the study of environmental communication. Applied Environmental Education and Communication, 2, 133–139. doi:10.1080/15330150390218261
   Google Scholar
• *Nichols, N. & Griffith, A. I. (2009). Talk, text, and educational action: An institutional ethnography of policy in practice. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39, 241–255. doi:10.1080/03057640902902286
   Google Scholar
• *Noy, D. (2009). When framing fails: Ideas, influence, and resources in San Francisco's homeless policy field. Social Problems, 56, 223–242. doi:10.1525/sp.2009.56.2.223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Olson, K. (2007). Lost opportunities to learn: The effects of education policy on primary language instruction for English learners. Linguistics and Education, 18, 121–141. doi:10.1016/j.linged.2007.07.001
   Google Scholar
• Osher, D. & Quinn, M. M. (2003). Policies matter: For students, for teachers, and for better outcomes. Preventing School Failure, 47, 52–58. doi:10.1080/10459880309604430
   Google Scholar
• Peräkylä, A. & Ruusuvuori, J. (2011). Analyzing talk and text. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 529–543). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• *Rains, S. A. & Bosch, L. A. (2009). Privacy and health in the information age: A content analysis of health web site privacy policy statements. Health Communication, 24, 435–446. doi:10.1080/10410230903023485
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Rethemeyer, R. K. (2006). Policymaking in the age of Internet: Is the Internet tending to make policy networks more or less inclusive? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17, 259–284. doi:10.1093/jopart/mul001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Rich, C., Schutten, J. K. & Rogers, R. A. (2012). “Don't drop the soap”: Organizing sexualities in the repeal of the US military's “Don't ask, don't tell” policy. Communication Monographs, 79, 269–291. doi:10.1080/03637751.2012.697633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Rogers, P. S., Gunesekera, M. & Yang, M. L. (2011). Language options for managing Dana Corporation's philosophy and policy document. Journal of Business Communication, 48, 256–299. doi:10.1177/0021943611406501
   Google Scholar
• *Rosenfeld, L. B., Richman, J. M. & May, S. K. (2004). Information adequacy, job satisfaction and organizational culture in a dispersed-network organization. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 32, 28–54. doi:10.1080/0090988042000178112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Rowe, D. & Brass, K. (2011). “We take academic freedom quite seriously”: How university media offices manage academic public communication. International Journal of Media and Cultural Politics, 7, 3–20. doi:10.1386/mcp.7.1.3_1
   Google Scholar
• *Saouter, E. & Andreasen, I. (2006). Costs and benefits of communicating product safety information to the public via the Internet. Integrated Environmental Assessment & Management, 2, 191–195. doi:10.1002/ieam.5630020212
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• *Sato, H. & Akabayashi, A. (2005). Bioethical policymaking for advanced medical technologies: Institutional characteristics and citizen participation in eight OECD countries. Review of Policy Research, 22, 571–587. doi:10.1111/j.1541-1338.2005.00156.x
   Google Scholar
• *Snyder, J. L. (2010). E-mail privacy in the workplace. Journal of Business Communication, 47, 266–294. doi:10.1177/0021943610369783
   Google Scholar
• *Sutherland, W. J., Armstrong-Brown, S., Armsworth, P. R., Brereton, T., Brickland, J., Campbell, C. D. & Watkinson, A. R. (2006). The identification of 100 ecological questions of high policy relevance in the UK. Journal of Applied Ecology, 43, 617–627. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01188.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Swanberg, J. E. (2004). Illuminating gendered organization assumptions: An important step in creating a family-friendly organization: A case study. Community, Work & Family, 7, 3–28. doi:10.1080/1366880042000200271
   Google Scholar
• *Tam, C. (2006). Harmony hurts: Participations and silent conflict at an Indonesian fish pond. Environmental Management, 38, 1–15. doi:10.1080/02255189.2007.9669187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Tang, J. J., Stavroula, L., Hunt, N. & MacLennan, S. (2011). Occupational psychosocial health policies in Hong Kong schools: A review and exploration of key stakeholder perceptions. Health Policy, 103, 266–275. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2011.07.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Thomas, C. A. & Lee, B. (2010). Language liaisons: Language planning leadership in health care. Language Problems & Language Planning, 34, 95–119. doi:10.1075/lplp.34.2.01.tho
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Tlili, A. (2007). Rendering equality and diversity policies in the UK higher education institutions. Critical Discourse Studies, 4, 283–310. doi:10.1080/17405900701656890
   Google Scholar
• *Toikka, A. (2010). Exploring the composition of communication networks of governance—a case study on local environmental policy in Helsinki, Finland. Environmental Policy & Governance, 20, 135–145. doi:10.1002/eet.532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tompkins, P. K. & Wanca-Thibault, M. (2001). Organizational communication: Prelude and prospects. In F. M. Jablin & L. L. Putnam (Eds.), The new handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods (pp. xvii–xxxi). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• *Tracy, K. & Ashcraft, C. (2001). Crafting policies about controversial values: How wording disputes manage a group dilemma. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 29, 297–316. doi:10.1080/00909880128115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *True, J. & Mintrom, M. (2001). Transnational networks and policy diffusion: The case of gender mainstreaming. International Studies Quarterly, 45, 27–57. doi:10.1111/0020-8833.00181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Urwin, K. & Jordan, A. (2008). Does public policy support or undermine climate change adaptation? Exploring policy interplay across different scales of governance. Global Environmental Change Part A: Human & Policy Dimensions, 18, 180–191. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Uusi-Rauva, C. & Nurkka, J. (2010). Effective internal environment-related communication. Corporate Communication, 15, 299–314. doi:10.1108/13563281011068140
   Google Scholar
• *van Wijk, C. H. & Finchilescu, G. (2008). Symbols of organizational culture: Describing and prescribing gender integration of navy ships. Journal of Gender Studies, 17, 237–249. doi:10.1080/09589230802204266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Verdonk, P., Benschop, Y. W., De Haes, J. J. & Lagro-Janssen, A. (2008). Making a gender difference: Case studies of gender mainstreaming in medical education. Medical Teacher, 30, 194–201. doi:10.1080/01421590802213206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Walfish, S. & Ducey, B. B. (2007). Readability level of Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act Notices of Privacy Practices used by psychologists in clinical practice. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 38, 203–207. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.38.2.203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Wallace, M. (2003). Policy and organizational discourses: Identities offered to women workers. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 22, 50–76. doi:10.1108/02610150310787324
   Google Scholar
• *Wallace, S. & Gravells, J. (2010). Telling a compelling story: Managing inclusion in colleges of further education. Management in Education, 24, 102–106. doi:10.1177/0892020608090406
   Google Scholar
• *Weaver, N. L., Wray, R. J., Zellin, S., Gautam, K. & Jupka, K. (2012). Advancing organizational health literacy in health care organizations serving high-needs populations: A case study. Journal of Health Communication: International Perspectives, 17(sup3), 55–66. doi:10.1080/10810730.2012.714442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Weitzer, R. (2010). The mythology of prostitution: Advocacy research and public policy. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 7, 15–29. doi:10.1177/0892020608090406
   Google Scholar
• *Whiteman, D. (2009). Documentary film as policy analysis: The impact of Yes, In My Backyard on activists, agendas, and policy. Mass Communication and Society, 12, 457–477. doi:10.1080/15205430903237816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Wibeck, V., Johansson, M., Larsson, A. & Oberg, G. (2006). Communicative aspects of environmental management by objectives: Examples from the Swedish context. Environmental Management, 37, 461–469. doi:10.1007/s00267-004-0386-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Ziek, P. (2009). Making sense of CSR communication. Corporate Social Responsibility & Environmental Management, 16, 137–14. doi:10.1002/csr.183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar