Students' Imagined Interactions as Intrapersonal Explanations for Instructional Dissent

References

• Allen, M. W., Edwards, R., Hayhoe, C. R. & Leach, L. (2007). Imagined interactions, family money management patterns and coalitions, and attitudes toward money and credit. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 28, 3–22. doi:10.1007/s10834-006-9048-1
   Google Scholar
• Allen, T. H. (1990). An investigation of Machiavellianism and imagined interaction. Communication Research Reports, 7, 116–120. doi:10.1080/08824099009359864
   Google Scholar
• Allen, T. H. & Berkos, K. M. (2005–2006). Ruminating about symbolic conflict through imagined interactions. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 25, 307–320.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, T. H. & Honeycutt, J. M. (1997). Planning, imagined interaction, and the nonverbal display of anxiety. Communication Research, 24, 64–82. doi:10.1177/009365097024001003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkos, K. M. (2012–2013). Imagined interactions as a deterrent to students' antisocial email requests. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 32, 23–40. doi:10.2190/IC.32.1.c
   Google Scholar
• Berkos, K. M., Allen, T. H., Kearney, P. & Plax, T. G. (2001). When norms are violated: Imagined interactions as processing and coping mechanisms. Communication Monographs, 68, 289–300. doi:10.1080/03637750128066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodie, G., Honeycutt, J. M. & Vickery, A. J. (2013). An analysis of the correspondence between imagined interactions attributes and functions. Human Communication Research, 39, 157–183. doi:10.1111/hcre.12003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolkan, S. & Goodboy, A. K. (2011). Consumer complaining behavior, imagined interactions, and communication traits: Cognitive processing following an organizational failure. Communication Quarterly, 59, 465–483. doi:10.1080/01463373.2011.597273
   Google Scholar
• Bolkan, S. & Goodboy, A. K. (2013). No complain, no gain: Students' organizational, relational, and personal reasons for withholding rhetorical dissent from their college instructors. Communication Education, 62, 278–300. doi:10.1080/03634523.2013.788198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckner, M. M. & Finn, A. N. (2013). Academic locus of control as an individual factor influencing student dissent. Communication Research Reports, 30, 333–341. doi:10.1080/08824096.2013.837389
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, R., Honeycutt, J. M. & Zagacki, K. S. (1988). Imagined interaction as an element of social cognition. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 52, 23–45. doi:10.1080/10570318809389623
   Google Scholar
• Goodboy, A. K. (2011a). Instructional dissent in the college classroom. Communication Education, 60, 296–313. doi:10.1080/03634523.2010.537756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodboy, A. K. (2011b). The development and validation of the instructional dissent scale. Communication Education, 60, 422–430. doi:10.1080/03634523.2011.569894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodboy, A. K. (2012). Sex differences in instructional dissent. Psychological Reports, 111, 189–195. doi:10.2466/11.07.16.PR0.111.4.189-195
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodboy, A. K. & Bolkan, S. (2013). Instructional dissent as a function of student conflict styles. Communication Research Reports, 30, 259–263. doi:10.1080/08824096.2012.763027
   Google Scholar
• Goodboy, A. K. & Frisby, B. N. (2014). Instructional dissent as an expression of students' academic orientations and beliefs about education. Communication Studies, 65, 96–111. doi:10.1080/10510974.2013.785013
   Google Scholar
• Goodboy, A. K. & Martin, M. M. (2013, November). Student temperament and motives as predictors of instructional dissent. Paper presented at the National Communication Convention, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Goodboy, A. K. & Myers, S. A. (2012). Instructional dissent as an expression of students' verbal aggressiveness and argumentativeness traits. Communication Education, 61, 448–458. doi:10.1080/03634523.2012.699635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmgren, J. L. & Bolkan, S. (2014). Instructor responses to rhetorical dissent: Student perceptions of justice and classroom outcomes. Communication Education, 63, 17–40. doi:10.1080/03634523.2013.833644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horan, S. M., Chory, R. M. & Goodboy, A. K. (2010). Understanding students' classroom justice experiences and responses. Communication Education, 59, 453–474. doi:10.1080/03634523.2010.487282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honeycutt, J. M. (1998–1999). Differences in imagined interactions as a consequence of marital ideology and attachment. Imagination, cognition and personality, 18, 269–283.
   Google Scholar
• Honeycutt, J. M. (2003). Imagined interactions: Daydreaming about communication. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Honeycutt, J. M. (2003–2004). Imagined interaction conflict-linkage theory: Explaining the persistence and resolution of interpersonal conflict in everyday life. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 23, 3–26. doi:10.2190/240J-1VPK-K86D-1JL8
   Google Scholar
• Honeycutt, J. M. (2008–2009). Symbolic interdependence, imagined interaction, and relationship quality. Imagination, cognition and personality, 28, 303–320. doi:10.2190/IC.28.4.b
   Google Scholar
• Honeycutt, J. M. (2010). Imagine that: Studies in imagined interaction. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Honeycutt, J. M., Choi, C. W. & DeBerry, J. R. (2009). Communication apprehension and imagined interactions. Communication Research Reports, 26, 228–236. doi:10.1080/08824090903074423
   Google Scholar
• Honeycutt, J. M., Edwards, R. & Zagacki, K. S. (1989–1990). Using imagined interaction features to predict measures of self-awareness: Loneliness, locus of control, self-dominance, and emotional intensity. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 9, 17–31. doi:10.2190/02L8-1GMP-JV5C-JQ7X
   Google Scholar
• Honeycutt, J. M. & Ford, S. G. (2001). Mental imagery and intrapersonal communication: A review of research on imagined interactions (IIs) and current developments. In W. B. Gudykunst (Ed.), Communication yearbook 25 (pp. 315–345). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Honeycutt, J. M. & Keaton, S. A. (2012–2013). Imagined interactions and personality preferences as predictors of relationship quality. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 32, 3–21. doi:10.2190/IC.32.1.b
   Google Scholar
• Honeycutt, J. M. & McCann, R. M. (2008). Predicting intrapersonal communication satisfaction on the basis of imagined interactions in the Pacific Rim. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 37, 25–42. doi:10.1080/17475750802077362
   Google Scholar
• Honeycutt, J. M., Nasser, K. A., Banner, J. M., Mapp, C. M. & DuPont, B. W. (2008). Individual differences in catharsis, emotional valence, trauma anxiety, and social networks among hurricane Katrina and Rita victims. Southern Communication Journal, 73, 229–242. doi:10.1080/10417940802219728
   Google Scholar
• Honeycutt, J. M. & Patterson, J. (1997). Affinity strategies in relationships: The role of gender and imagined interactions in maintaining liking among college roommates. Personal Relationships, 4, 35–46. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.1997.tb00129.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honeycutt, J. M., Pence, M. E. & Gearhart, C. C. (2012–2013). Associations between imagined interactions and the “Big Five” personality traits. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 32, 273–289. doi:10.2190/IC.32.3.d
   Google Scholar
• Honeycutt, J. M., Pence, M. E. & Gearhart, C. C. (2013). Using imagined interactions to predict covert narcissism. Communication Reports, 26, 26–38. doi:10.1080/08934215.2013.773051
   Google Scholar
• Honeycutt, J. M. & Wiemann, J. M. (1999). Analysis of functions of talk and reports of imagined interactions (IIs) during engagement and marriage. Human Communication Research, 25, 399–419. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1999.tb00451.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honeycutt, J. M., Zagacki, K. S. & Edwards, R. (1990). Imagined interaction and interpersonal communication. Communication Reports, 3, 1–8. doi:10.1080/08934219009367494
   Google Scholar
• Kearney, P., Plax, T. G., Hays, E. R. & Ivey, M. J. (1991). College teacher misbehaviors: What students don't like about what teachers say and do. Communication Quarterly, 39, 309–324. doi:10.1080/01463379109369808
   Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kramer, M. W. & Pier, P. M. (1999). Students' perceptions of effective and ineffective communication by college teachers. Southern Communication Journal, 65, 16–33. doi:10.1080/10417949909373153
   Google Scholar
• LaBelle, S. & Martin, M. M. (2014). Attribution theory in the college classroom: Examining the relationship of student attributions and instructional dissent. Communication Research Reports, 31, 110–116. doi:10.1080/08824096.2013.846257
   Google Scholar
• LaBelle, S., Martin, M. M. & Weber, K. (2013). Instructional dissent in the college classroom: Using the instructional beliefs model as a framework. Communication Education, 62, 169–190. doi:10.1080/03634523.2012.759243
   Google Scholar
• Martin, M. M., Goodboy, A. K. & Johnson, Z. (2013, November). Workplace bullying: The impact of faculty members bullying graduate students. Paper presented at the National Communication Convention, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• McCann, R. M. & Honeycutt, J. M. (2006). A cross-cultural analysis of imagined interactions. Human Communication Research, 32, 274–301. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2006.00276.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mottet, T. P., Martin, M. M. & Myers, S. A. (2004). Relationships among perceived instructor verbal approach and avoidance relational strategies and students' motives for communicating with their instructors. Communication Education, 53, 116–122. doi:10.1080/0363452032000135814
   Google Scholar
• Mottet, T. P. & Richmond, V. P. (1998). Newer is not necessarily better: A reexamination of affective learning measurement. Communication Research Reports, 15, 370–378. doi:10.1080/08824099809362136
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. A. (2010–2011). Third-party imagined interactions: Expanding mental imagery to the experience of others' communication. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 30, 147–169. doi:10.2190/IC.30.2.d
   Google Scholar
• Richmond, V. P., McCroskey, J. C., Kearney, P. & Plax, T. G. (1987). Power in the classroom VII: Linking behavior alteration techniques to cognitive learning. Communication Education, 36, 1–12. doi:10.1080/03634528709378636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenblatt, P. C. & Meyer, C. (1986). Imagined interactions in the family. Family Relations, 35, 319–324. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/583641
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherry, A. & Henson, R. K. (2005). Conducting and interpreting canonical correlation analysis in personality research: A user-friendly primer. Journal of Personality Assessment, 84, 37–48. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa8401_09
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stacks, D. W. & Andersen, P. A. (1989). The modular mind: Implications for intrapersonal communication. The Southern Communication Journal, 54, 273–293. doi:10.1080/10417948909372761
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, B. (1984). Canonical correlation analysis: Uses and interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, R. N., Crisp, R. J. & Lambert, E. (2007). Imagining intergroup contact can improve intergroup attitudes. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10, 427–441. doi:10.1177/1368430207081533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallade, J., Vela, L. & Martin, M. M. (2013, November). An investigation of students' forgiveness, instructional dissent, and learning in the college classroom. Paper presented at the National Communication Convention, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Van Kelegom, M. J. & Wright, C. N. (2013). The use of imagined interactions to manage relational uncertainty. Southern Communication Journal, 78, 91–106. doi:10.1080/1041794X.2012.726688.
   Google Scholar
• Wallenfelsz, K. P. & Hample, D. (2010). The role of taking conflict personally in imagined interactions about conflict. Southern Communication Journal, 75, 471–487. doi:10.1080/10417940903006057
   Google Scholar
• Zagacki, K. S., Edwards, R. & Honeycutt, J. M. (1992). The role of mental imagery and emotion in imagined interaction. Communication Quarterly, 40, 56–68. doi:10.1080/01463379209369820
   Google Scholar