Effects of Instrumental Success and Failure on Perceptions of Underaccommodative Messages and Sources

References

• Berger, C. R. (1973). Task performance and attributional communication as determinants of interpersonal attraction. Communications Monographs, 40, 280–286. doi:10.1080/03637757309375805
   Google Scholar
• Blanchard, F. A., Adelman, L., & Cook, S. W. (1975). Effect of group success and failure upon interpersonal attraction in cooperating interracial groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 1020–1030. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1979.tb00202.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. A. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnick, J. Levine, & S. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127–149). Washington, DC: APA Books.
   Google Scholar
• Coupland, N., Coupland, J., Giles, H., & Henwood, K. (1988). Accommodating the elderly: Invoking and extending a theory. Language in Society, 17, 1–41. doi:10.1017/S0047404500012574
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dragojevic, M., Gasiorek, J., & Giles, H. (2016). Accommodative strategies as core of CAT. In H. Giles (Ed.), Communication accommodation theory: Negotiating personal and social identities across contexts (pp. 36–59). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dragojevic, M., & Giles, H. (2016). I don’t like you because you’re hard to understand: The role of processing fluency in the language attitudes process. Human Communication Research, 42, 396–420. doi:10.1111/hcre.12079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, H., & Noller, P. (1993). Perceptions of overaccommodation used by nurses in communication with the elderly. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 12, 207–223. doi:10.1177/0261927X93123003
   Google Scholar
• Gallois, C., & Callan, V. (1988). Communication accommodation and the prototypical speaker: Predicting evaluations of status and solidarity. Language and Communication, 8, 271–283. doi:10.1016/0271-5309(88)90022-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallois, C., Ogay, T., & Giles, H. (2005). Communication accommodation theory: A look back and a look ahead. In W. Gudykunst (Ed.), Theorizing about intercultural communication (pp. 121–148). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gasiorek, J. (2013). “I was impolite to her because that’s how she was to me”: Perceptions of motive and young adults’ communicative responses to underaccommodation. Western Journal of Communication, 77, 604–624. doi:10.1080/10570314.2013.778421
   Google Scholar
• Gasiorek, J., & Giles, H. (2012). Effects of inferred motive on evaluations of nonaccommodative communication. Human Communication Research, 38, 309–332. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2012.01426.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasiorek, J., & Giles, H. (2015). The role of inferred motive in processing nonaccommodation: Evaluations of communication and speakers. Western Journal of Communication, 79, 456–471. doi:10.1080/10570314.2015.1066030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasiorek, J., & Van de Poel, K. (2012). Divergent perspectives on language-discordant mobile medical professionals’ communication with colleagues: An exploratory study. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 40, 368–383. doi:10.1080/00909882.2012.712708
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giles, H. (1973). Accent mobility: A model and some data. Anthropological Linguistics, 15, 87–105. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/30029508
   Google Scholar
• Giles, H. (Ed.). (2016). Communication accommodation theory: Negotiating personal relationships and social identities across contexts. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giles, H., & Williams, A. (1994). Patronizing the young: Forms and evaluations. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 39, 33–53. doi:10.2190/0LUC-NWMA-K5LX-NUVW
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, N. J., Vezich, I. S., & Shapiro, J. R. (2014). Perceived perspective taking: When others walk in our shoes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 941–960. doi:10.1037/a0036395
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C., Millis, K. K., & Zwaan, R. A. (1997). Discourse comprehension. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 163–189. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.48.1.163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenaway, K., Peters, K., Haslam, A., & Bingley, W. (2016). Shared identity and the intergroup dynamics of communication. In H. Giles & A. Maass (Eds.), Advances in intergroup communication (pp. 19–33). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Harwood, J., & Giles, H. (1996). Reactions to older people being patronized: The roles of response strategies and attributed thoughts. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 15, 395–421. doi:10.1177/0261927X960154001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewett, D. G., Watson, B. M., & Gallois, C. (2015). Communication between hospital doctors: Underaccommodation and interpretability. Language and Communication, 41, 71–83. doi:10.1016/j.langcom.2014.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holtgraves, T. M. (2002). Language as social action: Social psychology and language use. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W., & Van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363–394. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.85.5.363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lippi-Green, R. (2012). English with an accent (2nd ed.). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Malle, B. F. (2011). Time to give up the dogmas of attribution: An alternative theory of behavior explanation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 44, pp. 297–352). San Diego, CA: Academic Press/Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Platt, J., & Weber, H. (1984). Speech convergence miscarried: An investigation into inappropriate accommodation strategies. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 46, 131–146. doi:10.1515/ijsl.1984.46.131
   Google Scholar
• Riordan, M. A., Markman, K. M., & Stewart, C. O. (2013). Communication accommodation in instant messaging: An examination of temporal convergence. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 32, 84–95. doi:10.1177/0261927X12462695
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, S., & Shortreed, I. M. (1990). Japanese foreigner talk: Convergence or divergence? Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 1, 135–145.
   Google Scholar
• Scott-Phillips, T. (2014). Speaking our minds: Why human communication is different, and how language evolved to make it special. New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Searle, J. R. (1985). Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simard, L., Taylor, D., & Giles, H. (1976). Attribution processes and interpersonal accommodation in a bilingual setting. Language and Speech, 19, 374–387. doi:10.1177/002383097601900408
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soliz, J., & Giles, H. (2014). Relational and identity processes in communication: A contextual and meta-analytic review of communication accommodation theory. In E. L. Cohen (Ed.), Communication yearbook 38 (pp. 107–144). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Speer, R. B., Giles, H., & Denes, A. (2013). Investigating stepparent-stepchild interactions: The role of communication accommodation. Journal of Family Communication, 13, 218–241. doi:10.1080/15267431.2013.768248
   Google Scholar
• Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford, UK: Basil-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Street, R. L., Jr., & Giles, H. (1982). Speech accommodation theory: A social cognitive model of speech behaviour. In M. Roloff & C. R. Berger (Eds.), Social cognition and communication (pp. 193–226). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Thakerar, J. N., Giles, H., & Cheshire, J. (1982). Psychological and linguistic parameters of speech accommodation theory. In C. Fraser & K. R. Scherer (Eds.), Advances in the social psychology of language (pp. 205–255). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tomasello, M. (2010). Origins of human communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weiner, B. (2001). Responsibility for social transgressions: An attributional analysis. In B. F. Malle, L. J. Moses, & D. A. Baldwin (Eds.), Intentions and intentionality: Foundations of social cognition (pp. 331–334). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Worchel, S., Andreoli, V. A., & Folger, R. (1977). Intergroup cooperation and intergroup attraction: The effect of previous interaction and outcome of combined effort. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 131–140. doi:10.1016/S0022-1031(77)80006-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuckerman, M. (1979). Attribution of success and failure revisited, or: The motivational bias is alive and well in attribution theory. Journal of Personality, 47, 245–287. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1979.tb00202.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar