Anonymity and Online Self-Disclosure: A Meta-Analysis

References

• Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Chicester, UK: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2006). Comprehensive meta-analysis (Version 2.2) [Computer software]. Englewood, NJ: Biotstat.
   Google Scholar
• Borenstein, M., Higgins, J., Hedges, L. V., & Rothstein, H. R. (2017). Basics of meta-analysis: I2 is not an absolute measure of heterogeneity. Research Synthesis Methods, 8, 5–18. doi:10.1002/jrsm.1230
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Chen, X., Gang, L., Hu, Y., & Li, Y. (2016). How anonymity influence self-disclosure tendency on Sina Weibo. Anthropologist, 26, 217–226. doi:10.1080/09720073.2016.11892151
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, M. W. L. (2015). Meta-analysis: A structural equation modeling approach. West Sussex, UK: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, H. (2009). Research synthesis and meta-analysis: A step-by-step approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, H., Hedges, L. V., & Valentine, J. C. (Eds.). (2009). The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, J. A., & Rosenthal, R. (1991). Testing for moderator variables in meta-analysis: Issues and methods. Communication Monographs, 58, 437–448. doi:10.1080/03637759109376240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Hollenbaugh, E. E., & Everett, M. K. (2013). The effects of anonymity on self-disclosure in blogs: An application of the online disinhibition effect. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18, 283–302. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Joinson, A. N. (2001). Self-disclosure in computer-mediated communication: The role of self-awareness and visual anonymity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 177–192. doi:10.1002/ejsp.36
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Kang, H., & Yang, H. (2004). The effect of anonymity on the usage of avatar: Comparison of Internet Relay Chat and Instant Messenger. AMCIS 2004 Proceedings (pp. 2734–2743). New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• *Knoll, M., & Bronstein, J. (2014). An examination of the information disclosure behavior of infertility bloggers: Patterns of self-disclosure and anonymity. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 66, 175–201. doi:10.1108/AJIM-06-2013-0055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Lapidot-Lefler, N., & Barak, A. (2015). The benign online disinhibition effect: Could situational factors induce self-disclosure and prosocial behaviors? CyberPsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 9, 1–19. doi:10.5817/CP2015-2-3
   Google Scholar
• *Ma, X., Hancock, J., & Naaman, M. (2016). Anonymity, intimacy, and self-disclosure in social media. Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2016. doi:10.1145/2858036.2858414
   Google Scholar
• Misoch, S. (2015). Stranger on the internet: Online self-disclosure and the role of visual anonymity. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 535–541. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, M., Bin, Y. S., & Campbell, A. (2012). Comparing online and offline self-disclosure: A systematic review. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, & Social Networking, 15, 103–111. doi:10.1089/cyber.2011.0277
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Okdie, B. M. (2011). Blogging and self-disclosure: The role of anonymity, self-awareness, and perceived audience University of Alabama’s institutional repository. https://ir.ua.edu/handle/123456789/1100
   Google Scholar
• Pinsonneault, A., & Heppel, N. (1997). Anonymity in group support systems research: A new conceptualization, measure, and contingency framework. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14, 89–108. doi:10.1080/07421222.1997.11518176
   Google Scholar
• Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (1998). Deindividuation and antinormative behavior: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 238–259. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.123.3.238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Qian, H., & Scott, C. R. (2007). Anonymity and self-disclosure on weblogs. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1428–1451. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00380.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Rains, S. A. (2014). The implications of stigma and anonymity for self-disclosure in health blogs. Health Communication, 29, 23–31. doi:10.1080/10410236.2012.714861
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raufman, R., & Shahak, S. (2017). Anonymity as a major generator of self-disclosure in online groups. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 67, 591–596. doi:10.1080/00207284.2017.1314730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Retelas, G. (2008). Anonymity and self-disclosure on Myspace ( Master’s thesis). 3601. Retrieved from http://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/etd_theses/3601
   Google Scholar
• Ruppel, E. K., Gross, C., Stoll, A., Peck, B. S., Allen, M., & Kim, S. Y. (2017). Reflecting on connecting: Meta-analysis of differences between computer-mediated and face-to-face self-disclosure. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22, 18–34. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Schouten, A., Valkenburg, P., & Antheunis, M. (2006). An experimental test of processes underlying self-disclosure in computer-mediated communication. Presented at the Proceedings of the International Communication Association, Dresden, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Schouten, A. P., Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2007). Precursors and underlying processes of adolescents‘ online self-disclosure: Developing and testing an “Internet-attribute-perception” model. Media Psychology, 10, 292–315. doi:10.1080/15213260701375686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, C., & Bonito, J. (2006). Participation in online groups: Comparing anonymous, pseudonymous, and named conditions. Presented at the Proceedings of the International Communication Association, Dresden, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, C. R. (1998). To reveal or not to reveal: A theoretical model of anonymous communication. Communication Theory, 8, 381–407. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.1998.tb00226.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Snyder, J. (2004). Perceived anonymity and the role of self-disclosure in text-based computer interactions. Presented at the Proceedings of the International Communication Association, New Orleans, Louisiana.
   Google Scholar
• Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7, 321–326. doi:10.1089/1094931041291295
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Walther, J. B. (1994). Anticipated ongoing interaction versus channel effects on relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 20, 473–501. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1994.tb00332.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23, 3–43. doi:10.1177/009365096023001001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B. (2017). The merger of mass and interpersonal communication via new media: Integrating metaconstructs. Human Communication Research, 43, 559–572. doi:10.1111/hcre.12122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B., & Parks, M. R. (2002). Cues filtered out, cues filtered in: Computer-mediated communication and relationships. In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (3rd ed., pp. 529–563). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wheeless, L. R., & Grotz, J. (1976). Conceptualization and measurement of reported self-disclosure. Human Communication Research, 2, 338–346. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1976.tb00494.x
   Google Scholar
• Yum, Y. O., & Hara, K. (2005). Computer-mediated relationship development: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11, 133–152. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.tb00307.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yun, W. Z. (2009). Anonymity, private self-awareness & online self-disclosure– an examination for blogging activities ( Doctoral Dissertation). City University of Hong Kong.
   Google Scholar
• *Studies were analyzed in meta-analysis.
   Google Scholar