We’re Going Streaking!: Associations Between the Gamification of Mediated Communication and Relational Closeness

References

• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auxier, B., & Anderson, M. (2021, April 7). Social media use in 2021. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/social-media/?menuItem=b14b718d-7ab6-46f4-b447-0abd510f4180
   Google Scholar
• Bayer, J. B., Ellison, N. B., Schoenebeck, S. Y., & Falk, E. B. (2016). Sharing the small moments: Ephemeral social interaction on snapchat. Information, Communication & Society, 19(7), 956–977. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1084349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhold, Q. S., & Rice, R. (2020). Toward an integrated model of online communication attitudes, communication frequency, and relational closeness. Communication Studies, 71(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2019.1683594
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brody, N., Mooney, C. M., Westerman, S. A., & McDonald, P. G. (2009). Lts gt 2gthr 18r: Text messaging as a relational maintenance tool. Kentucky Journal of Communication, 28(2), 109–127.
   Google Scholar
• Buehler, E. M., Crowley, J. L., Peterson, A. M., & Jackl, J. A. (2022). Family communication patterns, mediated communication, and well-being: A communication interdependence perspective on parent–adult child relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075221145628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai, Y., & Shin, S. Y. (2022). How reading information on SNSs influences interpersonal and personal certainties about a target: The effects of information valence, information source, and positivism bias. Communication Studies, 73(5–6), 561–576. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2022.2118341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Déage, M. (2019, June 13–14). Don’t you trust me? Teenagers challenging friendship on snapchat [ Paper presentation]. 6th European Conference on Social Media (ECSM, 2019), Brighton, United Kingdom.
   Google Scholar
• Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011, September 28–30). From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining “gamification [ Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments, Tampere, Finland. https://doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040
   Google Scholar
• Dholakia, U. M., Bagozzi, R. P., & Pearo, L. K. (2004). A social influence model of consumer participation in network-and small-group-based virtual communities. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21(3), 241–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2003.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dibble, J. L., Levine, T. R., & Park, H. S. (2012). Unidimensional relationship closeness scale. Psychological Assessment, 24(3), 565–572. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dindia, K., & Canary, D. J. (1993). Definitions and theoretical perspectives on maintaining relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10(2), 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/026540759301000201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, J., Pearce, K. E., Massanari, A. L., Riles, J. M., Szulc, Ł., Ranjit, Y. S., Trevisan, F., Soriano, C. R. R., Vitak, J., Arora, P., Ahn, S. J., Alper, M., Gambino, A., Gonzalez, C., Lynch, T., Williamson, L. D., & L Gonzales, A. (2021). Open science, closed doors? Countering marginalization through an agenda for ethical, inclusive research in communication. Journal of Communication, 71(5), 764–784. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqab029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hristova, D., Dumit, J., Lieberoth, A., & Slunecko, T. (2020, April 1–3). Snapchat streaks: How adolescents metagame gamification in social media [ Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 4th Annual GamiFIN Conference, Levi, Finland. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/nszex
   Google Scholar
• Hristova, D., Jovicic, S., Göbl, B., de Freitas, S., & Slunecko, T. (2022). “Why did we lose our snapchat streak?”. Social media gamification and metacommunication. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 5, Article 100172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2022.100172
   Google Scholar
• Hristova, D., Jovicic, S., Göbl, B., & Slunecko, T. (2020). The social media game?: How gamification shapes our social media engagement. In R. Dillon (Ed.), The digital gaming handbook (pp. 63–94). CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kahlow, J., Coker, M. C., & Richards, R. (2020). The multimodal nature of Snapchat in close relationships: Toward a social presence-based theoretical framework. Computers in Human Behavior, 111, Article 106409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lampe, C. (2014). Gamification and social media. In S. P. Walz & S. Deterding (Eds.), The gameful world: Approaches, issues, applications (pp. 461–480). The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lampe, C., Walsh, R., Velasquez, A., & Ozkaya, E. (2010, April 10–15). Motivations to participate in online communities [ Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’10), Atlanta, GA, United States. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753616
   Google Scholar
• Ledbetter, A. M., & Keating, A. T. (2015). Maintaining Facebook friendships: Everyday talk as a mediator of threats to closeness. Western Journal of Communication, 79(2), 197–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2014.943426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ledbetter, A. M., & Kuznekoff, J. H. (2012). More than a game: Friendship relational maintenance and attitudes toward Xbox LIVE communication. Communication Research, 39(2), 269–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650210397042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ledbetter, A. M., Mazer, J. P., DeGroot, J. M., Meyer, K. R., Mao, Y., & Swafford, B. (2011). Attitudes toward online social connection and self-disclosure as predictors of Facebook communication and relational closeness. Communication Research, 38(1), 27–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650210365537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levordashka, A., & Utz, S. (2016). Ambient awareness: From random noise to digital closeness in online social networks. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 147–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, A. J., & Carr, C. T. (2022). Toward a theoretical framework of relational maintenance in computer-mediated communication. Communication Theory, 32(2), 243–264. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtaa035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nah, F. F.-H., Zeng, Q., Telaprolu, V. R., Ayyappa, A. P., & Eschenbrenner, B. (2014, June 25–27). Gamification of education: A review of literature [ Paper presentation]. International Conference on HCI in Business (HCIB 2014), Heraklion, Crete, Greece. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07293-7_39
   Google Scholar
• Resnick, P. (2001). Beyond bowling together: SocioTechnical capital. In J. M. Carrol (Ed.), Human-computer interaction in the new millenium (pp. 647–672). Addison-Wesley Professional.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, R. B., & Martin, M. M. (1998). Interpersonal communication motives. In J. C. McCroskey (Ed.), Communication and personality: Trait perspectives (pp. 287–307). Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sumner, E. M., & Ramirez, A., Jr. (2019). The effects of multimodal communication frequency, geographic distance, and coresidence on parent-child relationship quality during emerging adulthood. Communication Research Reports, 36(2), 114–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2019.1583552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tidwell, L. C., & Walther, J. B. (2002). Computer-mediated communication effects on disclosure, impressions, and interpersonal evaluations: Getting to know one another a bit at a time. Human Communication Research, 28(3), 317–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00811.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong, S. T., & Walther, J. B. (2011). Relational maintenance and CMC. In K. B. Wright & L. M. Webb (Eds.), Computer-mediated communication in personal relationships (pp. 98–118). Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Tong, S. T., & Westerman, D. K. (2016, January 5–8). Relational and masspersonal maintenance: Romantic partners’ use of social network websites [ Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 49th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS’16), Koloa, HI, United States. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2016.284
   Google Scholar
• Triệu, P., & Baym, N. K. (2020, April 25–30). Private responses for public sharing: Understanding self-presentation and relational maintenance via stories in social media [ Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’20), Honolulu, HI, United States. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376549
   Google Scholar
• Vaterlaus, J. M., Barnett, K., Roche, C., & Young, J. A. (2016). “Snapchat is more personal”: An exploratory study on snapchat behaviors and young adult interpersonal relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 594–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.04.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitak, J. (2014, February 15–19). Facebook makes the heart grow fonder: Relationship maintenance strategies among geographically dispersed and communication-restricted connections [ Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW’14), Baltimore, MD, United States. https://doi.org/10.1145/2531602.2531726
   Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B. (2008). Social information processing theory: Impressions and relational development online. In D. O. Braithwaite & P. Schrodt (Eds.), Engaging theories in interpersonal communication: Multiple perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 417–428). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B. (2021). The theory of interpersonal knowledge: Interaction requirements to develop dyad-specific familiarity. In D. O. Braithwaite & P. Schrodt (Eds.), Engaging theories in interpersonal communication: Multiple perspectives (3rd ed., pp. 391–402). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003195511.
   Google Scholar