Lukács Today: Totality, Labor, and Fantasies of Revenge

References

• Althusser, L., and É. Balibar. 1970. Reading Capital. New York: Pantheon.
   Google Scholar
• Althusser, L. 1971. Lenin and philosophy and other essays. New York: Monthly Review.
   Google Scholar
• Balibar, É. 1993. The non-contemporaneity of Althusser. In The Althusserian legacy, ed. A. Kaplan and M. Sprinker. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, D. 2011. Capitalist and bourgeois epics: Lukács, abstraction and the novel. In Georg Lukács: The fundamental dissonance of existence, ed. T. Bewes and T. Hall, 49–64. New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Day, G. 2011. Realism, totality and the militant citoyen: Or, what does Lukács have to do with contemporary art? In Georg Lukács: The fundamental dissonance of existence, ed. T. Bewes and T. Hall, 203–20. New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Feenberg, A. 2011. Rethinking reification. In Georg Lukács: The fundamental dissonance of existence, ed. T. Bewes and T. Hall, 101–20. New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1977. Nietzsche, genealogy, history. In Language, counter-memory, practice: Selected essays and interviews, ed. D. F. Bouchard, 139–64. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, T. 2011. Returning to Lukács: Honneth’s critical reconstruction of Lukács’ concepts of reification and praxis. In Georg Lukács reconsidered: Critical essays in politics, philosophy, and aesthetics, ed. M. J. Thompson, 195–210. New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Hardt, M., and A. Negri. 2004. Multitude: War and democracy in the age of empire. New York: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Irr, C. 2014. Toward the geopolitical novel: U.S. fiction in the twenty-first century. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jameson, F. 1981. The political unconscious: Narrative as a socially symbolic act. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jameson, F. 1984. Foreword to The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge, by F. Lyotard, vii–xxii. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jameson, F. 1988. Cognitive mapping. In Marxism and the interpretation of culture, ed. C. Nelson and L. Grossberg, 347–60. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jameson, F. 2009. Valences of the dialectic. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Jay, M. 1984. Marxism and totality: The adventures of a concept from Lukács to Habermas. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karatani, K. 2014. The structure of world history. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, N. 2011. Lukács sans proletariat, or Can History and class consciousness be rehistoricized? In Georg Lukács: The fundamental dissonance of existence, ed. T. Bewes and T. Hall, 81–100. New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Lazzarato, M. 2010. Multiplicity, totality and politics. Parrhesia, no. 9: 23–30.
   Google Scholar
• Lukács, G. 1964. Studies in European realism. New York: Grosset and Dunlap.
   Google Scholar
• Lukács, G. 1971. History and class consciousness: Studies in Marxist dialectics. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lukács, G. 1980. Realism in the balance. In Aesthetics and politics, ed. R. Taylor, 28–58. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Lyotard, J.-F. 1984. The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. 1973. Grundrisse: Foundations of the critique of political economy. New York: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. 1977. A contribution to the critique of political economy. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. 1991. Early writings. New York: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Mészáros, I. 1972. Lukács’s concept of dialectic. London: Merlin.
   Google Scholar
• Montag, W. 1993. Spinoza and Althusser against hermeneutics: Interpretation or intervention? In The Althusserian legacy, ed. A. Kaplan and M. Sprinker, 51–8. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Ruddick, S. 2010. The politics of affect: Spinoza in the work of Negri and Deleuze. Theory, Culture & Society 27 (4): 21–45. doi: 10.1177/0263276410372235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sartre, J.-P. 1990. Critique of dialectical reason. Vol. 1. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, M. 2011. Ontology and totality: Reconstructing Lukács’ concept of critical theory. In Georg Lukács reconsidered: Critical essays in politics, philosophy, and aesthetics, ed. M. J. Thompson, 229–50. New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Toscano, A. 2012. Seeing it whole: Staging totality in social theory and art. Sociological Review 60 (1): 64–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02117.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toscano, A., and J. Kinkle. 2014. Cartographies of the absolute. Alresford, UK: Zero Books.
   Google Scholar
• Wegner, P. 2014. Periodizing Jameson: Dialectics, the university, and the desire for narrative. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Žižek, S. 2000. Postface: Georg Lukács as the philosopher of Leninism. In A defence of “History and class consciousness”: Tailism and the dialectic, by G. Lukács, 151–60. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar