Late Neoclassical Economics as Neoliberal Neurosis

References

• Acemoglu, D. and J. A. Robinson. 2012. Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. New York: Crown.
   Google Scholar
• Acemoglu, D. and J. A. Robinson. 2019. The Narrow Corridor: How Nations Struggle for Liberty. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Akbulut, B., F. Adaman, and Y. M. Madra. 2015. “The Decimation and Displacement of Development Economics.” Forum 46 (4): 733–61.
   Google Scholar
• Ankarloo, D., and G. Palermo. 2004. “Anti-Williamson: A Marxian Critique of New Institutional Economics.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 28 (3): 413–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailes, J. 2019. Ideology and the Virtual City: Videogames, Power Fantasies and Neoliberalism. Hampshire, UK: Zero.
   Google Scholar
• Cahill, D., and M. Konings. 2017. Neoliberalism. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Callison, W., and Z. Manfredi, eds. 2019. Mutant Neoliberalism: Market Rule and Political Rupture. New York: Fordham University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coase, R. H. 1937. “The Nature of the Firm.” Economica 4 (16): 386–405.
   Google Scholar
• Coase, R. H. 1960. “The Problem of Social Cost.” Journal of Law and Economics 3 (October): 1–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, H.-J. 2003. Kicking Away the Ladder: Development Strategy in Historical Perspective. New York: Anthem Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crouch, C. 2011. The Strange Non-death of Neo-liberalism. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, J. 2017. “Is Mainstream Economics a Science Bubble?” Review of Political Economy 29 (4): 523–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean, J. 2008. “Enjoying Neoliberalism.” Cultural Politics 4 (1): 47–72.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, J. 2009. Democracy and Other Neoliberal Fantasies: Communicative Capitalism and Left Politics. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, M. 2014. “Rethinking Neoliberalism.” Journal of Sociology 50 (2): 150–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dikeç, M. 2013. “Immigrants, Banlieues, and Dangerous Things: Ideology as an Aesthetic Affair.” Antipode 45 (1): 23–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, R., J. Breitling, and V. Puleo. 2014. “Barbarian Hordes: The Overpopulation Scapegoat in International Development Discourse.” Third World Quarterly 35 (7): 1195–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, R., and C. Rammelt. 2017. “Decoupling: A Key Fantasy of the Post-2015 Sustainable Development Agenda.” Globalizations 14 (3): 450–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley, D. 2004. “Rationality and Ideology in Economics.” Social Research 71 (2): 329–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 2008. The Birth of Biopolitics. Lectures at College de France, 1978-79. Ed. M. Senellart, trans. G. Burchnell.
   Google Scholar
• Glynos, J. 2001. “The Grip of Ideology: A Lacanian Approach to the Theory of Ideology.” Journal of Political Ideologies 6 (2): 191–214.
   Google Scholar
• Glynos, J., and D. Howarth. 2007. Logics of Critical Explanation in Social and Political Theory. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Glynos, J., and Y. Stavrakakis. 2008. “Lacan and Political Subjectivity: Fantasy and Enjoyment in Psychoanalysis and Political Theory.” Subjectivity 24 (1): 256–74.
   Google Scholar
• Greif, A. 2008. Institutions and the Path to the Modern Economy: Lessons from Medieval Trade. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hands, D. W. 2019. “Economic Methodology in the Twenty-First Century (So Far): Some Post-reflection Reflections.” Unpublished manuscript, last modified September 2019. Adobe PDF file. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3464759.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 2003. The New Imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 2005. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herrera, R. 2006. “The Neoliberal ‘Rebirth’ of Development Economics.” Monthly Review 58 (1): 38–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ince, O. U. 2010. “‘Progress’ Revisited: A Historical Materialist Reappraisal.” Paper presented at the 68th Annual Conference of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, Ill., 22–5 April. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1675568.
   Google Scholar
• Ince, O. U. 2014. “Primitive Accumulation, the New Enclosures, and Global Land Grabs: A Theoretical Intervention.” Rural Sociology 79 (1): 104–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamat, S. 2014. “The New Development Architecture and the Post-political in the Global South.” In The Post-political and Its Discontents: Spaces of Depoliticisation, Spectres of Radical Politics, ed. J. Wilson and E. Swyngedouw, 67–85. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kapoor, I. 2020. Confronting Desire: Psychoanalysis and International Development. New York: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Konings, M. 2015. The Emotional Logic of Capitalism: What Progressives Have Missed. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Konings, M. 2018. “Against Exceptionalism: The Legitimacy of the Neoliberal Age.” Globalizations 15 (7): 1007–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krugman, P. 2020. Arguing with Zombies: Economics, Politics, and the Fight for a Better Future. New York: W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, T. 2019. Foucault’s Analysis of Modern Governmentality: A Critique of Political Reason. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Madra, Y. M. 2017. Late Neoclassical Economics: The Restoration of Theoretical Humanism in Contemporary Economic Theory. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Madra, Y. M., and F. Adaman. 2014. “Neoliberal Reason and Its Forms: De-politicisation through Economisation.” Antipode 46 (3): 691–716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madra, Y. M., and F. Adaman. 2018. “Neoliberal Turn in the Discipline of Economics: Depoliticization through Economization.” In The SAGE Handbook of Neoliberalism, ed. D. Cahill, M. Cooper, M. Konings, and D. Primrose, 113–28. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Madra, Y. M., and C. Özselçuk. 2019. “Capital’s Sovereign Exception: The Liberal Matrix and Its Discontents.” Polygraph, no. 27. https://polygraphjournal.files.wordpress.com/2019/02/polygraph-27_madra-and-ozselcuk.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Mandelbaum, M. M. 2020. The Nation/State Fantasy: A Psychoanalytical Genealogy of Nationalism. Cham, Switz.: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. 1976. Capital. Vol. 1. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• McNally, D. 2020. Political Economy and the Rise of Capitalism: A Reinterpretation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Milonakis, D., and B. Fine. 2007. “Douglass North’s Remaking of Economic History: A Critical Appraisal.” Review of Radical Political Economics 39 (1): 27–57.
   Google Scholar
• Mirowski, P. 2014. Never Let a Serious Crisis Go to Waste: How Neoliberalism Survived the Financial Meltdown. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Monbiot, G. 2016. “Neoliberalism—The Ideology at the Root of All Our Problems.” Guardian, 15 April. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2016/apr/15/neoliberalism-ideology-problem-george-monbiot.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, J. W. 2015. Capitalism in the Web of Life: Ecology and the Accumulation of Capital. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• North, D. C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• North, D. C. 1991. “Institutions.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 5 (1): 97–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North, D. C. 1995. “The New Institutional Economics and Third World Development.” In The New Institutional Economics and Third World Development, ed. J. Harriss, J. Hunter, C. Lewis, 31–40. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• North, D. C. 2000. “Understanding Institutions.” In Institutions, Contracts and Organizations, ed. C. Ménard, 7–10. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• North, D. C., and R. P. Thomas. 1973. Rise of the Western World: A New Economic History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Özselçuk, C., and Y. M. Madra. 2010. “Enjoyment as an Economic Factor: Reading Marx with Lacan.” Subjectivity 3 (3): 323–47.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, J. 2010a. Constructions of Neoliberal Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, J. 2010b. “Zombie Neoliberalism and the Ambidextrous State.” Theoretical Criminology 14 (1): 104–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peet, R. 2019. “Book Review: Neoliberalism.” Human Geography 12 (2): 91–3.
   Google Scholar
• Primrose, D. 2017. “The Subjectification of Homo economicus in Behavioural Economics.” Journal of Australian Political Economy, no. 80: 88–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmus, J. 2020. The Scourge of Neoliberalism: US Economic Policy from Reagan to Trump. Atlanta: Clarity.
   Google Scholar
• Ratner, C. 2019. Neoliberal Psychology. Cham, Switz.: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, W. I. 2020. The Global Police State. London: Pluto.
   Google Scholar
• Sirohi, R. 2017. “Colonial ‘Shock’ and Global Inequalities: A Critical Review of New Institutional Economics.” Economic and Political Weekly 52 (33): 85–93.
   Google Scholar
• Stilwell, F. 2019. “From Economics to Political Economy: Contradictions, Challenge, and Change.” American Journal of Economics and Sociology 78 (1): 35–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, O. E. 1975. Markets and Hierarchies. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. 2014. “The Shock of the Real: The Neoliberal Neurosis in the Life and Times of Jeffrey Sachs.” Antipode 46 (1): 301–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. 2015. “The Village that Turned to Gold: A Parable of Philanthrocapitalism.” Development and Change 47 (1): 3–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. 2016. “Neoliberal Gothic.” In The Handbook of Neoliberalism, ed. S. Springer, K. Birch, and J. MacLeavy, 578–88. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2002. Building Institutions for Markets. World Development Report 2002. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/5984/WDR%202002%20-%20English.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
   Google Scholar
• Žižek, S. 1989. The Sublime Object of Ideology. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Žižek, S. 1991. Looking Awry: An Introduction to Jacques Lacan Through Popular Culture. London: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Žižek, S. 1993. Tarrying with the Negative: Kant, Hegel, and the Critique of Ideology. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Žižek, S. 1994 “The Spectre of Ideology.” In Mapping Ideology, ed. S. Žižek, 1–33. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Žižek, S. 1997. The Plague of Fantasies. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Žižek, S. 1999. The Ticklish Subject: The Absent Centre of Political Ontology. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Žižek, S. 2000. “Class Struggle or Postmodernism? Yes, Please!” In Contingency, Hegemony, Universality, ed. J. Butler, E. Laclau, and S. Žižek, 90–135. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Žižek, S. 2002. Welcome to the Desert of the Real: Five Essays on September 11 and Related Dates. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Žižek, S. 2008. In Defence of Lost Causes. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar