Catastrophe or Revolution?

References

• Acemoğlu, D., and E. Brancaccio. 2021. “There Is (No) Alternative: Regulate the Market.” YouTube, 8 June. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GEvQb9IFAME.
   Google Scholar
• Akçiğit, U., W. Chen, F. J. Díez, R. A. Duval, P. Engler, J. Fan, C. Maggi, M. M. Tavares, D. Schwarz, I. Shibata, and C. Villegas-Sánchez. 2021. Rising Corporate Market Power: Emerging Policy Issues. IMF staff discussion note, 1 March. https://www.imf.org/-/media/Files/Publications/SDN/2021/English/SDNEA2021001.ashx.
   Google Scholar
• Algieri, B., E. Brancaccio, and D. Buonaguidi. 2020. “Stock Market Volatility, Speculation and Unemployment: A Granger-Causality Analysis.” PSL Quarterly Review 73 (293): 137–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Althusser, L. (1971) 2022. “Philosophy as a Revolutionary Weapon.” Marxists Internet Archive. https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/althusser/1968/philosophy-as-weapon.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, G. 1964. Human Capital. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blanchard, O., and E. Brancaccio. 2019. “Crisis and Revolution in Economic Theory and Policy: A Debate.” Review of Political Economy 31 (2): 271–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanchard, O., and L. H. Summers. 2019. “Ripensare le politiche macroeconomiche: Evoluzione o rivoluzione?” [Rethinking macroeconomic policy: Evolution or revolution?]. In “Crisi e rivoluzioni della teoria e della politica economica: Un simposio” [Crises and revolutions in economic theory and policy: A symposium], ed. E. Brancaccio and F. De Cristofaro, special issue, Moneta e Credito 72 (287): 171–96.
   Google Scholar
• Brancaccio, E., and D. Buonaguidi. 2019. “Stock Market Volatility Tests: A Classical-Keynesian Alternative to Mainstream Interpretations.” International Journal of Political Economy 48 (3): 253–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/08911916.2019.1655954.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brancaccio, E., and A. Califano. 2018. Anti-Blanchard Macroeconomics: A Comparative Approach. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Brancaccio, E., A. Califano, and F. De Cristofaro. 2021. “Migrant Inflows, Capital Outflows, Growth and Distribution: Should We Control Capital rather than Immigration?” European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention 18 (3): 344–63. https://doi.org/10.4337/ejeep.2021.0074.
   Google Scholar
• Brancaccio, E., and F. De Cristofaro. 2020. “Inside the IMF ‘Mea Culpa’: A Panel Analysis on Growth Forecast Errors and Keynesian Multipliers in Europe.” PSL Quarterly Review 73 (294): 225–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brancaccio, E., F. De Cristofaro, and R. Giammetti. 2020. “A Meta-Analysis on Labour Market Deregulation and Employment Performance: No Consensus around the IMF-OECD Consensus.” Review of Political Economy 32 (1): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09538259.2020.1759245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brancaccio, E., and G. Fontana. 2013. “‘Solvency Rule’ versus ‘Taylor Rule’: An Alternative Interpretation of the Relation between Monetary Policy and the Economic Crisis.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 37 (1): 17–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brancaccio, E., and G. Fontana. 2016. “‘Solvency Rule’ and Capital Centralisation in a Monetary Union.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 40 (4): 1055–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brancaccio, E., R. Giammetti, M. Lopreite, and M. Puliga. 2018. “Centralization of Capital and Financial Crisis: A Global Network Analysis of Corporate Control.” Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 45 (1): 94–104.
   Google Scholar
• Brancaccio, E., R. Giammetti, M. Lopreite, and M. Puliga. 2019. “Monetary Policy, Crisis and Capital Centralization in Corporate Ownership and Control Networks: A B-Var Analysis.” Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 51 (1): 55–66.
   Google Scholar
• Brancaccio, E., A. Califano, M. Lopreite, and A. Moneta. 2020. “Nonperforming Loans and Competing Rules of Monetary Policy: A Statistical Identification Approach.” Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 53 (1): 127–36.
   Google Scholar
• Brancaccio, E., and M. Monti. 2020. “Austerity, Keynesismo, comunismo: Dibattito tra Emiliano Brancaccio e Mario Monti” [Austerity, Keynesianism, communism: A debate between Emiliano Brancaccio and Mario Monti]. In Non sarà un pranzo di gala: Crisi catastrofe rivoluzione [It will not be a dinner party: Crisis, catastrophe and revolution], ed. E. Brancaccio, 159–84. Milan: Meltemi Editore.
   Google Scholar
• Brancaccio, E., and U. Pagano. 2020. “Opinion: Stop Private Speculation in COVID-19 Research.” The Scientist, 23 March 2020. https://www.the-scientist.com/news-opinion/opinion-stop-private-speculation-in-covid-19-research-67309.
   Google Scholar
• Brancaccio, E., and D. Suppa. 2018. “The ‘Solvency Rule’ of the Central Banker in a Monetary Scheme of Reproduction.” Bulletin of Political Economy 1 (2): 77–98.
   Google Scholar
• Bruff, I. 2014. “The Rise of Authoritarian Neoliberalism.” Rethinking Marxism 26 (1): 113–29.
   Google Scholar
• Coase, R., and N. Wang. 2016. How China Became Capitalist. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• De Carolis, M. 2021. “Catastrofe o pianificazione?” [Catastrophe or planning?]. Il Ponte 77 (1): 116–21.
   Google Scholar
• Della Volpe, G. (1946) 2018. La libertà comunista [Communist freedom]. Rome: Bordeaux.
   Google Scholar
• Di Pierro, M. 2018. “La biopolitica nel pensiero di Antonio Negri: Dalla ‘tendenza’ all’eccedenza affermativa della vita” [The bio-politics of Antonio Negri: From “tendency” to affirmative excess of life]. Etica & Politica 20 (1): 107–26.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1930) 2004. Civilization and Its Discontents. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Georgieva, K., F. J. Díez, R. Duval, and D. Schwarz. 2021. “Rising Market Power—A Threat to the Recovery?” IMF Blog, 15 March. https://blogs.imf.org/2021/03/15/rising-market-power-a-threat-to-the-recovery.
   Google Scholar
• Ginzburg, C. 1979. “Clues: Roots of a Scientific Paradigm.” Theory and Society 7 (3): 273–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilferding, R. (1910) 2007. Finance Capital: A Study in the Latest Phase of Capitalist Development. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Keynes, J. M. (1925) 2010. “A Short View of Russia.” In Essays in Persuasion, 253–71. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kott, J. 1961. Shakespeare, Our Contemporary. New York: W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Laibman, D. 2012. Political Economy after Economics: Scientific Method and Radical Imagination. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Leontief, W. 1974. “For a National Economic Planning Board.” New York Times, 14 March.
   Google Scholar
• Lyon-Callo, V. 2020. “COVID and Capitalism: A Conversation with Richard Wolff.” Rethinking Marxism 32 (4): 570–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madra, Y. M. 2017. Late Neoclassical Economics: The Restoration of Theoretical Humanism in Contemporary Economic Theory. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. (1867) 1990. Capital. Vol. 1. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Negri, A. 2012. “Alle origini del biopolitico: Un seminario” [At the origin of the biopolitical: A seminar]. In Il comune in rivolta: Sul potere costituente delle lotte, 78–96. Verona: Ombre Corte.
   Google Scholar
• NLR Editors. 1970. “Introduction to Della Volpe.” New Left Review, no. I/59: 97–100.
   Google Scholar
• Nordhaus, W. 1991. “To Slow or Not to Slow: The Economics of the Greenhouse Effect.” Economic Journal 101 (407): 920–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2019. Under Pressure: The Squeezed Middle Class. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/689afed1-en.
   Google Scholar
• Pagano, U. 2014. “The Crisis of Intellectual Monopoly Capitalism.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 38 (6): 1409–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patinkin, D. 1965. Money, Interest, and Prices: An Integration of Monetary and Value Theory. New York: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Piketty, T. 2014. Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. 1987. Freedom of Choice: Concept and Content. WIDER working paper 25, Helsinki, 22 August. https://www.wider.unu.edu/sites/default/files/WP25.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Shiller, R. 2000. Irrational Exuberance. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Solow, R. M. 2014. “Thomas Piketty Is Right.” New Republic, 22 April. https://newrepublic.com/article/117429/capital-twenty-first-century-thomas-piketty-reviewed.
   Google Scholar
• Stiglitz, J. 2019. People, Power, and Profits: Progressive Capitalism for an Age of Discontent. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Stiglitz, J., A. Jayadev, and A. Prabhala. 2020. “Patents vs. the Pandemic.” Project Syndicate, 23 April. https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/covid19-drugs-and-vaccine-demand-patent-reform-by-joseph-e-stiglitz-et-al-2020-04.
   Google Scholar
• Veronese Passarella, M., and H. Baron. 2015. “Capital’s Humpback Bridge: ‘Financialisation’ and the Rate of Turnover in Marx’s Economic Theory.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 39 (5): 1415–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, A., and N. Srnicek. 2013. “#Accelerate: Manifesto for an Accelerationist Politics.” Unpublished manuscript, 14 May 2013. Adobe PDF. https://syntheticedifice.files.wordpress.com/2013/06/accelerate.pdf.
   Google Scholar