Social Constructionism: Critical Analysis from a Vygotskian Perspective

References

• Anderson, H. 1997. Conversation, Language, and Possibilities: A Postmodern Approach to Therapy. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Augoustinos, M., and I. Walker. 1995. Social Cognition: An Integrated Introduction. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bertrando, P. 2000. “Text and Context: Narrative, Postmodernism and Cybernetics.” Journal of Family Therapy 22 (1): 83–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6427.00139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, S. D., J. Pujol, and B. C. Curt. 1998. “As One in a Web? Discourse, Materiality and the Place of Ethics.” In Social Constructionism, Discourse and Realism, ed. I. Parker, 75–90. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Burkitt, I. 1999. “Between the Dark and the Light: Power and the Material Contexts of Social Relations.” In Social Constructionist Psychology: A Critical Analysis of Theory and Practice, ed. D. J. Nightingale and J. Cromby, 71–82. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collier, A. 1998. “Language, Practice and Realism.” In Social Constructionism, Discourse and Realism, ed. I. Parker, 47–58. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cromby, J., and D. J. Nightingale. 1999. “What’s Wrong with Social Constructionism?” In Social Constructionist Psychology: A Critical Analysis of Theory and Practice, ed. D. J. Nightingale and J. Cromby, 1–21. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• da Costa, E., and S. C. Tuleski. 2017. “Constructionist Interpretation of Vygotsky: A Theoretical-Methodological Study of the Concept of Language.” In Vygotsky and Marx: Toward a Marxist Psychology, ed. C. Ratner and D. Nunes Henrique Silva. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315276632.
   Google Scholar
• Delphy, C. 2016. Close to Home: A Materialist Analysis of Women’s Oppression. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Dickerson, V. C. 2010. “Positioning Oneself within an Epistemology: Refining Our Thinking about Integrative Approaches.” Family Process 49 (3): 349–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2010.01327.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donovan, M. 2003. “Family Therapy beyond Postmodernism: Some Considerations on the Ethical Orientation of Contemporary Practice.” Journal of Family Therapy 25 (3): 285–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6427.00249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, D., M. Ashmore, and J. Potter. 1995. “Death and Furniture: The Rhetoric, Politics and Theology of Bottom Line Arguments against Relativism.” History of the Human Sciences 8 (2): 25–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/095269519500800202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, D., and J. Potter. 1992. Discursive Psychology. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Efran, J. S., M. D. Lukens, and R. J. Lukens. 1990. Language, Structure, and Change: Frameworks of Meaning in Psychotherapy. New York: W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Engels, F. (1888) 1969. Ludwig Feuerbach and the End of Classical German Philosophy. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Engels, F. (1884) 2010. The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Feyerabend, P. 1987. Farewell to Reason. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Flaskas, C. 2002. Family Therapy beyond Postmodernism. Hove, UK: Brunner-Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, D., and I. Prilleltensky, eds. 1997. Critical Psychology: An Introduction. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Frosh, S. 1995. “Postmodernism vs. Psychotherapy.” Journal of Family Therapy 17, no. 2 (May): 175–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6427.1995.tb00012.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frosh, S. 1997. “Postmodern Narratives: Or Muddles in the Mind.” In Multiple Voices: Narrative in Systemic Family Psychotherapy, ed. J. Byng-Hall and R. K. Papadopoulo, 86–99. London: Duckworth.
   Google Scholar
• Gergen, K. J. 1985. “The Social Constructionist Movement in Modern Psychology.” American Psychologist 40 (3): 255–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gergen, K. J. 1991. The Saturated Self: Dilemmas of Identity in Contemporary Life. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gergen, K. J. 1994a. “The Limits of Pure Critique.” In After Postmodernism: Reconstructing Ideology Critique, ed. H. W. Simons and M. Billig. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gergen, K. J. 1994b. Realities and Relationships: Soundings in Social Construction. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gergen, K. J. 1994c. Toward Transformation in Social Knowledge. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gergen, K. J. 1999. An Invitation to Social Construction. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gergen, K. J. 2001a. “Construction in Contention: Toward Consequential Resolutions.” Theory & Psychology 11 (3): 419–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354301113007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gergen, K. J. 2001b. “Psychological Science in a Postmodern Context.” American Psychologist 56 (10): 803–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gergen, K. J. 2004. “‘Old Stream’ Psychology Will Disappear with the Dinosaurs!” Forum Qualitative Socialforschung 5 (3). http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0403275.
   Google Scholar
• Gergen, K. J. 2007. “Relativism, Religion, and Relational Being.” Common Knowledge 13 (2–3): 362–78. http://doi.org/10.1215/0961754X-2007-011.
   Google Scholar
• Held, Β. 1995. Back to Reality: A Critique of Postmodern Theory in Psychotherapy. New York: W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Hepburn, A. 2003. An introduction to Critical Social Psychology. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Herzog, B. 2018. “Marx’s Critique of Ideology for Discourse Analysis: From Analysis of Ideologies to Social Critique.” Critical Discourse Studies 15 (4): 402–13. http://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2018.1457549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, G. A. 1970. “A Brief Introduction to Personal Construct Psychology.” Perspectives in Personal Construct Psychology, ed. D. Bannister, 1–30. London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knapp, N. F. 2019. “The Shape Activity: Social Constructivism in the Psychology Classroom.” Teaching of Psychology 46 (1): 87–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628318816181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoblauch, H., and R. Wilke. 2016. “The Common Denominator: The Reception and Impact of Berger and Luckmann’s the Social Construction of Reality.” Human Studies 39 (March): 51–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-016-9387-3.
   Google Scholar
• Lannamann, J. W. 1998a. “The Place of the Constructed in a Materially Responsive World.” Family Process 37 (4): 421–3. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.1998.00421.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lannamann, J. W. 1998b. “Social Constructionism and Materiality: The Limits of Interdeterminacy in Therapeutic Settings.” Family Process 37 (4): 393–419. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.1998.00393.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larner, G. 1994. “Para-Modern Family Therapy: Deconstructing Post-Modernism.” Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy 15 (March): 11–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/J.1467-8438.1994.TB00977.X.
   Google Scholar
• Larner, G. 1995. “The Real as Illusion: Deconstructing Power in Family Therapy.” Journal of Family Therapy 17 (2): 191–217. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6427.1995.tb00013.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larner, G. 2011. “Deconstructing Theory: Towards an Ethical Therapy.” Theory & Psychology 21 (6): 821–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354310395061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenin, V. (1913) 1963. Collected Works. Vol. 19. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Lenin, V. (1929) 1961. Collected Works. Vol. 38. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Leontiev, A. N. 1978. Activity, Consciousness, and Personality. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Leontiev, A. N. 1997. “On Vygotsky’s Creative Development.” In vol. 3 of The Collected Works of L. S. Vygotsky: Problems of the Theory and History of Psychology, ed. R. W. Rieber and J. Wollock, 233–344. New York: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, Karl. (1867) 1982. Capital. Vol. 1. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, Karl. (1888) 1998. “Theses on Feuerbach.” In The German Ideology, Including Theses on Feuerbach and Introduction to the Critique of Political Economy, by K. Marx and F. Engels, 143–5. New York: Prometheus.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, Karl. (1894) 1981. Capital. Vol. 3. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K., and F. Engels. (1846) 1972. The German Ideology. In The Marx-Engels Reader, ed. R. C. Tucker, 110–66. New York: W. W. Norton
   Google Scholar
• Maturana, H. R., and F. J. Varela. 1992. The Tree of Knowledge: The Biological Roots of Human Understanding. Boston: Shambhala.
   Google Scholar
• Montero, M. 1998. “The Perverse and Pervasive Character of Reality: Some Comments on the Effects of Monism and Dualism.” In Social Constructionism, Discourse and Realism, ed. I. Parker, 119–32. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Neimeyer, R. A., and J. D. Raskin 2001. “Varieties of Constructivism in Psychotherapy.” In Handbook of Cognitive-behavioral Therapies, 2nd ed., ed. K. S. Dobson, 393–430. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, F., and L. Holzman. 1993. Lev Vygotsky: Revolutionary Scientist. New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, I. 1992. Discourse Dynamics: Critical Analysis for Social and Individual Psychology. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, I. 1998. “Against Postmodernism: Psychology in Cultural Context.” Theory and Psychology 8 (5): 621–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354398085002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. 1968. Six Psychological Studies. Trans. A. Tenzer. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Pilgrim, D. 2000. “The Real Problem for Postmodernism.” Journal of Family Therapy 22 (1): 6–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6427.00135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pocock, D. 1995. “Searching for a Better Story: Harnessing Modern and Postmodern Positions in Family Therapy.” Journal of Family Therapy 17 (2): 149–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6427.1995.tb00011.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pocock, D. 2015. “The Case for Critical Realism.” Journal of Family Therapy 37 (2): 167–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6427.12027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polkinghorne, D. E. 1992. “Postmodern Epistemology of Practice.” In Psychology and Postmodernism, ed. S. Kvale, 146–65. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ratner, C. 2006. Cultural Psychology. A Perspective on Psychological Functioning and Social Reform. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Ratner, C. 2019. Psychology’s Contribution to Socio-Cultural, Political, and Individual Emancipation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ratner, C., D. Pavón-Cuéllar, and K. M. Ríos-Martínez. 2020. “The Politics of Realism and Social Constructionism in Psychology.” Psychotherapy and Politics International 18 (1). https://doi.org/10.1002/ppi.1522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roshchin, S. K. 1980. “The Use of Psychology in the Social Control System of Capitalist Society. Soviet Psychology 19 (1): 24–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayer, A. 2000. Realism and Social Science. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sève, L. 1978. Man in Marxist Theory and the Psychology of Personality. Sussex, UK: Harvester.
   Google Scholar
• Sève, L. 2021. “Where Is Marx in the Work and Thought of Vygotsky?” Mind, Culture, and Activity 28 (4): 293–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2021.1964535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shotter, J. 2008. Conversational Realities Revisited: Life, Language, Body and World. Chagrin Falls, Ohio: Taos Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Speed, Β. 1991. “Reality Exists O.K.? An Argument against Constructivism and Social Constructionism.” Journal of Family Therapy 13 (4): 395–405. https://doi.org/10.1046/J.1991.00436.X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stam, H. J. 1998. “Personal-Construct Theory and Social Constructionism: Difference and Dialogue.” Journal of Constructivist Psychology 11 (3): 187–203. http://doi.org/10.1080/10720539808405220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. 1971. The Psychology of Art. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. 1976. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Ed. M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, and E. Souberman. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. 1987. “Thinking and Speech.” In vol. 1 of The Collected Works of L. S. Vygotsky: Problems of General Psychology, ed. R. W. Rieber and A. S. Carton, 39–285. New York: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. 1989. “Concrete Human Psychology.” Soviet Psychology 27, no. 2: 53–77.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. 1994a. “Fascism in Psychoneurology.” In The Vygotsky Reader, ed. R. van der Veer and J. Valsiner, 327–37. Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. 1994b. “The Socialist Alteration of Man.” In The Vygotsky Reader, ed. R. van der Veer and J. Valsiner, 175–84. Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. 1997. “The Historical Meaning of the Crisis of Psychology.” In vol. 3 of The Collected Works of L. S. Vygotsky: Problems of the Theory and History of Psychology, ed. R. W. Rieber and J. Wollock, 233–344. New York: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. 2018. Vygotsky’s Notebooks: A Selection. Singapore: Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4625-4.
   Google Scholar
• Willig, C. 1999. “Beyond Appearances: A Critical Realist Approach to Social Constructionist Work.” In Social Constructionist Psychology: A Critical Analysis of Theory and Practice, ed. D. J. Nightingale and J. Cromby, 37–52. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Willig, C. 2013. Introducing Qualitative Research in Psychology. 3rd ed. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, S. 2009. Sexuality and Socialism: History, Politics, and Theory of LGBT Liberation. Chicago, Ill.: Haymarket.
   Google Scholar