References
- Archer, M. 1995. Realist social theory: The morphogenetic approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Archer, M. 2010. Morphogenesis versus structuration: On combining structure and action. Br. J. Sociol. 61:225–252.
- Bhaskar, R., C. Frank, K. G. Hoyer, P. Naess, and J. Parker. 2010. Interdisciplinarity and climate change: Transforming knowledge and Practice for our global futures. London: Routledge.
- Buizer, I. M., T. Kurz, and K. Ruthrof. 2012. Understanding restoration volunteering in a context of environmental change; In pursuit of novel ecosystems or historical analogues? Hum. Ecol. 40:153–160.
- Castán Broto, V., M. Gislason, and M. Ehlers. 2009. Practising interdisciplinarity in the interplay between disciplines: experiences of established researchers. Environ. Sci. Policy 12:922–933.
- Evely, A. C., I. Fazey, X. Lambin, E. Lambert, S. Allen, and M. Pinard. 2010. Defining and evaluating the impact of cross-disciplinary conservation research. Environ. Conserv. 37:442–450.
- Funtowicz, S., and J. Ravetz. 1993. Science for the post-normal age. Futures 25:739–755.
- Giddens, A. 1984. The constitution of society: Introduction of the theory of structuration. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
- Hirsch Hadorn, G., H. Hoffmann-Riem, S. Biber-Klemm, W. Grossenbacher-Mansuy, D. Joye, C. Pohl, U. Wiesmann, and E. Zemp eds. 2008. Handbook of transdisciplinary research. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
- Kueffer, C., G. H. Hadorn, G. Bammer, L. Van Kerkhoff, and C. Pohl. 2007. Towards a publication culture in transdisciplinary research. GAIA 16:22–26.
- Laurance, W., B. Dell, S. M. Turton, M. J. Lawes, L. B. Hutley, H. McCallum, and 19 additional authors. 2011. The 10 Australian ecosystems most vulnerable to tipping points. Biol. Conserv. 144:1472–1480.
- Lincoln, Y., and E. Guba. 2003. Pardigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In The landscape of qualitative research, ed. N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln 191–215. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Max-Neef, M. 2005. Foundations of transdisciplinarity. Ecol. Econ. 53:5–16.
- Moore, S., D. Newsome, K. Rodger, and A. Smith. 2009. Interdisciplinary ecotourism research: insights and issues for conservation. Open Conserv. Biol. J. 3:57–64.
- Patterson, M. E., and D. R. Williams. 1998. Paradigms and problems: The practice of social science in natural resource management. Society Nat. Resources 11:279–295.
- Petts, J., S. Owens, and H. Bulkeley. 2008. Crossing boundaries: Interdisciplinarity in the context of urban environments. Geoforum 39:593–601.
- Pohl, C. 2005. Transdisciplinary collaboration in environmental research. Futures 37:1159–1178.
- Reyers, B., D. Roux, R. Cowling, A. Ginsburg, J. Nel, and P. Farrell. 2010. Conservation planning as a transdisciplinary process. Conserv. Biol. 24:957–965.
- Rodger, K., S. A. Moore, and D. Newsome. 2010. Wildlife tourism science and scientists: Barriers and opportunities. Society Nat. Resources 23:679–694.
- Roux, D., R. Stirzaker, C. Breen, E. Lefroy, and H. Cresswell. 2010. Framework for participative reflection on the accomplishment of transdisciplinary research programs. Environ. Sci. Policy 13:733–741.
- Rydin, Y. 2007. Re-examining the role of knowledge within planning theory. Plan. Theory 6:52–68.
- Strober, M. 2006. Habits of the mind: Challenges for multidisciplinary engagement. Social Epistemol. 20:315–331.
- Tress, G., B. Tress, and G. Fry. 2005. Clarifying integrative research concepts in landscape ecology. Landscape Ecol. 20:479–493.
- Tress, G., B. Tress, and G. Fry. 2007. Analysis of the barriers to integration in landscape research projects. Land Use Policy 24:374–385.