Property and Possession: Hunting Tourism and the Morality of Landownership in Rural Norway

References

• Berge, E. 2002. Varieties of property rights to nature. Some observations on landholding and resource ownership in Norway and England. In Forest law and environmental legislation: Contributions of the IUFRO research group 6.13. Proceedings VII, ed. F. Schmithüsen, I. Georg, and P. Herbst, 14–33. Forstwissenschaftliche Beiträge Nr. 27. Zürich, Switzerland: Professur Forstpolitik und Forstökonomie, ETH.
   Google Scholar
• Blekesaune, A., and Rønningen, K. 2010. Bears and fears: Cultural capital, geography and attitudes towards large carnivores in Norway. Norwegian Journal of Geography 64(4):185–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandth, B., and M. S. Haugen 2011. Farm diversification into tourism—Implications for social identity? Journal of Rural Studies 27(1):35–44. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2010.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brottveit, A. 1999. Elgjaktas symbolske økonomi: Hva står på spill? [The symbolic economy of moose hunting. What is at stake?]. In Jakta på elgjaktkulturen [Hunting for the moose-hunting culture], ed. A. Brottveit and O. Aagedal. Oslo: Abstrakt forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, K. M. 2006. The role of moral values in contemporary common property enactment. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift–Norwegian Journal of Geography 60(1):89–99. doi:10.1080/00291950500535293
   Google Scholar
• Brown, K. M. 2014. Spaces of play, spaces of responsibility: Creating dichotomous geographies of outdoor citizenship. Geoforum 55:22–32. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, A., V. Kereži, B. Arroyo, M. Mateos-Delibes, D. Tadie, A. Lowassa, O. Krange, and K. Skogen. 2013. (De)legitimising hunting—Discourses over the morality of hunting in Europe and eastern Africa. Land Use Policy 32:261–70. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flemsæther, F., and G. Setten. 2009. Holding property in trust: Kinship, law and property enactment on Norwegian smallholdings. Environment and Planning A 41:2267–84. doi:10.1068/a41135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flø, B. E. 2008. Bygdedyret og elgen—ei stiavhengig analyse av næringsutvikling i elgskogen [A path dependent analysis of economic development of the moose forest]. In Den nye bygda [The changing rural community], ed. R. Almås M. S. Haugen M. Villa and J. F. Rye. Trondheim, Norway: Tapir Akademisk Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Hann, C. 2007. A new double movement? Anthropological perspectives on property in the age of neoliberalism. Socio-Economic Review 5(2):287–318. doi:10.1093/ser/mwl027
   Google Scholar
• Halkier, B. 2010. Focus groups as social enactments: Integrating interaction and content in the analysis of focus group data. Qualitative Research 10(1):71–89. doi:10.1177/1468794109348683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollander, J. A. 2004. The social contexts of focus groups. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 33(5):602–37. doi:10.1177/0891241604266988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaltenborn, B. P., H. Haaland, and K. Sandell. 2001. The public right of access – Some challenges to sustainable tourism development in Scandinavia. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 9(5):417–33. doi:10.1080/09669580108667412
   Google Scholar
• Krange, O., and K. Skogen. 2007. Reflexive tradition: Young working-class hunters between wolves and modernity. Young: Nordic Journal of Youth Research 15(3):215–33. doi:10.1177/110330880701500301
   Google Scholar
• Krange, O., and K. Skogen. 2011. When the lads go hunting: The ‘Hammertown mechanism’ and the conflict over wolves in Norway. Ethnography 12(4):466–89. doi:10.1177/1466138110397227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauss, M. 1954. The gift: Forms and functions of exchange in archaic societies. London, UK: Cohen & West.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. L. 1996. Focus groups. Annual Review of Sociology 22: 129–52. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newsome, D., and K. Rodger. 2012. Wildlife tourism. In A handbook of tourism and the environment, ed. A. Holden and D. Fennell 345–58. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nustad, K. G. 2013. Property’ and ‘rights’ in a South African land claim case. In Worlds of human rights. The ambiguities of rights claiming in Africa, ed. W. Derman A. Hellum and K. B. Sandvik 83–100. Leiden: Brill Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Øian, H. 2013. Wilderness tourism and the moralities of commitments: Hunting and angling as modes of engaging with the natures and animals of rural landscapes in Norway. Journal of Rural Studies 32:177–85. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2013.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 2003. How types of goods and property rights jointly affect collective action. Journal of Theoretical Politics 15(3):239–70. doi:10.1177/0951692803015003002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pröbstl, U., V. Wirth, and B. H. Elands. 2010. Management of recreation and nature based tourism in European forests. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie, J., J. Lewis, and R. G. Elam. 2013. Selecting samples. Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, C. M. 1994. Property and persuasion. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sikor, T., and C. Lund. 2009. Access and property: A question of power and authority. Development and Change 40(1):1–22. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7660.2009.01503.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skogen, K., and O. Krange. 2003. A wolf at the gate: The anti-carnivore alliance and the symbolic construction of community. Sociologia Ruralis 43(3):309–25. doi:10.1111/1467-9523.00247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Søilen, E. 1995. Sportsmenn i veideland. Norges jeger-og fiskerforbund. 125 års arbeid for jakt og fiske som rekreasjon [The Norwegian Association of hunters and anglers. 125 Years of work for hunting and fishing as recreation]. Billingstad, Norway: Norges jeger- og fiskeforbund.
   Google Scholar
• Urquhart, J., P. Courtney, and B. Slee. 2010. Private ownership and public good provision in English woodlands. Small-Scale Forestry 9(1):1–20. doi:10.1007/s00267-012-9900-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaccaro, I., and O. Beltran. 2008. The new Pyrenees: Contemporary conflicts around patrimony, resources and urbanization. Journal of the Society for the Anthropology of Europe 8(2):4–15. doi:10.1111/j.1556-5823.2008.00009.x
   Google Scholar
• Vail, D., and L. Hultkrantz. 2000. Property rights and sustainable nature tourism: Adaptation and mal-adaptation in Dalarna (Sweden) and Maine (USA). Ecological Economics 35(2):223–42. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00190-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vergunst, J., A. Whitehouse, N. Ellison, and A. Árnason. 2012. Introduction. In Landscapes beyond land: Routes, aesthetics, narratives, ed. A. Árnason N. Ellison J. Vergunst and A. Whitehouse 1–15. Oxford, UK: Berghan Books.
   Google Scholar
• von Benda-Beckmann, F., K. von Benda-Beckmann, and M. G. Wiber. 2009. Changing properties of property. Oxford, UK: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Ween, G., and S. Abram. 2012. The Norwegian Trekking Association: Trekking as constituting the nation. Landscape Research 37(2):155–71. doi:10.1080/01426397.2011.651112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar