Evaluating Collaborative Adaptive Management in Sierra Nevada Forests by Exploring Public Meeting Dialogues Using Self-Organizing Maps

References

• Allen, C. R., J. J. Fontaine, K. L. Pope, and A. S. Garmestani. 2011. Adaptive management for a turbulent future. Journal of Environmental Management 92:1339–45. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.11.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, C. R., and L. H. Gunderson. 2011. Pathology and failure in the design and implementation of adaptive management. Journal of Environmental Management 92:1379–84. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.10.063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bales, R., R. H. Barrett, J. J. Battles, M. H. Conklin, L. Huntsinger, N. M. Kelly, Q. Guo, et al. 2010. University of California Science Team (UCST) statement of neutrality. Sierra Nevada adaptive management project. http://snamp.cnr.berkeley.edu/documents/335/.
   Google Scholar
• Bales, R., R. H. Barrett, J. J. Battles, M. H. Conklin, L. Huntsinger, N. M. Kelly, Q. Guo, R. J. Gutiérrez, K. A. Rodrigues, and S. L. Stephens. 2007. Revision of the SNAMP workplan: Learning how to apply adaptive management in the Sierra Nevada Forest Plan amendment. Sierra Nevada adaptive management project. http://snamp.cnr.berkeley.edu/documents/91/
   Google Scholar
• Baskerville, G. 1988. Management of publicly owned forests. Forest Chronicle 64(3):193–98. doi:10.5558/tfc64193-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beierle, T. C., and D. M. Konisky. 2000. Values, conflict, and trust in participatory environmental planning. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 19(4):587–602. doi:10.1002/1520-6688(200023)19:4<587::aid-pam4>3.0.co;2-q
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bengston, D. N., and D. P. Fan. 1999. Conflict over natural resource management: A social indicator based on analysis of online news media text. Society & Natural Resources 12(5):493–500. doi:10.1080/089419299279560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkes, F., C. Folke, and J. Colding. 1998. Linking social and ecological systems: Management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bormann, B. T., R. W. Haynes, and J. R. Martin. 2007. Adaptive management of forest ecosystems: Did some rubber hit the road? BioScience 57(2):186–91. doi:10.1641/b570213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G., M. Kelly, and D. Whitall. 2013. Which ‘public’? Sampling effects in public participation GIS (PPGIS) and volunteered geographic information (VGI) systems for public lands management. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 57(2):190–214. doi:10.1080/09640568.2012.741045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmines, E. G., and R. A. Zeller. 1979. Reliability and validity assessment. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, H., C. Schuffels, and R. Orwig. 1996. Internet categorization and search: A self-organizing approach. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation 7(1):88–102. doi:10.1006/jvci.1996.0008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chon, T.-S. 2011. Self-organizing maps applied to ecological sciences. Ecological Informatics 6(1):50–61. doi:10.1016/j.ecoinf.2010.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, B. M., S. L. Stephens, J. J. Moghaddas, and J. J. Battles. 2010. Challenges and approaches in planning fuel treatments across fire-excluded forested landscapes. Journal of Forestry 108:24–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, A. L., and R. M. White. 2012. Collaboration in natural resource governance: Reconciling stakeholder expectations in deer management in Scotland. Journal of Environmental Management 112:160–69. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.07.032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dick, G. J., A. F. Andersson, B. J. Baker, S. L. Simmons, B. C. Thomas, A. P. Yelton, and J. F. Banfield. 2009. Community-wide analysis of microbial genome sequence signatures. Genome Biology 10(8):R85. doi:10.1186/gb-2009-10-8-r85
   Google Scholar
• Federal Register. 2012. National forest system land management planning; Final rule and record of decision. 36(219.9): 21162–21276.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Gimenez, M. E., H. L. Ballard, and V. E. Sturtevant. 2008. Adaptive management and social learning in collaborative and community-based monitoring: A study of five community-based forestry organizations in the western USA. Ecology and Society 13(2):4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferranto, S., L. Huntsinger, C. Getz, M. Lahiff, W. Stewart, G. Nakamura, and M. Kelly. 2013. Management without borders? A survey of landowner practices and attitudes toward cross-boundary cooperation. Society & Natural Resources 26(9):1082–100. doi:10.1080/08941920.2013.779343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finney, M. A. 2004. Chapter 9: Landscape fire simulation and fuel treatment optimization. General technical report PNW-GTR-610. Methods for integrated modeling of landscape change: Interior Northwest Landscape Analysis System. Portland, OR: USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.
   Google Scholar
• Folke, C. 2007. Social–ecological systems and adaptive governance of the commons. Ecological Research 22(1):14–15. doi:10.1007/s11284-006-0074-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greig, L. A., D. R. Marmorek, C. Murray, and D. C. E. Robinson. 2013. Insight into enabling adaptive management. Ecology and Society 18(3):24. doi:10.5751/es-05686-180324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gwartney, P. A., L. Fessenden, and G. Landt. 2002. Measuring the long-term impact of a community conflict resolution process: A case study using content analysis of public documents. Negotiation Journal 18(1):51–74. doi:10.1111/j.1571-9979.2002.tb00250.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holling, C. S. 1978. Adaptive environmental assessment and management. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Honkela, T., V. Pulkki, and T. Kohonen. 1995. Contextual relations of words in Grimm tales analyzed by self-organizing map. In Proceedings of ICANN'95, International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks, eds. F. Fogelman-Soulié and P. Gallinari, 3–7. Paris: EC2 et Cie.
   Google Scholar
• Kaski, S., T. Honkela, K. Lagus, and T. Kohonen. 1998. WEBSOM—Self-organizing maps of document collections. Neurocomputing 21:101–17. doi:10.1016/s0925-2312(98)00039-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, M., S. Ferranto, S. Lei, K. Ueda, and L. Huntsinger. 2012. Expanding the table: The web as a tool for participatory adaptive management in California forests. Journal of Environmental Management 109:1–11. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.04.035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohonen, T. 1998. The self-organizing map. Neurocomputing 21:1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohonen, T. 2001. Self-organizing maps, 3rd ed. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kohonen, T., S. Kaski, K. Lagus, J. Salojarvi, J. Honkela, V. Paatero, and A. Saarela. 2000. Self organization of a massive document collection. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 11:574–85. doi:10.1109/72.846729
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawler, J. J., T. H. Tear, C. Pyke, M. R. Shaw, P. Gonzalez, P. Kareiva, L. Hansen, L. Hannah, K. Klausmeyer, A. Aldous, C. Bienz, and S. Pearsall. 2010. Resource management in a changing and uncertain climate. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 8(1):35–43. doi:10.1890/070146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K. N. 1993. Compass and gyroscope: Integrating science and politics for the environment. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, K. N. 1999. Appraising adaptive management. Conservation Ecology 3(2):3.
   Google Scholar
• Lei, S., A. Iles, and N. M. Kelly. 2015. Characterizing the networks of digital information that support collaborative adaptive forest management in Sierra Nevada forests. Environmental Management 56(1):94–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, W. E., H. W. Bender, and D. J. Shields. 2000. Stakeholder objectives for public lands: Rankings of forest management alternatives. Journal of Environmental Management 58(1):21–32. doi:10.1006/jema.1999.0313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R., T. A. Aziz, and A. Rauber. 2007. Visualising class distribution on self-organising maps. In Artificial neural networks–ICANN 2007, eds. J. Marques de Sá, L. A. Alexandre, W. Duch, and D. Mandic, 359–68. Porto, Portugal: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R., and A. Rauber. 2011a. On wires and cables: Content analysis of WikiLeaks using self-organizing maps. In Advances in self-organizing maps, ed. J. Laaksonen and T. Honkela vol. 6731, 238–46. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R., and A. Rauber. 2011b. Java SOMToolbox. English (version 0.7.5–3 svn4280). Institute of Software Technology and Interactive System, Vienna University of Technology. http://www.ifs.tuwien.ac.at/dm/somtoolbox/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Neuendorf, K. A. 2002. The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pampalk, E., A. Rauber, and W. Merkl. 2002. Using smoothed data histograms for cluster visualization in self-organizing maps. In Artificial Neural Networks — ICANN 2002, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2415, 871–76. Madrid, Spain: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Plummer, R., and J. FitzGibbon. 2007. Connecting adaptive co-management, social learning and social capital through theory and practice. In Adaptive co-management: Collaboration, learning, and multi-level governance, ed. F. Berkes D. R. Armitage and N. Doubleday 55–78. Vancouver, Canada: UBC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Portuese, B. G., R. W. Malmsheimer, A. Anderson, D. Floyd, and D. Keele. 2009. Litigants' characteristics and outcomes in US Forest Service land-management cases 1989 to 2005. Journal of Forestry 107(1):16–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauber, A., D. Merkl, and M. Dittenbach. 2002. The growing hierarchical self-organizing map: Exploratory analysis of high-dimensional data. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 13:1331–41. doi:10.1109/tnn.2002.804221
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, M. S., A. Graves, N. Dandy, H. Posthumus, K. Hubacek, J. Morris, C. Prell, C. H. Quinn, and L. C. Stringer. 2009. Who's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management 90:1933–49. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.01.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutherford, M. W., P. F. Buller, and P. R. McMullen. 2003. Human resource management problems over the life cycle of small to medium-sized firms. Human Resource Management 42(4):321–35. doi:10.1002/hrm.10093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skupin, A. 2008. Visualizing human movement in attribute space. In Self-organising maps, 121–35. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Skupin, A. 2009. Discrete and continuous conceptualizations of science: Implications for knowledge domain visualization. Journal of Informetrics 3:233–45. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2009.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Susskind, L., A. E. Camacho, and T. Schenk. 2010. Collaborative planning and adaptive management in Glen Canyon: A cautionary tale. Columbia Journal of Environmental Law 35:1–56.
   Google Scholar
• Tear, T. H., P. Kareiva, P. L. Angermeier, P. Comer, B. Czech, R. Kautz, L. Landon, D. Mehlman, K. Murphy, M. Ruckelshaus, J. M. Scott, and G. Wilhere. 2005. How much is enough? The recurrent problem of setting measurable objectives in conservation. BioScience 55(10):835–49. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0835:hmietr]2.0.co;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tran, L. T., C. G. Knight, R. V. O'Neill, E. R. Smith, and M. O'Connell. 2003. Self-organizing maps for integrated environmental assessment of the Mid-Atlantic region. Environmental Management 31:822–35. doi:10.1007/s00267-003-2917-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ultsch, A. 1993. Self-organizing neural networks for visualisation and classification. In Information and classification, ed. P. D. O. Opitz, D. B. Lausen, and P. D. R. Klar 307–13. Studies in classification, data analysis and knowledge organization. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• U. S. Forest Service. 2004. Sierra Nevada forest plan amendment: Final supplemental environmental impact statement. Vallejo, CA: U.S. Forest Service, Region 5.
   Google Scholar
• van Wilgen, B. W., and H. C. Biggs. 2011. A critical assessment of adaptive ecosystem management in a large savanna protected area in South Africa. Biological Conservation 144:1179–87. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2010.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters, C. J. 1997. Challenges in adaptive management of riparian and coastal ecosystems. Conservation Ecology 1(2):1.
   Google Scholar
• Walters, C. J., and C. S. Holling. 1990. Large-scale management experiments and learning by doing. Ecology 71:2060–68. doi:10.2307/1938620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, J. H. 1963. Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association 58(301):236–44. doi:10.2307/2282967
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, E. P., and A. M. Khademian. 2008. Wicked problems, knowledge challenges, and collaborative capacity builders in network settings. Public Administration Review 68:334–49. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00866.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, B. K., and E. D. Brown. 2014. Adaptive management: From more talk to real action. Environmental Management 53(2):465–79. doi:10.1007/s00267-013-0205-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wondolleck, J. M. 1988. Public lands conflict and resolution: Managing national forest disputes. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wondolleck, J. M., and S. L. Yaffee. 2000. Making collaboration work: Lessons from innovation in natural resource management. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, Z., and D. N. Bengston. 1997. Trends in national forest values among forestry professionals, environmentalists, and the news media, 1982–1993. Society & Natural Resources 10(1):43–59. doi:10.1080/08941929709381008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, J., and J.-C. Thill. 2008. Visual exploration of spatial interaction data with self-organizing maps. In Self-organising maps, 67–85. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
   Google Scholar