Using Public Preferences to Weight Species Prioritization Criteria in Conservation Decision Making: A Case Study to Explore Potential Strengths and Weaknesses

References

• Balmford, A., L. Bennun, B. ten Brink, D. Cooper, I. M. Cote, P. Crane, A. Dobson, N. Dudley, I. Dutton, R. E. Green, R. D. Gregory, J. Harrison, E. T. Kennedy, C. Kremen, N. Leader-Williams, T. E. Lovejoy, G. Mace, R. May, P. Mayaux, P. Morling, J. Phillips, K. Redford, T. H. Ricketts, J. P. Rodriguez, M. Sanjayan, P. J. Schei, A. S. van Jaarsveld, and B. A. Walther. 2005. The Convention on Biological Diversity’s 2010 target. Science 307 (5707):212–13. doi:10.1126/science.1106281
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bath, A. J. 1996. Increasing the applicability of human dimensions research to large predators. Journal of Wildlife Research 1:215–20.
   Google Scholar
• Bath, A. J., and J. W. Enck. 2003. Wildlife human interactions in national parks in Canada and the USA. Social Science Research Review 4:1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Bessette, D., V. Campbell-Arvai, and J. Arvai. 2015. Expanding the reach of participatory risk management: Testing an online decision-aiding framework for informing internally consistent choices. Risk Analysis. doi:10.1111/risa.12481
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branco, P., J. L. Costa, and P. R. de Almeida. 2008. Conservation Priority Index for Estuarine Fish (COPIEF). Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 80 (4):581–88. doi:10.1016/j.ecss.2008.09.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, R., and G. Harris. 2005. Comanagement of wildlife corridors: The case for citizen participation in the Algonquin to Adirondack proposal. Journal of Environmental Management 74 (2):97–106. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.08.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buijs, A. E., and B. H. M. Elands. 2013. Does expertise matter? An in-depth understanding of people’s structure of thoughts on nature and its management implications. Biological Conservation 168:184–91. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2013.08.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buijs, A. E., A. Fischer, D. Rink, and J. C. Young. 2008. Looking beyond superficial knowledge gaps: Understanding public representations of biodiversity. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystems Services & Management 4:65–80. doi:10.3843/Biodiv.4.2:1
   Google Scholar
• Carter, M. F., W. C. Hunter, D. N. Pashley, and K. V. Rosenberg. 2000. Setting conservation priorities for landbirds in the United States: The Partners in Flight approach. Auk 117 (2):541–48. doi:10.1642/0004-8038(2000)117[0541:Scpfli]2.0.Co;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chase, L. C., D. J. Decker, and T. B. Lauber. 2004. Public participation in wildlife management: What do stakeholders want? Society & Natural Resources 17 (7):629–39. doi:10.1080/08941920490466611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dallimer, M., K. N. Irvine, A. M. J. Skinner, Z. G. Davies, J. R. Rouquette, L. L. Maltby, P. H. Warren, P. R. Armsworth, and K. J. Gaston. 2012. Biodiversity and the feel-good factor: Understanding associations between self-reported human well-being and species richness. Bioscience 62 (1):47–55. doi:10.1525/bio.2012.62.1.9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, T. M. 2005. Beyond biogeography: A framework for involving the public in planning of US marine protected areas. Conservation Biology 19 (5):1392–401. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00116.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, A., J. Krishnaswamy, K. S. Bawa, M. C. Kiran, V. Srinivas, N. S. Kumar, and K. U. Karanth. 2006. Prioritisation of conservation areas in the Western Ghats, India. Biological Conservation 133 (1):16–31. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2006.05.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decker, S. E., and A. J. Bath. 2010. Public versus expert opinions regarding public involvement processes used in resource and wildlife management. Conservation Letters 3 (6):425–34. doi:10.1111/j.1755-263X.2010.00129.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeKay, M. L., and G. H. McClelland. 1996. Probability and utility components of endangered species preservation programs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 2 (1):60–83. doi:10.1037//1076-898x.2.1.60
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faith, D. P. 1994. Phylogenetic diversity: A general framework for the prediction of feature diversity. In Systematics and conservation evaluation, ed. P. L. Forey, C. J. Humphries, and R. I. Vane-Wright. 251–68, Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, A., B. Bednar-Friedl, F. Langers, M. Dobrovodska, N. Geamana, K. Skogen, and M. Dumortier. 2011. Universal criteria for species conservation priorities? Findings from a survey of public views across Europe. Biological Conservation 144 (3):998–1007. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2010.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, A., and J. C. Young. 2007. Understanding mental constructs of biodiversity: Implications for biodiversity management and conservation. Biological Conservation 136 (2):271–82. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2006.11.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleishman, E., R. F. Noss, and B. R. Noon. 2006. Utility and limitations of species richness metrics for conservation planning. Ecological Indicators 6 (3):543–53. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2005.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankham, R., J. D. Ballou, and D. A. Briscoe. 2010. Introduction to conservation genetics, 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frankham, R., C. J. A. Bradshaw, and B. W. Brook. 2014. Genetics in conservation management: Revised recommendations for the 50/500 rules, Red List criteria and population viability analyses. Biological Conservation 170:56–63. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2013.12.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauthier, P., M. Debussche, and J. D. Thompson. 2010. Regional priority setting for rare species based on a method combining three criteria. Biological Conservation 143 (6):1501–09. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2010.03.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gotmark, F. 1992. Naturalness as an evaluation criterion in nature conservation. Conservation Biology 6 (3):455–58. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1992.06030455.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunnthorsdottir, A. 2001. Physical attractiveness of an animal species as a decision factor for its preservation. Anthrozoos 14 (4):204–15. doi:10.2752/089279301786999355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes, C. M. 2003. The influence of protected area outreach on conservation attitudes and resource use patterns: A case study from western Tanzania. Oryx 37 (3):305–15. doi:10.1017/S0030605303000565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hull, R. B., D. P. Robertson, and A. Kendra. 2001. Public understandings of nature: A case study of local knowledge about “natural” forest conditions. Society & Natural Resources 14 (4):325–40. doi:10.1080/08941920151080273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunsberger, C. A., R. B. Gibson, and S. K. Wismer. 2005. Citizen involvement in sustainability-centred environmental assessment follow-up. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 25 (6):609–27. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2004.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, L. M., and J. Brehm. 2003. Qualitative insight into public knowledge of, and concern with, biodiversity. Human Ecology 31 (2):309–20. doi:10.1023/A:1023988914865
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, M. 1996. Benchmarks for managing ecosystems: Are human activities natural? Conservation Biology 10 (3):695–97. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10030695.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Union for Conservation of Nature. 1988. IUCN red list of threatened animals. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.
   Google Scholar
• International Union for Conservation of Nature. 2001. IUCN red list categories and criteria. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN Species Survival Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Joseph, L. N., R. F. Maloney, and H. P. Possingham. 2008. Optimal allocation of resources among threatened species: A project prioritization protocol. Conservation Biology 23 (2):328–38. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01124.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, R. A., and M. A. Casey. 2000. Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lambeck, R. J. 1997. Focal species: A multi-species umbrella for nature conservation. Conservation Biology 11 (4):849–56. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1997.96319.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, R. L., and D. A. Deagen. 2001. Choosing public participation methods for natural resources: A context-specific guide. Society & Natural Resources 14 (10):857–72. doi:10.1080/089419201753242779
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loomis, J. B., and D. S. White. 1996. Economic benefits of rare and endangered species: Summary and meta-analysis. Ecological Economics 18 (3):197–206. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(96)00029-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mace, G. M., and N. J. Collar. 1995. Extinction risk assessment for birds through quantitative criteria. Ibis 137:S240–S246. doi:10.1111/j.1474-919X.1995.tb08451.x
   Google Scholar
• Mace, G. M., and E. J. Hudson. 1999. Attitudes toward sustainability and extinction. Conservation Biology 13 (2):242–46. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.013002242.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mace, G. M., H. P. Possingham, and N. Leader-Williams. 2007. Prioritizing choices in conservation. In Key topics in conservation biology, ed. D. W. Macdonald and K. Service. 17–34, Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Machado, A. 2004. An index of naturalness. Journal for Nature Conservation 12:95–110. doi:10.1016/j.jnc.2003.12.002
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H., A. Dennis, H. Hines, A. Kutt, K. McDonald, E. Weber, S. Williams, and J. Winter. 2007. Optimizing allocation of management resources for wildlife. Conservation Biology 21 (2):387–99. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00589.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, J. L., P. Cardoso, M. Arechavaleta, P. A. V. Borges, B. F. Faria, C. Abreu, A. F. Aguiar, J. A. Carvalho, A. C. Costa, R. T. Cunha, F. M. Fernandes, R. Gabriel, R. Jardim, C. Lobo, A. M. F. Martins, P. Oliveira, P. Rodrigues, L. Silva, D. Teixeira, I. R. Amorim, N. Homem, B. Martins, M. Martins, and E. Mendonca. 2010. Using taxonomically unbiased criteria to prioritize resource allocation for oceanic island species conservation. Biodiversity and Conservation 19 (6):1659–82. doi:10.1007/s10531-010-9795-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martín-López, B., J. A. Gonzalez, and C. Montes. 2011. The pitfall-trap of species conservation priority setting. Biodiversity and Conservation 20 (3):663–82. doi:10.1007/s10531-010-9973-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martín-López, B., C. Montes, and J. Benayas. 2007. The non-economic motives behind the willingness to pay for biodiversity conservation. Biological Conservation 139 (1–2):67–82. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2007.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martín-López, B., C. Montes, and J. Benayas. 2008. Economic valuation of biodiversity conservation: The meaning of numbers. Conservation Biology 22 (3):624–35. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00921.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Master, L. L. 1991. Assessing threats and setting priorities for conservation. Conservation Biology 5 (4):559–63. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.1991.tb00370.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCool, S. F., and K. Guthrie. 2001. Mapping the dimensions of successful public participation in messy natural resources management situations. Society & Natural Resources 14 (4):309–23. doi:10.1080/713847694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehlman, D. W., K. V. Rosenberg, J. V. Wells, and B. Robertson. 2004. A comparison of North American avian conservation priority ranking systems. Biological Conservation 120 (3):383–90. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2004.03.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menzel, S., and S. Bögeholz. 2010. Values, beliefs and norms that foster Chilean and German pupils’ commitment to protect biodiversity. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education 5 (1):31–49.
   Google Scholar
• Metrick, A., and M. L. Weitzman. 1996. Patterns of behavior in endangered species preservation. Land Economics 72 (1):1–16. doi:10.2307/3147153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, R. M., J. P. Rodriguez, T. Aniskowicz-Fowler, C. Bambaradeniya, R. Boles, M. A. Eaton, U. Gardenfors, V. Keller, S. Molur, S. Walker, and C. Pollock. 2006. Extinction risk and conservation priorities. Science 313 (5786):441. doi:10.1126/science.313.5786.441a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millsap, B. A., J. A. Gore, D. E. Runde, and S. I. Cerulean. 1990. Setting priorities for the conservation of fish and wildlife species in Florida. Wildlife Monographs 111:1–57.
   Google Scholar
• Moilanen, A., A. M. A. Franco, R. I. Early, R. Fox, B. Wintle, and C. D. Thomas. 2005. Prioritizing multiple-use landscapes for conservation: Methods for large multi-species planning problems. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 272 (1575):1885–91. doi:10.1098/rspb.2005.3164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery, C. A. 2002. Ranking the benefits of biodiversity: An exploration of relative values. Journal of Environmental Management 65 (3):313–26. doi:10.1006/jema.2002.0553
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. L. 1998. Planning focus groups. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Norton, B. G. 1994. On what we should save: The role of culture in determining conservation targets. In Systematics and conservation evaluation, ed. P. L. Forey, C. J. Humphries, and R. I. Vane-Wright. 23–9, Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peretti, J. H. 1998. Nativism and nature: Rethinking biological invasion. Environmental Values 7 (2):183–92. doi:10.3197/096327198129341537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabinowitz, D. 1981. Seven forms of rarity. In The biological aspects of rare plant conservation, ed. H. Synge. 205–17, New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Ratcliffe, D. A. 1977. A nature conservation review, Vol. 1. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ressurreicao, A., J. Gibbons, T. P. Dentinho, M. Kaiser, R. S. Santos, and G. Edwards-Jones. 2011. Economic valuation of species loss in the open sea. Ecological Economics 70 (4):729–39. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.11.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reyers, B., A. S. Van Jaarsveld, M. A. McGeoch, and A. N. James. 1998. National biodiversity risk assessment: A composite multivariate and index approach. Biodiversity and Conservation 7 (7):945–65. doi:10.1023/A:1008881405539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, L., and J. Loomis. 2009. The total economic value of threatened, endangered and rare species: An updated meta-analysis. Ecological Economics 68 (5):1535–48. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.10.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley, S., W. Siemer, D. Decker, L. Carpenter, J. Organ, and L. Berchielli. 2003. Adaptive impact management: An integrative approach to wildlife management. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 8:81–95. doi:10.1080/10871200304301
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, J. P., F. Rojas-Suarez, and C. J. Sharpe. 2004. Setting priorities for the conservation of Venezuela’s threatened birds. Oryx 38 (4):373–82. doi:10.1017/S0030605304000730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohlf, D. J. 1991. Six biological reasons why the Endangered Species Act doesnt work—and what to do about it. Conservation Biology 5 (3):273–82. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.1991.tb00139.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolston, H. 1997. Our duties to endangered species. In Principles of conservation biology, ed. G. K. Meffe and C. R. Carroll. 35–6, Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Roux, D. J., K. H. Rogers, H. C. Biggs, P. J. Ashton, and A. Sergeant. 2006. Bridging the science–management divide: Moving from unidirectional knowledge transfer to knowledge interfacing and sharing. Ecology and Society 11 (1). http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art4/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagoff, M. 1996. On the value of endangered and other species. Environmental Management 20 (6):897–911. doi:10.1007/Bf01205970
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samu, F., P. Csontos, and C. Szinetar. 2008. From multi-criteria approach to simple protocol: Assessing habitat patches for conservation value using species rarity. Biological Conservation 141 (5):1310–20. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2008.03.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmeller, D. S., B. Gruber, E. Budrys, E. Framsted, S. Lengyel, and K. Henle. 2008. National responsibilities in European species conservation: A methodological review. Conservation Biology 22 (3):593–601. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00961.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selge, S., A. Fischer, and R. van der Wal. 2011. Public and professional views on invasive non-native species—A qualitative social scientific investigation. Biological Conservation 144 (12):3089–97. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2011.09.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serpell, J. A. 2004. Factors influencing human attitudes to animals and their welfare. Animal Welfare 13:S145–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strager, M. P., and R. S. Rosenberger. 2006. Incorporating stakeholder preferences for land conservation: Weights and measures in spatial MCA. Ecological Economics 57 (4):627–39. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.05.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, H. 2010. Recruitment of participants using Facebook. Contemporary Approaches to Research in Mathematics, Science, Health and Environmental Education. http://www.deakin.edu.au/arts-ed/efi/conferences/car-2010/papers/tan-recruitment-facebook.pdf (accessed November 14, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• The Nature Conservancy. 1988. Natural Heritage Program operations manual. Arlington, VA: The Nature Conservancy.
   Google Scholar
• Tisdell, C. A. 2014. Human values and biodiversity conservation. The survival of wild species. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Vane-Wright, R. I., C. J. Humphries, and P. H. Williams. 1991. What to protect—Systematics and the agony of choice. Biological Conservation 55 (3):235–54. doi:10.1016/0006-3207(91)90030-D
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallington, T. J., R. J. Hobbs, and S. A. Moore. 2005. Implications of current ecological thinking for biodiversity conservation: A review of the salient issues. Ecology and Society 10 (1). http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss1/art15/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, K. A., J. Carwardine, and H. P. Possingham. 2009. Setting conservation priorities. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1162:237–64. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04149.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar