Making Decisions About Forestland Succession: Perspectives from Pennsylvania's Private Forest Landowners

References

• Best, C., and L. A. Wayburn. 2001. America’s private forests: Status and stewardship. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bieling, C. 2004. Non-industrial private-forest owners: Possibilities for increasing adoption of close-to-nature forest management. European Journal of Forest Research 123(4):293–303. doi:10.1007/s10342-004-0042-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Brookings Institution. 2003. Back to prosperity: A competitive agenda for Renewing Pennsylvania. http://www.brookings.edu/research/reports/2003/12/metropolitanpolicy-pennsylvania
   Google Scholar
• Butler, B. J. 2008. Family forest owners of the United States, 2006: A technical document supporting the Forest Service 2010 RPA assessment. Newtown Square, PA: USDA Forest Service.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, B. J., P. F. Catanzaro, J. L. Greene, J. H. Hewes, M. A. Kilgore, D. B. Kittredge, Z. Ma, and M. L. Tyrrell. 2012. Taxing family forest owners: Implications of federal and state policies in the United States. Journal of Forestry 110(7):371–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caron, J. A., R. H. Germain, and N. M. Anderson. 2012. Parcelization and land use: A case study in the New York City Watershed. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry 29(2):74–80.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, M. L. E. S. 2008. Facilitating private forestland management: Relating landowners’ experience of their forestland and their conceptualization of forest management to their management behavior. PhD dissertation, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN.
   Google Scholar
• Dayer, A. A., R. C. Stedman, S. B. Allred, K. V. Rosenberg, and A. K. Fuller. 2016. Understanding landowner intentions to create early successional forest habitat in the northeastern United States. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 40:59–68. doi:10.1002/wsb.613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeCoster, L. A. 1998. The Boom in Forest Owners–A Bust for Forestry? Journal of Forestry 96(5):25–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doherty, W. J., P. G. Boss, R. LaRossa, W. R. Schumm, and S. K. Steinmetz. 2009. Family theories and methods. In Sourcebook of family theories and methods, 3–30. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., and I. Ajzen 2010. Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, J., and A. Nino-Murcia. 2005. Status of species conservation banking in the United States. Journal of Conservation Biology 19(4):996–1007. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00231.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gobster, P. H., and M. G. Rickenbach. 2004. Private forestland parcelization and development in Wisconsin’s Northwoods: perceptions of resource-oriented stakeholders. Landscape and urban planning 69(2):165–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, J. L., S. H. Bullard, T. L. Cushing, and T. Beauvais. 2006. Effect of the federal estate tax on nonindustrial private forest holdings. Journal of Forestry 104(1):15–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, J. L., B. J. Butler, P. F. Catanzaro, J. H. Hewes, M. A. Kilgore, D. B. Kittredge, and M. L. Tyrrell. 2014. Family forest owners and federal taxes. Forest Policy and Economics 38:219–26. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2013.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregory, S. A., C. M. Conway, J. Sullivan. 2003. Econometric analyses of nonindustrial forest landowners: Is there anything left to study? Journal of Forest Economics 9(2):137–64. doi:10.1078/1104-6899-00028
   Google Scholar
• Gruver, J. B. 2010. Understanding private forest landowners’ experiences’ as they plan for their forests’ future. PhD Dissertation, School of Forest Resources. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University.
   Google Scholar
• Gustafson, E. J., and C. Loehle. 2006. Effects of parcelization and land divestiture on forest sustainability in simulated forest landscapes. Forest Ecology and Management 236(2):305–14. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2006.09.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haines, A. L., T. T. Kennedy, and D. L. McFarlane. 2011. Parcelization: Forest change agent in northern Wisconsin. Journal of Forestry 109(2):101–08.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karppinen, H. 2005. Forest owners’ choice of reforestation method: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Forest Policy and Economics 7(3):393–409. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2003.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendra, A., and R. B. Hull 2005. Motivations and behaviors of new forest owners in Virginia. Forest Science 51(2):142–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilgore, M. A. 2014. Do high property taxes influence family forest land Tenure decisions? Journal of Forest Economics 20(2):161–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kittredge, D. B. 2004. Extension/outreach: Implications for America’s family forest owners. Journal of Forestry 102(7):15–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaPierre, S., and R. H. Germain. 2005. Forestland parcelization in the New York city watershed. Journal of Forestry 103(3):139–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longmire, C. 2012. Pennsylvania’s private forest landowners: Exploring motivations, management activities, and sources of information. PhD dissertation, Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, Z., B. J. Butler, D. B. Kittredge, and P. Catanzaro. 2012. Factors associated with landowner involvement in forest conservation programs in the US: Implications for policy design and outreach. Land Use Policy 29(1):53–61. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, Z., and D. B. Kittredge. 2011. How family forest owners consider timber harvesting, land sale, and conservation easement decisions: Insights from Massachusetts, USA. International Journal of Forestry Research 2011:1–13. doi:10.1155/2011/290353
   Google Scholar
• Martin, T. F. 2015. Advancing dynamic family theories: Applying optimal matching analysis to family research. Journal of Family Theory & Review 7(4):482–97. doi:10.1111/jftr.12120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mater, C. M. 2001. Non-joiner NIPFs: What drives their decisions to fragment and/or conserve their forestland. Paper presented at Pinchot Institute for Conservation, Milford, PA, March.
   Google Scholar
• Mehmood, S. R., and D. Zhang. 2001. Forest parcelization in the United States. Journal of Forestry 99(4):30–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metcalf, A. L., J. B. Gruver, J. C. Finley, and A. E. Luloff. 2016 (in press). Segmentation to focus outreach: Behavioral intentions of private forest landowners in Pennsylvania. Journal of Forestry. doi:10.5849/jof.15-030
   Google Scholar
• Mundell, J., S. J. Taft, M. A. Kilgore, and S. A. Snyder. 2010. Using real estate records to assess forestland parcelization and development: A Minnesota case study. Landscape and Urban Planning 94(2):71–76. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muth, A. B. 2004. Opportunities for Deer Lodge, Tennessee: Community development and land stewardship by a collaborative learning community group. PhD Dissertation. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee.
   Google Scholar
• Pan, Y., Y. Zhang, and I. Majumdar. 2009. Population, economic welfare and holding size distribution of private forestland in Alabama, USA. Silva Fennica 43(1):161–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polkinhorne, D. F. 1989. Phenomenological research methods. In Existential–phenomenological perspectives in psychology: Exploring the breadth of human experience, eds. R. S. Valle and S. Halling 41–62. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pollio, H. R., T. Henley, and C. B. Thompson. 1997. The phenomenology of everyday life. London, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polyakov, M., and D. Zhang. 2008. Property tax policy and land-use change. Land Economics 84(3):396–408. doi:10.3368/le.84.3.396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poudyal, N. C., and D. G. Hodges. 2009. Property taxation and rural land values: Their effect on private forestland ownership structure in Texas. Land Use Policy 26:1100–05. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rickenbach, M. G., and P. H. Gobster. 2003. Stakeholders’ perceptions of parcelization in Wisconsin’s northwoods. Journal of Forestry 101(6):18–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegel, W. C., H. L. Haney, and J. L. Green. 2009. Estate planning for forest landowners: What will become of your timberland?. Asheville, NC: USDA Forest Service.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, S. 2006. Encouraging conservation on private lands: A behavioral analysis of financial incentives. Arizona Law Review 48:541–71.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, R. S., and M. L. Tyrrell. 2012. Motivations for family forestland parcelization in the Catskill/Delaware watersheds of New York. Journal of Forestry 110(5):267–74. doi:10.5849/jof.11–015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ties to the Land. 2011. http://tiestotheland.org (accessed June 21, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Tyrrell, M. L., M. H. Hall, and R. N. Sampson. 2004. Dynamic models of land use change in northeastern USA. New Haven, CT: Global Institute of Sustainable Forestry, Yale University.
   Google Scholar
• Tyson, C. B., and S. H. Broderick. 1999. A strategic approach to promoting estate conservation planning for combatting land fragmentation. Society & Natural Resources 12(7):693–702. doi:10.1080/089419299279399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau. 2010. US census factfinder. http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/CTTable (accessed April 12, 2010).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2010. General technical report, 1997 National Resources Inventory (revised December 2010). http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/technical/NRI/1997/summary_report (accessed February 18, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., D. Zhang, and J. Schelhas. 2005. Small-scale non-industrial private forest ownership in the United States: rationale and implications for forest management. Silva Fennica 39(3):443. doi:10.14214/sf.378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar