Community Forest Owners Evaluate a Decade of Payments for Ecosystem Services in the Mexican Cloud Forest: The Importance of Attention to Indigenous Sovereignty in Conservation

References

• Baker, R., and J. Rice. 2012. Stakeholder perceptions of Mexico’s payment for environmental services program: A comparative study of socioeconomic and environmental impacts in Oaxaca and Yucatan. Master’s thesis, Duke University, Durham, NC.
   Google Scholar
• Barkin, D., and M. Fuente. 2013. Community forest management: Can the green economy contribute to environmental justice? Natural Resources Forum 37:200–10. doi:10.1111/1477-8947.12010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barsimantov, J. 2010. Vicious and virtuous cycles and the role of external non-government actors in community forestry in Oaxaca and Michoacán, Mexico. Human Ecology 38:49–63. doi:10.1007/s10745-009-9289-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartra, A., and Otero, G. 2008. Movimientos indígenas campesinos en México: la lucha por la tierra, la autonomía y la democracia. In Recuperando La Tierra: El Resurgimiento de Movimientos Rurales En África, Asia y América Latina, ed. S. Moyo and P. Yeros, 401–428. Buenos Aires, Argentina: CLACSO, Consejo Latinoamericano de Ciencias Sociales.
   Google Scholar
• Berkes, F. 2009. Community conserved areas: Policy issues in historic and contemporary context. Conservation Letters 2 (1):20–25. doi:10.1111/j.1755–263X.2008.00040.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bray, D., E. Duran, and O. Molina. 2012. Beyond harvests in the commons: Multi-scale governance and turbulence in indigenous/community conserved areas in Oaxaca, Mexico. International Journal of the Commons 6 (2):151–78. doi:10.18352/bmgn-lchr.328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brisk, A. 2000. From tribal village to global village. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carruthers, D. V. 1996. Indigenous ecology and the politics of linkage in Mexican social movements. Third World Quarterly 17 (5):1007–28. doi:10.1080/01436599615236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbera, E., N. Kosoy, and T. Martínez. 2007. Equity implications of marketing ecosystem services in protected areas and rural communities: Case studies from Mesoamerica. Global Environmental Change 17:365–80. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbera, E., C. Soberanis, and K. Brown. 2009. Institutional dimensions of PES: An analysis of Mexico’s carbon forestry programme. Ecological Economics 68 (3):743–61. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.06.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortina-Villar, S., H. Plascencia-Vargas, R. Vaca, G. Schroth, Y. Zepeda, L. Soto-Pinto, and J. Nahed-Toral. 2012. Resolving the conflict between ecosystem protection and land use in protected areas of the Sierra Madre de Chiapas, Mexico. Environmental Management 49 (3):649–662. doi:10.1007/s00267-011-9799-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daily, G. 1997. Nature’s services. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dolsak, N., and E. Ostrom. 2003. The challenges of the commons. In The commons in the new millenium, ed. N. Dolsak and E. Ostrom, 3–34. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Enlace Zapatista. 2016. Que Retiemble en sus Centros La Tierra [from its center]. http://enlacezapatista.ezln.org.mx/2016/10/14/que-retiemble-en-sus-centros-la-tierra (accessed November 10, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Farley, K., W. Anderson, L. Bremer, and C. Harden. 2011. Compensation for ecosystem services: An evaluation of efforts to achieve conservation and development in Ecuadorian páramo grasslands. Environmental Conservation 38 (4):393–405. doi:10.1017/s037689291100049x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Amado, L., M. Ruiz-Pérez, and S. Barrasa-García. 2013. Motivation for conservation: Assessing integrated conservation and development projects and PES in La Sepultura Biosphere Reserve, Mexico. Ecological Economics 89:92–100. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Amado, L., M. Ruiz-Pérez, F. Reyes-Escutia, S. Barrasca-García, and E. Contreras-Mejía. 2011. Efficiency of payments for environmental services: Equity and additionality in a case study from a Biosphere Reserve in Chiapas, Mexico. Ecological Economics 70 (12):2361–68. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.07.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indian Law Resource Center (ILRC). 2011. REDD and why it is important to Native Peoples. http://indianlaw.org/content/what-redd-and-why-it-important-native-peoples (accessed November 1, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Instituto de Geografía y Estadística (INEGI). 2010. Oaxaca por distrito: Conteo de Población y Vivienda, tabulados básicos. http://www.inegi.org.mx/est/contenidos/Proyectos/ccpv/ (accessed January, 5 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Kosoy, N., E. Corbera, and K. Brown. 2008. Participation in payments for ecosystem services: Case studies from the Lacandon rainforest, Mexico. Geoforum 39 (6):2073–83. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langston, N. Forthcoming. Taconite and the Anishinabeg in the Lake Superior Basin. In Mining North America, ed. G. Vrtis and J. McNeil. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lansing, D. M. 2015. Carbon forestry and sociospatial difference: An examination of two carbon offset projects among indigenous smallholders in Costa Rica. Society & Natural Resources 28 (6):593–608. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.948243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahanty, S., W. Dressler, S. Milne, and C. Filer. 2013. Unravelling property relations around forest carbon. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 34 (2):188–205. doi:10.1111/sjtg.12024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, G., C. Camacho, S. Ansa Fonseca, F. Chapela, and M. A. González Ortíz. 2011. ICCAs in Oaxaca, Mexico. Management of Environmental Quality 22 (2):250–66.
   Google Scholar
• McAfee, K., and E. N. Shapiro. 2010. PES in Mexico: Nature, neoliberalism, social movements, and the state. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 100 (3):579–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muñoz-Piña, C., A. Guevara, J. M. Torres, and J. Braña. 2008. Paying for the hydrological services of Mexico’s forests: Analysis, negotiations and results. Ecological Economics 65 (4):725–36. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muradian, R., E. Corbera, U. Pascual, N. Kosoy, and P. H. May. 2010. Reconciling theory and practice: An alternative conceptual framework for understanding payments for environmental services. Ecological Economics 69 (6):1202–08. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orta-Martínez, M., and M. Finer. 2010. Oil frontiers and indigenous resistance in the Peruvian Amazon. Ecological Economics 70 (2):207–18. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.04.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, T. M. 2011. Carbon forestry and agrarian change: Access and land control in a Mexican rainforest. Journal of Peasant Studies 38 (4):859–83. doi:10.1080/03066150.2011.611281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E., and T. Hayes. 2005. Conserving the world's forests: Are protected areas the only way? Indiana Law Review 38 (3):595–617.
   Google Scholar
• Ricketts, T. H., B. Soares-Filho, G. A. B. da Fonseca, D. Nepstad, A. Pfaf, A. Petsonk, and R. Victurine. 2010. Indigenous lands, protected areas, and slowing climate change. PLoS Biology 8 (3):6–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosa, A. H., S. Kandel, and L. Dimas. 2004. Compensation for environmental services and rural communities: Lessons from the Americas. International Forestry Review 6 (2):187–94. doi:10.1505/ifor.6.2.187.38401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scullion, J., C. W. Thomas, K. Vogt, O. Pérez-Maqueo, and M. G. Logsdon. 2011. Evaluating the environmental impact of PES in Coatepec (Mexico) using remote sensing and on-site interviews. Environmental Conservation 38 (4):426–34. doi:10.1017/s037689291100052x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro-Garza, E. 2013. Contesting the market-based nature of Mexico’s national payments for ecosystem services programs: Four sites of articulation and hybridization. Geoforum 46:5–15. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.11.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, S. 2014. Indigenous peoples, national parks, and protected areas: A new paradigm linking conservation, culture, and rights. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ulloa, A. 2011. The politics of autonomy of indigenous peoples of the Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta, Colombia: A process of relational indigenous autonomy. Latin American and Caribbean Ethnic Studies 6 (1):79–107. doi:10.1080/17442222.2011.543874
   Google Scholar
• Vatn, A. 2010. An institutional analysis of payments for environmental services. Ecological Economics 69 (6):1245–52. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velasco Murguía, A., E. Duran-Medina, R. Rivera, and D. Bray. 2013. Cambios en la cobertura arbolada de comunidades indígenas con y sin iniciativas de conservación en Oaxaca, México. Investigaciones Geográficas, Boletín Del Instituto de Geografía 83:55–73.
   Google Scholar
• VonHedemann, N., and T. Osborne. 2016. State forestry incentives and community stewardship: A political ecology of payments and compensation for ecosystem services in Guatemala’s highlands. Journal of Latin American Geography 15 (1):83–110. doi:10.1353/lag.2016.0002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittman, H. K., and C. Caron. 2009. Carbon offsets and inequality: Social costs and co-benefits in Guatemala and Sri Lanka. Society & Natural Resources 22 (8):710–26. doi:10.1080/08941920802046858
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar