Publication Cover
Society & Natural Resources
An International Journal
Volume 31, 2018 - Issue 9
908
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Rejoinder

Recognizing Carbon Forestry’s Uneven Geography: A Response to Purdon and the Structure-Agency Dichotomy That Never Was

ORCID Icon &
Pages 1094-1102 | Received 08 Mar 2018, Accepted 05 May 2018, Published online: 01 Jun 2018

References

  • Agrawal, A. 2005. Environmentality: Community, intimate government, and the making of environmental subjects in Kumaon, India. Current Anthropology 46 (2):161–90.
  • Andersson, E., and W. Carton. 2017. Sälja Luft? Om Klimatkompensation Och Miljörättvisa i Uganda. In Politisk Ekologi: Om Makt Och Miljöer, ed. Erik Jönsson and Elina Andersson. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Bakker, K. 2004. An uncooperative commodity; privatizing water in England and Wales. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Bakker, K., and G. Bridge. 2006. Material worlds? Resource geographies and the ‘matter of nature. Progress in Human Geography 30 (1):5–27. doi:10.1191/0309132506ph588oa.
  • Boyd, W., and S. Prudham. 2017. On the themed collection, ‘the formal and real subsumption of nature. Society and Natural Resources 30 (7):877–84. doi:10.1080/08941920.2017.1304600.
  • Boyd, W., W. S. Prudham, and R. A. Schurman. 2001. Industrial dynamics and the problem of nature. Society & Natural Resources 14 (7):555–70. doi:10.1080/08941920120686.
  • Bryant, G., S. Dabhi, and S. Böhm. 2015. Fixing’ the climate crisis: Capital, states, and carbon offsetting in India. Environment and Planning A 47 (10):2047–63. doi:10.1068/a130213p.
  • Carton, W., and E. Andersson. 2017. Where forest carbon meets its maker: Forestry-based offsetting as the subsumption of nature. Society and Natural Resources 30 (7):829–43. doi:10.1080/08941920.2017.1284291.
  • Carton, W., E. Jönsson, and B. Bustos. 2017. Revisiting the ‘subsumption of nature’: Resource use in times of environmental change. Society & Natural Resources 30 (7):789–96.
  • Cavanagh, C., and T. A. Benjaminsen. 2014. Virtual nature, violent accumulation: The ‘spectacular failure’ of carbon offsetting at a Ugandan national park. Geoforum 56:55–65. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.06.013.
  • Corbera, E., and A. Martin. 2015. Carbon offsets: Accommodation or resistance? Environment and Planning A 47 (10):2023–30. doi:10.1177/0308518X15611666.
  • Ecotrust. 2018a. Financing mechanisms. 2018. http://ecotrust.or.ug/financing-mechanisms/.
  • Ecotrust. 2018b. Trees for global benefits ‘A cooperative carbon offsetting scheme.’ 2018. http://ecotrust.or.ug/programme-areas/management-and-control-of-pollution/trees-for-global-benefit/.
  • Fisher, J. 2012. No pay, no care? A case study exploring motivations for participation in payments for ecosystem services in Uganda. Oryx 46 (1):45–54. doi:10.1017/S0030605311001384.
  • Fisher, J., C. J. Cavanagh, T. Sikor, and D. Mwayafu. 2018. Linking notions of justice and project outcomes in carbon offset forestry projects: Insights from a comparative study in Uganda. Land Use Policy 73:259–68. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.12.055.
  • Gomm, R., M. Hammersley, and P. Foster, eds. 2000. Case study method: Key issues, key texts. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
  • Hendrickson, C. Y., and E. Corbera. 2015. Participation dynamics and institutional change in the Scolel Té carbon forestry project, Chiapas, Mexico. Geoforum 59:63–72. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.11.022.
  • Leach, M., and I. Scoones. 2015a. Carbon conflicts and forest landscapes in Africa, ed. M. Leach and I. Scoones. New York: Routledge.
  • Leach, M., and I. Scoones. 2015b. Political ecologies of carbon in Africa. In Carbon conflicts and forest landscapes in Africa, ed. M. Leach and I. Scoones, 1–42. New York: Routledge.
  • Marx, K. 1977. Capital: A critique of political economy. Vol. 1. New York: Vintage.
  • Murray, L. T. 2007. Practices of assemblage and community forest management. Economy and Society 36 (2):263–293. doi:10.1080/03085140701254308.
  • Osborne, T. 2011. Carbon forestry and agrarian change: Access and land control in a Mexican rainforest. The Journal of Peasant Studies 38 (4):859–83. doi:10.1080/03066150.2011.611281.
  • Osborne, T. 2015. Tradeoffs in carbon commodification: A political ecology of common property forest governance. Geoforum 67:64–77. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.10.007.
  • Osborne, T., and E. Shapiro-Garza. 2018. Embedding carbon markets: Complicating commodification of ecosystem services in Mexico’s forests. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 108 (1):88–105. doi:10.1080/24694452.2017.1343657.
  • Peet, R., P. Robbins, and M. Watts. 2011. Global political ecology. London, New York: Routledge. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.
  • Polanyi, K. 2001. The great transformation: The political and economic origins of our time. Boston: Beacon Press.
  • Purdon, M. 2018. Finding common ground: A critique of subsumption theory and its application to small-scale Forest carbon offsetting in Uganda. Society & Natural Resources 0 (0):1–12. doi:10.1080/08941920.2017.1414908.
  • Robbins, P. 2012. Political ecology: A critical introduction. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Shapiro-Garza, E. 2013. Contesting the market-based nature of Mexico’s national payments for ecosystem services programs: Four sites of articulation and hybridization. Geoforum 46:5–15. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.11.018.
  • Smith, N. 2006. Nature as accumulation strategy. In Socialist register 2007: Coming to terms with nature, ed. Leo Panitch and Colin Leys, 16–36. London: Merlin Press.
  • Wittman, H. K., and C. Caron. 2009. Carbon offsets and inequality: Social costs and co-benefits in Guatemala and Sri Lanka. Society and Natural Resources 22 (8):710–26. doi:10.1080/08941920802046858.
  • Yin, R. K. 2003. Case study research: Design and methods. London: Sage Publications Ltd.