Cultivating Benefit and Risk: Aquaculture Representation and Interpretation in New England

References

• Amberg, S. M., and T. E. Hall. 2010. Precision and rhetoric in media reporting about contamination in farmed salmon. Science Communication 32 (4):489–513. doi:10.1177/1075547009357599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binder, A. R., M. A. Cacciatore, D. A. Scheufele, and D. Brossard. 2014. The role of news media in the social amplification of risk. In The SAGE handbook of risk communication, ed. H. Cho, T. Reimer, and K.A. McComas, 69–85. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bradbury, D. 2000, November 14. Atlantic salmon declared endangered: Conservationists applaud the news, public officials question the science. Portland (ME) Press Herald.
   Google Scholar
• Callahan, R. 2000. June 29. Researchers: Fish farms taking toll on oceans. Bangor (ME) Daily News.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. 2001. Grounded theory. In Contemporary field research: Perspectives and formulations, ed. R. Emerson, 2nd ed., 335–352. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, B. C. 1963. The press and foreign policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Corbett, J. B., and J. L. Durfee. 2004. Testing public (un)certainty of science: Media representations of global warming. Science Communication, 26:129–151. doi:10.1177/1075547004270234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., and A. Strauss. 2008. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. 2003. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• D’Anna, L. M., and G. D. Murray. 2015. Perceptions of shellfish aquaculture in British Columbia and implications for well-being in marine social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society 20 (1):57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diana, D. S. 2009. Aquaculture production and biodiversity conservation. BioScience 59 (1):27–38. doi:10.1525/bio.2009.59.1.7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downs, A. 1972. Up and down with ecology – The “issue attention cycle.” The Public Interest 28:38–50.
   Google Scholar
• Entman, R. M. 1993. Framing: Towards clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication 43 (4):51–58. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Fishery and Aquaculture Information and Statistics Service 2016. The state of the world fisheries and aquaculture 2016. Rome: FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department.
   Google Scholar
• Feucht, Y., and K. Zander. 2015. Of earth ponds, flow-through and closed recirculation systems – German consumers’ understanding of sustainable aquaculture and its communication. Aquaculture 438:151–158. doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2015.01.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feucht, Y., and K. Zander. 2017. Aquaculture in the German print media. Aquaculture International 25 (1):177–195. doi:10.1007/s10499-016-0021-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, S., E. Vigoda-Gadot, H. Sterr, M. Schultz, I. Korchenkov, P. Krost, and D. Angel. 2012. Public attitudes toward marine aquaculture: A comparative analysis of Germany and Israel. Environmental Science & Policy 22:60–72. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2012.05.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frewer, L. J., K. Bergmann, M. Brennan, R. Lion, R. Meertens, G. Rowe, M. Siegrist, and C. Vereijken. 2011. Consumer response to novel agri-food technologies: Implications for predicting consumer acceptance of emerging food technologies. Trends in Food Science & Technology 22 (8):442–456. doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2011.05.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Froehlich, H. E., R. R. Gentry, M. B. Rust, D. Grimm, and B. S. Halpern. 2017. Public perceptions of aquaculture: Evaluating spatiotemporal patterns of sentiment around the world. PLoS ONE 12 (1):e0169281 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0169281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gwet, K. L. 2014. Handbook of inter-rater reliability: The definitive guide to measuring the extent of agreement among raters. Gaithersburg, MD: Advanced Analytics, LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, T. E., and S. M. Amberg. 2013. Factors influencing consumption of farmed seafood products in the Pacific Northwest. Appetite 66:1–9. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2013.02.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, A. 2010. Environment, media, and communication. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hites, R. A., J. A. Foran, D. O. Carpenter, M. C. Hamilton, B. A. Knuth, and S. J. Schwager. 2004. Global assessment of organic contaminants in farmed salmon. Science 303 (5655):226–229. doi:10.1126/science.1091447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Höijer, B., R. Lidskog, and L. Thornberg. 2006. News media and food scares: The case of contaminated salmon. Environmental Sciences 3 (4):273–288. doi:10.1080/15693430601049645.
   Google Scholar
• Legere, C. 2008, March 6. Trio seeks to set up oyster farm. Boston Globe.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, H. 2016. The effects of emotional appeals and gain versus loss framing in communicating sea star wasting disease. Science Communication 38 (2):143–169. doi:10.1177/1075547015619173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luoma, S., N., and R. E. Lofstedt. 2007. Contaminated salmon and the public’s trust. Environmental Science & Technology 6, 15:1811–1814. doi:10.1021/es072497j.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamila, A. Y. 2010, October 13. Case for genetically altered salmon doesn’t hold water. Portland (ME) Press Herald.
   Google Scholar
• Kitzinger, J. 1994. The methodology of focus groups: The importance of interaction between research participants. Sociology of Health & Illness 16:103–121. doi:10.1111/1467-9566.ep11347023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. 2004. Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mazur, N. A., and A. L. Curtis. 2006. Risk perceptions, aquaculture, and issues of trust: Lessons from Australia. Society and Natural Resources 19 (9):791–808. doi:10.1080/08941920600835551.
   Google Scholar
• Mazur, A., and J. Lee. 1993. Sounding the global alarm: Environmental issues in the US national news. Social Studies of Science 23: 681–720. doi:10.1177/030631293023004003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McComas, K. A., J. P. Schuldt, C. A. Burge, and S. Roh. 2015. Communicating about marine disease: The effects of message frames on policy support. Marine Policy 57:45–52. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2015.02.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCombs, M. E., and D. L. Shaw. 1972. The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly 36 (2):176–187. doi:10.1086/267990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMahon, M. D., D. F. Cowan, Y. Chen, G. D. Sherwood, and J. H. Grabowski. 2016. Growth of juvenile American lobster Homarus americanus in a changing environment. Marine Ecology Progress Series 557: 177–187. doi:10.3354/meps11854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. L. 1997. Focus groups as qualitative research, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, M., J. R. Anthony, C. L. Noblet, and L. Rickard. 2017. 2017 National aquaculture survey results. Technical report, Sustainable Ecological Aquaculture Network, University of Maine.
   Google Scholar
• National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Fisheries. n.d. 10 Myths about U.S. Marine Aquaculture. http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/aquaculture/archive/10myths.html (accessed May 25, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). 2016a. Aquaculture in the United States. http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/aquaculture/aquaculture_in_us.html (accessed May 25, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). 2016b. What is Aquaculture? http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/aquaculture/what_is_aquaculture.html (accessed January 10, 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Nisbet, M. C. 2009. Communicating climate change: Why frames matter for public engagement. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 51 (2):12–23. doi:10.3200/ENVT.51.2.12-23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbet, M. C., and T. P. Newman. 2015. Framing, the media, and environmental communication. In The Routledge handbook of environment and communication, ed. A. Hansen and R. Cox, 325–338. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Paquotte, P. 2007. Le marché des produits de la pisciculture en Europe. Paper presented at the Aquaculture Conference of the European Commission, Brussels, Belgium, November 15–16.
   Google Scholar
• Pershing, A J., M. A. Alexander, C. M. Hernandez, L. A. Kerr, A. Le Bris, K. E. Mills, J. A. Nye, N. R. Record, H. A. Scannell, J. D. Scott, G. D. Sherwood, and A. C. Thomas. 2015. Slow adaptation in the face of rapid warming leads to collapse of the Gulf of Maine cod fishery. Science 350 (6262):809–812. doi:10.1126/science.aac9819.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redmond, S., S. Belknap, and R. C. Uchenna. 2015. Aquaculture in shared waters: Kelp aquaculture. http://www.islandinstitute.org/aquaculture (accessed January 9, 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Rickard, L. N., and A. M. Feldpausch-Parker. 2016. Of sea lice and superfood: A comparison of regional and national news media coverage of aquaculture. Frontiers in Communication. doi: 10.3389/fcomm.2016.00014
   Google Scholar
• Riffe, D., S. Lacy, and F. Fico. 2014. Analyzing media messages: Using quantitative content analysis in research, 3rd ed. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Riffe, D., and D. Reimold. 2008. Newspapers get high marks on environmental report card. Newspaper Research Journal 29 (3):65–79. doi:10.1177/073953290802900306.
   Google Scholar
• Scheufele, D. A. 1999. Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication 49: 103–122. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02784.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheufele, D. A., and D. Tewksbury. 2007. Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication 57:9–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlag, A. K. 2010. Aquaculture: An emerging issue for public concern. Journal of Risk Research 13 (7):829–844. doi:10.1080/13669871003660742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlag, A. K. 2011. Aquaculture in Europe: Media representations as a proxy for public opinion. International Journal of Fisheries and Aquaculture 3 (7):158–165.
   Google Scholar
• Schlag, A. K., and K. Ystgaard. 2013. Europeans and aquaculture: Perceived differences between wild and farmed fish. British Food Journal 115 (2):209–222. doi:10.1108/00070701311302195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shoemaker, P. J., and S. D. Reese. 1996. Mediating the message: Theories of influences on mass media content, 2nd ed. White Plains, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Siegrist, M., and G. Cvetkovich. 2000. Perception of hazards: The role of social trust and knowledge. Risk Analysis 20: 713–719. doi:10.1111/0272-4332.205064.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic, P. 1987. Perception of risk. Science 236: 280–285. doi:10.1126/science.3563507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic, P., M. L. Finucane, E. Peters, and D. G. MacGregor. 2004. Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Analysis 24 (2):311–322. doi:10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00433.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trope, Y., and N. Liberman. 2010. Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review 117 (2):440–463. doi:10.1037/a0018963.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). 2013. 2013 Census of Aquaculture. https://www.agcensus.usda.gov/Publications/2012/Online_Resources/Aquaculture/ (accessed January 10, 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Valderrama, D., N. Hishamunda, and X. Zhou. 2005. Estimating employment in world aquaculture. FAO Aquaculture Newsletter 45:24–25.
   Google Scholar
• Vanhonacker, F., T. Altintzoglou, J. Luten, and W. Verbeke. 2011. Does fish origin matter to European consumers? British Food Journal 113 (4):535–549. doi:10.1108/00070701111124005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitmarsh, D., and M. G. Palmieri. 2011. Consumer behaviour and environmental preferences: A case study of Scottish salmon aquaculture. Aquaculture Research 42:142–147. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2109.2010.02672.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar