Feeling at Home from A Distance? How Geographical Distance and Non-Residency Shape Sense of Place among Private Forest Owners

References

• Baxter, J. 2010. Case studies in qualitative research. In Qualitative research methods in human geography, ed. I. Hay, 81–97. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beidler, K. J., and J. M. Morrison. 2015. Sense of place: Inquiry and application. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability 9 (3):205–215. doi: 10.1080/17549175.2015.1056210
   Google Scholar
• Bradshaw, M., and E. Stratford. 2010. Qualitative research design and rigour. In Qualitative research methods in human geography, ed. I. Hay, 69–80. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2):77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Castree, N. 2003. Place: Connections and boundaries in an interdependent world. In Key concepts in geography, eds. S. L Holloway, S. P. Rice, and G. Valentine, 165–185. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Convery, I., G. Corsane, and P. Davis. 2014. Introduction: Making sense of place. In Making sense of place: Multidisciplinary perspectives, eds. I. Convery, G. Corsane, and P. Davis, 1–8. Woodbridge: The Boydell Press.
   Google Scholar
• Creighton, J., K. A. Blatner, and M. S. Carroll. 2015. For the love of the land: Generational land transfer and the future of family forests in Western Washington state, USA. Small-Scale Forestry 15 (1):1–15. doi: 10.1007/s11842-015-9301-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cresswell, T. 2004. Place: A short introduction. Malden: Blackwell Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Cresswell, T. 2014. Place. In The sage handbook of human geography, eds. R. Lee, N. Castree, R. Kitchin, V. Lawson, A. Paasi, C. Philo, S. Radcliffe, S. M. Roberts, and C. W. J. Withers, 3–21. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Derrien, M. M., and P. A. Stokowski. 2014. Sense of place as a learning process: Examples from the narratives of Bosnian immigrants in Vermont. Leisure Sciences 36 (2):107–125. doi: 10.1080/01490400.2013.862885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhauer, B. W., R. S. Krannich, and D. J. Blahna. 2000. Attachments to special places on public lands: An analysis of activities, reason for attachments, and community connections. Society & Natural Resources 13 (5):421–441. doi: 10.1080/089419200403848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farnum, J., T. Hall, and L. E. Kruger. 2005. Sense of place in natural resource recreation and tourism: An evaluation and assessment of research findings. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-660. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, A. P., J. Bliss, F. Ingemarson, G. Lidestav, and L. Lönnstedt. 2010. From the small woodland problem to ecosocial systems: The evolution of social research on small-scale forestry in Sweden and the USA. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 25 (4):390–398. doi: 10.1080/02827581.2010.498386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flemsaeter, F. 2009. Home matters: The role of home in property enactment on Norwegian smallholdings. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift - Norwegian Journal of Geography 63 (3):204–214. doi: 10.1080/00291950903239030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafson, P. 2001. Meanings of place: Everyday experience and theoretical conceptualizations. Journal of Environmental Psychology 21 (1):5–16. doi: 10.1006/jevp.2000.0185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafson, P. 2006. Place attachment and mobility. In Multiple dwelling and tourism: Negotiating place, home and identity. eds. N. McIntyre, D. Williams, and K. McHugh, 17–31. Wallingford: CAB International.
   Google Scholar
• Gustafson, P. 2009. Mobility and territorial belonging. Environment and Behavior 41 (4):490–508. doi: 10.1177/0013916508314478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 1996. Justice, nature and the geography of difference. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Haugen, K., S. Karlsson, and K. Westin. 2016. New forest owners: Change and continuity in the characteristics of Swedish non-industrial private forest owners (NIPF owners) 1990–2010. Small-Scale Forestry 15 (4):533–550. doi: 10.1007/s11842-016-9338-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogl, K., M. Pregernig, and G. Weiss. 2005. What is new about new forest owners? A typology of private forest ownership in Austria. Small–Scale Forest Economics, Management and Policy 4 (3):325–342.
   Google Scholar
• Ingemarson, F., A. Lindhagen, and L. Eriksson. 2006. A typology of small-scale private forest owners in Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 21 (3):249–259. doi: 10.1080/02827580600662256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorgensen, B. S., and R. C. Stedman. 2001. A comparative analysis of predictors of sense of place dimensions: Attachment to, dependence on, and identification with lakeshore properties. Journal of Environmental Management 79 (3):316–327. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.08.003
   Google Scholar
• Jörgensen, H., and O. Stjernström. 2008. Emotional links to forest ownership. Restitution of land and use of a productive resource in Põlva County, Estonia. Fennia 186 (2):95–111.
   Google Scholar
• Kaltenborn, B. P., and D. R. Williams. 2002. The meaning of place: Attachments to Femundsmarka National Park, Norway, among tourists and locals. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift – Norwegian Journal of Geography 56 (3):189–98. doi: 10.1080/00291950260293011
   Google Scholar
• Kendra, A., and R. B. Hull. 2005. Motivations and behaviors of new forest owners in Virginia. Forest Science 51 (2):142–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keskitalo, E. C. H. 2017. Conclusions: New forest owners under globalised, rural-urban relations. In Globalisation and change in forest ownership and forest use: Natural resource management in transition, ed. E. C. H. Keskitalo, 303–314. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kittredge, D. B. 2005. The cooperation of private forest owners on scales larger than one individual property: International examples and potential application in the United States. Forest Policy and Economics 7 (4):671–688. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2003.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvarda, M. E. 2004. Non-agricultural forest owners’ in Austria – A new type of forest ownership. Forest Policy and Economics 6 (5):459–467. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2004.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson, S., D. M. De Freitas, and C. C. Hicks. 2013. Sense of place as a determinant of people’s attitudes towards the environment: Implications for natural resources management and planning in the Great Barrier Reef. Journal of Environmental Management 117: 226–234. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.11.035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidestav, G., C. Thellbro, P. Sandström, T. Lind, E. Holm, O. Olsson, K. Westin, H. Karppinen, and A. Ficko. 2017. Interactions between forest owners and their forests. In Globalisation and change in forest ownership and forest use: Natural resource management in transition, ed. E. C. H. Keskitalo, 97–137. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, C.-C., and M. Lockwood. 2014. Assessing sense of place in natural settings: A mixed-method approach. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 57 (10):1441–1464. doi: 10.1080/09640568.2013.811401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lähdesmäki, M., and A. Matilainen. 2014. Born to be a forest owner? An empirical study of the aspects of psychological ownership in the context of inherited forests in Finland. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 29 (2):101–110. doi: 10.1080/02827581.2013.869348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manzo, L. C. 2003. Beyond house and haven: Toward a revisioning of emotional relationships with places. Journal of Environmental Psychology 23 (1):47–61. doi: 10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00074-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markowski-Lindsay, M., P. Catanzaro, A. Milman, and D. Kittredge. 2016. Understanding family forest land future ownership and use: Exploring conservation bequest motivations. Small-Scale Forestry 15 (2):241–256. doi: 10.1007/s11842-015-9320-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massey, D. 1993. Questions of locality. Geography 78 (2):142–149.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, D. 1994. Space, place and gender. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, D. 2005. For space. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Mårald, E., C. Sandström, and A. Nordin. 2017. Forest governance and management across time: Developing a new forest social contract. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nordlund, A., and K. Westin. 2011. Forest values and forest management attitudes among private forest owners in Sweden. Forests 2 (1):30–50. doi: 10.3390/f2010030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Relph, E. 1976. Place and placelessness. London: Pion Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Rickenbach, M., K. Zeuli, and E. Sturgess-Cleek. 2005. Despite failure: The emergence of “new” forest owners in private forest policy in Wisconsin, USA. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 20 (6):503–513. doi: 10.1080/02827580500434806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie, J., J. Lewis, and G. Elam. 2012. Designing and selecting samples. In Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers, eds. J. Ritchie, and J. Lewis, 77–108. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Soini, K., H. Vaarala, and E. Pouta. 2012. Residents’ sense of place and landscape perceptions at the rural–urban interface. Landscape and Urban Planning 104 (1):124–134. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorice, M. G., K. Rajala, and U. P. Kreuter. 2018. Understanding management decisions of absentee landowners: More than just presence-absence. Rangeland Ecology & Management 71 (2):159–162. doi: 10.1016/j.rama.2017.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics Sweden [SCB] 2018. Kommuner i siffror [Municipalities in numbers]. https://www.scb.se/hitta-statistik/sverige-i-siffror/kommuner-i-siffror/#?region1=2462&region2=1293 (accessed September 10, 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Stedman, R. C. 2003. Is it really just a social construction? The contribution of the physical environment to sense of place. Society & Natural Resources: An International Journal 16 (8):671–685. doi: 10.1080/08941920309189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stedman, R. C. 2006. Understanding place attachment among second home owners. American Behavioral Scientist 50 (2):187–205. doi: 10.1177/0002764206290633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokowski, P. A. 2008. Creating social senses of place: New directions for sense of place research in natural resource management. In Understanding concepts of place in recreation research and management, eds. L. E. Kruger, T. E Hall, and M. C. Stiefel, 31–60. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-744. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.
   Google Scholar
• Tuan, Y.-F. 1975. Place: An experiential perspective. Geographical Review 65 (2):151–165. doi: 10.2307/213970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuan, Y.-F. 1977. Space and place: The perspective of experience. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Urquhart, J., and P. Courtney. 2011. Seeing the owner behind the trees: A typology of small-scale private woodland owners in England. Forest Policy and Economics 13 (7):535–544. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2011.05.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urquhart, J., P. Courtney, and B. Slee. 2010. Private ownership and public good provision in English woodlands. Small-Scale Forestry 9 (1):1–20. doi: 10.1007/s11842-009-9098-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westin, K., L. Eriksson, G. Lidestav, H. Karpinnen, K. Haugen, and A. Ficko. 2017. Individual forest owners in context. In Globalisation and change in forest ownership and forest use: Natural resource management in transition, ed. E. C. H. Keskitalo, 57–96. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wiersum, K. F., B. H. M. Elands, and M. A. Hoogstra. 2005. Small-scale forest ownership across Europe: Characteristics and future potential. Small-Scale Forest Economics, Management and Policy 4 (1):1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, D. R. 2002. Post-utilitarian forestry: What’s place got to do with it? In Proceedings of the Human Dimensions of Natural Resources in the West Conference, 114–123. Alta, WY, October 18–21.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, D. R., and J. J. Vaske. 2003. The measurement of place attachment: Validity and generalizability of a psychometric approach. Forest Science 49 (6):830–840.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winchester, H. P. M., and M. W. Rofe. 2010. Qualitative research and its place in human geography. In Qualitative research methods in human geography, ed. I. Hay, 3–25. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar