From Lightning Rod to Community Asset? The Creation of a Protected Area in Northern California and its Evolving Relationship to a Nearby Community

References

• Barbour, M. G., S. Lydon, M. Borchert, M. Popper, V. Whitworth, and J. Evarts. 2001. Coast redwood: A natural and cultural history. Los Olivos, CA: Cachuma Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, N. J. 2016. Using perceptions as evidence to improve conservation and environmental management. Conservation Biology 30 (3):582–592. doi:10.1111/cobi.12681.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevington, D. 2009. The rebirth of environmentalism: Grassroots activism from the spotted owl to the polar bear. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berkes, F. 2009. Evolution of co-management: Role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. Journal of Environmental Management 90 (5):1692–1702. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.12.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blicharska, M., W. H. Orlikowska, J.-M. Roberge, and M. Grodzinska-Jurczak. 2016. Contribution of social science to large scale biodiversity conservation: A review of research about the natura 2000 network. Biological Conservation 199:110–22. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2016.05.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouamrane, M., M. Spierenburg, A. Agrawal, A. Boureima, M.-C. Cormer-Salem, M. Etienne, C. L. Page, H. Levrel, and R. Mathevet. 2016. Stakeholder engagement and biodiversity conservation challenges in social-ecological systems: Some insights from biosphere reserves in Western africa and France. Ecology and Society 21 (4):25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandon, K., L. J. Gorenflo, A. S. L. Rodrigues, and R. W. Waller. 2005. Reconciling biodiversity conservation, people, protected areas, and agricultural suitability in Mexico. World Development 33 (9):1403–1418. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.10.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bureau of Land Management (BLM). 2003. Headwaters Forest reserve proposed resource management plan and final EIS/EIR. Eureka, CA: U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management.
   Google Scholar
• California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). 2016. California natural diversity database: State and federally listed endangered and threatened animals of California. https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=109405andinline (accessed October 5, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Clements, T., S. Suon, D. S. Wilkie, and E. J. Milner-Gulland. 2014. Impacts of protected areas on local livelihoods in Cambodia. World Development 64:S125–S134. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.03.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cline, S. A., S. Weiler, and A. Aydin. 2011. The value of a name: Estimating the economic impact of public land designation. The Social Science Journal 48 (4):681–692. doi:10.1016/j.soscij.2011.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cumming, G. S. 2016. The relevance and resilience of protected areas in the anthropocene. Anthropocene 13:46–56. doi:10.1016/j.ancene.2016.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, A., R. Rohde, and K. Sandell. 2010. National parks and environmental justice: comparing access rights and ideological legacies in three countries. Conservation and Society 8 (3):209–24. doi:10.4103/0972-4923.73810.
   Google Scholar
• Dovers, S., S. Feary, A. Martin, L. McMillan, D. Morgan, and M. Tollefson. 2015. Engagement and participation in protected area management: Who, why, how, and when? In Protected area governance and management, ed. G. L. Worboys, M. Lockwood, A. Kothari, S. Feary, and I. Pulsford, 413–440. Canberra, Australia: ANU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Durrant, J. O., and J. M. Shumway. 2004. Attitudes toward wilderness study areas: A survey of six southeastern Utah counties. Environmental Management 33 (2):271–83. doi:10.1007/s00267-003-3019-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, K. L. 1967. A history of the pacific lumber company. Arcata, California: Humboldt State University.
   Google Scholar
• Gorner, T., K. Najmanova, and M. Cihar. 2012. Changes in local people’s perceptions of the sumava national park in the Czech Republic over a ten year period (1998–2008). Sustainability 4 (6):1354–1370. doi:10.3390/su4061354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosnell, H., and J. Abrams. 2011. Amenity migration: Diverse conceptualizations of drivers, socioeconomic dimensions, and emerging challenges. GeoJournal 76 (4):303–322. doi:10.1007/s10708-009-9295-4.
   Google Scholar
• Grodzinska-Jurczak, M., and J. Cent. 2011. Expansion of nature conservation areas: Problems with natura 2000 implementation in Poland? Environmental Management 47 (1):11–27. doi:10.1007/s00267-010-9583-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, J. M., N. D. Burgess, S. Rantala, H. Vihemaki, G. Jambiya, R. E. Gereau, F. Makonda, F. Njilima, P. Sumbi, and A. Kizaji. 2014. Ecological and social outcomes of a new protected area in tanzania. Conservation Biology : The Journal of the Society for Conservation Biology 28 (6):1512–21. doi:10.1111/cobi.12335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, D. 1997. The last stand: The war between wall street and main street over california’s ancient redwoods. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. doi:10.2307/3985564.
   Google Scholar
• Layzer, J. A. 2012. The environmental case: Translating values into policy. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lorah, P., and R. Southwick. 2003. Environmental protection, population change, and economic development in the rural Western United States. Population and Environment 24 (3):255–272. doi:10.1023/A:1021299011243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathevet, R., J. D. Thompson, C. Folke, and F. S. Chapin. 2016. Protected areas and their surrounding territory: Socioecological systems in the context of ecological solidarity. Ecological Applications 26 (1):5–16. doi:10.1890/14-0421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nastran, M. 2015. Why does nobody ask us? Impacts on local perception of a protected area in designation, Slovenia. Land Use Policy 46:38–49. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, S. K., and T. E. Hamer. 1995. Nest success and the effects of predation on marbled murrelets. In Ecology and conservation of the marbled murrelet, ed. C. J. Ralph, G. L. Hunt, Jr., M. G. Raphael, and J. F. Platt, 89–98. Albany, CA: USDA Forest Service Pacific Southwest Research Station.
   Google Scholar
• Nuttavuthisit, K., P. Jindahra, and P. Prasarnphanich. 2015. Participatory community development: Evidence from Thailand. Community Development Journal 50 (1):55–70. doi:10.1093/cdj/bsu002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldekop, J. A., G. Holmes, W. E. Harris, and K. L. Evans. 2016. A global assessment of the social and conservation outcomes of protected areas. Conservation Biology 30 (1):133–141. doi:10.1111/cobi.12568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pimbert, M. P., and J. N. Pretty. 1995. Parks, people and professionals: Putting “participation” into protected area management. Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.
   Google Scholar
• Prager, K., B. Nienaber, B. Neumann, and A. Phillips. 2015. How should rural policy be evaluated if it aims to foster community involvement in environmental management?. Journal of Rural Studies 37:120–131. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.12.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rashid, A. Z. N., D. Craig, and N. A. Khan. 2015. Selected dynamics of collaborative protected area management in the global North and South: experiences from Australia and Nepal. International Journal of Research on Land-Use Sustainability 2:113–124.
   Google Scholar
• Rasker, R., P. H. Gude, and M. Delorey. 2013. The effect of protected federal lands on economic prosperity in the non-metropolitan West. Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy 43 (2):110–122.
   Google Scholar
• Rasker, R. 2006. An exploration into the economic impact of industrial development versus conservation on western public lands. Society and Natural Resources 19 (3):191–207. doi:10.1080/08941920500460583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudzitis, G., and H. E. Johansen. 1991. How important is wilderness? Results from a United States survey. Environmental Management 15 (2):227–233. doi:10.1007/BF02393853.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Save the Redwoods League. 2014. Coast Redwoods. http://www.savetheredwoods.org/redwoods/coast-redwoods/ (accessed October 5, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Schelhas, J. 2001. The USA national parks in international perspective: Have we learned the wrong lesson? Environmental Conservation 28 (4):300–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speece, D. 2016. Defending giants. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, M. J. 2010. Payoffs versus process: Expanding the paradigm for park/people studies beyond economic rationality. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 29 (2-4):174–201. doi:10.1080/10549810903547809.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. L. 1987. Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sturtevant, V. 2003. Methods of community inquiry. In Understanding community-forest relations, ed. L. E. Kruger, 7–21. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.
   Google Scholar
• United States Census Bureau. 2015. American Community Survey data profiles. https://www.census.gov/acs/www/data/data-tables-and-tools/data-profiles/2015/ (accessed January 2, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• UNEP-WCMC and IUCN. 2016. Protected Planet Report 2016. https://www.unep-wcmc.org/resources-and-data/protected-planet-report-2016. (accessed November 20, 2018).
   Google Scholar
• United States Census Bureau. 2017. Quick Facts. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/PST045217 (accessed June 6, 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Walker, P., and L. Fortmann. 2003. Whose landscape? A political ecology of the ‘exurban’ sierra. Cultural Geographies 10 (4):469–491. doi:10.1191/1474474003eu285oa.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, P., and D. Brockington. 2006. An anthropological perspective on some unexpected consequences of protected areas. Conservation Biology 20 (3):609–616. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00432.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkie, D. S., G. A. Morelli, J. Demmer, M. Starkey, P. Telfer, and M. Steil. 2006. Parks and people: Assessing the human welfare effects of establishing protected areas for biodiversity conservation. Conservation Biology 20 (1):247–249. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00291.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar