Understanding the Past and Present and Predicting the Future: Farmers’ Use of Multiple Nutrient Best Management Practices in the Upper Midwest

References

• Adrian, A. M., S. H. Norwood, and P. L. Mask. 2005. Producers’ perceptions and attitudes toward precision agriculture technologies. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 48 (3):256–71. doi:10.1016/j.compag.2005.04.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbuckle, J. G., and G. Roesch-McNally. 2015. Cover crop adoption in Iowa: The role of perceived practice characteristics. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 70 (6):418–29. doi:10.2489/jswc.70.6.418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbuckle, J. G., J. Hobbs, A. Loy, L. W. Morton, L. S. Prokopy, and J. Tyndall. 2014. Understanding corn belt farmer perspectives on climate change to inform engagement strategies for adaptation and mitigation. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 69 (6):505–16. doi:10.2489/jswc.69.6.505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgart-Getz, A., L. S. Prokopy, and K. Floress. 2012. Why farmers adopt best management practice in the United States: A meta-analysis of the adoption literature. Journal of Environmental Management 96 (1):17–25. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.10.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, H. and J. Mayerl. 2013. Values, beliefs, attitudes: An empirical study on the structure of environmental concern and recycling participation. Social Science Quarterly 94(3):691–714. doi:10.1111/ssqu.12010.
   Google Scholar
• Blesh, J., and L. E. Drinkwater. 2013. The impact of nitrogen source and crop rotation on nitrogen mass balances in the Mississippi river basin. Ecological Applications 23 (5):1017–35. doi:10.1890/12-0132.1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A. 1989. Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A. 2002. Latent variables in psychology and the social sciences. Annual Review of Psychology 53(1):605–34. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosch, N. S., J. D. Allan, J. P. Selegean, and D. Scavia. 2013. Scenario-testing of agricultural best management practices in lake Erie watersheds. Journal of Great Lakes Research 39 (3):429–36. doi:10.1016/j.jglr.2013.06.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T. A., and M. T. Moore. 2012. Confirmatory factor analysis. In Handbook of structural equation modeling, edited by R. Hoyle, 361–79. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Diaz, R. J., and R. Rosenberg. 2008. Spreading dead zones and consequences for marine ecosystems. Science 321 (5891):926–9. doi:10.1126/science.1156401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. A., J. D. Smyth, and L. M. Christian. 2014. Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Drinkwater, L. E., and S. S. Snapp. 2007. Nutrients in agroecosystems: Rethinking the management paradigm. Advances in Agronomy 92:163–86. doi:10.1016/S0065-2113(04)92003-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, M., J. D. Ulrich-Schad, L. S. Prokopy, R. L. Myers, C. R. Watts, and K. Scanlon. 2016. Perceptions and use of cover crops among early adopters: Findings from a national survey. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 71 (1):29–40. doi:10.2489/jswc.71.1.29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EPA. 2017. National Water Quality Inventory: Report to Congress. EPA 841-R-16-011. Washington, DC. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2017-12/documents/305brtc_finalowow_08302017.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., and I. Ajzen. 2015. Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Flis, S. 2017. The 4Rs in crop nitrogen research. Crops & Soils 50 (2):18–20. doi:10.2134/cs2017.50.0209.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, R., D. G. Armanini, and A. G. Yates. 2016. Effects of best management practice on ecological condition: Does location matter? Environmental Management 57 (5):1062–76. doi:10.1007/s00267-016-0662-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houser, M., D. Stuart, and M. Carolan. 2017. Is seeing believing? Applying a realist framework to examine agriculture and climate change. Environmental Sociology 3 (4):321–36. doi:10.1080/23251042.2017.1335380.
   Google Scholar
• Howarth, R. W., E. W. Boyer, W. J. Pabich, and J. N. Galloway. 2002. Nitrogen use in the United States from 1961-2000 and potential future trends. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment 31 (2):88–96. doi:10.1579/0044-7447-31.2.88.
   Google Scholar
• Hoyle, R. H. 2012. Model specification in structural equation modeling. In Handbook of structural equation modeling, edited by R. Hoyle, 126–44. New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knowler, D., and B. Bradshaw. 2007. Farmers’ adoption of conservation agriculture: A review and synthesis of recent research. Food Policy 32 (1):25–48. doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2006.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, Q. D., B. Schmalz, and H. Fohrer. 2011. The impact of agricultural best management practices on water quality in a North German lowland catchment. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 183 (1–4):351–79. doi:10.1007/s10661-011-1926-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, D. M., P. Sullivan, R. Claassen, and L. Foreman. 2007. Profiles of US farm households adopting conservation-compatible practices. Land Use Policy 24 (1):72–88. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2005.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., W. Yang, L. Leon, I. Wong, C. McCrimmon, A. Dove, and P. Fong. 2016. Hydrologic modeling and evaluation of best management practice scenarios for the grand river watershed in Southern Ontario. Journal of Great Lakes Research 42 (6):1289–301. doi:10.1016/j.jglr.2016.02.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makarewicz, J. C., T. W. Lewis, I. Bosch, M. R. Noll, N. Herendeen, R. D. Simon, J. Zollweg, and A. Vodacek. 2009. The impact of agricultural best management practices on downstream systems: Soil loss and nutrient chemistry and flux to Conesus lake, New York, USA. Journal of Great Lakes Research 35 (Suppl. 1):23–36. doi:10.1016/j.jglr.2008.10.006.
   Google Scholar
• McGuire, J., L. W. Morton, and A. D. Cast. 2013. Reconstructing the good farmer identity: Shifts in farmer identities and farm management practices to improve water quality. Agriculture and Human Values 30:57–69. doi:10.1007/s10460-012-9381-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morton, L. W., J. M. McGuire, and A. D. Cast. 2017. A good farmer pays attention to the weather. Climate Risk Management 15:18–31. doi:10.1016/j.crm.2016.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motsinger, J., P. Kalita, and R. Bhattarai. 2016. Analysis of best management practices implementation on water quality using the soil and water assessment tool. Water 8 (4):145. doi:10.3390/w8040145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Napier, T. L. 2000. Use of soil and water protection practices among farmers in the North Central region of the United States. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 36(4):723–35. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2000.tb04301.x.
   Google Scholar
• Napier, T. L., and T. Bridges. 2002. Adoption of conservation production systems in two Ohio watersheds: A comparative study. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 57 (4):229–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Napier, T. L., and T. Bridges. 2003. Adoption of conservation production systems within the upper region of the Scioto river watershed in Ohio. Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment 1 (2):287–94.
   Google Scholar
• Napier, T. L., M. Tucker, and S. McCarter. 2000. Adoption of conservation production systems in three Midwest watersheds. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 55:123–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Napier, T. L., and M. Tucker. 2001. Use of soil and water protection practices among farmers in three Midwest watersheds. Environmental Management 27 (2):269–79. doi:10.1007/s002670010148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, J. C., and Z. Leviston. 2014. Predicting pro-environmental agricultural practices: The social, psychological and contextual influences on land management. Journal of Rural Studies 34 (0):65–78. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2013.10.001.
   Google Scholar
• Prokopy, L. S., K. Floress, D. Klotthor-Weinkauf, and A. Baumgart-Getz. 2008. Determinants of agricultural BMP adoption: Evidence from the literature. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 63 (5):300–11. doi:10.2489/jswc.63.5.300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raykov, T. 1997. Estimation of composite reliability for congeneric measures. Applied Psychological Measurement 21 (2):173–84. doi:10.1177/01466216970212006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reimer, A. P., and L. S. Prokopy. 2014. One federal policy, four different policy contexts: An examination of agri-environmental policy implementation in the Midwestern United States. Land Use Policy 38:605–14. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.01.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reimer, A. P., A. W. Thompson, and L. S. Prokopy. 2012. The multi-dimensional nature of environmental attitudes among farmers in Indiana: Implications for conservation adoption. Agriculture and Human Values 29(1):29–40. doi:10.1007/s10460-011-9308-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribaudo, M. 2006. Hypoxia in the Gulf: Addressing agriculture’s contribution. Amber Waves 4:37.
   Google Scholar
• Ribaudo, M. 2015. The limits of voluntary conservation programs. Choices: The Magazine of Food, Farm & Resource Issues 30 (2):1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Ribaudo, M., J. Delgado, L. Hansen, M. Livingston, R. Mosheim, and J. Williamson. 2011. Nitrogen in agricultural systems: Implications for conservation policy. Washington, DC. http://www.chesapeake.org/stac/presentations/63_RibaudoMetal_2011_Nitrogeninagriculturalsystems_implicationsforconservationpolicy.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, G. P., and P. M. Vitousek. 2009. Nitrogen in agriculture: Balancing the cost of an essential resource. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 34 (1):97–125. doi:10.1146/annurev.environ.032108.105046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, C. S. 2017. Enhanced nitrogen fertiliser technologies support the ‘4R’ concept to optimise crop production and minimise environmental losses. Soil Research 55 (6):463–72. doi:10.1071/SR16335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sowa, S. P., M. Herbert, S. Mysorekar, G. M. Annis, K. Hall, A. P. Nejadhashemi, S. A. Woznicki, L. Wang, and P. J. Doran. 2016. How much conservation is enough? Defining implementation goals for healthy fish communities in agricultural rivers. Journal of Great Lakes Research 42 (6):1302–21. doi:10.1016/j.jglr.2016.09.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart, D., B. Basso, S. Marquart-Pyatt, A. Reimer, G. P. Robertson, and J. Zhao. 2015. The need for a coupled human and natural systems understanding of agricultural nitrogen loss. BioScience 65 (6):571–8. doi:10.1093/biosci/biv049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart, D., R. C. H. Denny, M. Houser, A. P. Reimer, and S. Marquart-Pyatt. 2018. Farmer selection of sources of information for nitrogen management in the US Midwest: Implications for environmental programs. Land Use Policy 70:289–97. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.10.047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart, D., R. L. Schewe, and M. McDermott. 2012. Responding to climate change: Barriers to reflexive modernization in U.S. agriculture. Organization & Environment 25 (3):308–27. doi:10.1177/1086026612456536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart, D., R. L. Schewe, and M. McDermott. 2014. Reducing nitrogen fertilizer application as a climate change mitigation strategy: Understanding farmer Decision-Making and potential barriers to change in the US. Land Use Policy 36:210–8. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.08.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teshager, A. D., P. W. Gassman, S. Secchi, and J. T. Schoof. 2017. Simulation of targeted pollutant-mitigation-strategies to reduce nitrate and sediment hotspots in agricultural watershed. Science of the Total Environment 607–608:1188–200. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.048.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, A. W., A. Reimer, and L. S. Prokopy. 2015. Farmers’ views of the environment: The influence of competing attitude frames on landscape conservation efforts. Agriculture and Human Values 32 (3):385–99. doi:10.1007/s10460-014-9555-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulrich-Schad, J. D., S. G. de Jalón, N. Babin, A. Pape, and L. S. Prokopy. 2017. Measuring and understanding agricultural producers’ adoption of nutrient best management practices. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 72 (5):506–18. doi:10.2489/jswc.72.5.506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). 2012. Census of agriculture. Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistical Service. https://www.agcensus.usda.gov/Publications/2012/ (accessed November 15,2017).
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). 2015. Crop production 2014 summary. Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistical Service. www.usda.gov/nass/PUBS/TODAYRPT/cropan15.pdf (accessed November 15, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Upadhyay, B. M., D. L. Young, H. H. Wang, and P. Wandschneider. 2003. How do farmers who adopt multiple conservation practices differ from their neighbors? American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 18 (1):27–36. doi:10.1079/AJAA2003027.
   Google Scholar
• Wauters, E., and E. Mathijs. 2014. The adoption of farm level soil conservation practices in developed countries: A meta-analytic review. International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology 10 (1):78–102. doi:10.1504/IJARGE.2014.061058.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, C., and L. McCann. 2015. Adoption of nitrogen-efficient technologies by U.S. corn farmers. Journal of Environment Quality 44 (2):391–401. doi:10.2134/jeq2014.02.0089.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, S. G., A. B. Taylor, and W. Wu. 2012. “Model Fit and Model Selection in Structural Equation Modeling.” In Handbook of structural equation modeling, edited by R. Hoyle, 209–31. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar