Publication Cover
Society & Natural Resources
An International Journal
Volume 32, 2019 - Issue 7
1,130
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Constructing the Klamath: Nature, Culture, and the Management of a Western River

Pages 790-806 | Received 17 Aug 2018, Accepted 11 Feb 2019, Published online: 01 Apr 2019

References

  • Andrews, E. J., M. G. Reed, T. D. Jardine, and T. A. Steelman. 2018. Damming knowledge flows: POWER as a constraint on knowledge pluralism in river flow decision-making in the Saskatchewan river Delta. Society & Natural Resources 31 (8):892–907. doi:10.1080/08941920.2018.1451582.
  • Athearn, R. G. 1986. The mythic west in Twentieth-Century America. Lawrence, Kansas: University Press of Kansas. doi: 10.1086/ahr/92.5.1289.
  • Blomley, N. 2003. Law, property, and the geography of violence: The frontier, the survey, and the grid. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 93 (1):121–41. doi:10.1111/1467-8306.93109.
  • Brandenburg, A. M., and M. S. Carroll. 1995. Your place or mine? The effect of place creation on environmental values and landscape meanings. Society and Natural Resources 8 (5):381–98. doi:10.1080/08941929509380931.
  • Breslow, S. J. 2014. A complex tool for a complex problem: Political ecology in the service of ecosystem recovery. Coastal Management 42 (4):308–31. doi:10.1080/08920753.2014.923130.
  • Brick, P. 1995. Taking back the rural west. In Let the people judge: Wise use and the private property rights movement, ed J. Echeverria and R. B. Eby, 61–5. Washington, DC: Island Press.
  • Campbell, J. L., C. Quincy, J. Osserman, and O. K. Pedersen. 2013. Coding in-depth semistructured interviews: Problems of unitization and intercoder reliability and agreement. Sociological Methods & Research 42 (3):294–320. doi:10.1177/0049124113500475.
  • Castree, N. 2005. Nature. Key ideas in geography. New York: Routledge.
  • Chaffin, B. C., and H. Gosnell. 2017. Beyond mandatory fishways: Federal hydropower relicensing as a window of opportunity for dam removal and adaptive governance of riverine landscapes in the United States. Water Alternatives 10 (3):819–39.
  • Creswell, J. W. 1994. Research design: Qualitative & quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
  • Cronon, W. 1992. A place for stories: Nature, history, and narrative. The Journal of American History 78 (4):1347–76. doi:10.2307/2079346.
  • Cronon, W. 1996. The trouble with wilderness: Or, getting back to the wrong nature. Environmental History 1 (1):7–28. doi:10.2307/3985059.
  • Dixon, D. P., and H. M. Hapke. 2003. Cultivating discourse: The social construction of agricultural legislation. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 93 (1):142–64. doi:10.1111/1467-8306.93110.
  • Doremus, H., and A. D. Tarlock. 2003. Fish, farms, and the clash of cultures in the Klamath basin. Ecology LQ 30:279.
  • Doremus, H., and A. D. Tarlock. 2008. Water war in the Klamath basin: Macho law, combat biology, and dirty politics. Washington, DC: Island Press.
  • Douglas, M., and A. Wildavsky. 1983. Risk and culture: An essay on the selection of technological and environmental dangers. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Farrell, J. 2015. The battle for Yellowstone: Morality and the sacred roots of environmental conflict. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  • Fiege, M. 1999. Irrigated Eden: The making of an agricultural landscape in the American west. Seattle: University of Washington Press. doi: 10.1086/ahr/106.1.179.
  • Fischer, F. 2003. Reframing public policy: Discursive politics and deliberative practices. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Fleck, J. 2016. Water is for fighting over and other myths about water in the west. Washington, DC: Island Press.
  • Fox, C. A., F. J. Magilligan, and C. S. Sneddon. 2016. You kill the dam, you are killing a part of me’: Dam removal and the environmental politics of river restoration. Geoforum 70:93–104. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.02.013.
  • Gieryn, T. F. 2000. A space for place in sociology. Annual Review of Sociology 26 (1):463–96. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.463.
  • Grabowski, Z. J., A. Denton, M. A. Rozance, M. Matsler, and S. Kidd. 2017. Removing dams, constructing science: Coproduction of undammed riverscapes by politics, finance, environment, society and technology. Water Alternatives 10 (3):769–95.
  • Greider, T., and L. Garkovich. 2010. Landscapes: The social construction of nature and the environment. Rural Sociology 59 (1):1–24. doi:10.1111/j.1549-0831.1994.tb00519.x.
  • Hajer, M. A. 1995. The politics of environmental discourse: Ecological modernization and the policy process. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Harvey, D. 1993. The nature of the environment: The dialectics of social and environmental change. In Real problems, false solutions, ed. R. Miliband and L. Panitch, 1–51. London: Merlin.
  • Hays, S. P. 1959. Conservation and the gospel of efficiency: The progressive conservation movement, 1890-1920. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. doi: 10.1086/ahr/65.4.930.
  • Holling, C. S. 1986. The resilience of terrestrial ecosystems: Local surprise and global change. In Sustainable development of the biosphere, ed. W. C. Clark and R. E. Munn. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
  • Holling, C. S., and G. K. Meffe. 1996. Command and control and the pathology of natural resource management. Conservation Biology 10 (2):328–37. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10020328.x.
  • Hull, R. B., D. P. Robertson, D. Richert, E. Seekamp, G. J. Buhyoff, and others. 2002. Assumptions about ecological scale and nature knowing best hiding in environmental decisions. Conservation Ecology 6 (2):12.
  • Jacobs, H. M. 1995. The anti-environmental ‘wise use’ movement in America. Land Use Law 47 (2):3–8. doi:10.1080/00947598.1995.10394698.
  • Jacobs, J. P. 2017. Republicans in hot seat over landmark deal for dam removal. E&E News. March 13, 2017. http://www.eenews.net/stories/1060051348.
  • Janssen, M. A. 2002. A future of surprises. In Panarchy: Understanding transformations in human and natural systems, ed. L. H. Gunderson and C. S. Holling, 241–60. Washington, DC: Island Press.
  • Johnston, B. R. 2003. The political ecology of water: An introduction. Capitalism Nature Socialism 14 (3):73–90. doi:10.1080/10455750308565535.
  • Kahan, D. M. 2012. Cultural cognition as a conception of the cultural theory of risk. In Handbook of risk theory, ed. S. Roeser, R. Hillerbrand, P. Sandin, and M. Peterson, 725–59. Amsterdam: Springer. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-94-007-1433-5_28.
  • Kahan, D. M., and D. Braman. 2006. Cultural cognition and public policy. Yale Law & Policy Review 24:147.
  • Landis, R. J., and G. G. Koch. 1977. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33 (1):159–74. doi:10.2307/2529310.
  • Lange, J. L. 1996. The logic of competing information campaigns: Conflict over old growth and the spotted owl. In A wolf in the garden: The land rights movement and the new environmental debate, ed. P. D. Brick and R. M. Cawley, 135–50. Lanham, MA: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
  • Layzer, J. 2012. The environmental case: Translating values into policy. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
  • Macnaughten, P., and J. Urry. 1998. Contested natures. Theory, culture & society. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd.
  • McCarthy, J. 1998. Environmentalism, wise use, and the nature of accumulation in the rural west. In Remaking reality: Nature at the millennium, ed. B. Braun and N. Castree, 126–49. New York: Routledge.
  • McCarthy, J. 2002. First world political ecology: Lessons from the wise use movement. Environment and Planning A 34 (7):1281–302. doi:10.1068/a3526.
  • McCool, D. 2018. Integrated water resources management and collaboration: The failure of the Klamath river agreements. J Policy History 30 (1):83–104. doi:10.1017/S0898030617000392.
  • McKinney, M., and W. Harmon. 2004. The Western confluence: A guide to governing natural resources. Washington, DC: Island Press.
  • McKinney, M., and J. E. Thorson. 2015. Resolving water conflicts in the American west. Water Policy 17 (4):679–706. doi:10.2166/wp.2015.146.
  • Milstein, M. 2002. The press portrayed the story as fish vs. farmers. But the Klamath river story is a whole lot more complicated than that. Nieman Reports.
  • Nie, M. 2008. The governance of Western public lands: Mapping its present and future. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
  • Paystrup. 1993. The Wolf at Yellowstone’s Door: Extending and applying the cultural approach to risk communication to an endangered species recovery plan controversy. PhD. diss., Purdue University.
  • Pielke, Jr., R. A. 2007. The honest broker: Making sense of science in policy and politics. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Rayner, S., and C. Heyward. 2014. The inevitability of nature as a rhetorical resource. In Anthropology and nature, ed. K. Hastrup, 125–46. Routledge studies in anthropology. New York: Routledge.
  • Raik, D., A. Wilson, and D. Decker. 2008. Power in natural resources management: An application of theory. Society & Natural Resources 21 (8):729–39. doi:10.1080/08941920801905195.
  • Reisner, M. 1993. Cadillac desert: The American west and its disappearing water. Revised edition. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
  • Rikoon, J. S. 2006. Wild horses and the political ecology of nature restoration in the Missouri ozarks. Geoforum 37(2):200–11. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2005.01.010.
  • Robbins, W. G. 2004. Landscapes of conflict: The Oregon story, 1940-2000. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
  • Saldaña, J. 2009. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. 1st ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
  • Sarewitz, D. 2004. How science makes environmental controversies worse. Environmental Science & Policy 7 (5):385–403. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2004.06.001.
  • Scarce, R. 1999. Who or what is in control here? Understanding the social context of salmon biology. Society & Natural Resources 12 (8):763–76. doi:10.1080/089419299279308.
  • Schwarz, M., and M. Thompson. 1990. Divided we stand: Re-defining politics, technology, and social choice. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
  • Service, R. 2003. Combat biology’ on the Klamath. Science 300 :36–9. doi:10.1126/science.300.5616.36.
  • Sheridan, T. E. 2007. Embattled ranchers, endangered species, and urban sprawl: The political ecology of the new American west. Annual Review of Anthropology 36 (1):121–38. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.36.081406.094413.
  • Stone, D. 2012. Policy paradox: The art of political decision making. 3rd ed. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.
  • Verweij, M., M. Douglas, R. Ellis, C. Engel, F. Hendriks, S. Lohmann, S. Ney, S. Rayner, and M. Thompson. 2006. Clumsy solutions for a complex world: The case of climate change. Public Administration 84 (4):817–43. doi:10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.09566.x-i1.
  • Wang, G. A. 2018. Who controls the land? Lessons from armed takeover of the Malheur national wildlife refuge. Case Studies in the Environment, January. doi:10.1525/cse.2017.000778.
  • Warren, W. 2007. What is a healthy Forest? Definitions, rationales, and the lifeworld. Society & Natural Resources 20 (2):99–117. doi:10.1080/08941920600901890.
  • White, R. 1995. ‘Are you an environmentalist or do you work for a living?’ Work and nature.” In Uncommon ground: Toward reinventing nature, ed. William Cronon, 171–85. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
  • Wilkinson, C. F. 1992. Crossing the next meridian: Land, water, and the future of the west. Washington, DC: Island Press.
  • Wilson, M. A. 1997. The wolf in yellowstone: Science, symbol, or politics? Deconstructing the conflict between environmentalism and wise use. Society & Natural Resources 10 (5):453–68. doi:10.1080/08941929709381044.
  • Worster, D. 1985. Rivers of empire: Water, aridity, and the growth of the American west. Cambridge, MA: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1086/ahr/92.1.214.
  • Worster, D. 1994. Nature’s economy: A history of ecological ideas. 2nd ed. Cambridge; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.