Collaborative Governance and Conflict Management: Lessons Learned and Good Practices from a Case Study in the Amazon Basin

References

• ACA. 2017. Strengthening indigenous capacity in conflict resolution and sustainable resource management in the lot 76 hydrocarbon concession and Amarakaeri Communal Reserve in Madre de Dios Department, Peru (revised): Final outcome evaluation. Produced for USAID under cooperative agreement AID-527-A-14-00006, The Amazon Conservation Association, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• ACCA. 2016a. Material sobre contenido para la capacitacion de funcionarios de gobiernos locales y el regional de Madre de Dios vinulcados a la Reserva Comunal Amarakaeri. [Training materials for capacity building workshops local and regional government personnel in the Department of Madre de Dios who are associated with the Amarakaeri Communal Reserve], Conservacion Amazonica, Washington, DC. https://www.scribd.com/lists/21765008/Proyecto-Amarakaeri (accessed on May 21, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• ACCA. 2016b. Manuales de contenidos de capacitation para indigenas – Version Espanol. [Training manual for capacity building workshops for indigenous communities: Spanish version] https://www.scribd.com/lists/21765008/Proyecto-Amarakaeri (accessed on May 21, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• ACCA. 2016c. Manuales de contenidos de capacitation para indigenas – Version Matsiguenka. [Training manual for capacity building workshops for indigenous communities: Matsiguenka version] https://www.scribd.com/lists/21765008/Proyecto-Amarakaeri (accessed on May 21, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• ACCA. 2016d. Manuales de contenidos de capacitation para indigenas – Version Yine. [Training manual for capacity building workshops for indigenous communities: Yine version] https://www.scribd.com/lists/21765008/Proyecto-Amarakaeri (accessed on May 21, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• ACCA. 2016e. Manuales de contenidos de capacitation para indigenas – Version Harakbut. [Training manual for capacity building workshops for indigenous communities: Harakbut version] https://www.scribd.com/lists/21765008/Proyecto-Amarakaeri (accessed on May 21, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Ajroud, B., N. Al-Zyoud, L. Cardona, J. Edmond, D. Pavitt, and A. Woomer. 2017. Environmental peacebuilding training manual. Arlington, VA.: Conservation International.
   Google Scholar
• Álvarez, A., J. Alca, M. Galvin, and A. García. 2008. The difficult invention of participation in the Amarakaeri Communal Reserve, Peru. In People, protected areas and global change: Participatory conservation in latin america, africa, asia and Europe. Perspectives of the swiss national Centre of competence in research (NCCR) North-South, ed. M. Galvin and T. Haller. Bern, Switzerland: Geographica Bernensia.
   Google Scholar
• Balint, P. J., R. E. Stewart, A. Desai, and L. C. Walters. 2011. Wicked environmental problems: Managing uncertainty and conflict. Washington, DC.: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barbolet, A., R. Goldwyn, M. Lange, C. Moyroud, A. Sherriff, and L. C. Werleigh. 2004. Conflict sensitive approaches to development, humanitarian assistance and peacebuilding: Tools for peace and conflict impact assessment. Chapter 2, pp 1-40. Saferworld http://local.conflictsensitivity.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Conflict-Sensitive-Approaches-to-Development-Humanitarian-Assistance-and-Peacebuilding-Resource-Pack.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bedoya, M. 2004. Gold mining and indigenous conflict in Peru: Lessons from the Amarakaeri. In Beyond silencing of the guns, ed. C.K. Roy, V. Tauli-Corpuz and A. Romero-Medina. Baguio City, Philippines: Tebtebba Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Bragagnolo, C., R. Correia, A. C. M. Malhado, M. de Marins, and R. J. Ladle. 2017. Understanding non-compliance: Local people’s perceptions of natural resource exploitation inside two national parks in northeast Brazil. Journal for Nature Conservation 40:64–76. doi: 10.1016/j.jnc.2017.09.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CARE-Peru. 2017. Informe de Conflictos Socioambientales de la Reserva Comunal Amarakaeri. [Report on Social and Environmental Conflicts of the Amarakaeri Communal Reserve] https://www.scribd.com/document/363654076/Informe-de-Conflictos-Socioambientales-en-la-Reserva-Comunal-Amarakaeri (accessed on May 21, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Conflict Sensitivity Consortium. 2012. How to guide to conflict sensitivity. http://local.conflictsensitivity.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/6602_HowToGuide_CSF_WEB_3.pdf (accessed on May 21, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, S. E., and G. B. Walker. 2001. Working through environmental conflict: The collaborative learning approach. Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, A. L., R. Bryce, and S. M. Redpath. 2013. Use of multicriteria decision analysis to address conservation conflicts. Conservation Biology 27 (5):1–9. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12090.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Pourcq, K., E. Thomas, B. Arts, A. Vranckx, T. Léon-Sicard, and P. Van Damme. 2015. Conflict in protected areas: Who Says co-management does not work? PLoS One 10(12):e0144943. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144943.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Defries, R., and H. Nagendra. 2017. Ecosystem management as a wicked problem. Science 356 (6335):265–70. doi: 10.1126/science.aal1950.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derkye, M. A. A. 2012. Fighting over forest: Interactive governance of conflicts over forest and tree resources in Ghana’s high forest zone. Oxfordshire, UK: African Studies Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Deutsch, M., P. T. Coleman, and E. C. Marcus. 2006. The handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice. San Francisco, LA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Dickman, A. J. 2010. Complexities of conflict: the importance of considering social factors for effectively resolving human–wildlife conflict. Animal Conservation 13(5):458–66. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1795.2010.00368.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerson, K., and T. Nabatchi. 2015. Collaborative governance regimes. Washington, DC.: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Finer, M., and S. Novoa. 2017. MAAP #71: Gold mining threatens the Amarakaeri Communal Reserve, again. https://maaproject.org/2017/amarakaeri_cusco/ (accessed on May 21, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, J. 2014. Managing environmental conflict. In The handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice, ed. M. Deutsch, P. Coleman, and E. Marcus. 3rd ed. San Francisco, LA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, J., and K. Rucki. 2017. Re-conceptualizing the science of sustainability: A dynamical systems approach to understanding the nexus of conflict, development and the environment. Sustainable Development 25(4):267–75. doi: 10.1002/sd.1656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, J., P. Arora, and S. Rhee. 2018. Conserving tropical forests: Can sustainable livelihoods outperform artisanal or informal mining? Sustainability 10(8):2586. doi: 10.3390/su10082586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallice, G. R., G. Larrea-Gallegos, and I. Vazquez-Rowe. 2017. The threat of road expansion in the Peruvian Amazon. Oryx 53 (2): 1–9. doi: 10.1017/S0030605317000412.
   Google Scholar
• Geldmann, J., M. Barnes, L. Coad, I. D. Craigie, M. Hockings, and N. D. Burgess. 2013. Effectiveness of terrestrial protected areas in reducing habitat loss and population declines. Biological Conservation 161:230–8. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.02.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammill, A., A. Crawford, R. Craig, R. Malpas, and R. Matthew. 2009. Conflict-sensitive conservation practitioners’ manual. Winnipeg, MB: International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD). http://www.iisd.org/pdf/2009/csc_manual.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Haselip, J. 2011. Transparency, consultation and conflict: Assessing the micro-level risks surrounding the drive to develop Peru’s Amazonian oil and gas resources. Natural Resources Forum 35(4):283–92. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-8947.2011.01404.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haselip, J., and B. Martínez Romera. 2011. Peru’s Amazonian oil and gas industry: risks, interests and the politics of grievance surrounding the development of block 76, Madre de Dios. International Development Planning Review 33(1):1–26. doi: 10.3828/idpr.2011.2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Head, G. 2003. Effective collaboration: Deep collaboration as an essential element of the learning process. Journal of Educational Inquiry 4(2):47–62.
   Google Scholar
• Lecuyer, L., R. M. White, B. Schmook, and S. Calmé. 2018. Building on common ground to address biodiversity conflicts and foster collaboration in environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management 220:217–26. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.05.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madden, F., and B. McQuinn. 2014. Conservation’s blind spot: The case for conflict transformation in wildlife conservation. Biological Conservation 178:97–106. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.07.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mascia, M. B., S. Pailler, R. Krithivasan, V. Roshchanka, D. Burns, M. J. Mlotha, D. R. Murray, and N. Peng. 2014. Protected area downgrading, downsizing, and degazettement (PADDD) in Africa, Asia, and Latin America and the Caribbean, 1900–2010. Biological Conservation 169:355–61. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.11.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, T. H. E., C. R. J. Pollard, D. Chimalakonda, A. M. Guerrero, C. Kerr-Smith, S. A. G. Milheiras, M. Roberts, P. R. Ngafack, and N. Bunnefeld. 2018. Wicked conflict: Using wicked problem thinking for holistic management of conservation conflict. Conservation Letters 11(6):e12460. doi: 10.1111/conl.12460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIntosh, B. S., and A. Taylor. 2013. Developing T-shaped water professionals: Reflections on a framework for building capacity for innovation through collaboration, learning and leadership. Water Policy 15(S2):42–60. doi: 10.2166/wp.2013.011.
   Google Scholar
• Nel, J. L., D. J. Roux, A. Driver, L. Hill, A. C. Maherry, K. Snaddon, C. R. Petersen, L. B. Smith-Adao, H. Van Deventer, and B. Reyers. 2015. Knowledge co-production and boundary work to promote implementation of conservation plans. Conservation Biology 0(0):1–13. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12560.
   Google Scholar
• Redpath, S. M., S. Bhatia, and J. Young. 2015. Tilting at wildlife: Reconsidering human–wildlife conflict. Oryx 49(2):222–5. doi: 10.1017/S0030605314000799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redpath, S. M., R. J. Gutiérrez, K. A. Wood, and J. Young. 2015. Conflicts in conservation: Navigating towards solutions, ecological reviews series. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Redpath, S. M., A. Keane, H. Andrén, Z. Baynham-Herd, N. Bunnefeld, A. B. Duthie, J. Frank, C. A. Garcia, J. Månsson, L. Nilsson, et al. 2018. Games as tools to address conservation conflicts. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 33(6):415–26. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2018.03.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redpath, S. M., J. Young, A. Evely, W. M. Adams, W. J. Sutherland, A. Whitehouse, A. Amar, R. A. Lambert, J. D. C. Linnell, A. Watt, et al. 2013. Understanding and managing conservation conflicts. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 28(2):100–9. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2012.08.021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, M. S. 2008. Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. Biological Conservation 141(10):2417–31. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SERNANP. 2016. Plan Maestro de la Reserva Comunal Amarakaeri, 2016-2020. Lima, Peru. http://old.sernanp.gob.pe/planes-maestros (accessed on May 21, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Soliku, O., and U. Schraml. (n.d.). From conflict to collaboration: The contribution of co-management in mitigating conflicts in Mole National Park, Ghana. Oryx, 1–11. doi: 10.1017/s0030605318000285.
   Google Scholar
• Sterling, E. J., E. Betley, A. Sigouin, A. Gomez, A. Toomey, G. Cullman, C. Malone, A. Pekor, F. Arengo, M. Blair, et al. 2017. Assessing the evidence for stakeholder engagement in biodiversity conservation. Biological Conservation 209:159–71. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.02.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNDPA (United Nations Department of Political Affairs) and UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme). 2015. A guide for mediation practitioners natural resources and conflict. http://postconflict.unep.ch/publications/UNDPA_UNEP_NRC_Mediation_full.pdf (accessed on May 21, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• USAID 2018. Program Cycle Discussion Note: Complexity Aware Monitoring. USAID Collaborative Learning Lab. https://usaidlearninglab.org/sites/default/files/resource/files/cleared_dn_complexity-aware_monitoring.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Vucetich, J. A., D. Burnham, E. A. Macdonald, J. T. Bruskotter, S. Marchini, A. Zimmermann, and D. W. Macdonald. 2018. Just conservation: What is it and should we pursue it? Biological Conservation 221:23–33. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2018.02.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, B., L. Gunderson, A. Kinzig, C. Folke, S. Carpenter, and L. Schultz. 2006. A handful of heuristics and some propositions for understanding resilience in social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society 11(1):13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, E. P., J. M. Belsky, D. Lach, and A. S. Cheng. 2014. The value of practice-based knowledge. Society and Natural Resources 27(10):1074–88. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2014.919168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, P., J. Igoe, and D. Brockington. 2006. Parks and peoples: The social impact of protected areas. Annual Review of Anthropology 35(1):251–77. doi: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.35.081705.123308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson-Grau, R. 2013. Performance monitoring’s three blind spots. In USAID complexity-aware monitoring discovery launch. Washington, DC.: USAID Learning Lab. https://usaidlearninglab.org/sites/default/files/resource/files/MEs-3blindspots-091714.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson-Grau, R., and H. Britt. 2012. Outcome harvesting. New York, NY: Ford Foundation MENA Office. https://usaidlearninglab.org/sites/default/files/resource/files/Outome%20Harvesting%20Brief%20FINAL%202012-05-2-1.pdf.
   Google Scholar