Evaluating the Process and Outcomes of Collaborative Conservation: Tools, Techniques, and Strategies

References

• Abrams, J., H. Huber-Stearns, H. Gosnell, A. Santo, S. Duffey, and C. Moseley. 2019. Tracking a governance transition: Identifying and measuring indicators of social forestry on the Williamette National Forest. Society & Natural Resources. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/08941920.2019.1605434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alkin, M. C., and A. T. Vo. 2010. Evaluation essentials: From A to Z. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ansell, C. K. 2011. Pragmatist democracy: Evolutionary learning as public philosophy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., and A. Gash. 2007. Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18(4):543–71. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkes, F., D. R. Armitage, and N. Doubleday. 2007. Adaptive co-management [electronic resource]: Collaboration, learning, and multi-level governance. Vancouver, Canada: UBC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bodin, Ö., and M. Tengö. 2012. Disentangling intangible social–ecological systems. Global Environmental Change 22(2):430–9. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.01.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, A. S., and V. E. Sturtevant. 2012. A framework for assessing collaborative capacity in community-based public forest management. Environmental Management 49(3):675–89. doi:10.1007/s00267-011-9801-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clement, S., A. Gonzalez, and C. Wyborn. 2018. Understanding effectiveness in its broader context: Assessing case study methodologies for evaluating collaborative conservation. Society & Natural Resources. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/08941920.2018.1556761.
   Google Scholar
• Conley, A., and M. A. Moote. 2003. Evaluating collaborative natural resource management. Society & Natural Resources 16(5):371–86. doi:10.1080/08941920309181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., and V. L. P. Clark. 2017. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cundill, G., and C. Fabricius. 2010. Monitoring the governance dimension of natural resource co-management. Ecology and Society 15(1):15. doi:10.5751/ES-03346-150115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniels, S.E. and G.B. Walker. 2001. Working through environmental conflict: The collaborative learning approach. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• De Pourcq, K., E. Thomas, B. Arts, A. Vranckx, T. Léon-Sicard, and P. Van Damme. 2015. Conflict in protected areas: Who says co-management does not work? PLoS One 10(12):e0144943. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0144943.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeFries, R., and H. Nagendra. 2017. Ecosystem management as a wicked problem. Science 356(6335):265–70. doi:10.1126/science.aal1950.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerson, K., and T. Nabatchi. 2015. Collaborative governance regimes. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, J. 2014. Managing environmental conflict. In The handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice, ed. M. Deutsch, P. Coleman, and E. Marcus. 3rd ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, J., H. Stutzman, M. Vedoveto, D. Delgado, R. Ramon, W. Q. Dariquebe, L. S. Contreras, T. Souto, A. Harden, and S. Rhee. 2019. Collaborative governance and conflict management: Lessons learned and good practices from a case study in the Amazon basin. Society & Natural Resources. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/08941920.2019.1620389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Head, G. 2003. Effective collaboration: Deep collaboration as an essential element of the learning process. Journal of Educational Inquiry 4(2):47–62.
   Google Scholar
• Horwich, R. H., and J. Lyon. 2007. Community conservation: Practitioners’ answer to critics. Oryx 41(3):376–85. doi:10.1017/S0030605307001010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innes, J. L., and B. E. Booher. 1999. Consensus building and complex adaptive systems: A framework for evaluating collaborative planning. Journal of the American Planning Association 65(4):412–23. doi:10.1080/01944369908976071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. 2004. States of knowledge: The co-production of knowledge and social order. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Koontz, T. M., N. W. Jager, and J. Newig. 2018. Assessing collaborative conservation: A case survey of output, outcome, and impact measures used in the empirical literature. Society & Natural Resources. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/08941920.2019.1583397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koontz, T. M., T. A. Steelman, J. Carmin, K. S. Korfmacher, C. Moseley, and C. W. Thomas. 2005. Collaborative environmental management: What roles for government? Washington, DC: Resources for the Future Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koontz, T. M., and C. W. Thomas. 2006. What do we know and need to know about the environmental outcomes of collaborative management? Public Administration Review 66(s1):111–21. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00671.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattor, K. M., A. S. Cheng, B. Kittler, and M. McDonough. 2019. Assessing collaborative governance outcomes and indicators across spatial and temporal scales: Stewardship contract implementation by the USDA forest service. Society & Natural Resources. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/08941920.2019.1665762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mertens, D.M., and A. T. Wilson. 2012. Program evaluation theory and practice: A comprehensive guide. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moseley, C., and S. Charnley. 2014. Understanding micro-processes of institutionalization: Stewardship contracting and national forest management. Policy Sciences 47(1):69–98. doi:10.1007/s11077-013-9190-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newig, J., A. Adzersen, E. Challies, O. Fritsch, and N. Jager. 2013. Comparative analysis of public environmental decision-making processes: A variable-based analytical scheme. Discussion paper 37:13, Leuphana University, Luneburg, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• O’Leary, R., C. Gerard, and L. B. Bingham. 2006. Introduction to the symposium on collaborative public management. Public Administration Review 66:6–9. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00661.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pimbert, M. P., and J. N. Pretty. 1995. Parks, people and professionals: Putting ‘participation’ into protected area management. Discussion paper no. 57, United Nations Research Institute for Social Development, Geneva, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, T., M. Kern, R. Sero, and C. W. Thomas. 2019. How collaborative governance practitioners can assess the effectiveness of collaborative environmental governance, while also evaluating their own services. Society & Natural Resources. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/08941920.2019.1668990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, H., M. Buchy, and W. Proctor. 2002. Laying down the ladder: A typology of public participation in Australian natural resource management. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management 9(4):205–17. doi:10.1080/14486563.2002.10648561.
   Google Scholar
• Secco, L., R. Da Re, D.M. Pettenella, and P. Gatto. 2014. Why and how to measure forest governance at local level: A set of indicators. Forest Policy and Economics 49:57–71. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2013.07.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman, R., J. G. Snodgrass, and H. D. Delcore. 2010. Indigenous peoples and the collaborative stewardship of nature: Knowledge binds and institutional conflicts. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stirling, A. 2010. Keep it complex. Nature 468(7327):1029–31. doi:10.1038/4681029a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterling, E. J., E. Betley, A. Sigouin, A. Gomez, A. Toomey, G. Cullman, C. Malone, A. Pekor, F. Arengo, M. Blair., et al. 2017. Assessing the evidence for stakeholder engagement in biodiversity conservation. Biological Conservation 209:159–71. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2017.02.008.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, C. W., and T. M. Koontz. 2011. Research designs for examining the impact of community-based management on natural resource conservation. Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research 3(2):97–111. doi:10.1080/19390459.2011.557877.
   Google Scholar
• Trochim, W. 1998. An evaluation of Michael Scriven’s Minimalist theory: The least theory that practice requires. The American Journal of Evaluation 19(2):243–9. doi:10.1016/S1098-2140(99)80202-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, E. P., J. M. Belsky, D. Lach, and A. S. Cheng. 2014. The value of practice-based knowledge. Society & Natural Resources 27(10):1074–88. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.919168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkel, G. 2014. When the pendulum doesn’t find its center: Environmental narratives, strategies, and forest policy change in the US Pacific Northwest. Global Environmental Change 27:84–95. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, O. R., L. A. King, and H. Schroeder, Eds. 2008. Institutions and environmental change: Principal findings, applications and research frontiers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.s
   Google Scholar