Publication Cover
Society & Natural Resources
An International Journal
Volume 34, 2021 - Issue 1
824
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles/Findings

Climate Change Views, Energy Policy Support, and Personal Action in the Intermountain West: The Anti-Reflexivity Effect

, , &
Pages 99-121 | Received 21 Oct 2019, Accepted 01 May 2020, Published online: 28 May 2020

References

  • Antonio, R. J., and R. J. Brulle. 2011. The unbearable lightness of politics: Climate change denial and political polarization. The Sociological Quarterly 52 (2):195–202. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01199.x.
  • Beck, U., A. Giddens, and S. Lash. 1994. Reflexive modernization: Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Blake, J. 1999. Overcoming the ‘value-action gap’ in environmental policy: Tensions between national policy and local experience. Local Environment 4 (3):257–78. doi:10.1080/13549839908725599.
  • Boudet, H. S. 2019. Public perceptions of and responses to new energy technologies. Nature Energy 4 (6):446–55. doi:10.1038/s41560-019-0399-x.
  • Bourdieu, P. 1977. Outline of a theory of practice. Trans. R. Nice. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
  • Brechin, S. R., and M. Bhandari. 2011. Perceptions of climate change worldwide. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 2 (6):871–85. doi:10.1002/wcc.146.
  • Brehm, J. M., B. W. Eisenhauer, and R. C. Stedman. 2013. Environmental concern: Examining the role of place meaning and place attachment. Society and Natural Resources 26 (5):522–38. doi:10.1080/08941920.2012.715726.
  • Briscoe, M. D., J. E. Givens, S. O. Hazboun, and R. S. Krannich. 2019. At home, in public, and in between: Gender differences in public, private and transportation pro-environmental behaviors in the. US Intermountain West. Environmental Sociology 5 (4):374–92. doi:10.1080/23251042.2019.1628333.
  • Brulle, R. J. 2014. Institutionalizing delay: Foundation funding and the creation of US climate change counter-movement organizations. Climatic Change 122 (4):681–94. doi:10.1007/s10584-013-1018-7.
  • Brulle, R. J., J. Carmichael, and J. C. Jenkins. 2012. Shifting public opinion on climate change: An empirical assessment of factors influencing concern over climate change in the US, 2002–2010. Climatic Change 114 (2):169–88. doi:10.1007/s10584-012-0403-y.
  • Capstick, S., L. Whitmarsh, W. Poortinga, N. Pidgeon, and P. Upham. 2015. International trends in public perceptions of climate change over the past quarter century. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 6 (4):435–61. doi:10.1002/wcc.343.
  • Carrus, G., A. Panno, and L. Leone. 2018. The moderating role of interest in politics on the relations between conservative political orientation and denial of climate change. Society and Natural Resources 31 (10):1103–17. doi:10.1080/08941920.2018.1463422.
  • Clarke, C. E., P. S. Hart, J. P. Schuldt, D. T. Evensen, H. S. Boudet, J. B. Jacquet, and R. C. Stedman. 2015. Public opinion on energy development: the interplay of issue framing, top-of-mind associations, and political ideology. Energy Policy 81:131–40. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2015.02.019.
  • Cutler, M. J., J. Marlon, P. Howe, and A. Leiserowitz. 2020. Is global warming affecting the weather?’ Evidence for increased attribution beliefs among coastal versus inland US residents. Environmental Sociology 6 (1):6–18. doi:10.1080/23251042.2019.1690725.
  • Davidson, D. J., and R. C. Stedman. 2018. Calling forth the change-makers: Reflexivity theory and climate change attitudes and behaviors. Acta Sociologica 61 (1):79–94. doi:10.1177/0001699317693065.
  • Dietz, T. 2010. Narrowing the US energy efficiency gap. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107 (37):16007–8. doi:10.1073/pnas.1010651107.
  • Dietz, T., A. Dan, and R. Shwom. 2007. Support for climate change policy: Social psychological and social structural influences. Rural Sociology 72 (2):185–214. doi:10.1526/003601107781170026.
  • Dietz, T., A. Fitzgerald, and R. Shwom. 2005. Environmental values. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 30 (1):335–72. doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144444.
  • Dietz, T., C. Leshko, and A. M. McCright. 2013. Politics shapes individual choices about energy efficiency. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110 (23):9191–2. doi:10.1073/pnas.1307484110.
  • Dietz, T., G. T. Gardner, J. Gilligan, P. C. Stern, and M. P. Vandenbergh. 2009. Household actions can provide a behavioral wedge to rapidly reduce US carbon emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106 (44):18452–6. doi:10.1073/pnas.0908738106.
  • Dillman, D. A., J. D. Smyth, and L. M. Christian. 2014. Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Driscoll, D. 2019. Assessing sociodemographic predictors of climate change concern, 1994–2016. Social Science Quarterly 100 (5):1699–708. doi:10.1111/ssqu.12683.
  • Dunlap, R. E. 2014. Clarifying anti-reflexivity: conservative opposition to impact science and scientific evidence. Environmental Research Letters 9 (2):021001. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/9/2/021001.]
  • Dunlap, R. E., and P. J. Jacques. 2013. Climate change denial books and conservative think tanks: Exploring the connection. The American behavioral scientist 57 (6):699–731. doi:10.1177/0002764213477096.
  • Dunlap, R. E., and R. York. 2008. The globalization of environmental concern and the limits of the postmaterialist values explanation: Evidence from four multinational surveys. The Sociological Quarterly 49 (3):529–63. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.2008.00127.x.
  • Dunlap, R. E., K. D. Van Liere, A. G. Mertig, and R. E. Jones. 2000. New trends in measuring environmental attitudes: Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: a revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues 56 (3):425–42. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00176.
  • Engels, A., O. Hüther, M. Schäfer, and H. Held. 2013. Public climate-change skepticism, energy preferences and political participation. Global Environmental Change 23 (5):1018–27. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.05.008.
  • Fairbrother, M. 2013. Rich people, poor people, and environmental concern: Evidence across nations and time. European Sociological Review 29 (5):910–22. doi:10.1093/esr/jcs068.
  • Farrell, J. 2016a. Corporate funding and ideological polarization about climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 113 (1):92–7. doi:10.1073/pnas.1509433112.
  • Farrell, J. 2016b. Network structure and influence of the climate change counter-movement. Nature Climate Change 6 (4):370–4. doi:10.1038/nclimate2875.
  • Farrell, J. 2019. The growth of climate change misinformation in US philanthropy: evidence from natural language processing. Environmental Research Letters 14 (3):034013. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aaf939.
  • Fitzgerald, J. B., A. K. Jorgenson, and B. Clark. 2015. Energy consumption and working hours: A longitudinal study of developed and developing nations, 1990–2008. Environmental Sociology 1 (3):213–23. doi:10.1080/23251042.2015.1046584.
  • Fraune, C., and M. Knodt. 2018. Sustainable energy transformations in an age of populism, post-truth politics, and local resistance. Energy Research and Social Science 43:1–7. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2018.05.029.
  • Gardezi, M., and J. G. Arbuckle. 2020. Techno-optimism and farmers’ attitudes toward climate change adaptation. Environment and Behavior 52 (1):82–105. doi:10.1177/0013916518793482.
  • Giddens, A. 1990. The consequences of modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Givens, J. E. 2014. Sociology: Drivers of climate change beliefs. Nature Climate Change 4 (12):1051–2. doi:10.1038/nclimate2453.
  • Givens, J. E., and A. K. Jorgenson. 2011. The effects of affluence, economic development, and environmental degradation on environmental concern: A multilevel analysis. Organization and Environment 24 (1):74–91. doi:10.1177/1086026611406030.
  • Givens, J. E., and A. K. Jorgenson. 2013. Individual environmental concern in the world polity: A multilevel analysis. Social science research 42 (2):418–31. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.10.005.
  • Grimberg, B., S. Ahmed, C. Ellis, Z. Miller, and F. Menalled. 2018. Climate change perceptions and observations of agricultural stakeholders in the northern Great Plains. Sustainability 10 (5):1687. doi:10.3390/su10051687.
  • Gromet, D. M., H. Kunreuther, and R. P. Larrick. 2013. Political ideology affects energy-efficiency attitudes and choices. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110 (23):9314–9. doi:10.1073/pnas.1218453110.
  • Haltinner, K., and D. Sarathchandra. 2018. Climate change skepticism as a psychological coping strategy. Sociology Compass 12 (6):e12586. doi:10.1111/soc4.12586.
  • Hamilton, L. C., and M. D. Stampone. 2013. Blowin’ in the wind: Short-term weather and belief in anthropogenic climate change. Weather, Climate, and Society 5 (2):112–9. doi:10.1175/WCAS-D-12-00048.1.
  • Hamilton, L. C., and T. G. Safford. 2015. Environmental views from the coast: Public concern about local to global marine issues. Society & Natural Resources 28 (1):57–74. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.933926.
  • Hamilton, L. C., E. Bell, J. Hartter, and J. D. Salerno. 2018. A change in the wind? US public views on renewable energy and climate compared. Energy, Sustainability and Society 8 (1):11. doi:10.1186/s13705-018-0152-5.
  • Hamilton, L. C., J. Hartter, and E. Bell. 2019. Generation gaps in US public opinion on renewable energy and climate change. PLOS One 14 (7):e0217608doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0217608.
  • Hamilton, L. C., J. Hartter, M. Lemcke-Stampone, D. W. Moore, and T. G. Safford. 2015. Tracking public beliefs about anthropogenic climate change. PLoS One 10 (9):e0138208doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0138208.
  • Hazboun, S. O., M. Briscoe, J. Givens, and R. Krannich. 2019. Keep quiet on climate: Assessing public response to seven renewable energy frames in the Western United States. Energy Research and Social Science 57:101243. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2019.101243.
  • Heath, Y., and R. Gifford. 2006. Free-market ideology and environmental degradation: The case of belief in global climate change. Environment and Behavior 38 (1):48–71. doi:10.1177/0013916505277998.
  • Hornsey, M. J., E. A. Harris, P. G. Bain, and K. S. Fielding. 2016. Meta-analyses of the determinants and outcomes of belief in climate change. Nature Climate Change 6 (6):622–6. doi:10.1038/nclimate2943.
  • Howe, P. D., and A. Leiserowitz. 2013. Who remembers a hot summer or a cold winter? The asymmetric effect of beliefs about global warming on perceptions of local climate conditions in the US. Global Environmental Change 23 (6):1488–500. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.09.014.
  • Howe, P. D., and J. L. Mathieu. 2018. Age and perceived benefits are associated with willingness to participate in an electric load control program. doi:10.31235/osf.io/rpg46
  • Howe, P. D., M. Mildenberger, J. R. Marlon, and A. Leiserowitz. 2015. Geographic variation in opinions on climate change at state and local scales in the USA. Nature Climate Change 5 (6):596–603. doi:10.1038/nclimate2583.
  • Hunter, L. M., A. Hatch, and A. Johnson. 2004. Cross-national gender variation in environmental behaviors. Social Science Quarterly 85 (3):677–94. doi:10.1111/j.0038-4941.2004.00239.x.
  • Hunter, L. M., S. Strife, and W. Twine. 2010. Environmental perceptions of rural South African residents: The complex nature of environmental concern. Society & Natural Resources 23 (6):525–41. doi:10.1080/08941920903357782.
  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2011. In Special report on renewable energy sources and climate change mitigation, ed. O. Edenhofer, R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, K. Seyboth, P. Matschoss, S. Kadner, T. Zwickel, P. Eickemeier, G. Hansen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, New York: Cambridge University Press. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/renewable-energy-sources-and-climate-change-mitigation/. (accessed February 1, 2020).
  • Johnson, E. W., and P. Schwadel. 2019. Political polarization and long-term change in public support for environmental spending. Social Forces 98 (2):915–41. doi:10.1093/sf/soy124.
  • Jones, R. E., and R. E. Dunlap. 2010. The social bases of environmental concern: Have they changed over time? Rural Sociology 57 (1):28–47. doi:10.1111/j.1549-0831.1992.tb00455.x.
  • Jorgenson, A. K., and J. E. Givens. 2014. Economic globalization and environmental concern: A multilevel analysis of individuals within 37 nations. Environment and Behavior 46 (7):848–71. doi:10.1177/0013916513479796.
  • Kennedy, E. H., and J. E. Givens. 2019. Eco-habitus or eco-powerlessness? Examining environmental concern across social class. Sociological Perspectives 62 (5):646–67. doi:10.1177/0731121419836966.
  • Kennedy, E. H., and J. Kmec. 2018. Reinterpreting the gender gap in household pro-environmental behaviour. Environmental Sociology 4 (3):299–310. doi:10.1080/23251042.2018.1436891.
  • Kennedy, E. H., H. Krahn, and N. T. Krogman. 2015. Are we counting what counts? A closer look at environmental concern, pro-environmental behaviour, and carbon footprint. Local Environment 20 (2):220–36. doi:10.1080/13549839.2013.837039.
  • Kennedy, E. H., T. M. Beckley, B. L. McFarlane, and S. Nadeau. 2009. Why we don’t “walk the talk”: Understanding the environmental values/behaviour gap in Canada. Human Ecology Review 16 (2):151–60.
  • Kim, S. Y., and Y. Wolinsky-Nahmias. 2014. Cross-national public opinion on climate change: The effects of affluence and vulnerability. Global Environmental Politics 14 (1):79–106. doi:10.1162/GLEP_a_00215.
  • Knight, K. W. 2018. Does fossil fuel dependence influence public awareness and perception of climate change? A Cross-National Investigation. International Journal of Sociology 48 (4):295–313. doi:10.1080/00207659.2018.1515702.
  • Knight, K. W., and B. L. Messer. 2012. Environmental concern in cross-national perspective: The effects of affluence, environmental degradation, and World Society. Social Science Quarterly 93 (2):n/a–537. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6237.2012.00846.x.
  • Kollmuss, A., and J. Agyeman. 2002. Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research 8 (3):239–60. doi:10.1080/13504620220145401.
  • sLeiserowitz, A. 2006. Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: The role of affect, imagery, and values. Climatic Change 77 (1–2):45–72. doi:10.1007/s10584-006-9059-9.
  • Lucas, C. H., and A. Davison. 2019. Not ‘getting on the bandwagon’: When climate change is a matter of unconcern. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space 2 (1):129–49. doi:10.1177/2514848618818763.
  • Malin, S. A., A. Mayer, K. Shreeve, S. K. Olson-Hazboun, and J. Adgate. 2017. Free market ideology and deregulation in Colorado's Oilfields: Evidence for triple movement activism? Environmental politics 26 (3):521–45. doi:10.1080/09644016.2017.1287627.
  • Marlon, J. R., S. van der Linden, P. D. Howe, A. Leiserowitz, S. L. Woo, and K. Broad. 2019. Detecting local environmental change: the role of experience in shaping risk judgments about global warming. Journal of Risk Research 22 (7):936–50. doi:10.1080/13669877.2018.1430051.
  • Marquart-Pyatt, S. T. 2012. Contextual influences on environmental concerns cross-nationally: A multilevel investigation. Social science research 41 (5):1085–99. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.04.003.
  • Marquart-Pyatt, S. T., A. M. McCright, T. Dietz, and R. E. Dunlap. 2014. Politics eclipses climate extremes for climate change perceptions. Global Environmental Change 29:246–57. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.10.004.
  • Marquart-Pyatt, S. T., H. Qian, M. K. Houser, and A. M. McCright. 2019. Climate change views, energy policy preferences, and intended actions across welfare state regimes: Evidence from the European Social Survey. International Journal of Sociology 49 (1):1–26. doi:10.1080/00207659.2018.1560979.
  • Mayer, A. 2019a. National energy transition, local partisanship? Elite cues, community identity, and support for clean power in the United States. Energy Research and Social Science 50:143–50. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2018.11.020.
  • Mayer, A. 2019b. Partisanship, politics, and the energy transition in the United States: A critical review and conceptual framework. Energy Research and Social Science 53:85–8. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2019.02.022.
  • McCright, A. M. 2016. Anti-reflexivity and climate change skepticism in the US general public. Human Ecology Review 22 (2):77–108. doi:10.22459/HER.22.02.2016.04.
  • McCright, A. M., and C. Xiao. 2014. Gender and environmental concern: Insights from recent work and for future research. Society and Natural Resources 27 (10):1109–13. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.918235.
  • McCright, A. M., C. Xiao, and R. E. Dunlap. 2014. Political polarization on support for government spending on environmental protection in the USA, 1974–2012. Social science research 48:251–60. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.06.008.
  • McCright, A. M., and R. E. Dunlap. 2003. Defeating Kyoto: The conservative movement’s impact on US climate change policy. Social Problems 50 (3):348–73. doi:10.1525/sp.2003.50.3.348.
  • McCright, A. M., and R. E. Dunlap. 2010. Anti-reflexivity. Theory, Culture, and Society 27 (2–3):100–33. doi:10.1177/0263276409356001.
  • McCright, A. M., and R. E. Dunlap. 2011a. Cool dudes: The denial of climate change among conservative white males in the United States. Global Environmental Change 21 (4):1163–72. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.06.003.
  • McCright, A. M., and R. E. Dunlap. 2011b. The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public’s views of global warming, 2001–2010. The Sociological Quarterly 52 (2):155–94. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01198.x.
  • McCright, A. M., R. E. Dunlap, and C. Xiao. 2014. The impacts of temperature anomalies and political orientation on perceived winter warming. Nature Climate Change 4 (12):1077–81. doi:10.1038/nclimate2443.
  • McCright, A. M., S. T. Marquart-Pyatt, R. L. Shwom, S. R. Brechin, and S. Allen. 2016. Ideology, capitalism, and climate: Explaining public views about climate change in the United States. Energy Research and Social Science 21:180–9. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2016.08.003.
  • Mohai, P. 1992. Men, women, and the environment: An examination of the gender gap in environmental concern and activism. Society and Natural Resources 5 (1):1–19. doi:10.1080/08941929209380772.
  • Olson-Hazboun, S. K., R. S. Krannich, and P. G. Robertson. 2016. Public views on renewable energy in the Rocky Mountain region of the United States: Distinct attitudes, exposure, and other key predictors of wind energy. Energy Research & Social Science 21:167–79. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2016.07.002.
  • Olson-Hazboun, S. K. 2017. Public opinion on renewable energy: The nexus of climate, politics, and economy. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Utah State University, Logan, Utah. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/5860/ (accessed May 7, 2020).
  • Oreskes, N., and E. M. Conway. 2010. Merchants of doubt. New York: Bloomsbury Press.
  • Parkins, J. R., C. Hempel, T. M. Beckley, R. C. Stedman, and K. Sherren. 2015. Identifying energy discourses in Canada with Q methodology: Moving beyond the environment versus economy debates. Environmental Sociology 1 (4):304–14. doi:10.1080/23251042.2015.1054016.
  • Rand, J., and B. Hoen. 2017. Thirty years of North American wind energy acceptance research: What have we learned? Energy Research and Social Science 29:135–48. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2017.05.019.
  • Sanderson, M. R., J. S. Bergtold, J. L. H. Stamm, M. M. Caldas, S. M. Ramsey, and J. Aistrup. 2018. Climate change beliefs in an agricultural context: what is the role of values held by farming and non-farming groups? Climatic Change 150 (3–4):259–72. doi:10.1007/s10584-018-2283-2.
  • Schnaiberg, A. 1980. The environment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Shao, W., and K. Goidel. 2016. Seeing is believing? An examination of perceptions of local weather conditions and climate change among residents in the US Gulf Coast. Risk Analysis: An Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis 36 (11):2136–57. doi:10.1111/risa.12571.
  • Sierzchula, W., S. Bakker, K. Maat, and B. van Wee. 2014. The influence of financial incentives and other socio-economic factors on electric vehicle adoption. Energy Policy 68:183–94. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2014.01.043.
  • Solon, G., S. J. Haider, and J. M. Wooldridge. 2015. What are we weighting for? Journal of Human Resources 50 (2):301–16. doi:10.3368/jhr.50.2.301.
  • Spence, A., W. Poortinga, C. Butler, and N. F. Pidgeon. 2011. Perceptions of climate change and willingness to save energy related to flood experience. Nature Climate Change 1 (1):46–9. doi:10.1038/nclimate1059.
  • Stern, P. C., B. K. Sovacool, and T. Dietz. 2016. Towards a science of climate and energy choices. Nature Climate Change 6 (6):547–55. doi:10.1038/nclimate3027.
  • Stern, P. C. 2000. New environmental theories: toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues 56 (3):407–24. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00175.
  • Stern, P. C., and T. Dietz. 1994. The value basis of environmental concern. Journal of Social Issues 50 (3):65–84. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb02420.x.
  • Stern, P. C., T. Dietz, and L. Kalof. 1993. Value orientations, gender, and environmental concern. Environment and Behavior 25 (5):322–48. doi:10.1177/0013916593255002.
  • Thombs, R. P. 2018. Has the relationship between non-fossil fuel energy sources and CO2 emissions changed over time? A cross-national study, 2000–2013. Climatic Change 148 (4):481–90. doi:10.1007/s10584-018-2215-1.
  • Tranter, B., and K. Booth. 2015. Scepticism in a changing climate: A cross-national study. Global Environmental Change 33:154–64. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.05.003.
  • Liere, K. D. V., and R. E. Dunlap. 1980. The social bases of environmental concern: A review of hypotheses, explanations and empirical evidence. Public Opinion Quarterly 44 (2):181–97. doi:10.1086/268583.
  • Willis, M. M., and J. B. Schor. 2012. Does changing a light bulb lead to changing the world? Political action and the conscious consumer. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 644 (1):160–90. doi:10.1177/0002716212454831.
  • Wolske, K. S., P. C. Stern, and T. Dietz. 2017. Explaining interest in adopting residential solar photovoltaic systems in the United States: Toward an integration of behavioral theories. Energy Research and Social Science 25:134–51. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2016.12.023.
  • Xiao, C., and A. M. McCright. 2014. A test of the biographical availability argument for gender differences in environmental behaviors. Environment and Behavior 46 (2):241–63. doi:10.1177/0013916512453991.
  • Xiao, C., and D. Hong. 2012. Gender and concern for environmental issues in urban China. Society and Natural Resources 25 (5):468–82. doi:10.1080/08941920.2011.565455.
  • York, R. 2010. Three lessons from trends in CO2 emissions and energy use in the United States. Society and Natural Resources 23 (12):1244–52. doi:10.1080/08941920903421133.
  • York, R. 2012. Do alternative energy sources displace fossil fuels? Nature Climate Change 2 (6):441–3. doi:10.1038/nclimate1451.
  • York, R., and S. E. Bell. 2019. Energy transitions or additions?: Why a transition from fossil fuels requires more than the growth of renewable energy. Energy Research and Social Science 51:40–3. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2019.01.008.
  • Zahran, S., S. D. Brody, H. Grover, and A. Vedlitz. 2006. Climate change vulnerability and policy support. Society and Natural Resources 19 (9):771–89. doi:10.1080/08941920600835528.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.