Gendered Impacts of Conservation on Rural Communities in Northern Ghana: Implications for Collaborative Natural Resources Management

References

• Agarwal, B. 2000. Conceptualising environmental collective action: Why gender matters. Cambridge Journal of Economics 24 (3):283–310. doi:10.1093/cje/24.3.283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal, B. 2001. Participatory exclusions, community forestry, and gender: An analysis for South Asia and a conceptual framework. World Development 29 (10):1623–48. doi:10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00066-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal, B. 2009. Gender and forest conservation: The impact of women’s participation in community forest governance. Ecological Economics 68 (11):2785–99. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.04.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agrawal, A., and C. C. Gibson. 1999. Enchantment and disenchantment: The role of community in natural resource conservation. World Development 27 (4):629–49. doi:10.1016/S0305-750X(98)00161-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed, A., and A. Gasparatos. 2020. Reconfiguration of land politics in community resource management areas in Ghana: Insights from the Avu Lagoon CREMA. Land Use Policy 97:104786. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amoah, M., and E. D. Wiafe. 2012. Livelihoods of fringe communities and the impacts on the management of conservation area: the case of Kakum National Park in Ghana. International Forestry Review 14 (2):131–44. doi:10.1505/146554812800923381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awedoba, A. K. 2006. The peoples of northern Ghana. Accra: National Commission on Culture.
   Google Scholar
• Brechin, S. R., P. R. Wilshusen, C. L. Fortwangler, and P. C. West. 2002. Beyond the square wheel: Toward a more comprehensive understanding of biodiversity conservation as social and political process. Society & Natural Resources 15 (1):41–64. doi:10.1080/089419202317174011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton, A. C., E. B. Buedi, C. Balangtaa, D. G. Kpelle, M. K. Sam, and J. S. Brashares. 2011. The decline of lions in Ghana’s Mole National Park. African Journal of Ecology 49 (1):122–6. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2028.2010.01234.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., and V. L. P. Clark. 2011. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cundill, G., G. Thondhlana, L. Sisitka, S. Shackleton, and M. Blore. 2013. Land claims and the pursuit of co-management on four protected areas in South Africa. Land Use Policy 35:171–8. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.05.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmhirst, R. 2011. Introducing new feminist political ecologies. Geoforum 42 (2):129–32. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.01.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floress, K., L. S. S. B. Prokopy, and S. B. Allred. 2011. It’s who you know: Social capital, social networks, and watershed groups. Society & Natural Resources 24 (9):871–86. doi:10.1080/08941920903493926.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forestry Commission of Ghana. 2000. Wildlife division policy for collaborative community based wildlife management. Accra: Wildlife Division of Forestry Commission, Ghana.
   Google Scholar
• Forestry Commission of Ghana. 2011. Mole National Management Plan, 2011–2016. Accra: Wildlife Division of Forestry Commission, Ghana.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, M. 2003. Partitioned nature, privileged knowledge: community‐based conservation in Tanzania. Development and Change 34 (5):833–62. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7660.2003.00331.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodale, K., G. J. Parsons, and K. Sherren. 2015. The nature of the nuisance—damage or threat—determines how perceived monetary costs and cultural benefits influence farmer tolerance of wildlife. Diversity 7 (3):318–41. doi:10.3390/d7030318.
   Google Scholar
• Hennink, M. M. 2014. Focus group discussions: Understanding qualitative research. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hulme D., and M. Murphree, eds. 2001. African wildlife and livelihoods: The promise and performance of community conservation. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• IUCN-PAPACO. 2011. Management effectiveness tracking tool (METT) – Mole National Park. http://papaco.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/METT-Mole_En_final.pdf (accessed May 15, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Kansanga, M. M., P. Mkandawire, V. Kuuire, and I. Luginaah. 2020. Agricultural mechanization, environmental degradation, and gendered livelihood implications in northern Ghana. Land Degradation and Development 31 (11):1422–40. doi:10.1002/ldr.3490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kansky, R., M. Kidd, and A. T. Knight. 2016. A wildlife tolerance model and case study for understanding human wildlife conflicts. Biological Conservation 201:137–45. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2016.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katikiro, R. E., E. D. Macusi, and K. A. Deepananda. 2015. Challenges facing local communities in Tanzania in realising locally-managed marine areas. Marine Policy 51:220–9. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2014.08.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiwango, W. A., H. C. Komakech, T. M. C. Tarimo, and L. Martz. 2015. Decentralized environmental governance: A reflection on its role in shaping wildlife management areas in Tanzania. Tropical Conservation Science 8 (4):1080–97. www.tropicalconservationscience.org. doi:10.1177/194008291500800415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, C., M. C. McKinnon, B. T. Wright, H. P. Possingham, and B. S. Halpern. 2015. Social equity and the probability of success of biodiversity conservation. Global Environmental Change 35:299–306. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.09.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuusaana, E. D., and J. A. Eledi. 2015. Customary land allocation, urbanization and land use planning in Ghana: Implications for food systems in the Wa Municipality. Land Use Policy 48:454–66. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.06.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambrecht, I. B. 2016. “As a husband I will love, lead, and provide.” Gendered access to land in Ghana. World Development 88:188–200. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.07.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leisher, C., G. Temsah, F. Booker, M. Day, L. Samberg, D. Prosnitz, B. Agarwal, E. Matthews, D. Roe, D. Russell, et al. 2016. Does the gender composition of forest and fishery management groups affect resource governance and conservation outcomes? A systematic map. Environmental Evidence 5 (1):1–10. doi:10.1186/s13750-016-0057-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard, L. 2013. The relationship between the conservation agenda and environmental justice in post-apartheid South Africa. South African Review of Sociology 44 (3):2–21. doi:10.1080/21528586.2013.817059.
   Google Scholar
• Lise, W. 2005. A game model of people's participation in forest management in Northern India. Environment and Development Economics 10 (2):217–40. doi:10.1017/S1355770X04001688.
   Google Scholar
• McConney, P., R. Mahon, and R. Pomeroy. 2007. Challenges Facing Coastal Resources Co-management in the Caribbean. In Adaptive co-management: collaboration, learning, and multi-level governance, eds. D. Armitage, F. Berkes, and N. Doubleday, 105–24. Vancouver: UBC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldãna, eds. 2014. Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Ming’ate, F. L. M., H. G. Rennie, and A. Memon. 2014. Potential for co-management approaches to strengthen livelihoods of forest dependent communities: A Kenyan case. Land Use Policy 41:304–12. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.06.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molyneux, M. 2002. Gender and the silences of social capital: Lessons from Latin America. Development and Change 33 (2):167–88. doi:10.1111/1467-7660.00246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphree, M. 2004. Communal approaches to natural resource management in Africa: from whence and to where? Journal of International Wildlife Law & Policy 7 (3–4):203–16. doi:10.1080/13880290490883250.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, G., A. Agyare, P. Dearden, and R. Rollins. 2019. Devolution, coordination, and community-based natural resource management in Ghana’s community resource management areas. African Geographical Review 38 (4):296–309. doi:10.1080/19376812.2018.1426022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukadasi, B., and M. Nabalegwa. 2007. Gender mainstreaming and community participation in plant resource conservation in Buzaya county, Kamuli district, Uganda. African Journal of Ecology 45 (s1):7–12. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2028.2007.00730.x.
   Google Scholar
• Musavengane, R., and L. Leonard. 2019. When race and social equity matters in nature conservation in post-apartheid South Africa. Conservation and Society 17 (2):135–46. doi:10.4103/cs.cs_18_23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musavengane, R., and D. Simatele. 2017. Significance of social capital in collaborative management of natural resources in Sub-Saharan African rural communities: A qualitative meta-analysis. South African Geographical Journal 99 (3):267–82. doi:10.1080/03736245.2016.1231628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuman, W. L. 2000. Social research methods. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Ogra, M. V. 2008. Human-wildlife conflict and gender in protected area borderlands: a case study of costs, perceptions, and vulnerabilities from Uttarakhand (Uttaranchal), India. Geoforum 39 (3):1408–22. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.12.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pomeroy, R. S., and F. Berkes. 1997. Two to tango: The role of government in fisheries co-management. Marine Policy 21 (5):465–80. doi:10.1016/S0308-597X(97)00017-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roe, D. 2008. The origins and evolution of the conservation-poverty debate: A review of key literature, events and policy processes. Oryx 42 (04):491–503. doi:10.1017/S0030605308002032.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, S., and J. R. Nielsen. 1996. Co-management: A comparative analysis. Marine Policy 20 (5):405–18. doi:10.1016/0308-597X(96)00028-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soliku, O., and U. Schraml. 2020. From conflict to collaboration: The contribution of co-management in mitigating conflicts in Mole National Park, Ghana. Oryx 54 (4):483–93. doi:10.1017/S0030605318000285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, Y., E. Mwangi, and R. Meinzen-Dick. 2011. Is gender an important factor influencing user groups’ property rights and forestry governance? Empirical analysis from East Africa and Latin America. International Forestry Review 13 (2):205–19. doi:10.1505/146554811797406598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundberg, J. 2016. Feminist political ecology. International Encyclopedia of Geography: People, the Earth, Environment and Technology:1–12. doi:10.1002/9781118786352.wbieg0804.
   Google Scholar
• Thondhlana, G., S. M. Redpath, P. O. Vedeld, L. van Eden, U. Pascual, K. Sherren, and C. Murata. 2020. Non-material costs of wildlife conservation to local people and their implications for conservation interventions. Biological Conservation 246:108578. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNEP, UN Women, PBSO and UNDP. 2013. Women and natural resources unlocking the peacebuilding potential. New York: UN.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, K. 2000. Nature is a feminist issue: Motivating ecofeminism by taking empirical data seriously. In Ecofeminist philosophy: A western perspective on what it is and why it matters, 1–19. Lanham: Rowman.
   Google Scholar
• Westermann, O., J. Ashby, and J. Pretty. 2005. Gender and social capital: The importance of gender differences for the maturity and effectiveness of natural resource management groups. World Development 33 (11):1783–99. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.04.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaro, J. 2010. Customary tenure systems under siege: Contemporary access to land in Northern Ghana. Geojournal 75 (2):199–214. doi:10.1007/s10708-009-9301-x.
   Google Scholar
• Zahra, A., and N. G. McGehee. 2013. Volunteer tourism: A host community capital perspective. Annals of Tourism Research 42:22–45. doi:10.1016/j.annals.2013.01.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar