The Role of Trust in the Participatory Establishment of Protected Areas—Lessons Learnt from a Failed National Park Project in Switzerland

References

• Arpin, I., and A. Cosson. 2021. Seeking legitimacy in European biodiversity conservation policies: The case of French national parks. Environmental Science & Policy 116:181–7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.11.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Backhaus, N., L. Pleger, A. von Atzigen, O. Bosello, O. Graefe, M. Hunziker, F. Sager, and D. Siegrist. 2018. Parc Adula: Gründe und Hintergründe der Ablehnung in den Gemeindeabstimmungen. Zurich: Department of Geography, University of Zurich.
   Google Scholar
• BAFU (Federal Office for the Environment). 2014. Handbuch für die Errichtung und den Betrieb von Pärken Nationaler Bedeutung. Mitteilung des BAFU als Vollzugsbehörde an Gesuchsteller. Umwelt-Vollzug Nr. 1414. Bern: Bundesamt für Umwelt.
   Google Scholar
• BFS (Federal Statistical Office). 2018. Stimmbeteiligung. Bern: Federal Statistical Office. https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/de/home/statistiken/politik/abstimmungen/stimmbeteiligung.html.
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L., and E. Chiapello. 2018. The new spirit of capitalism. 2nd ed. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, J. S., K. A. Waylen, and M. Borgerhoff Mulder. 2012. How national context, project design, and local community characteristics influence success in community-based conservation projects. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109 (52):21265–70. doi: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1207141110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, K., and M. J. Stern. 2018a. Boundary spanners as trust ambassadors in collaborative natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 61 (2):291–308. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2017.1303462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, K., and M. J. Stern. 2018b. Exploring the functions of different forms of trust in collaborative natural resource management. Society & Natural Resources 31 (1):21–38. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2017.1364452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Cruz, J. 2019. Humble trust. Philosophical Studies 176 (4):933–53. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-018-1220-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobson, A. 2014. Listening for democracy. Recognition, representation, reconciliation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engen, S., P. Fauchald, V. Hausner, S. E. Id, and V. Hausner. 2019. Stakeholders' perceptions of protected area management following a nationwide community-based conservation reform. PLoS ONE 14 (4):e0215437. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FDFA (Federal Department of Foreign Affairs). 2019. Direct democracy. https://www.eda.admin.ch/aboutswitzerland/en/home/politik/uebersicht/direkte-demokratie.html.
   Google Scholar
• Franks, P., and K. Schreckenberg. 2016. Advancing equity in protected area conservation. IIED Briefing February 2016. http://pubs.iied.org/17344IIED
   Google Scholar
• Galindo-Pérez-de-Azpillaga, L., C. Foronda-Robles, and A. García-López. 2014. The value of trust: An analysis of social capital in natural areas. Social Indicators Research 118 (2):673–94. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0427-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haggenmacher, M. 2017. Landwirtschaft und Naturschutzprojekte. Eine Untersuchung zur Wahrnehmung der Landwirtinnen und Landwirte am Beispiel des Nationalparkprojekts Parc Adula. Zurich: Department of Geography, University of Zurich.
   Google Scholar
• Hammer, T., I. Mose, D. Siegrist, and N. Weixlbaumer. eds. 2016. Parks of the future. Protected areas in Europe challenging regional and global Change. München: oekom.
   Google Scholar
• Hardin, R. 2001. Distrust. Boston University Law Review 81 (3):495–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardin, R. 2002. Trust and Trustworthiness. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, G., and C. J. Cavanagh. 2016. A review of the social impacts of neoliberal conservation: Formations, inequalities, contestations. Geoforum 75:199–209. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.07.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubschmid, E., and M. Hunziker. 2018. Wildtierfreundliches Freeriden von Wintersportlerinnen und -Sportlern. Eine Analyse der Wirkung persuasiver Lenkungsinstrumente. Naturschutz Und Landschaftsplanung 50 (4):120–6.
   Google Scholar
• Hunziker, M., and M. Mondini. 2014. Einstellungen und Wissensstand der lokalen Bevölkerung zur Errichtung des Nationalparks Parc Adula. Birmensdorf: Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL.
   Google Scholar
• Jankovsky, P. 2015. San Bernardinos Skilifte stehen wieder still. https://www.nzz.ch/schweiz/wintertourismus/san-bernardinos-skilifte-stehen-wieder-still-1.18464470.
   Google Scholar
• Jaquet, F., and R. Michel. 2016. Charta Parc Adula: Stellungnahme des SAC - Zentralverbandes. http://www.sac-cas.ch/nc/umwelt/weitgehend-freier-zugang/neue-paerke.html?cid=8452&did=1014944&sechash=9c906243.
   Google Scholar
• Job, H., M. Fliessbach-Schendzielorz, S. Bittlingmaier, A. Herling, and M. Woltering. 2019. Akzeptanz der Bayerischen Nationalparks. In Würzburger Geographische Arbeiten, ed. R. Baumhauer, B. Hahn, H. Job, H. Paeth, J. Rauh, and B. Terhorst, Vol. 122. Würzburg: Würzburg University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lachapelle, P. R., and S. F. McCool. 2012. The role of trust in community wildland fire protection planning. Society & Natural Resources 25 (4):321–35. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2011.569855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mace, G. M. 2014. Ecology. Whose conservation? Science 345 (6204):1558–60. doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1254704.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcus, K. 2016. The fundamental role of large-scale trust building in natural resource management. Environmental Values 25 (3):259–86. doi: https://doi.org/10.3197/096327116X14598445991385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, A. 2017. Just conservation. Biodiversity, wellbeing and sustainability. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mayring, P. 2014. Qualitative content analysis: Theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution. Klagenfurt. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-395173.
   Google Scholar
• McLeod, C. 2020. Trust. In The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, ed. E. N. Zalta, Fall 2020 ed. Stanford, CA: Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/trust/.
   Google Scholar
• Michel, A. H. 2019a. Park moralities: Social and political negotiations in Parc Adula. Switzerland. Zurich: University of Zurich.
   Google Scholar
• Michel, A. H. 2019b. How conceptions of equity and justice shape National Park Negotiations: The Case of Parc Adula, Switzerland. Eco.mont (Journal on Protected Mountain Areas Research) 11 (1):25–31. doi: https://doi.org/10.1553/eco.mont-11-1s25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michel, A. H., and N. Backhaus. 2019. Unravelling reasons for the non-establishment of protected areas: Justification regimes and principles of worth in a Swiss national park project. Environmental Values 28 (2):171–90. doi: https://doi.org/10.3197/096327119X15515267418511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michel, A. H., and A. Bruggmann. 2019. Conflicting discourses: Understanding the rejection of a Swiss national park project using data analysis triangulation. Mountain Research and Development 39 (1):R24–R36. doi: https://doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-18-00081.1.full.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michel, A. H., and A. Wallner. 2020. How can local populations be won over to protected areas? Swiss Academies Factsheet 15 (5):1–7. https://naturalsciences.ch/service/publications/126330-how-can-local-populations-be-won-over-to-protected-areas-.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. 2005. The return of the political. 2nd ed. London/New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Naidoo, R., D. Gerkey, D. Hole, A. Pfaff, A. M. Ellis, C. D. Golden, D. Herrera, K. Johnson, M. Mulligan, T. H. Ricketts, et al. 2019. Evaluating the impacts of protected areas on human well-being across the developing world. Science Advances 5 (4):eaav3006. doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aav3006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldekop, J. A., G. Holmes, W. E. Harris, and K. L. Evans. 2016. A global Assessment of the Social and Conservation Outcomes of Protected Areas. Conserv Biol 30 (1):133–41. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palomo, I., B. Martín-López, C. López-Santiago, and C. Montes. 2011. Participatory scenario planning for protected areas management under the ecosystem services framework: The Doñana social-ecological system in southwestern Spain. Ecology and Society 16 (1):23. doi: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03862-160123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palomo, I., C. Montes, B. Martín-López, J. A. González, M. García-Llorente, P. Alcorlo, and M. R. G. Mora. 2014. Incorporating the social-ecological approach in protected areas in the anthropocene. BioScience 64 (3):181–91. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/bit033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkins, J. R. 2010. The problem with trust: Insights from advisory committees in the forest sector of Alberta. Society & Natural Resources 23 (9):822–36. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920802545792.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. 1990. Purposeful sampling. In Qualitative evaluation and research methods, ed. M. Q. Patton, 169–86. Beverly Hills: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Payton, M. A., D. C. Fulton, and D. H. Anderson. 2005. Influence of place attachment and trust on civic action: A study at Sherburne National Wildlife Refuge. Society & Natural Resources 18 (6):511–28. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920590947940.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pichler-Koban, C., and M. Jungmeier. 2015. Naturschutz, Werte, Wandel. Die Geschichte ausgewählter Schutzgebiete in Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz. Bern: Haupt.
   Google Scholar
• Pleger, L. E. 2017. Voters’ acceptance of land use policy measures: A two-level analysis. Land Use Policy 63:501–13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pleger, L. E. 2019. Democratic acceptance of spatial planning policies. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Pleger, L. E., P. Lutz, and F. Sager. 2018. Public acceptance of incentive-based spatial planning policies: A framing experiment. Land Use Policy 73:225–38. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.01.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reutz, B., S. Gruber, and S. Forster. 2016. Management plan Parc Adula. Kapitel C. Roveredo. Switzerland: Parc Adula.
   Google Scholar
• Schenk, A., M. Hunziker, and F. Kienast. 2007. Factors influencing the Acceptance of Nature Conservation measures-A qualitative study in Switzerland. Journal of Environmental Management 83 (1):66–79. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.01.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semadeni, S., and U. Leugger-Eggimann. 2016. Parc Adula: Auf der Schwelle zu Einer neuen Pioniertat. https://www.pronatura.ch/sites/pronatura.ch/files/mediareleases//16.01.28%2520Mediendossier%2520Charta%2520Parc%2520Adula.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. W., J. E. Leahy, D. H. Anderson, and M. A. Davenport. 2013. Community/agency trust and public involvement in resource planning. Society & Natural Resources 26 (4):452–71. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2012.678465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, A. M., O. Temby, D. Kim, A. S. Cisneros, and G. M. Hickey. 2019. Measuring, mapping and quantifying the effects of trust and informal communication on transboundary collaboration in the Great Lakes fisheries policy network. Global Environmental Change 54:6–18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, M. J. 2008. The power of trust: Toward a theory of local opposition to neighboring protected areas. Society & Natural Resources 21 (10):859–75. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920801973763%5Cn.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, M. J., and K. J. Coleman. 2015. The multidimensionality of trust: Applications in collaborative natural resource management. Society & Natural Resources 28 (2):117–32. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2014.945062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Südostschweiz. 2016. Leuthard Unterstützt «Nationalpark Einer Neuen Generation». Südostschweiz, June 30. https://www.suedostschweiz.ch/politik/2016-06-30/leuthard-unterstuetzt-nationalpark-einer-neuen-generation#so_comment.
   Google Scholar
• Swiss Confederation. 2007. CC 451.36 Ordinance of 7 November 2007 on Parks of National Importance (Parks Ordinance, ParkO). https://www.admin.ch/opc/en/classified-compilation/20071162/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, B., and R. C. de Loë. 2012. Conceptualizations of local knowledge in collaborative environmental governance. Geoforum 43 (6):1207–17. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.03.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilly, C. 2004. Trust and rule. Theory and Society 33 (1):1–30. nodoi: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RYSO.0000021427.13188.26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vatter, A. 2018. Swiss federalism. The transformation of a federal model. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Von Lindern, E., R. Knoth, and X. Junge. 2019. Akzeptanz, Identifikation und Engagement: Ansichten und Mitwirkung der Bevölkerung in UNESCO Biosphärenreservaten (AkIdEn). Bern: Forum Landscape, Alps, Parks (FoLAP), Swiss Academy of Sciences (SCNAT) and Austrian commission for the UNESCO program “Man and the Biosphere”. doi: https://doi.org/10.1553/MAB-AkIdEn.
   Google Scholar
• Wald, D. M., K. A. Nelson, A. M. Gawel, and H. S. Rogers. 2019. The role of trust in public attitudes toward invasive species management on Guam: A case study. Journal of Environmental Management 229:133–44. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.06.047.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, M. E., ed. 1999. Democracy and trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, J. E. M., N. Dudley, D. B. Segan, and M. Hockings. 2014. The performance and potential of protected areas. Nature 515 (7525):67–73. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13947.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, P., J. Igoe, and D. Brockington. 2006. Parks and peoples: The social impact of protected areas. Annual Review of Anthropology 35 (1):251–77. doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.35.081705.123308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 2003. Case study research. Design and methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Young, J. C., K. Searle, A. Butler, P. Simmons, A. D. Watt, and A. Jordan. 2016. The role of trust in the resolution of conservation conflicts. Biological Conservation 195:196–202. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.12.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zafra-Calvo, N., U. Pascual, D. Brockington, B. Coolsaet, J. A. Cortes-Vazquez, N. Gross-Camp, I. Palomo, and N. D. Burgess. 2017. Towards an indicator system to assess equitable management in protected areas. Biological Conservation 211:134–41. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2017.05.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar