Evaluating Conservation Easement and Land Records Data in Rapidly Growing Counties in the United States and the Implications for Environmental Governance

References

• Allen, K. B. 1992. Access to government information. Government Information Quarterly 9 (1):67–80. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0740-624X(92)90033-I.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anonymous. 2017. Researchers should reach beyond the science bubble. Nature 542 (7642):391. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/542391a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armitage, D., P. Mbatha, E.-K. Muhl, W. Rice, and M. Sowman. 2020. Governance principles for community-centered conservation in the post-2020 global biodiversity framework. Conservation Science and Practice 2 (2):e160. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.160.
   Google Scholar
• Barboza, T. 2013. Digital mapping files are public records, State Supreme Court rules. Los Angles Times, July 8. https://www.latimes.com/local/la-xpm-2013-jul-08-la-me-adv-map-ruling-20130709-story.html
   Google Scholar
• Berkes, F. 2004. Rethinking community-based conservation. Conservation Biology 18 (3):621–30. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00077.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkes, F. 2010. Devolution of environment and resources governance: Trends and future. Environmental Conservation 37 (4):489–500. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S037689291000072X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawes, S. S., M. E. Cook, and N. Helbig. 2006. Challenges of treating information as a public resource: The case of parcel data. Proceedings of the 39^th Hawaii International Conferences on System Sciences. Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2006.83.
   Google Scholar
• Dudley, N., J. D. Parrish, K. H. Redford, and S. Stolton. 2010. The revised IUCN protected area management categories: The debate and ways forward. Oryx 44 (4):485–90. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605310000566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, E. F., and B. J. Niemann. 2014. Modernizing American land records: Order upon chaos. Redlands: Esri Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fairfax, S. K., and D. Guenzler. 2001. Conservation trusts. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• Fairfax, S. K., L. Gwin, M. A. King, L. Raymond, and L. A. Watt. 2005. Buying nature: The limits of land acquisition as a conservation strategy, 1780–2004. Cambridge, Mass: MIT.
   Google Scholar
• Govind, P. J. 2020. Extinction in the anthropocene and moving toward an ethic of responsibility. Griffith Law Review 29 (4):534–60. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2020.1924951.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper, T. L., and S. M. Stein. 2006. Dialogical planning in a fragmented society. New Jersey: Center for Urban Policy Research.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, F., and D. Tulloch. 2006. Local-government data sharing: Evaluating the foundations of spatial data infrastructures. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 20 (7):743–68. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13658810600661607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, H. M. 1999. Fighting over land: America’s legacy…America’s future? Journal of the American Planning Association 65 (2):141–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369908976043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamieson, K. H. 2020. Reconceptualizing public engagement by Land-Grant University scientists. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 117 (6):2734–6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1922395117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, M., Y. Charalabidis, and A. Zuiderwijk. 2012. Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government. Information Systems Management 29 (4):258–68. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2012.716740.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, P. A., R. Sieber, T. Scassa, M. Stephens, and P. Robinson. 2017. The cost(s) of geospatial open data. Transactions in GIS 21 (3):434–45. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.12283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juergensmeyer, J. C., T. E. Roberts, P. E. Salkin, and R. M. Roweberry. 2018. Land use planning and development regulation law. 4th ed. St. Paul, Minnesota: West Academic Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• King, M. A., and S. K. Fairfax. 2006. Public accountability and conservation easements: Learning from the uniform conservation easement act debates. Natural Resources Journal 46 (1):65–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueckeberg, D. A. 1995. The difficult character of property: To whom do things belong? Journal of the American Planning Association 61 (3):301–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369508975644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemos, M. C., and A. Agrawal. 2006. Environmental governance. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 31 (1):297–325. doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.31.042605.135621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H.-Y., M. Kobernus, D. Broday, and A. Bartonova. 2014. A conceptual approach to a citizens’ observatory-supporting community-based environmental governance . Environmental Health 13 (1):107. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-13-107.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Manson, S. M., H. A. Sander, D. Ghosh, J. M. Oakes Jr, M. W. Orfield, W. J. Craig Jr, T. F. Luce, E. Myott, and S. Sun. 2009. Parcel data for research and policy. Geography Compass 3 (2):698–726. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2008.00209.x.
   Google Scholar
• Margules, C. R., and R. L. Pressey. 2000. Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405 (6783):243–53. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/35012251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, N. A. 2002. The role of land trusts in biodiversity conservation on private lands. Idaho Law Review 38 (2):453.
   Google Scholar
• Merenlender, A. M., L. Huntsinger, G. Guthey, and S. K. Fairfax. 2004. Land trusts and conservation easements: Who is conserving what for whom? Conservation Biology 18 (1):65–75. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00401.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, A. W. 2008. Easing conservation? Conservation easements, public accountability and neoliberalism. Geoforum 39 (3):1215–27. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.10.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, A. W., and A. R. Rissman. 2009. Public access to information on private land conservation: Tracking conservation easements. Wisconsin Law Review 2009(6):1237–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 1980. Need for a multipurpose cadastre. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 2007. National land parcel data: A vision for the future. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.17226/11978.
   Google Scholar
• NCED. 2020. How complete is the NCED? https://www.conservationeasement.us/completeness/ (accessed November 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Olmsted, J. L. 2011. The Invisible Forest: Conservation Easement Databases and the End of the Clandestine Conservation of Natural Lands. Law and Contemporary Problems 74 (4):51–82.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 2010. Beyond Markets and States: Polycentric Governance of Complex Economic Systems. American Economic Review 100 (3):641–72. doi: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.3.641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E., and M. Cox. 2010. Moving beyond Panaceas: A multi-tiered diagnostic approach for social-ecological analysis. Environmental Conservation 37 (4):451–63. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892910000834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, J. C. 1961. In search of title. Alabama Law Review 14 (1):11–64.
   Google Scholar
• Pidot, J. 2011. Conservation easement reform: As maine goes should the nation follow? Law and Contemporary Problems 74 (4):1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Platt, R. H. 2014. Land use and society: Geography, law, and public policy. 3rd ed. Washington: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raymond, C. M., I. Fazey, M. S. Reed, L. C. Stringer, G. M. Robinson, and A. C. Evely. 2010. Integrating local and scientific knowledge for environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management 91 (8):1766–77. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.03.023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rissman, A. R., A. W. Morris, A. Kalinin, P. A. Kohl, D. P. Parker, and O. Selles. 2019. Private organizations, public data: Land trust choices about mapping conservation easements. Land Use Policy 89 :104221. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rissman, A. R., J. Owley, A. W. L’Roe, A. W. Morris, and C. B. Wardropper. 2017. Public access to spatial data on private-land conservation. Ecology and Society 22 (2):24. doi: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09330-220224.
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. 2016. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. 3rd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Trombulak, S. C., and R. F. Baldwin. 2010. Landscape-scale conservation planning. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• USDA Forest Service. 1995. Description of the ecoregions of the United States. Bailey, Robert G. Misc. Publ. No. 13911995. Washington, DC: USDA Forest Service. https://ia801705.us.archive.org/19/items/descriptionofeco1391bail/descriptionofeco1391bail.pdf. (accessed November 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, M. A., B. G. Dickson, M. B. Hooten, R. A. Graves, M. N. Lubell, and M. W. Schwartz. 2021. Improving inferences about private land conservation by accounting for incomplete reporting. Conservation Biology 35 (4):1174–85. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13673.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yavuz, N., and E. W. Welch. 2014. Factors affecting openness of local government websites: Examining the differences across planning, finance and police departments. Government Information Quarterly 31 (4):574–83. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.07.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar