Practice-Based Knowledge for REDD+ in Vanuatu

References

• Addinsall, C., K. Glencross, N. Rihai, L. Kalomor, G. Palmer, D. Nichols, and G. Smith. 2016. Enhancing agroforestry in Vanuatu: Striking the balance between individual entrepreneurship and community development. Forest Trees Livelihoods 25 (1):78–96. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14728028.2015.1093434.
   Google Scholar
• Angelsen, A. 2017. REDD + as result-based aid: General lessons and bilateral agreements of Norway. Review of Development Economics 21 (2):237–64. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.12271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aru, R., J. D. Nichols, J. C. Grant, A. J. Leys, K. Glencross, M. Sethy, K. Convery, and R. Viranamangga. 2012. Constraints to whitewood (Endospermum medullosum) plantation development on Santo Island. International Forestry Review 14 (4):414–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1505/146554812804715928.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babon, A., and G. Gowae. 2013. The context of REDD + in Papua New Guinea: Drivers agents and institutions. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR.
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett, T. 2012. Applying agroforestry to improve rural livelihoods. Australian Forest Grower 35 (3):28–30.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, J., P. West, and C. Filer. 2015. Tropical forests of Oceania: Anthropological perspectives. Asia-Pacific environment monograph: 10. Acton, Australia: ANU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berkes, F., and H. Ross. 2013. Community resilience: Toward an integrated approach. Society & Natural Resources 26 (1):5–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2012.736605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernard, H. 2011. Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches, 5th ed. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Betzold, C. 2015. Adapting to climate change in small island developing states. Climatic Change 133 (3):481–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1408-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogner, A., B. Littig, and W. Menz. 2009. Introduction: Expert interviews—An introduction to a new methodological debate. In Interviewing experts, 1–13. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bourne, W. 2019. NTFP value chain study findings: final report. Port Vila, Vanuatu: REDD + Department of Forests, Vanuatu.
   Google Scholar
• Carodenuto, S., E. Merger, E. Essomba, M. Panev, T. Pistorius, and J. Amougou. 2015. A methodological framework for assessing agents, proximate drivers and underlying causes of deforestation: Field test results from Southern Cameroon. Forests 6 (12):203–24. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/f6010203.
   Google Scholar
• Carodenuto, S., B. Schwartz, G. Andre, J. Kampai, A. Nelson, S. McDonnell, and S. Weaver. 2017. Analytical studies for Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation (REDD+) in Vanuatu. Report prepared for Vanuatu Department of Forests (DOF). http://reddplus.vu/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/FINALREDD-Analytical-Studies-Report_UNIQUE_final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, T., K. E. McNamara, R. Clissold, and P. D. Nunn. 2019. Community-based adaptation to climate change: lessons from Tanna Island, Vanuatu. Island Studies Journal 14:1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clissold, R., and K. E. McNamara. 2020. Exploring local perspectives on the performance of a community-based adaptation project on Aniwa, Vanuatu. Climate and Development 12 (5):457–68. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2019.1640656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corrin, J. 2012. REDD + and forest carbon rights in Vanuatu: Background Legal Analysis. Report for SPC/GIZ Regional REDD + Project ‘Climate Protection through Forest Conservation in Pacific Island Countries.’ https://reddpluspacific.org/
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. 2003. Research design: Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Dalsgaard, S. 2016. Carbon valuation: Alternatives, alternations and lateral measures? Valuation Studies 4 (1):67–91. doi:https://doi.org/10.3384/VS.2001-5992.164167.
   Google Scholar
• Dauvergne, P. 2001. Loggers and degradation in the Asia-Pacific: Corporations and environmental management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Day, S. J., T. Forster, J. Himmelsbach, L. Korte, P. Mucke, K. Radtke, P. Thielbörger, and D. Weller. 2019. World risk report. Berlin: Bündnis Entwicklung Hilft and Ruhr University Bochum – Institute for International Law of Peace and Armed Conflict (IFHV).
   Google Scholar
• Ernst, A. 2019. Research techniques and methodologies to assess social learning in participatory environmental governance. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 23:100331. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.100331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabriel, J. 2015. Evergreen’and REDD + in the forests of Oceania. In Tropical forests of oceania: Anthropological perspectives, eds. A. Bell, P. West, and C. Filer, 237–63. Acton, Australia: ANU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Granderson, A. 2017. The role of traditional knowledge in building adaptive capacity for climate change: Perspectives from Vanuatu. Weather, Climate, and Society 9 (3):545–61. doi:https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-16-0094.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, J., K. Glencross, J. Nichols, G. Palmer, M. Sethy, and J. Vanclay. 2012. Silvicultural implications arising from a simple simulation model for Endospermum medullosum in Vanuatu. International Forestry Review 14 (4):452–62. doi:https://doi.org/10.1505/146554812804715874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, S., and R. Harrison. 2016. Financial models of multi-species agroforestry systems in Fiji and Vanuatu. Promoting sustainable agriculture and agroforestry to replace unproductive land use in Fiji and Vanuatu. ACIAR Monograph MN191. The Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR). https://research.usc.edu.au/esploro/outputs/99450683102621
   Google Scholar
• Horner, L. 2016. Co-constructing research: A critical literature review. Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC). https://www.research.ed.ac.uk/en/publications/co-constructing-research-a-critical-literature-review
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, G., K. McNamara, and B. Witt. 2017. A framework for disaster vulnerability in a small island in the Southwest Pacific: A case study of Emae Island. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science 8 (4):358–73. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-017-0145-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamanda, N., E. Malézieux, and P. Martin. 2006. Structure and dynamics of coconut-based agroforestry systems in Melanesia: A case study from the Vanuatu archipelago. In Tropical homegardens, eds. B. M. Kumar and P. K. R. Nair, 105–21. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mahanty, S., A. Bradley, and S. Milne. 2015. The forest carbon commodity chain in Cambodia’s voluntary carbon market. In Conservation and development in Cambodia: Exploring frontiers of change in nature, state and society, eds. S. Milne and S. Mahanty, 177–200. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Maraseni, T., B. Poudyal, E. Rana, S. Khanal, P. Ghimire, and B. Subedi. 2020. Mapping national REDD + initiatives in the Asia-Pacific region. Journal of Environmental Management 269:110763. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110763.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarter, J., and M. C. Gavin. 2014. In situ maintenance of traditional ecological knowledge on Malekula Island, Vanuatu. Society & Natural Resources 27 (11):1115–29. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2014.905896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDermott, C. L., L. Coad, A. Helfgott, and H. Schroeder. 2012. Operationalizing social safeguards in REDD+: Actors, interests and ideas. Environmental Science & Policy 21:63–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonnell, S. 2013. Exploring the cultural power of land law in Vanuatu: Law as a performance that creates meaning and identities. Intersections: Gender and Sexuality in Asia and the Pacific, 33.
   Google Scholar
• McGregor, A., S. Weaver, E. Challies, P. Howson, R. Astuti, and B. Haalboom. 2014. Practical critique: bridging the gap between critical and practice-oriented REDD + research communities. Asia Pacific Viewpoint 55 (3):277–91. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/apv.12064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merger, E., C. Held, T. Tennigkeit, and T. Blomley. 2012. A bottom-up approach to estimating cost elements of REDD + pilot projects in Tanzania. Carbon Balance and Management 7 (1):9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-0680-7-9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Milne, S., S. Mahanty, P. To, W. Dressler, P. Kanowski, and M. Thavat. 2019. Learning from ‘actually existing’ REDD+: A synthesis of ethnographic findings. Conservation & Society 17 (1):84–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. 2014. Pragmatism as a paradigm for mixed methods research. Integrating qualitative and quantitative methods: A pragmatic approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Nalau, J., J. Handmer, and M. Dalesa. 2017. The role and capacity of government in a climate crisis: Cyclone Pam in Vanuatu. In Climate change adaptation in Pacific countries, 151–61. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Napua, A. 2017. Making the invisible seen: Putting women’s rights on Vanuatu’s land reform agenda. In Kastom, property and ideology: Land transformations in Melanesia, eds. S. McDonnell, M. Allen, and C. Filer. 305–26. Canberra, Australia: ANU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nathan, I., and M. Pasgaard. 2017. Is REDD + effective, efficient, and equitable? Learning from a REDD + project in Northern Cambodia. Geoforum 83:26–38. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.04.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, A., G. Andre, S. Warakar, S. Weaver, and R. Henderson. 2015. Loru forest project. Project description part A: General description. An avoided deforestation project at Loru, Santo, Vanuatu. D3.2a v1.0, 20151009. The Nakau Programme Pty Ltd. http://www.nakau.org/uploads/5/2/2/5/52251233/loru_pd_part_a_d3.2a_v1.0_20151009b.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, A., and M. Dyer. 2020. Loru Forest Project Monitoring Report 2, 2020. D3.3 (1) v1.0 20200704. Nakau Programme Pty Ltd. https://www.planvivo.org/Handlers/Download.ashx?IDMF=9b38d53d-c675-4807-bfa3-46c652be5f8c
   Google Scholar
• Payne, B. 2020. Community, forest carbon & indigeneity: A case study of the Loru project in Espiritu Santo, Vanuatu. Masters Dissertation, Victoria University of Wellington. https://researcharchive.vuw.ac.nz/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10063/9289/thesis_access.pdf?sequence=1
   Google Scholar
• Regenvanu, R., S. Wyatt, and L. Tacconi. 1997. Changing forestry regimes in Vanuatu: Is sustainable management possible? The Contemporary Pacific 9 (1):73–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, H., and F. Berkes. 2014. Research approaches for understanding, enhancing, and monitoring community resilience. Society & Natural Resources 27 (8):787–804. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2014.905668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutakumwa, R., J. Mugisha, S. Bernays, E. Kabunga, G. Tumwekwase, M. Mbonye, and J. Seeley. 2020. Conducting in-depth interviews with and without voice recorders: A comparative analysis. Qualitative Research 20 (5):565–81. 1468794119884806. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794119884806.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seymour, F., and A. Angelsen. 2012. Summary and conclusions: REDD without regrets. In Analysing REDD+: Challenges and choices, eds. A. Angelsen, M. Brockhaus, W. D. Sunderlin, and L. V. Verchot, 317–34. Bogor: Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR).
   Google Scholar
• Skutsch, M., and E. Turnhout. 2020. REDD+: If communities are the solution, what is the problem. ? World Development 130:104942. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.104942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, R. 2017. From colonial intrusions to ‘intimate exclusions’: Contesting legal title and ‘chiefly title’ to land in Epi, Vanuatu. In Kastom, property and ideology: Land transformations in Melanesia, eds. S. McDonnell, M. Allen, and C. Filer, 327–56. Canberra, Australia: ANU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R., K. Glencross, J. Nichols, G. Palmer, and R. Viranamangga. 2016. Effect of initial spacing on first thinning product recovery, and financial outcomes in whitewood (Endospermum medullosum) plantations in Vanuatu. Small-Scale Forestry 15 (1):45–59. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-015-9307-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, N. H., S. Peters, V. Bakhshi, A. Bowen, C. Cameron, S. Catovsky, D. Crane, S. Cruickshank, S. Dietz, N. Edmonson, et al. 2006. Stern review: The economics of climate change, vol. 30. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turnhout, E., A. Gupta, J. Weatherley‐Singh, M. J. Vijge, J. De Koning, I. J. Visseren‐Hamakers, M. Herold, and M. Lederer. 2017. Envisioning REDD + in a post‐Paris era: Between evolving expectations and current practice. WIREs Climate Change 8 (1):e425. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.425.
   Google Scholar
• Visseren-Hamakers, I. J., A. Gupta, M. Herold, M. Peña-Claros, and M. J. Vijge. 2012. Will REDD + work? The need for interdisciplinary research to address key challenges. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 4 (6):590–6. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2012.10.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, M., J. Calderón, L. Kupscznk, G. Squires, and C. Su. 2018. Is collaborative, community-engaged scholarship more rigorous than traditional scholarship? On advocacy, bias, and social science research. Urban Education 53 (4):445–72. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085918763511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weaver, S. 2015. Practitioner perspective on REDD: Commercial challenges in project‐based rainforest protection financing in the Asia Pacific region. Asia Pacific Viewpoint 56 (1):140–52. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/apv.12090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, E., J. Belsky, D. Lach, and A. Cheng. 2014. The value of practice-based knowledge. Society & Natural Resources 27 (10):1074–88. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2014.919168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S., and A. Angelsen. 2009. Global and national REDD + architecture. In Realising REDD, ed. A. Angelsen, 13–24. Bogor, Indonesia: Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR).
   Google Scholar
• West, P. 2016. Dispossession and the environment: Rhetoric and inequality in Papua New Guinea. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Westholm, L., and S. Arora-Jonsson. 2015. Defining solutions, finding problems: Deforestation, gender, and REDD + in Burkina Faso. Conservation and Society 13 (2):189–99. doi:https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-4923.164203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westoby, R., K. McNamara, R. Kumar, and P. Nunn. 2020. From community-based to locally led adaptation: evidence from Vanuatu. Ambio 49 (9):1466–73. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-019-01294-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, D., and P. Minang. 2011. Estimating the opportunity costs of REDD+: A training manual. World Bank Institute Version 1.3 March 2011. http://www.forestcarbonpartnership.org/redd-opportunity-costs-training-manual
   Google Scholar