Individuals and Multilevel Management: A Study of the Perceived Adaptive Capacity of the Goose Management System among Farmers in Sweden

References

• Arbuckle, J. L. 2016. Amos. Version 24.0. [Computer Program]. Armonk, NY: IBM SPSS.
   Google Scholar
• Bakker, E. S., C. G. F. Veen, G. J. N. Ter Heerdt, N. Huig, and J. M. Sarneel. 2018. High grazing pressure of geese threatens conservation and restoration of reed belts. Frontiers in Plant Science 9:1649. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W., and R. Cudeck. 1993. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In Testing structural equation models, ed. K. A. Bollen and J. S. Long, 136–62. New Park, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Buij, R., T. C. P. Melman, M. J. J. E. Loonen, and A. D. Fox. 2017. Balancing ecosystem function, services and disservices resulting from expanding goose populations. Ambio 46 (2):301–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-017-0902-1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carlisle, K., and R. L. Gruby. 2019. Polycentric systems of governance: A theoretical model for the commons. Policy Studies Journal 47 (4):927–52. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cinner, J. E., W. N. Adger, E. H. Allison, M. L. Barnes, K. Brown, P. J. Cohen, S. Gelcich, C. C. Hicks, T. P. Hughes, J. Lau, et al. 2018. Building adaptive capacity to climate change in tropical coastal communities. Nature Climate Change 8 (2):117–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-017-0065-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conover, M. R., E. Butikofer, and D. J. Decker. 2018. Wildlife damage to crops: Perceptions of agricultural and wildlife leaders in 1957, 1987, and 2017. Wildlife Society Bulletin 42 (4):551–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.930.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cope, D., J. Vickery, and M. Rowcliffe. 2005. People and wildlife. Conflict or coexistence? In Conservation biology, ed. R. Woodroffe, S. Thirgood, and A. Rabinowitz, 176–91. London, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Craig, R. K., J. B. Ruhl, E. D. Brown, and B. K. Williams. 2017. A proposal for amending administrative law to facilitate adaptive management. Environmental Research Letters 12 (7):074018. doi:https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa7037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diedrich, A., N. Stoeckl, G. G. Gurney, M. Esparon, and R. Pollnac. 2017. Social capital as a key determinant of perceived benefits of community-based marine protected areas. Conservation Biology 31 (2):311–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12808.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz, T., P. C. Stern, and G. A. Guagnano. 1998. Social structural and social psychological bases of environmental concern. Environment and Behavior 30 (4):450–71. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/001391659803000402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dressel, S., C. Sandström, and G. Ericsson. 2015. A meta-analysis of studies on attitudes toward bears and wolves across Europe 1976-2012. Conservation Biology 29 (2):565–74. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dressel, S., M. Johansson, G. Ericsson, and C. Sandström. 2020. Perceived adaptive capacity within a multi-level governance setting: The role of bonding, bridging, and linking social capital. Environmental Science & Policy 104:88–97. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.11.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., and S. Chaiken. 1993. The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrhart, S., M. Stühlinger, and U. Schraml. 2021. The relationship of stakeholders’ social identities and wildlife value orientations with attitudes toward red deer management. Human Dimensions of Wildlife. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10871209.2021.1885767.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson, L., A. Nordlund, and K. Westin. 2013. The general public’s support for forest policy in Sweden: A value belief approach. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 56 (6):850–67. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2012.708324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, L., A. Nordlund, O. Olsson, and K. Westin. 2012. Beliefs about urban fringe forests among urban residents in Sweden. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 11 (3):321–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2012.02.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, L., C. Björkman, and M. J. Klapwijk. 2018. General public acceptance of forest risk management strategies in Sweden: Comparing three approaches to acceptability. Environment and Behavior 50 (2):159–86. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916517691325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, L., M. Johansson, J. Månsson, S. Redpath, C. Sandström, and J. Elmberg. 2020. The public and geese: A conflict on the rise? Human Dimensions of Wildlife 25 (5):421–37. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10871209.2020.1752420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eythórsson, E., I. M. Tombre, and J. Madsen. 2017. Goose management schemes to resolve conflicts with agriculture: Theory, practice and effects. Ambio 46 (2):231–40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-016-0884-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, A. D., and J. Madsen. 2017. Threatened species to super-abundance: The unexpected international implications of successful goose conservation. Ambio 46 (2):179–87. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-016-0878-2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fox, A. D., J. Elmberg, I. M. Tombre, and R. Hessel. 2017. Agriculture and herbivorous waterfowl: A review of the scientific basis for improved management. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 92 (2):854–77. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fulton, D. C., M. J. Manfredo, and J. Lipscomb. 1996. Wildlife value orientations: A conceptual and measurement approach. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 1 (2):24–47. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10871209609359060.
   Google Scholar
• Gagnon Thompson, S. C., and M. A. Barton. 1994. Ecocentric and anthropocentric attitudes toward the environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology 14 (2):149–57. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80168-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodale, K., G. J. Parsons, and K. Sherren. 2015. The nature of the nuisance – Damage or threat – Determines how perceived monetary costs and cultural benefits influence farmer tolerance of wildlife. Diversity 7 (3):318–41. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/d7030318.
   Google Scholar
• Green, A. J., and J. Elmberg. 2014. Ecosystem services provided by waterbirds. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 89 (1):105–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12045.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haney, M. J., and M. R. Conover. 2013. Ungulate damage to safflower in Utah. The Journal of Wildlife Management 77 (2):282–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, A. L., N. Petkov, D. Mitev, G. Popgeorgiev, B. Gove, and G. M. Hilton. 2018. Scale-dependent habitat selection by wintering geese: Implications for landscape management. Biodiversity and Conservation 27 (1):167–88. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-017-1427-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, C. M. 2018. Crop foraging, crop losses, and crop raiding. Annual Review of Anthropology 47 (1):377–94. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102317-050022.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L.-T., and P. M. Bentler. 1999. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 6 (1):1–55. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBM Corp. 2016. IBM SPSS statistics for windows. Version 24.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, M. H., J. J. Vaske, S. Dubois, and P. Fehres. 2014. More than fear: Role of emotions in acceptability of lethal control of wolves. European Journal of Wildlife Research 60 (4):589–98. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-014-0823-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson, M., A. Mysterud, and A. Flykt. 2020. Livestock owners’ worry and fear of tick-borne diseases. Parasites & Vectors 13 (1):331. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-020-04162-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson, M., and Å. Waldo. 2021. Local people’s appraisal of the fishery-seal situation in traditional fishing villages on the Baltic Sea Coast in Southeast Sweden. Society & Natural Resources 34 (3):271–90. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2020.1809756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson, M., C. Sandström, E. Pedersen, and G. Ericsson. 2016. Factors governing human fear of wolves: Moderating effects of geographical location and standpoint on protected nature. European Journal of Wildlife Research 62 (6):749–60. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-016-1054-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson, M., J. Karlsson, E. Pedersen, and A. Flykt. 2012. Factors governing human fear of brown bear and wolf. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 17 (1):58–74. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10871209.2012.619001.
   Google Scholar
• Jonker, S. A., R. M. Muth, J. F. Organ, R. R. Zwick, and W. F. Siemer. 2006. Experiences with beaver damage and attitudes of Massachusetts residents toward beaver. Wildlife Society Bulletin 34 (4):1009–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.2193/0091-7648(2006)34[1009:EWBDAA.2.0.CO;2]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kansky, R., M. Kidd, and A. T. Knight. 2014. Meta-analysis of attitudes toward damage-causing mammalian wildlife. Conservation Biology 28 (4):924–38. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kansky, R., M. Kidd, and A. T. Knight. 2016. A wildlife tolerance model and case study for understanding human wildlife conflicts. Biological Conservation 201:137–45. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koontz, T. M., D. Gupta, P. Mudliar, and P. Ranjan. 2015. Adaptive institutions in social-ecological systems governance: A synthesis framework. Environmental Science & Policy 53:139–51. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krasznai, A., and K. Belcher. 2019. Farmer attitudes and preferences regarding a hypothetical lease hunting policy in Saskatchewan. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 24 (2):116–31. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10871209.2018.1551585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kross, S. M., K. P. Ingram, R. F. Long, and M. T. Niles. 2018. Farmer perceptions and behaviors related to wildlife and on-farm conservation actions. Conservation Letters 11 (1):e12364–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leventhal, H., and K. R. Scherer. 1987. The relationship of emotion to cognition: A functional approach to a semantic controversy. Cognition & Emotion 1 (1):3–28. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02699938708408361.
   Google Scholar
• Lockwood, M., J. Davidson, A. Curtis, E. Stratford, and R. Griffith. 2010. Governance principles for natural resource management. Society & Natural Resources 23 (10):986–1001. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920802178214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montrás-Janer, T., J. Knape, M. Stoessel, L. Nilsson, I. Tombre, T. Pärt, and J. Månsson. 2020. Spatio-temporal patterns of crop damage caused by geese, swans and cranes – Implications for crop damage prevention. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 300:107001. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2020.107001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montrás-Janer, T., J. Knape, L. Nilsson, I. Tombre, T. Pärt, and J. Månsson. 2019. Relating national levels of crop damage to the abundance of large grazing birds: Implications for management. Journal of Applied Ecology 56 (10):2286–97. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson, L. 2013. Censuses of autumn staging and wintering goose populations in Sweden 1977/1978–2011/2012. Ornis Svecica 23 (1):3–45. doi:https://doi.org/10.34080/os.v23.22581.
   Google Scholar
• Olsson, C., G. Gunnarsson, and J. Elmberg. 2017. Field preference of Greylag geese Anser anser during the breeding season. European Journal of Wildlife Research 63 (1):28. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-017-1086-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ragland, C. J., L. A. Bernacchi, and T. R. Peterson. 2015. The role of social capital in endangered species management: A valuable resource. Wildlife Society Bulletin 39 (4):689–99. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redpath, S. M., J. Young, A. Evely, W. M. Adams, W. J. Sutherland, A. Whitehouse, A. Amar, R. A. Lambert, J. D. C. Linnell, A. Watt, et al. 2013. Understanding and managing conservation conflicts. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 28 (2):100–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2012.08.021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reser, J. P., and J. K. Swim. 2011. Adapting to and coping with the threat and impacts of climate change. The American Psychologist 66 (4):277–89. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer, K. R. 2001. Appraisal considered as a process of multi-level sequential checking. In Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research, ed. K. R. Scherer, A. Schorr and T. Johnstone, 92–120. New York, NY; Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seara, T., P. M. Clay, and L. L. Colburn. 2016. Perceived adaptive capacity and natural disasters: A fisheries case study. Global Environmental Change 38:49–57. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.01.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SEPA. 2015. Strategi för svensk viltförvaltning – med mål och åtgärder för naturvårdsverket. Stockholm, Sweden: SEPA.
   Google Scholar
• Simonsen, C. E., I. M. Tombre, and J. Madsen. 2017. Scaring as a tool to alleviate crop damage by geese: Revealing differences between farmers’ perceptions and the scale of the problem. Ambio 46 (2):319–27. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-016-0891-5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• St John, F. A. V., T. H. E. Mason, and N. Bunnefeld. 2021. The role of risk perception and affect in predicting support for conservation policy under rapid ecosystem change. Conservation Science and Practice 3 (2):e316. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.316.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stroud, D. A., J. Madsen, and A. D. Fox. 2017. Key actions towards the sustainable management of European geese. Ambio 46 (2):328–38. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-017-0903-0.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Teel, T. L., M. J. Manfredo, F. S. Jensen, A. E. Buijs, A. Fischer, C. Riepe, R. Arlinghaus, and M. H. Jacobs. 2010. Understanding the cognitive basis for human—wildlife relationships as a key to successful protected-area management. International Journal of Sociology 40 (3):104–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.2753/IJS0020-7659400306.
   Google Scholar
• Tombre, I. M., E. Eythórsson, and J. Madsen. 2013. Stakeholder involvement in adaptive goose management; case studies and experiences from Norway. Ornis Norvegica 36:17–24. doi:https://doi.org/10.15845/on.v36i0.430.
   Google Scholar
• Tuvendal, M., and J. Elmberg. 2015. A handshake between markets and hierarchies: Geese as an example of successful collaborative management of ecosystem services. Sustainability 7 (12):15937–54. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su71215794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USDA. 2005. Final environmental impact statement: Resident Canada Goose management. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
   Google Scholar
• van Velden, J. L., T. Smith, and P. G. Ryan. 2016. Cranes and crops: Investigating farmer tolerances toward crop damage by threatened blue cranes (Anthropoides paradiseus) in the Western Cape, South Africa. Environmental Management 58 (6):972–83. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-016-0768-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar