References
- Agrawal, A., and C. Gibson. 1999. Enchantment and disenchantment: The role of community in natural resource conservation. World Development 27 (4):629–49. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(98)00161-2.
- Allison, P. 1999. Multiple regression: A primer. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
- American Psychological Association. 2007. Report of the APA task force on socioeconomic status. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
- Bastian, C., C. Keske, D. McLeod, and D. Hoag. 2017. Landowner and land trust agent preferences for conservation easements: Implications for sustainable land uses and landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning 157:1–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.05.030.
- Box, G., and P. Tidwell. 1962. Transformation of the independent variables. Technometrics 4 (4):531–50. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1962.10490038.
- Brain, R., M. Hostetler, and T. Irani. 2014. Why do cattle ranchers participate in conservation easement agreements? Key motivators in decision making. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 38 (3):299–316. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2013.819479.
- Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2):77–101. doi:https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
- Bray, Z. 2010. Reconciling development and natural beauty: The promise and dilemma of conservation easements. Harvard Environmental Law Review 34 (1):119–70.
- Brenner, J., S. Lavallato, M. Cherry, and E. Hileman. 2013. Land use determines interest in conservation easements among private landowners. Land Use Policy 35:24–32. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.03.006.
- Cialdini, R., and N. Goldstein. 2004. Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology 55 (1):591–621. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015.
- Cirino, P., C. Chin, R. Sevcik, M. Wolf, M. Lovett, and R. Morris. 2002. Measuring socioeconomic status: Reliability and preliminary validity for different approaches. Assessment 9 (2):145–55. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/10791102009002005.
- Comerford, E. 2014. Understanding why landholders choose to participate or withdraw from conservation programs: A case study from a Queensland conservation auction. Journal of Environmental Management 141:169–76. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.01.049.
- Creswell, J. 2014. A concise introduction to mixed methods research. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
- Cross, J., C. Keske, M. Lacy, D. Hoag, and C. Bastian. 2011. Adoption of conservation easements among agricultural landowners in Colorado and Wyoming: The role of economic dependence and sense of place. Landscape and Urban Planning 101 (1):75–83. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.01.005.
- Dillman, D. 2000. Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Wiley.
- Duane, T. 2010. Increasing the public benefits of agricultural conservation easements: An illustration with the Central Valley Farmland Trust in the San Joaquin Valley. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 53 (7):925–45. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2010.495487.
- Ernst, T., and G. Wallace. 2008. Characteristics, motivations, and management actions of landowners engaged in private land conservation in Larimer County Colorado. Natural Areas Journal 28 (2):109–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.3375/0885-8608(2008)28[109:CMAMAO.2.0.CO;2]
- Farmer, J., C. Chancellor, and B. Fischer. 2011. Motivations for using conservation easements as a land protection mechanism: A mixed methods analysis. Natural Areas Journal 31 (1):80–7. doi:https://doi.org/10.3375/043.031.0109.
- Farmer, J., C. Chancellor, J. Brenner, J. Whitacre, and E. Knackmuhs. 2016. To ease or not to ease: Interest in conservation easements among landowners in Brown County. The Professional Geographer 68 (4):584–94. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2015.1129910.
- Farmer, J., D. Knapp, V. Meretsky, C. Chancellor, and B. Fischer. 2011. Motivations influencing the adoption of conservation easements. Conservation Biology: The Journal of the Society for Conservation Biology 25 (4):827–34. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01686.x.
- Farmer, J., V. Meretsky, D. Knapp, C. Chancellor, and B. Fischer. 2015. Why agree to a conservation easement? Understanding the decision of conservation easement granting. Landscape and Urban Planning 138:11–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.01.005.
- Ferranto, S., L. Huntsinger, C. Getz, G. Nakamura, W. Stewart, S. Drill, Y. Valachovic, M. Delasaux, and M. Kelly. 2011. Forest and rangeland owners value land for natural amenities and as financial investment. California Agriculture 65 (4):184–91. doi:https://doi.org/10.3733/ca.v065n04p184.
- Friedkin, N. 2006. A structural theory of social influence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Geoghegan, J., L. Lynch, and S. Bucholtz. 2003. Capitalization of open spaces into housing values and the residential property tax revenue impacts of agricultural easement programs. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 32 (1):33–45. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1068280500002483.
- Gerber, J., and A. Rissman. 2012. Land-conservation strategies: The dynamic relationship between acquisition and land-use planning. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 44 (8):1836–55. doi:https://doi.org/10.1068/a44395.
- Ghimire, R., G. Green, N. Poudyal, and H. Cordel. 2014. Do outdoor recreation participants place their lands in conservation easements? Nature Conservation 9 (9):1–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.9.7981.
- Graves, R., M. Williamson, R. Belote, and J. Brandt. 2019. Quantifying the contribution of conservation easements to large-landscape conservation. Biological Conservation 232:83–96. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.01.024.
- Gustanski, J., and R. Squires (Ed.). 2000. Protecting the land: Conservation easements past, present, and future. Covelo, CA: Island Press.
- Haymond, J. 1988. NIPF opinion leaders: What do they want? Journal of Forestry 86 (4):30–5.
- Hemby, T. L. (2016). Exploring the “where” and “why” of conservation easements: The role of community-level factors in the likelihood of adoption [Master’s thesis, Virginia Tech]. VTechWorks Repository. http://hdl.handle.net/10919/73650
- Horton, K., H. Knight, K. Galvin, J. Goldstein, and J. Herrington. 2017. An evaluation of landowners' conservation easements on their livelihoods and well-being. Biological Conservation 209:62–7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2017.02.016.
- Kabii, T., and P. Horwitz. 2006. A review of landholder motivations and determinants for participation in conservation covenanting programmes. Environmental Conservation 33 (1):11–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892906002761.
- Kiesecker, J., T. Comendant, T. Grandmason, E. Gray, C. Hall, R. Hilsenbeck, P. Kareiva, L. Lozier, P. Naehu, A. Rissman, et al. 2007. Conservation easements in context: A quantitative analysis of their use by The Nature Conservancy. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 5 (3):125–30. doi:https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2007)5[125:CEICAQ.2.0.CO;2]
- Korngold, G. 2011. Globalizing conservation easements: Private law approaches for international environmental protection. Wisconsin International Law Journal 28 (4):585–638.
- Land Trust Alliance. 2010. National land trust census report: A look at voluntary land conservation in America. http://www.landtrustalliance.org/about/national-land-trust-census
- LeVert, M., T. Stevens, and D. Kittredge. 2009. Willingness-to-sell conservation easements: A case study. Journal of Forest Economics 15 (4):261–75. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfe.2009.02.001.
- Ma, Z., B. Butler, D. Kittredge, and P. Catanzaro. 2012. Factors associated with landowner involvement in forest conservation programs in the U.S.: Implications for policy design and outreach. Land Use Policy 29 (1):53–61. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.05.004.
- Mashour, T., J. Alavalapati, R. Matta, S. Larkin, and D. Carter. 2005. A hedonic analysis of the effect of natural attributes and deed restrictions on the value of conservation easements. Forest Policy and Economics 7 (5):771–81. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2005.03.013.
- McLaughlin, N., and W. Weeks. 2009. In defense of conservation easements: A response to 'The end of perpetuity. Wyoming Law Review 9 (1):1–96.
- McPherson, M., L. Smith-Lovin, and J. Cook. 2001. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology 27 (1):415–44. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415.
- Miller, A., C. Bastian, D. McLeod, C. Keske, and D. Hoag. 2010. Factors impacting agricultural landowners' willingness to enter into conservation easements: A case study. Society & Natural Resources 24 (1):65–74. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920802684146.
- Moon, K., and C. Cocklin. 2011. A landholder-based approach to the design of private-land conservation programs. Conservation Biology 25 (3):493–503. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01639.x.
- NCED. 2015. National Conservation Easement Database. http://www.conservationeasement.us/
- Newman, L., and A. Dale. 2007. Homophily and agency: Creating effective sustainable development networks. Environment, Development and Sustainability 9 (1):79–90. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-005-9004-5.
- Quintas-Soriano, C., D. Gibson, J. Brandt, M. López-Rodríguez, J. Cabello, P. Aguilera, and A. Castro. 2021. An interdisciplinary assessment of private conservation areas in the Western United States. Ambio 50 (1):150–62. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-020-01323-x.
- Rabotyagov, S., and S. Lin. 2013. Small forest landowner preferences for working forest conservation contract attributes: A case of Washington State, USA. Journal of Forest Economics 19 (3):307–30. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfe.2013.06.002.
- Raymond, C., and G. Brown. 2011. Assessing conservation opportunity on private land: Socio-economic, behavioral, and spatial dimensions. Journal of Environmental Management 92 (10):2513–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.05.015.
- Richardson, J., and A. Bernard. 2011. Zoning for conservation easements. Law and Contemporary Problems 74 (4):83–108.
- Rilla, E. 2002. Landowners, while pleased with agricultural easements, suggest improvements. California Agriculture 56 (1):21–5. doi:https://doi.org/10.3733/ca.v056n01p21.
- Rilla, E., and A. Sokolow. 2000. California farmers and conservation easements: Motivations, experiences, and perceptions in three counties. Davis, CA: University of California.
- Rissman, A., and A. Merenlender. 2008. The conservation contributions of conservation easements: Analysis of the San Francisco Bay area protected lands spatial database. Ecology and Society 13 (1):40. doi:https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-02329-130140.
- Rissman, A., J. Owley, M. Shaw, and B. Thompson. 2015. Adapting conservation easements to climate change. Conservation Letters 8 (1):68–76. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12099.
- Rogers, E. 2003. Diffusion of innovations. 5th ed. New York, NY: The Free Press.
- Saldaña, J. 2013. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage Publications.
- Selinske, M., J. Coetzee, K. Purnell, and A. Knight. 2015. Understanding the motivations, satisfaction, and retention of landowners in private land conservation programs. Conservation Letters 8 (4):282–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12154.
- Stedman, R. 2002. Toward a social psychology of place: Predicting behavior from place-based cognitions, attitude, and identity. Environment and Behavior 34 (5):561–81. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916502034005001.
- Stern, M. 2008. The power of trust: Toward a theory of local opposition to neighboring protected areas. Society & Natural Resources 21 (10):859–75. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920801973763.
- Stern, M. 2018. Social science theory for environmental sustainability: A practical guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Suter, J., S. Dissanayake, and L. Lewis. 2014. Public incentives for conservation easements on private land [Paper presentation]. Agricultural & Applied Economics Association’s 2014 Annual Meeting, Minneapolis, MN.
- U.S. Census Bureau. 2008. 2010 participant statistical areas program: Participant information. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
- Vizek, A., and M. Nielsen-Pincus. 2017. Landowner attitudes toward conservation easements: Balancing the private and public interest in land. Society & Natural Resources 30 (9):1080–95. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2017.1331486.