Centering Community Voices in Mining Governance

References

• Adam, J. N., T. Adams, J.-D. Gerber, and T. Haller. 2021. Decentralization for increased sustainability in natural resource management? Two cautionary cases from Ghana. Sustainability 13 (12):6885. doi:10.3390/su13126885.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, N. 2016. Challenges of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in domestic settings: An exploration of mining regulation vis-à-vis CSR in Ghana. Resources Policy 47:9–17. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2015.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, N., and M. Essah. 2020. The sustainable development conundrum in gold mining: Exploring ‘Open, Prior and Independent Deliberate Discussion’ as a community-centered framework. Resources Policy 68:101798. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anguelovski, I. 2011. Understanding the dynamics of community engagement of corporations in communities: The Iterative relationship between dialogue processes and local protest at the Tintaya Copper Mine in Peru. Society & Natural Resources 24 (4):384–99. doi:10.1080/08941920903339699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arellano-Yanguas, J. 2011. Aggravating the resource curse: Decentralisation, mining and conflict in Peru. Journal of Development Studies 47 (4):617–38. doi:10.1080/00220381003706478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arellano-Yanguas, J. 2019. Extractive industries and regional development: Lessons from Peru on the limitations of revenue devolution to producing regions. Regional & Federal Studies 29 (2):249–73. doi:10.1080/13597566.2018.1493461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aresti, M. L. 2016. Mineral revenue sharing in Peru. Revenue Sharing Case Study. Natural Resource Governance Institute. https://resourcegovernance.org/sites/default/files/documents/mineral-revenue-sharing-in-peru_0.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Armah, F. A., S. Obiri, D. O. Yawson, E. K. Afrifa, G. T. Yengoh, J. A. Olsson, and J. O. Odoi. 2011. Assessment of legal framework for corporate environmental behaviour and perceptions of residents in mining communities in Ghana. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 54 (2):193–209. doi:10.1080/09640568.2010.505818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armitage, D., P. Mbatha, E. K. Muhl, W. Rice, and M. Sowman. 2020. Governance principles for community‐centered conservation in the post‐2020 global biodiversity framework. Conservation Science and Practice 2 (2):e160. doi:10.1111/csp2.160.
   Google Scholar
• Bebbington, A., L. Hinojosa, D. H. Bebbington, M. L. Burneo, and X. Warnaars. 2008. Contention and ambiguity: Mining and the possibilities of development. Development and Change 39 (6):887–914. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7660.2008.00517.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bury, J. 2004. Livelihoods in transition: Transnational gold mining operations and local change in Cajamarca, Peru. The Geographical Journal 170 (1):78–91. doi:10.1111/j.0016-7398.2004.05042.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bury, J. 2005. Mining mountains: Neoliberalism, land tenure, livelihoods, and the new Peruvian mining industry in Cajamarca. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 37 (2):221–39. doi:10.1068/a371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. L., C. Quincy, J. Osserman, and O. K. Pedersen. 2013. Coding in-depth semistructured interviews: Problems of unitization and intercoder reliability and agreement. Sociological Methods & Research 42 (3):294–320. doi:10.1177/0049124113500475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheshire, L. 2010. A corporate responsibility? The constitution of fly-in, fly-out mining companies as governance partners in remote, mine-affected localities. Journal of Rural Studies 26 (1):12–20. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2009.06.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Church, S., M. Dunn, and L. Prokopy. 2019. Benefits to qualitative data quality with multiple coders: Two case studies in multi-coder data analysis. Journal of Rural Social Sciences 1:2. https://egrove.olemiss.edu/jrss/vol34/iss1/2/.
   Google Scholar
• Conde, M. 2017. Resistance to mining. A review. Ecological Economics 132:80–90. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.08.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conde, M., and P. Le Billon. 2017. Why do some communities resist mining projects while others do not? The Extractive Industries and Society 4 (3):681–97. doi:10.1016/j.exis.2017.04.009.
   Google Scholar
• Dagvadorj, L., B. Byamba, and M. Ishikawa. 2018. Effect of local community’s environmental perception on trust in a mining company: A case study in Mongolia. Sustainability 10 (3):614–2. doi:10.3390/su10030614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daneshvar, F., J. Frankenberger, K. Cherkauer, H. Novoa, and L. Bowling. 2021. Hydrological assessment of interconnected river basins in semi-arid region of Peruvian Andes. Earth and Space Science Open Archive. doi:10.1002/essoar.10506222.1.
   Google Scholar
• Devenin, V., and C. Bianchi. 2018. Soccer fields? What for? Effectiveness of corporate social responsibility initiatives in the mining industry. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 25 (5):866–79. doi:10.1002/csr.1503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erwin, A., Z. Ma, R. Popovici, E. P. Salas O'Brien, L. Zanotti, E. Zeballos Zeballos, J. Bauchet, N. Ramirez Calderón, and G. R. Arce Larrea. 2021. Intersectionality shapes adaptation to social-ecological change. World Development 138:105282. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Essah, M., and N. Andrews. 2016. Linking or de-linking sustainable mining practices and corporate social responsibility? Insights from Ghana. Resources Policy 50:75–85. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2016.08.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flemmer, R., and A. Schilling-Vacaflor. 2016. Unfulfilled promises of the consultation approach: the limits to effective indigenous participation in Bolivia’s and Peru’s extractive industries. Third World Quarterly 37 (1):172–88. doi:10.1080/01436597.2015.1092867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franco, I. B., and S. Ali. 2017. Decentralization, corporate community development and resource governance: A comparative analysis of two mining regions in Colombia. The Extractive Industries and Society 4 (1):111–9. doi:10.1016/j.exis.2016.12.001.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, J. 2021. Mining companies and communities: Collaborative approaches to reduce social risk and advance sustainable development. Resources Policy 74:101144. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2018.02.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. 2009. Scales of justice: Reimagining political space in a globalizing world. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, J., and N. C. Kunz. 2018. Water stewardship: Attributes of collaborative partnerships between mining companies and communities. Water 10 (8):1081. doi:10.3390/w10081081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frederiksen, T. 2019. Political settlements, the mining industry and corporate social responsibility in developing countries. The Extractive Industries and Society 6 (1):162–70. doi:10.1016/j.exis.2018.07.007.
   Google Scholar
• Gamu, J. K., and P. Dauvergne. 2018. The slow violence of corporate social responsibility: The case of mining in Peru. Third World Quarterly 39 (5):959–75. doi:10.1080/01436597.2018.1432349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodge, R. A. 2014. Mining company performance and community conflict: Moving beyond a seeming paradox. Journal of Cleaner Production 84 (1):27–33. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.007.
   Google Scholar
• Holley, E., and C. Mitcham. 2016. The Pebble Mine Dialogue: A case study in public engagement and the social license to operate. Resources Policy 47:18–27. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2015.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H. F., and S. E. Shannon. 2005. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research 15 (9):1277–88. doi:10.1177/1049732305276687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaskoski, M. 2014. Environmental licensing and conflict in Peru’s mining sector: A path-dependent analysis. World Development 64:873–83. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.07.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konte, M., and R. C. Vincent. 2021. Mining and quality of public services: The role of local governance and decentralization. World Development 140:105350. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson, A. M., and F. Soto. 2008. Decentralization of natural resource governance regimes. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 33 (1):213–39. doi:10.1146/annurev.environ.33.020607.095522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockwood, M., J. Davidson, A. Curtis, E. Stratford, and R. Griffith. 2010. Governance principles for natural resource management. Society & Natural Resources 23 (10):986–1001. doi:10.1080/08941920802178214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malone, A., N. M. Smith, and E. Z. Zeballos. 2021. Coexistence and conflict between artisanal mining, fishing, and farming in a Peruvian boomtown. Geoforum 120:142–54. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.01.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLennan, S., and G. Banks. 2019. Reversing the lens: Why corporate social responsibility is not community development. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 26 (1):117–26. doi:10.1002/csr.1664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer-Mapstone, L., W. Rifkin, W. Louis, and K. Moffat. 2019. Power, participation, and exclusion through dialogue in the extractive industries: Who gets a seat at the table? Resources Policy 61:190–9. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2018.11.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer-Mapstone, L. D., W. Rifkin, K. Moffat, and W. Louis. 2018. What makes stakeholder engagement in social licence “meaningful”? Practitioners’ conceptualisations of dialogue. Rural Society 27 (1):1–17. doi:10.1080/10371656.2018.1446301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muradian, R., J. Martinez-Alier, and H. Correa. 2003. International capital versus local population: The environmental conflict of the Tambogrande Mining Project, Peru. Society & Natural Resources 16 (9):775–92. doi:10.1080/08941920309166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mzembe, A. N., and Y. Downs. 2014. Managerial and stakeholder perceptions of an Africa-based multinational mining company’s corporate social responsibility (CSR). The Extractive Industries and Society 1 (2):225–36. doi:10.1016/j.exis.2014.06.002.
   Google Scholar
• Neuman, L. 2009. Social science research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. 7th ed. Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, J. R., and D. Kemp. 2013. Social licence and mining: A critical perspective. Resources Policy 38 (1):29–35. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2012.06.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paredes, M. 2016. The glocalization of mining conflict: Cases from Peru. The Extractive Industries and Society 3 (4):1046–57. doi:10.1016/j.exis.2016.08.007.
   Google Scholar
• Pinto del Carpio, P. M. 2020. Gobernanza de recursos naturales y conflicto social: El caso de minera bateas, caylloma-perú 2005–2018. Thesis. Universidad Nacional de San Agustín deArequipa.
   Google Scholar
• Popovici, R., A. Erwin, Z. Ma, L. Prokopy, L. Zanotti, E. F. Bocardo Delgado, J. P. Pinto Cáceres, E. Zeballos Zeballos, E. P. Salas O’brien, L. Bowling, et al. 2021. Outsourcing governance in Peru’s integrated water resources management. Land Use Policy 101:105105. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prno, J., and D. S. Slocombe. 2012. Exploring the origins of 'social license to operate in the mining sector: Perspectives from governance and sustainability theories. Resources Policy 37 (3):346–57. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2012.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rey-Coquais, S. 2021. Territorial experience and the making of global norms: How the Quellaveco dialogue roundtable changed the game of mining regulation in Peru. The Extractive Industries and Society 8 (1):55–63. doi:10.1016/j.exis.2020.05.002.
   Google Scholar
• Sosa, M., R. Boelens, and M. Zwarteveen. 2017. The influence of large mining: Restructuring water rights among rural communities in Apurimac, Peru. Human Organization 76 (3):215–26. doi:10.17730/0018-7259.76.3.215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The World Bank. 2005. Wealth and sustainability: The environmental and social dimensions of the mining sector in Peru. Peru Country Management Unit, Environmentally and Socially Sustainable Development, Latin America and the Caribbean Region, The World Bank, 194. http://icsidfiles.worldbank.org/icsid/icsidblobs/onlineawards/C3004/C-032_Eng.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Toledo Orozco, Z., and M. Veiga. 2018. Locals’ attitudes toward artisanal and large-scale mining—A case study of Tambogrande. The Extractive Industries and Society 5 (2):327–34. doi: 10.1016/j.exis.2018.01.002.
   Google Scholar
• Triscritti, F. 2013. Mining, development and corporate-community conflicts in Peru. Community Development Journal 48 (3):437–50. doi:10.1093/cdj/bst024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vela-Almeida, D., F. Kuijk, G. Wyseure, and N. Kosoy. 2016. Lessons from Yanacocha: Assessing mining impacts on hydrological systems and water distribution in the Cajamarca region, Peru. Water International 41 (3):426–46. doi:10.1080/02508060.2016.1159077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbrugge, B. 2015. Decentralization, institutional ambiguity, and mineral resource conflict in Mindanao, Philippines. World Development 67:449–60. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.11.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 2013. Case study research: Design and methods. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar